Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 8 in The herpetofauna of Veracruz, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 8. Deforestation. Recently deforested and burned area converted to cropland in the municipality of Uxpanapa, Gulf Coastal Lowlands, in the southeastern portion of the state, at an elevation of ca. 75 m. Photo by Ricardo Luria Manzano.

Fig. 7 in The herpetofauna of Veracruz, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 7. UPGMA generated dendrogram illustrating the similarity relationships of species richness among the herpetofaunal components in the four physiographic regions of Veracruz (based on the data in Table 7; Sokal and Michener 1958). Similarity values were calculated using Duellman's (1990) Coefficient of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR).

Fig. 4 in The herpetofauna of Veracruz, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 4. Sierra de Los Tuxtlas. Cloud forest at the top of Volcán San Martín. Photo by Elí García-Padilla.

Fig. 3 in The herpetofauna of Veracruz, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 3. Gulf Coastal Lowlands. Mangrove forest during the dry season in the vicinity of Tumilco, municipality of Túxpam. Photo by Uriel Hernández-Salinas.

Fig. 6 in The herpetofauna of Veracruz, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 6. Transmexican Volcanic Belt. Vegetation on the "roof of Mexico," Volcán Pico de Orizaba or "Citlatépetl." Photo by Jorge González Sánchez.

Fig. 1 in The herpetofauna of Veracruz, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 1. Location in Mexico and physiographic regions of Veracruz, Mexico. Abbreviations: GCL = Gulf Coastal Lowlands; SLT = Sierra de Los Tuxtlas; SMO = Sierra Madre Oriental; and TVB = Transmexican Volcanic Belt.

Fig. 3 in Call survey indicates rainbow trout farming alters glassfrog community composition in the Andes of Ecuador

Fig. 3. Map of the study area. Inset: Pichincha Province, Ecuador. Main: Blue points indicate non-trout farm sites whereas red points indicate trout farm sites. Yellow line represents the equator (latitude 0).

Fig. 2 in Call survey indicates rainbow trout farming alters glassfrog community composition in the Andes of Ecuador

Fig. 2. Glassfrog species found during surveys. (A) Centrolene heloderma, (B) Centrolene ballux, (C) Esparana prosoblepon, (D) Nymphargus lasgralarias, (E) Centrolene peristictum, (F) Nymphargus grandisonae, (G) Centrolene lynchi, (H) Egg mass from C. ballux. Nymphargus griffithsi was not encountered during the 2017 survey but has been documented at Kathy's creek in 2012 and 2013 (by Jane A. Lyons). Photographs by Dana G. Wessels (A–F) and Timothy J. Krynak (G–H).

Fig. 1 in Call survey indicates rainbow trout farming alters glassfrog community composition in the Andes of Ecuador

Fig. 1. Trout farming in the Mindo region of Ecuador utilizes a flow-through aquaculture technique. Stream water is diverted into tandem raceways/holding reservoirs and then flows through these reservoirs back into the natural stream system. This figure displays a panoramic view of Finca de Jaime's (FJ) set-up. Photograph by Katherine L. Krynak.

Fig. 4 in Call survey indicates rainbow trout farming alters glassfrog community composition in the Andes of Ecuador

Fig. 4. Two-dimensional NMDS ordination of survey sites and glassfrog species based upon presence of frogs audibly documented in 2017 survey conducted in the Mindo region of Ecuador (Stress = 3%). Red points and labels represent glassfrog species; grey points represent trout farms; and black points represent non-trout farms. RSR = Río Santa Rosa, LC = Lucy's Creek, Bcrk = Ballux Creek, KC = Kathy's Creek, M = Michelle's, C = tributary of the Chalguayacu Grande River, 5F = Five Frog Creek, LRSR = Lower Río Santa Rosa, ST = Santa Teresita, FJ = Finca de Jaime, LS = La Sierra, VC = Verdecocha, EP = El Paraíso del Pescador. Trout farms EP, LS, and VC are not included in the analysis because glassfrogs were not observed at these sites. A significant difference in glassfrog community composition between trout farm and non-trout farm sites was indicated by MRPP (delta = 0.59, A = 0.11, P = 0.03). NMDS1 correlated with elevation; NMDS2 correlated with: percent canopy openness, dissolved oxygen (mg/L), total dissolved solids (mg/L), and conductivity (µS).

Fig. 6. A in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 6. A UPGMA generated dendrogram illustrating the similarity relationships of species richness among the herpetofauna in the four physiographic regions of Hidalgo (based on the data in Table 6). Similarity values were calculated values using Duellman's (1990) Coefficient of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR).

Fig. 11. Pet trade. A in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 11. Pet trade. A boa constrictor (Boa imperator) captured by locals for maintenance in captivity as a pet in El Borbollon in the municipality of Huehuetla. Photo by Christian BerriozabalIslas.

Fig. 5 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 5. Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Sierra de Pachuca. Xerophilic scrub in Cerro de San Cristobal in the municipality of Pachuca. Photo by Paola Lazcano-Juárez.

Fig. 3 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 3. Sierra Madre Oriental. Panoramic view in the vicinity of Diego Mateo inside the Parque Nacional El Chico in the municipality of Mineral del Chico. Photo by Cristian Raúl Olvera-Olvera.

Fig. 8 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 8. Deforestation for ranching purposes. Cattle pasture in the municipality of Tepehuacan de Guerrero. Photo by Christian Berriozabal-Islas.

Fig. 1 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 1. Physiographic regions of Hidalgo, Mexico. Abbreviations: GCL = Gulf Coastal Lowlands; SMO = Sierra Madre Oriental; MXP = Mexican Plateau; TMV = Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt.

Fig. 4 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 4. Mexican Plateau. Vegetation in the vicinity of Santa Monica in the municipality of Metztitlán. Photo by Cristian Raúl Olvera-Olvera.

Fig. 7. Forest fires. A in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 7. Forest fires. A forest fire for land use conversion in the vicinity of El Naranjal, in the municipality of Pisaflores. Photo by Christian Berriozabal-Islas.

Fig. 9 in The herpetofauna of Hidalgo, Mexico: composition, distribution, and conservation status

Fig. 9. Deforestation for agricultural purposes. Change in land use for agricultural purposes in the vicinity of San Cristobal in the municipality of Metztitlán. Photo by Cristian Raúl Olvera-Olvera.