Find research datasets worth reusing

Supplementary material 6 from: Bellati A, Scherz MD, Megson S, Hyde Roberts S, Andreone F, Rosa GM, Noël J, Randrianirina JE, Fasola M, Glaw F, Crottini A (2018) Resurrection and re-description of Plethodontohyla laevis (Boettger, 1913) and transfer of Rhombophryne alluaudi (Mocquard, 1901) to the genus Plethodontohyla (Amphibia, Microhylidae, Cophylinae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 109-135. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.14698

PDF-embedded 3D model of the skeleton of ZSM 89/2004, a specimen assigned to Plethodontohyla alluaudi :

Supplementary material 5 from: Bellati A, Scherz MD, Megson S, Hyde Roberts S, Andreone F, Rosa GM, Noël J, Randrianirina JE, Fasola M, Glaw F, Crottini A (2018) Resurrection and re-description of Plethodontohyla laevis (Boettger, 1913) and transfer of Rhombophryne alluaudi (Mocquard, 1901) to the genus Plethodontohyla (Amphibia, Microhylidae, Cophylinae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 109-135. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.14698

PDF-embedded 3D model of the skeleton of MRSN A6340, a specimen assigned to Plethodontohyla laevis :

Supplementary material 4 from: Bellati A, Scherz MD, Megson S, Hyde Roberts S, Andreone F, Rosa GM, Noël J, Randrianirina JE, Fasola M, Glaw F, Crottini A (2018) Resurrection and re-description of Plethodontohyla laevis (Boettger, 1913) and transfer of Rhombophryne alluaudi (Mocquard, 1901) to the genus Plethodontohyla (Amphibia, Microhylidae, Cophylinae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 109-135. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.14698

PDF-embedded 3D model of the skeleton of ZSM 3/2002, a specimen of an undescribed Rhombophryne species formerly called Rhombophryne 'alluaudi' :

Supplementary material 3 from: Bellati A, Scherz MD, Megson S, Hyde Roberts S, Andreone F, Rosa GM, Noël J, Randrianirina JE, Fasola M, Glaw F, Crottini A (2018) Resurrection and re-description of Plethodontohyla laevis (Boettger, 1913) and transfer of Rhombophryne alluaudi (Mocquard, 1901) to the genus Plethodontohyla (Amphibia, Microhylidae, Cophylinae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 109-135. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.14698

PDF-embedded 3D model of the skeleton of Plethodontohyla laevis tsianovohensis holotype (MNHN 1936.47) :

opennotspecifiedDec 2018View details →

FIGURE 1 in Both non-type species of Molytophilus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytinae) are transferred to Oreoscotus

FIGURE 1. Molytophilus carinatus. Lectotype (A–E), paralectotype (F) and a non-type specimen from Somalia (G). Habitus, dorsal (A, G), lateral (B) and ventral (F); aedeagus dorsal (C), ventral (D) and lateral (E).

opennotspecifiedDec 2018View details →

FIGURE 2 in Both non-type species of Molytophilus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytinae) are transferred to Oreoscotus

FIGURE 2. Holotypes of Oreoscotus affinis (Hustache, 1936) comb. n. (A, B; image copyright: NHMUK) and O. puncticollis (Hustache, 1936) comb. n. (C, D).

opencc-by-nc-nd-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Optimization of an ex vivo gene transfer to the hamstrings tendons muscle remnants: potential for genetic enhancement of bone healing

Human muscle tissue samples obtained from 31 patients was used in this in vitro analytical and experimental study. To optimize transduction protocol, samples from 28 patients were transduced with the adenoviral vector carrying firefly luciferase cDNA (Ad.luc) using different doses, times of transduction and addition of positive ions for transduction enhancement. The optimized protocol was further tested on muscle samples from 3 new patients, which were transduced with Ad.BMP-2. Released bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) levels in osteogenic medium were measured every 3 days during the period of 21 days. Expression of osteogenic markers was at day 14 and 21.  After 21 days of cultivation, muscle tissue was prepared for immunohistochemical staining for collagen type I (COL-I).

Fig. 8 in Species of Wadicosa (Araneae, Lycosidae): transfer of two species from Pardosa and description of three new species from Africa

Fig. 8. Epigyne in ventral (A–C) and dorsal (D–F) view. — A, D. Wadicosa benadira (Caporiacco), from Kenya, Marsabit. — B, E. W. cognata sp. nov., from Kenya, Lake Magadi. — C, F. W. jocquei sp. nov. C. From Mauritius. F. From Comoros, Anjouan. fo, foveola; l.el. lateral elevation; sp, spermatheca; arrow points at lateral elevation partly covering foveola. Scale bars: A–F = 300 µm.

Fig. 6 in Species of Wadicosa (Araneae, Lycosidae): transfer of two species from Pardosa and description of three new species from Africa

Fig. 6. Tegulum of left male palp with tegular apophysis (tg.a). Basal part and lower branch of tegular apophysis with spinulae (s) and verrucose outgrows (v), the latter enlarged in B and D. — A–B. Wadicosa cognata sp. nov., from Kenya, Lake Magadi. — C–D. W. Fdelis (Pickard-Cambridge), from Spain. Scale bars: A, C = 100 µm, B, D = 10 µm.

Fig. 4 in Species of Wadicosa (Araneae, Lycosidae): transfer of two species from Pardosa and description of three new species from Africa

Fig. 4. Bulbus of left male palp in ventral (A–C) and retrolateral (D–F) view. — A, D. Wadicosa benadira (Caporiacco), from Kenya, WNW of Mombasa. — B, E. W. cognata sp. nov., from Kenya, Lake Magadi. — C, F. W. jocquei sp. nov., from Comoros, Moheli. a.rl.p, anterior retrolateral process; co, conductor; em, embolus; p.rl.p, posterior retrolateral process; sc, scutra; tg.a, tegular apophysis. Scale bar: A–F = 300 µm.

Fig. 5 in Species of Wadicosa (Araneae, Lycosidae): transfer of two species from Pardosa and description of three new species from Africa

Fig. 5. Terminal part of left male palp with embolus (em) and conductor (co). — A. Wadicosa cognata sp. nov., from Kenya, Lake Magadi, ventral view. — B. W. Fdelis (Pickard-Cambridge), from Spain, ventral view. — C–D. W. benadira (Caporiacco), from Kenya, WNW of Mombasa. C. Ventral view. D. More frontal view. — E. W. jocquei sp. nov., from Comoros, Moheli, frontal view. Scale bars: A–B = 200 µm, C–E = 200 µm.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2018View details →

Artifact Evaluation for "Optimizing Remote Data Transfers in X10" - PACT'18

Artifact Evaluation Reproduction for "Optimizing Remote Data Transfers in X10", PACT 2018. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This repository contains artifacts and source codes to reproduce experiments from the PACT 2018 research paper titled "Optimizing Remote Data Transfers in X10" Our evaluations are done on Linux based Operation system. Hardware pre-requisities: ------------------------------ We recommend the following architectures any of the following architectures: * An Intel System with two nodes, each node having 32 cores (32 CPUs). Total 64 cores. * An AMD System, with two nodes, each node having 16 cores (16 CPUs). Total 32 cores.   Software pre-requisites: ---------------------------- 1) For Evaluation using Virtual Machine required software are already installed in the provided image. A VirtualBox (from Oracle) is required to install the image and do evaluation. 2) For Manual evaluation, the below required software needs to be installed in the system. * g++ (preferred version 5.4.0) * Apache ant software (preferred version 1.9.6 ) * Java software     - preferred jvm jdk1.8.0_151 (or) java-8-oracle     - After installation, set JAVA_HOME path in ~/.bashrc to point to the installed JAVA bin Benchmarks: --------------- 1) Taken from IMSuite Benchmark kernels (http://www.cse.iitm.ac.in/~krishna/imsuite/). Already, included in the package. Installation, Execution and Validation of results: --------------------------------------------------------- 1) For Evaluation using Virtual Machine see README.md file in ./AE/VM folder 2) For Evaluation using Manual method see README.md file in ./AE/Manual folder 3) For Evaluating AT-Opt technique againt varing input sizes (not discussed in the paper), look at web page http://www.cse.iitm.ac.in/~krishna/imsuite/. In the ./AE/Manual folder,  "x10-base" folder is the baseline compiler (after bulid) and "x10-atOpt" (after build) folder is the AT-Opt compiler (has our techniques implemented).   If anything in unclear, or any unexpected results occur, please report it to the authors.

FIGURE 5 in A new species of and a new transfer from the millipede genus Polydrepanum Carl, 1932 (Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Polydrepanini)

FIGURE 5. Original illustrations of Telodrepanum badaga Carl, 1932 (A) and Polydrepanum implicatum Carl, 1941 (B) showing structural similarities (reproduced from Carl (1932, 1941)). Arrows indicate sickle-shaped solenophore (1) and postfemoral process (2).

FIGURE 2 in A new species of and a new transfer from the millipede genus Polydrepanum Carl, 1932 (Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Polydrepanini)

FIGURE 2. Polydrepanum fissum sp. nov.. A: Male habitus, mesal view. B: Same, frontal view. C: Anterior part of body, dorsal view. D: Haplosegments, dorsal view. E: Same, mesal view. F: Diplosegments 1–3, dorsal view. G: Diplosegments 7–9, dorsal view. H: Same, mesal view. I: Gnathochilarium, ventral view. J: 'Teeth', ventral view. K: Posterior part of body, dorsal view. L: Same, ventral view. M: Same, mesal view. N: Sternal lamella between coxae 4, ventral view. O: Gonopore on conical process of leg 2 coxae, ventral view. P: Gonopod aperture, ventral view. Scale bars: A 2 mm; C, F–G 1 mm; B, D–E, H–I, K– M 0.5 mm; J, N–P 0.2 mm.

FIGURE 1. A in A new species of and a new transfer from the millipede genus Polydrepanum Carl, 1932 (Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Polydrepanini)

FIGURE 1. A: Field photograph of Polydrepanum fissum sp. nov.. B: Kiliyur Falls. Photo courtesy Jimmy Paul.

FIGURE 4 in A new species of and a new transfer from the millipede genus Polydrepanum Carl, 1932 (Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Polydrepanini)

FIGURE 4. Polydrepanum fissum sp. nov.. A: Right gonopod, ventral view. B: Same, mesal view. C: Same, lateral view. Abbreviations: C = cannula, dlLF = distolateral lobe of femorite, dlLL = distolateral lobe of lamina lateralis, F = femorite, FF = fold of femorite, GC = gonocoxa, LL = lamina lateralis, LLp = lateral lamellate process of solenophore, mLL = mesal extension of lamina lateralis, mTp = mesal triangular process of solenophore, MWp 1 & 2 = membranous wing-like process of solenophore 1 and 2, PF = prefemur, SG = seminal groove, Sm = Solenomere, Sp = Solenophore. Arrows indicate tip of solenomere (3), branches of solenophore tip (1–2) and distoventral, long, stiff seta of prefemur (4). Scale bars: A–B 0.5 mm; C 0.2 mm.

FIGURE 3 in A new species of and a new transfer from the millipede genus Polydrepanum Carl, 1932 (Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Polydrepanini)

FIGURE 3. Polydrepanum fissum sp. nov., male legs (A–D) and gonopod (E–F). A: Leg pair I, ventral view (insets adenostyle on right femur 1, lateral view (left) and tarsus of the right leg showing tarsal brush, lateral view (right)). B: Left leg of haplosegment 2, mesal view (inset tarsus of the same showing tarsal brush, mesal view). C: Left leg of haplosegment 3, mesal view (inset tarsus of the same showing tarsal brush, mesal view). D: Tarsus of right anterior leg of diplosegment 4 showing tarsal brush, mesal view. E: Right gonopod, ventral view. F: Same, mesal view. Scale bars: A–C, E–F 0.5 mm; D 0.2 mm.

FIGURE 6 in A new species of and a new transfer from the millipede genus Polydrepanum Carl, 1932 (Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Polydrepanini)

FIGURE 6. Previously known Polydrepanum spp.. A: Polydrepanum asperrimum (Carl, 1932) (reproduced from Carl (1932)). B: Polydrepanum horridum Golovatch, 1984 (reproduced from Golovatch (1984)). C: Polydrepanum tamilum Carl, 1932 (reproduced from Carl (1932)). D–F: Undescribed Polydrepanum spp.: D: Polydrepanum sp. 1; E: Polydrepanum sp. 2; F: Polydrepanum sp. 3 (all reproduced from Bano & Murthy (1997)). All figures not to scale.

FIGURE 7 in A new species of and a new transfer from the millipede genus Polydrepanum Carl, 1932 (Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Polydrepanini)

FIGURE 7. Distribution records of Polydrepanum. ♦ Polydrepanum asperrimum (Carl, 1932) ● Polydrepanum fissum sp. nov.