Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,719
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,719 results for “Making”
Data from: Mothers make a difference: mothers develop weaker bonds with immature sons than daughters
<p>Data for model calculation</p>
Persistence of butterfly populations along urban density gradients: motility makes the difference
<p>Simulated genetic data</p>
FIGURES 5–7 in Egg parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae and Trichogrammatidae) of the gall-making leafhopper Scenergates viridis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) from Uzbekistan, with taxonomic notes on the Palaearctic species of Aphelinoidea
FIGURES 5–7. Aphelinoidea sariq female (holotype). 5. Antenna. 6. Wings. 7. Body.
FIGURE 2 in Canines make the difference: a new species of Hypsugo (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Laos and Vietnam
FIGURE 2. Portrait of a living specimen of H. dolichodon n. sp. (ROM 110807, from Vietnam).
FIGURE 1 in Making future taxonomy of Niphargus (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Niphargidae) in the Middle East easier: DELTA database of Middle East species with description of four new species from Iran
FIGURE 1. Distribution map of the genus Niphargus in Iran and Middle East.
Figure 1 from: Conte M, Flynn AJ, Barrison P, Boisvert P, Landis-Lewis Z, Friedman C (2023) Digital objects to make computable biomedical knowledge FAIR: an infrastructural approach to knowledge representation, dissemination and implementation. Research Ideas and Outcomes 9: e109307. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e109307
Figure 1 Conceptual model of a Knowledge Object (KO) containing a payload, machine-actionable service and deployment specifications, metadata and a unique persistent identifier. We are exploring aligning our conceptual model with emerging best practices for FAIR Digital Objects. Derived from Wittenburg et al's Digital Objects as Drivers towards Convergence in Data Infrastructures (Wittenburg et al. 2019).
Figure 3 from: Conte M, Flynn AJ, Barrison P, Boisvert P, Landis-Lewis Z, Friedman C (2023) Digital objects to make computable biomedical knowledge FAIR: an infrastructural approach to knowledge representation, dissemination and implementation. Research Ideas and Outcomes 9: e109307. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e109307
Figure 3 This figure illustrates the dual nature of Knowledge Objects: knowledge-as-resource and knowledge-as-service. A KO can be curated and maintained in a repository, pass metadata to a knowledge graph or deployed into applications. Different to other digital objects, the methods to deploy the KO to applications via custom or generic runtimes called by microservices are built into the KO.
Figure 2 from: Conte M, Flynn AJ, Barrison P, Boisvert P, Landis-Lewis Z, Friedman C (2023) Digital objects to make computable biomedical knowledge FAIR: an infrastructural approach to knowledge representation, dissemination and implementation. Research Ideas and Outcomes 9: e109307. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e109307
Figure 2 (L) Sample KO as viewed from the KGrid Library, from which the KO can be implemented in a hosted runtime environment or downloaded. (R) Sample output results from deploying the KO.
TABLE 2 in Canines make the difference: a new species of Hypsugo (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Laos and Vietnam
<p><b>TABLE 2</b>. Factor loadings of craniodental characters obtained by the PCA.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Character</th><th>PC1</th><th>PC2</th><th>PC3</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>GLS-i</th><td>0.837</td><td>-0.140</td><td>0.105</td></tr><tr><th>GLS</th><td>0.871</td><td>-0.291</td><td>0.054</td></tr><tr><th>CCL</th><td>0.932</td><td>-0.202</td><td>-0.032</td></tr><tr><th>C1C1W</th><td>0.678</td><td>-0.167</td><td>0.156</td></tr><tr><th>M3M3W</th><td>0.862</td><td>-0.142</td><td>0.057</td></tr><tr><th>IOW</th><td>0.418</td><td>0.648</td><td>0.355</td></tr><tr><th>MAW</th><td>0.724</td><td>0.483</td><td>-0.08</td></tr><tr><th>BCW</th><td>0.515</td><td>0.672</td><td>0.306</td></tr><tr><th>BCH</th><td>0.575</td><td>-0.527</td><td>0.398</td></tr><tr><th>CM3L</th><td>0.886</td><td>0.114</td><td>-0.297</td></tr><tr><th>CP4L</th><td>0.682</td><td>-0.056</td><td>-0.600</td></tr><tr><th>ML</th><td>0.857</td><td>-0.039</td><td>-0.064</td></tr><tr><th>cm3L</th><td>0.840</td><td>0.270</td><td>-0.296</td></tr><tr><th>CPH</th><td>0.765</td><td>-0.166</td><td>0.313</td></tr><tr><th>Eigenvalue</th><td>8.101</td><td>1.693</td><td>1.064</td></tr><tr><th>Percentage of variance (%)</th><td>57.9</td><td>12.1</td><td>7.6</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1 in Canines make the difference: a new species of Hypsugo (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Laos and Vietnam
<p><b>TABLE 1</b>. Selected external and craniodental measurements (in mm) of <i>H. pulveratus</i> and <i>H. dolichodon</i> <b>n. sp.</b> Values are given as mean, ± SD (n ≥ 2), min-max, (n). Acronyms and definitions for measurements are given in the text.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>character</th><th><i>H. pulveratus</i></th><th><i>H. pulveratus</i> ♂</th><th><i>H. pulveratus</i> ♀</th><th><i>H. dolichodon</i> <b>n.sp.</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>FA</th><td>34.6 ± 1.39 32.4–37.6 (32)</td><td>34.2 ± 0.99 32.4–35.8 (19)</td><td>35.4 ± 1.63 32.4–37.6 (11)</td><td>37.0 ± 1.30 35.2–38.4 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>TIB</th><td>13.9 ± 0.53 12.9–14.7 (11)</td><td>13.7 ± 0.42 13.0–14.1 (5)</td><td>14.0 ± 0.62 12.9–14.7 (6)</td><td>14.4 ± 0.20 14.2–14.5 (2)</td></tr><tr><th>HF</th><td>6.1 ± 0.79 4.7–8.2 (24)</td><td>6.0 ± 0.81 4.7–8.0 (14)</td><td>6.3 ± 0.78 5.4–8.2 (10)</td><td>6.4 ± 0.50 5.9–7.0 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>GLS-i</th><td>14.01 ± 0.38 13.26–14.64 (26)</td><td>13.89 ± 0.38 13.26–14.28 (11)</td><td>14.12 ± 0.40 13.32–14.64 (13)</td><td>14.25 ± 0.43 13.83–14.83 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>GLS</th><td>13.75 ± 0.25 13.26–14.11 (26)</td><td>13.66 ± 0.22 13.26–13.94 (11)</td><td>13.81 ± 0.27 13.32–14.11 (13)</td><td>13.76 ± 0.41 13.30–14.29 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>CCL</th><td>12.63 ± 0.30 12.00–13.20 (28)</td><td>12.53 ± 0.22 12.12–12.81 (12)</td><td>12.75 ± 0.31 12.00–13.20 (13)</td><td>12.86 ± 0.36 12.45–13.31 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>C1C1W</th><td>4.22 ± 0.19 3.72–4.53 (30)</td><td>4.27 ± 0.18 4.00–4.53 (12)</td><td>4.20 ± 0.20 3.72–4.42 (14)</td><td>4.17 ± 0.19 4.00–4.40 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>M3M3W</th><td>5.73 ± 0.21 5.20–6.11 (29)</td><td>5.69 ± 0.13 5.34–5.83 (11)</td><td>5.78 ± 0.26 5.20–6.11 (14)</td><td>5.77 ± 0.20 5.52–6.00 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>RW</th><td>4.95 ± 0.22 4.53–5.45 (30)</td><td>4.95 ± 0.18 4.62–5.24 (12)</td><td>4.95 ± 0.26 4.53–5.45 (14)</td><td>5.20 ± 0.35 4.87–5.65 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>IOW</th><td>3.73 ± 0.15 3.33–3.99 (31)</td><td>3.75 ± 0.14 3.50–3.97 (12)</td><td>3.70 ± 0.17 3.33–3.99 (15)</td><td>3.86 ± 0.06 3.77–3.90 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>ZYW</th><td>8.46 ± 0.18 8.15–8.80 (21)</td><td>8.39 ± 0.15 8.16–8.62 (11)</td><td>8.52 ± 0.20 8.15–8.80 (8)</td><td>8.43 ± 0.35 8.18–8.68 (2)</td></tr><tr><th>MAW</th><td>7.24 ± 0.13 6.94–7.56 (27)</td><td>7.23 ± 0.12 7.00–7.37 (12)</td><td>7.27 ± 0.15 6.94–7.56 (12)</td><td>7.66 ± 0.14 7.47–7.77 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>BCW</th><td>6.75 ± 0.16 6.18–6.97 (27)</td><td>6.79 ± 0.12 6.58–6.97 (11)</td><td>6.72 ± 0.20 6.18–6.96 (13)</td><td>6.97 ± 0.17 6.79–7.12 (3)</td></tr><tr><th>BCH</th><td>4.81 ± 0.13 4.62–5.10 (25)</td><td>4.78 ± 0.10 4.62–4.97 (10)</td><td>4.82 ± 0.15 4.62–5.10 (12)</td><td>4.84 ± 0.15 4.67–5.04 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>AOB</th><td>0.85 ± 0.19 0.54–1.17 (22)</td><td>0.87 ± 0.14 0.76–1.10 (7)</td><td>0.87 ± 0.21 0.54–1.17 (13)</td><td>0.96 ± 0.07 0.92–1.06 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>CM3L</th><td>4.88 ± 0.14 4.57–5.15 (33)</td><td>4.87 ± 0.14 4.62–5.11 (14)</td><td>4.91 ± 0.14 4.64–5.15 (15)</td><td>5.05 ± 0.15 4.84–5.19 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>CP4L</th><td>1.99 ± 0.12 1.66–2.23 (33)</td><td>2.01 ± 0.11 1.81–2.17 (14)</td><td>1.97 ± 0.14 1.66–2.23 (15)</td><td>2.09 ± 0.20 1.80–2.24 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>ML</th><td>9.65 ± 0.21 9.15–9.96 (31)</td><td>9.59 ± 0.18 9.29–9.92 (14)</td><td>9.75 ± 0.15 9.50–9.96 (14)</td><td>10.00 ± 0.28 9.59–10.21 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>cm3L</th><td>5.20 ± 0.14 4.86–5.47 (33)</td><td>5.19 ± 0.14 4.98–5.47 (14)</td><td>5.24 ± 0.13 5.01–5.39 (15)</td><td>5.49 ± 0.14 5.34–5.65 (4)</td></tr><tr><th>CPH</th><td>2.75 ± 0.11 2.52–3.02 (33)</td><td>2.71 ± 0.09 2.52–2.85 (14)</td><td>2.79 ± 0.13 2.58–3.02 (15)</td><td>2.90 ± 0.20 2.72–3.11 (3)</td></tr></tbody></table>
Modernising Optimisation in Decision Making
<p>Optimisation in decision making has broad applicability to the whole spectrum of nuclear and radiation-related policy, regulation and practice. The way it is applied has changed in recent years as society has evolved to promote an inclusive and holistic decision-making process. In the radiological protection area, the increasing challenge is to apply it in the broader context of overall risk management, broaden the stakeholder participation process, and deepen the thinking on reasonableness in optimisation. Experience in various circumstances has shown that there is a need to develop a framework in which very different aspects can be balanced to support risk-based decision-making and determine the level of tolerance of risk and uncertainty. Currently, optimisation, as one of the three protection principles of the international radiological protection system, is well defined in theory, complex in practice in a large number of situations, and increasingly based on the combination of four pillars:</p> <ul> <li>holistic, or integrated, protection where optimisation of radiological protection is applied as part of an overall optimisation of protection from all relevant hazards (sometimes referred to as an ‘all hazards approach’);</li> <li>maximising net benefit and the ‘common good’ - taking all relevant socio-economic and environmental risks and impacts, and benefits, into account so that radiological protection facilitates and enhances well-being and does not result in unintended consequences;</li> <li>involving stakeholders – with stakeholder engagement being integral to the decision-making process and key for defining acceptance or tolerance;</li> <li>the need for proportionality – by implementing a graded approach.</li> </ul> <p>As radiological protection moves towards a more holistic approach, recognising its multi-dimensional nature, there should be an even greater focus on understanding and meeting the expectations of those affected by the application of protection. Development is therefore needed along three main lines:</p> <p>(i) how policy and practice are developed in consultation with, and understood by a wider cross section of society;</p> <p>(ii) how policy and practice could be simplified;</p> <p>(iii) how to integrate consideration of other policies and practices so that radiological protection is properly integrated into the wider decision-making process and not seen as a separate "add-on" process.</p> <p>The forthcoming work of the Committee on Radiological Protection and Public Health on modernising the way optimisation is implemented should help inform the revision of the ICRP system. The ultimate goal is to facilitate sustainable and transparent decision-making, beyond the optimisation of radiological protection, in the broader perspective of individual and social well-being.</p> <p>Text on behalf the NEA CRPPH's bureau.</p>
Research data supporting: Decreasing alertness modulates perceptual decision-making
<p>The zip file contains research data supporting the paper: Decreasing alertness modulates perceptual decision-making<br> The files are arranged in the following manner:</p> <ol> <li>The raw data is present for 32 subjects used in the analysis.<br> Each subject has a directory, for e.g. s_02 <br> a) Inside this directory, there are two directories:<br> awake: s_02_awake<br> drowsy: s_02_drowsy<br> b) The awake file has 124 trials, and the drowsy has 740 trials<br> c) The files are .mff format (egi) and the coding is as follows:<br> 'tone' - stimulus, 'RESP' - response. <br> Each 'tone' is followed by a 'DIN2' marker, that marks when the stimulus was actually presented.</li> <li> 'summary_Righthanders.csv' contains the other details for all subjects, with subject id and whether the data was<br> actually used for the analysis or not.</li> </ol>
Supplementary material 1 from: Ednie A, Gale T (2021) Soundscapes and protected area conservation: Are noises in nature making people complacent? Nature Conservation 44: 177-195. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.44.69578
Connections to nature survey
"Concrete ways we can make a difference": a multi-centre, multi-professional evaluation of sustainability within quality improvement education
<p>Post-teaching survey responses. Quantitative data only. </p>
Improving the Process of Shared Decision-Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools
<p>Data of the SDM cases.</p>
Supplementary material 1 from: Cerri J, Carnevali L, Monaco A, Genovesi P, Bertolino S (2022) Blacklists do not necessarily make people curious about invasive alien species. A case study with Bayesian structural time series and Wikipedia searches about invasive mammals in Italy. NeoBiota 71: 113-128. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.71.69422
Supplementary information
Action Planning Makes Physical Activity More Automatic, Only If it Is Autonomously Regulated: A Moderated Mediation Analysis
<p>Dataset used for analysis. </p>
What doesn't kill you can make you stronger: variation in plasticity in response to early temporally heterogeneous hydrological experience
<p><span>Temporally heterogeneous environments may drive rapid and continuous plastic responses, leading to highly variable plasticity in traits. However, direct experimental evidence for such meta-plasticity due to environmental heterogeneity is rare.</span></p> <p><span>Our objective was to investigate the effects of early experience with temporally heterogeneous water availability on the subsequent plasticity of plant species in response to water conditions.</span></p> <p><span>We subjected</span><span> eight plant species</span><span> from three habitats</span><span>, four exotic and four native to North America,</span><span> to initial exposure to either a first round of alternating drought and inundation treatment (</span><span>E<sub>het</sub></span><span>, temporally heterogeneous experience) or a consistently moderate water supply (</span><span>E<sub>hom</sub></span><span>, homogeneous experience), and to a second round of drought, moderate watering or inundation treatments. Afterwards the performance in a series of traits of these species, after the first and second rounds of treatments, was measured. </span></p> <p><span>Compared to E<sup>hom</sup>, E<sub>het</sub> increased final mean total mass of all species considered together, but did not affect mean mortality. E<sub>het</sub> relative to E<sub>hom</sub>, decreased the initial total mass of native species as a group, but increased the mass of exotic species or species from hydric habitats; E<sub>het</sub> also increased the late growth of natives, but did not for exotics, and increased the late growth of mesic species more than xeric and hydric species.</span></p> <div> <p><span>Our results suggest that previous</span> <span>exposure to temporal heterogeneity in water supply may be not beneficial immediately, but can be beneficial for plant growth and response to water stress later in a plant's lifetime.</span> <span>Heterogeneous experiences may not necessarily enhance the degree of plasticity, but may improve the expression of plasticity in terms of better performance later,</span><span> effects of which differ for different groups of species, suggesting species-specific strategies for dealing with fluctuating abiotic environments. </span></p> <p><span><em>Synthesis</em>.</span><span> Previous </span><span>temporally heterogeneous experience can benefits plant growth later in life though modulating the expression of plasticity</span><span>, leading to adaptive meta-plasticity</span><span>. </span><span>Studies of meta-plasticity </span><span>may not only improve</span><span> our understanding of the importance of variable plasticity in relation how plants </span><span>cope with environmental challenges, but also </span><span>the costs versus benefits of plastic responses and its limits over the long term.</span></p> </div>
Replication package for: We are all behavioral, more or less: A taxonomy of consumer decision making
<p>Code and data for reproducing tables in the paper.</p>
Coded Segments - Factors Influencing Managerial Data-Driven Decision-Making
<p>Supplementary material for SAC 2023: Coded segments resulting from data analysis.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.