Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
47,155
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
47,155 results for “evaluations”
Fig. 1 in Experimental evaluation of pathogenicity and acquired immunity of Eimeria species, E. uekii and E. raichoi, infecting Japanese rock ptarmigans in a subspecies of the birds
Fig. 1. Weight gain of Svalbard rock ptarmigans after inoculation with E. uekii and E. raichoi oocysts. The inoculation doses of E. uekii and E. raichoi were 4 104 and × 17 103 or 4 103 (A), 2 104 and 8 103 (B), 4 103 and 17 or 4 102 (C), and 4 102 and 17 or 4 101 (D), respectively. Group E was administered PBS as a × × × × × × × × control, and group F was inoculated with 4 104 oocysts of E. raichoi that had been passed in turkeys. "n" indicates the numbers of examined chicks.
Fig. 5 in Experimental evaluation of pathogenicity and acquired immunity of Eimeria species, E. uekii and E. raichoi, infecting Japanese rock ptarmigans in a subspecies of the birds
Fig. 5. Histopathological photomicrographs of sections of the intestines of challenged chicks. Panels A and B show the ileum and duodenum of the primary inoculated chick at 7 days PI, respectively. Panels C and D show the ileum and colon of a non-inoculated chick at 7 days PI, respectively. Arrows indicate developmental zoites (sexual stages in panels C and D). Scale bars are 20 μm in panels A and C and 50 μm in panels B and D.
Fig. 4 in Experimental evaluation of pathogenicity and acquired immunity of Eimeria species, E. uekii and E. raichoi, infecting Japanese rock ptarmigans in a subspecies of the birds
Fig. 4. Weight gain of Svalbard rock ptarmigans after challenge inoculation. Panels A and B show the weight of control (PBS) and primary inoculated chicks, respectively. Two-direction arrows indicate the period of challenge inoculation, 4 104 E. uekii and 2 103 E. raichoi for 5 days.
Fig. 3 in Experimental evaluation of pathogenicity and acquired immunity of Eimeria species, E. uekii and E. raichoi, infecting Japanese rock ptarmigans in a subspecies of the birds
Fig. 3. Histopathological photomicrographs of sections from an experimentally inoculated chick (Svalbard rock ptarmigan). Panel A shows the ileum of the chick at 4 days PI after inoculation with 4 × 104 E. uekii and 2 × 103 E. raichoi oocysts. Panel B is a higher magnification of the section. Arrows indicate developmental zoites or mature schizonts (in panel B). Scale bars in panels A and B are 20 μm and 50 μm, respectively.
Fig. 3 in Molecular evaluation of Eimeria spp. Infection in the Volga-Ural Saiga antelope population of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree generated by the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) method using partial sequences of the 18S rRNA of the Eimeria species that infect the Saiga tatarica.
Fig. 2 in Molecular evaluation of Eimeria spp. Infection in the Volga-Ural Saiga antelope population of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Fig. 2. Eimeria spp. Oocyst at 40x magnification. The outer (OL) and the inner (IL) layers of the oocyst wall, micropyle (M), micropyle cap (MC), spores (S).
Fig. 1 in Molecular evaluation of Eimeria spp. Infection in the Volga-Ural Saiga antelope population of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Fig. 1. Photomicroscope images showing the oocysts of E. elegans (40х magnification). The outer (OL) and the inner (IL) layers of the oocyst wall, cytoplasmic mass (CM), micropyle (M).
Expansion Cones Dataset for Robust Tetrahedral Mapping Evaluation
<p>This record stores the dataset used by the <a href="https://www.algohex.eu/publications/expansion-cones/">"Expansion Cones"</a> paper.<br>This paper presents a volumetric mapping method called <em>Shrink-And-Expand</em> (SAE for short).<br>Its robustness was evaluated by mapping ~3'000 ball-topology meshes to 4 different target boundaries (spherical, tetrahedral, "stiff" tetrahedral and random star-shaped). Other tetrahedral mapping methods can be evaluated by using the rest meshes and either of the target boundaries.</p> <p>The record is structured as follows:</p> <ul> <li>`ball_topology_tet_wild_ovm_format`: all input meshes in their original shapes, in <a href="https://www.graphics.rwth-aachen.de/software/openvolumemesh/">.ovm</a> format. These consists of the <a href="https://github.com/Yixin-Hu/TetWild">TetWild</a> dataset, restricted to ball-topology meshes. If you need to convert the meshes to another format, you can use Martin Heistermann's <a href="https://github.com/mheistermann/meshio">fork</a> of <a href="https://pypi.org/project/meshio/">meshio</a>.<br>NOTE: Those meshes were pre-processed by splitting all <strong>interior</strong> edges connecting two boundary vertices and all <strong>interior</strong> faces connecting three boundary vertices. This was done to satisfy the prerequisites of our method.</li> <li>`XXX_boundary_conditions.zip`: boundary conditions for the 4 boundary shapes: tetrahedral, "stiff" tetrahedral, ball and random star-shape. Please read the related paper for more details about the boundary types.<br>Those boundary conditions are stored as `.txt` files, each containing a list of boundary vertices indices, along with their prescribed positions.</li> </ul> <p>The other archives contain data used to compare SAE with two other volumetric mapping methods called <a href="https://github.com/duxingyi-charles/lifting_simplices_to_find_injectivity"><em>Total Lifted Conten</em>t (TLC)</a> and <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3450626.3459847">FoldOver-Free (FOF)</a></p> <ul> <li> `SAE_results/expansion_data`: All `.json` files corresponding to executions of our method (SAE) on those meshes.</li> <li> `SAE_results/quality_stats`: conformal and volumetric distortion values for _all_ cells of _all_ meshes.</li> <li>`TLC_FOF_results`: For each mesh and each competitor method (and each boundary map), there are 1 to 3 files, depending on the results of running those methods. <ul> <li>`TLC/FOF_timing_s.txt` gives the number of seconds it took to run</li> <li>`TLC/FOF_stats.txt` stores the following data: `[mesh name, #vertices, #edges, #faces, #cells, #degenerate cells after running the method, #flipped cells after running the method]`. This file only exists if the method terminated within the 12hours time limit.</li> <li>`TLC/FOF_quality_stats.txt` lists the conformal and volumetric distortion of each individual cell in the resulting map produced by the competitor methods (one line per cell), This file only exists if the method produced a valid map.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>NOTE</strong>: If you want to download the codomain meshes, with prescribed boundary positions already set. you can find them in the v2.0 of this same dataset.</p>
Results and figures from "Evaluating the robustness of the ARIO model for a local disaster: 2021 Flooding in Germany"
<p>These files and notebook allow reproducing the figures from "Evaluating the robustness of the ARIO model for a local disaster: 2021 Flooding in Germany".</p> <p>The main result file is a pandas DataFrame saved in parquet format under "results/general-plot_df.parquet".</p> <p>Two notebooks allow post-processing these results and plot the figures.</p> <p>Reproduction of the raw results can be achieved with the Snakemake pipeline, available here: https://github.com/spjuhel/BoARIO-Sensitivity</p> <p> </p>
FIGURE 3 in New material and evaluation of the chronostratigraphic position of Daphoenictis tedfordi (Mammalia, Carnivora, Amphicyonidae), a cat-like carnivoran from the latest Eocene of northwestern Nebraska, USA
FIGURE 3. Stratigraphic section of the Chadron Formation including RAM Locality 4906, SE1/4, sec. 31, T34N, R53W, Sioux Co., Nebraska, measured by R.H. Tedford in 1964. Note the LPW (Lower Purple-White) and UPW (Upper Purple-White) ashes relative to the faunal horizon.
FIGURE 4 in New material and evaluation of the chronostratigraphic position of Daphoenictis tedfordi (Mammalia, Carnivora, Amphicyonidae), a cat-like carnivoran from the latest Eocene of northwestern Nebraska, USA
FIGURE 4. Stratigraphic section of the Chadron Formation from Ostrander (1985, fig. 5) in W1/2, NE1/4, sec. 31, T34N, R53W, with the Raben Ranch local fauna and the fossiliferous interval above and below the "pond limestone" that corresponds to the stratigraphic interval that produced the UNSM assemblage with Daphoenictis.
FIGURE 1 in New material and evaluation of the chronostratigraphic position of Daphoenictis tedfordi (Mammalia, Carnivora, Amphicyonidae), a cat-like carnivoran from the latest Eocene of northwestern Nebraska, USA
FIGURE 1. Right hemimandible of Daphoenictis tedfordi (UNSM 27015) with canine, p3-m2, and broken base of p2 and single-rooted p1, middle Chadronian, Chadron Formation, section 31, T34N, R53W, Orella 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle, Sioux Co., Nebraska. 1, buccal view; 2, lingual view; 3, occlusal view.
FIGURE 2 in New material and evaluation of the chronostratigraphic position of Daphoenictis tedfordi (Mammalia, Carnivora, Amphicyonidae), a cat-like carnivoran from the latest Eocene of northwestern Nebraska, USA
FIGURE 2. Topographic map of the Toadstool Park–Raben Ranch–Orella Buttes area, Sioux County, Nebraska. Chadron Formation outcrops here have yielded most fossils of Daphoenictis tedfordi in North America, including UNSM 27015 that closely compares with the Cypress Hills holotype, Saskatchewan. 1, ravine in sec. 31, T34N, R53W, site of the Raben Ranch local fauna and probable collecting locality of UNSM 27015; 2, stratotype of the Big Cottonwood Creek Member of the Chadron Formation (Terry and LaGarry, 1998); 3, approximate limit of the "1 mile northwest of UNSM collecting district Sx-41," stated in the UNSM locality designation for UNSM 27015 (see Site of Collection); RAM 4906 and RAM 4907, Ray Alf Museum sites where D. tedfordi was collected.
FIGURE 5 in Re-evaluation of the very large Eomellivora fricki (Pia, 1939) (Carnivora, Mustelidae, Mellivorinae) from the Late Miocene of Austria
FIGURE 5. Main comparative material of mandible and lower dentition of species of Eomellivora considered in this manuscript. 1-2, Eomellivora fricki NHMW 1977/1948/0130 from Gaiselberg (Austria), MN9.1, lateral view, 2, occlusal view; 3-4, Eomellivora piveteaui Bat-3´13.230 from Batallones (Spain), MN10. 3, lateral view, 4, occlusal view; 5-6, Eomellivora wimani PMU-M3693 from Shangyingou (China), MN12-13 (same specimen as PMU-M3692). 5, lateral view, 6, occlusal view; 7-8, Holotype of Eomellivora ursogulo PIN-No.269a from Grebeniki (Ukraine), MN11. 7, lateral view, 8, occlusal view; 9-10, Holotype of Eomellivora hungarica MFGI-Ob-2676 from Polgárdi 2 (Hungary), MN13. 9, lateral view, 10, occlusal view. Scale bar equals 5 cm.
FIGURE 6 in Re-evaluation of the very large Eomellivora fricki (Pia, 1939) (Carnivora, Mustelidae, Mellivorinae) from the Late Miocene of Austria
FIGURE 6. Scatter diagrams of measurements (mm) of the dentition of Eomellivora and Ekorus ekakeran. 1, P4; 2, M1; 3, c; 4, p4; 5, m1; 6, m2. Sources: WXII (Wien XII-Altmannsdorf) present manuscript; GAI (Gaiselberg) present manuscript; SH (Shangyingou), and LI (Liuwangou), Zdansky (1924); GRT (Gritsev), Wolsan and Semenov (1996); NO (Novaya Emetovka), Orlov (1948); GYÖ (Györszentmárton), Kretzoi (1965), KRF (Kern River Formation site 50), Stock and Hall (1933); CIM (Cimislia), Wolsan and Semenov (1996); YAS (Yassiören), Ozansoy (1965) and for P4 and M1, estimations based on pictures of MNHN-TRQ-1005, rather than the evidently confusing original data provided in Ozansoy (1965); WSS (Wissberg), Tobien (1955); RPI (Ravin de la Pluie), Koufos (2012); BAT (Batallones), Valenciano et al. (2015); LVF (Los Valles de Fuentidueña), Crusafont-Pairó and Ginsburg (1973) and for p2 Valenciano et al. (2015); KLF (Kalfa), Lungu (1978) and for M1 Valenciano et al. (2015); GRE (Grebeniki), Orlov (1948); CSA (Csákvár), Kretzoi (1942); POL (Polgárdi 2); LOT (Lothagam) Werdelin, 2003.
FIGURE 4 in Re-evaluation of the very large Eomellivora fricki (Pia, 1939) (Carnivora, Mustelidae, Mellivorinae) from the Late Miocene of Austria
FIGURE 4. Main comparative material of the upper dentition of species of Eomellivora considered in the present manuscript. 1, Holotype of Eomellivora fricki NHMW 2016/0065/0001 from Wien XII-Altmannsdorf (Austria), MN9; 2, Eomellivora piveteaui MNHN-TRQ-1005 from type locality Yassiören (Turkey), MN9; 3, Eomellivora piveteaui Bat- 3´13.185 from Batallones (Spain), MN10; 4, Holotype of Eomellivora ursogulo PIN-No.268 from Grebeniki (Ukraine), MN11; 5, Lectotype of Eomellivora wimani PMU-M3692 from Shangyingou (China), MN12-13; 6, Paratype (M1) of Eomellivora hungarica MFGI-Ob-3831 from Polgárdi 2 (Hungary), MN13; 8, cast of the holotype of Eomellivora ursogulo NHMW 2016/0085/0001 from Grebeniki (Ukraine), MN11; 9, cast of the holotype of Ekorus ekakeran KNM- LT 23125 from Lothagan (Kenya), 7 m.y.a. 1-6, occlusal view, 7-9, lateral view. Scale bar equals 5 cm.
FIGURE 2 in Re-evaluation of the very large Eomellivora fricki (Pia, 1939) (Carnivora, Mustelidae, Mellivorinae) from the Late Miocene of Austria
FIGURE 2. Fossil remains of Eomellivora fricki (Pia, 1939) from Wien XII-Altmannsdorf and Gaiselberg. 1-4, Holotype NHMW 2016/0065/0001 from Wien XII-Altmannsdorf, left maxilla fragment, 1, lateral view, 2, occlusal view, 3, rostral view, 4, caudal view; 5-6, right maxilla fragment, 5, lateral view, 6, occlusal view; 7, fragment of the left zygomatic arch; 8, fragment of the left temporo-mandibular joint; 9-10, fragment with the right mastoid process (mp), the ventral part of the nuchal crest (nc), the external auditory meatus (eam), and part of the glenoid cavity (gc), 9, lateral view, 10, dorsal view; 11-14, NHMW 1977/1948/0130 right hemimandible from Gaiselberg. 11, lateral view, 12, medial view, 13, occlusal view, 14, ventral view. Scale bar equals 5 cm.
FIGURE 3 in Re-evaluation of the very large Eomellivora fricki (Pia, 1939) (Carnivora, Mustelidae, Mellivorinae) from the Late Miocene of Austria
FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic relationship of Eomellivora fricki within Eomellivora, and of some extinct Neogene mustelids and living carnivorans. Canis lupus is the outgroup. Searches were performed by means of the Branch and Bound and a Bootstrap analysis through 1000 replicates. A single tree is obtained (length 172 steps, consistency index (CI)=0.4593, retention index (RI)=0.5811). The numbers below nodes are Bremer indices, and the numbers above nodes are Bootstrap support percentages (only shown ≥ 50). Letters (A-K) indicated selected nodes. The synapomorphies for each node are reported in Table 4.
FIGURE 1 in Re-evaluation of the very large Eomellivora fricki (Pia, 1939) (Carnivora, Mustelidae, Mellivorinae) from the Late Miocene of Austria
FIGURE 1. Vienna Basin with geographic and stratigraphic position of localities (asterisks) (modified after Harzhauser et al., 2004, figures 1 and 2).
Data from: Technological Evaluation of Fiber Effects in Wheat-Based Dough and Bread
<p>This dataset is linked to the article by Celeste Verbeke, Els Debonne, Stien Versele, Filip Van Bockstaele and Mia Eeckhout, published in Foods (August 2024):<br>"Technological Evaluation of Fiber Effects in Wheat-Based Dough and Bread" (DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162582).</p> <ul> <li>Farinogram curve data.csv & Alveogram curve data.csv & Pasting curve data.csv <ul> <li>Observations: <ul> <li>Ref = wheat flour</li> <li>PF1/5/10 = 1/5/10% pea fiber</li> <li>CF1/5/10 = 1/5/10% cocoa fiber</li> <li>AF1/5/10 = 1/5/10% apple fiber</li> <li>1/2/3/avg = Replicate 1/2/3 & average of the three replicates</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>Dough and bread characteristics.csv <ul> <li>Observations:<br> <ul> <li>Ref = wheat flour</li> <li>PF1/5/10 = 1/5/10% pea fiber</li> <li>CF1/5/10 = 1/5/10% cocoa fiber</li> <li>AF1/5/10 = 1/5/10% apple fiber</li> </ul> </li> <li>Abbreviations: <ul> <li>WRC = water retention capacity</li> <li>WA = water absorption</li> <li>DDT = dough development time</li> <li>STAB = stability</li> <li>SOFT = softening</li> <li>P = tenacity</li> <li>L = extensibility</li> <li>W = deformation energy</li> <li>PH = proving height</li> <li>IV = initial viscosity</li> <li>T_past = pasting temperature</li> <li>V_peak = peak viscosity</li> <li>T_peak = peak temperature</li> <li>HS = holding strength</li> <li>V_final = final viscosity</li> <li>BD = breakdown</li> <li>SB_peak = setback from peak</li> <li>SB_total = total setback</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.