Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →

Fig. 5 in New record of Rhinolophus chiewkweeae (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia with new information on their echolocation calls, genetics and their taxonomy

Fig. 5. The echolocation call of Rhinolophus chiewkweeae. Legend: H 1 (first harmonic), H2 (second harmonic), H3 (third harmonic) and H4 (fourth harmonic).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2016View details →

Fig. 4 in New record of Rhinolophus chiewkweeae (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) from the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia with new information on their echolocation calls, genetics and their taxonomy

Fig. 4. Lateral, dorsal and ventral views of Rhinolophus chiewkweeae skull from Sungai Buweh, Lawit. Scale bar = 5mm

Fig. 8 in Tridacna noae (Röding, 1798) - a valid giant clam species separated from T. maxima (Röding, 1798) by morphological and genetic data

Fig. 8. Photos in Chemnitz (1784) referred by Röding (1798) firstly named the giant clam species "noae" (no. 494), "maxima" (no. 495), and Tridacna derasa (no. 497).

Fig. 6 in Tridacna noae (Röding, 1798) - a valid giant clam species separated from T. maxima (Röding, 1798) by morphological and genetic data

Fig. 6. Shell morphology of Tridacna maxima from Hongchia with prominent rib scales on right valve (A–F) and Tridacna noae from Naliao (G–L). R: rib; S: scale.

Fig. 4 in Tridacna noae (Röding, 1798) - a valid giant clam species separated from T. maxima (Röding, 1798) by morphological and genetic data

Fig. 4. Neighbour joining tree of Tridacninae using Kimura 2-parameter model based on 18S rRNA gene sequence. Bootstrap values: 1,000; outgroup: Corculum cardissa.

Fig. 2 in Tridacna noae (Röding, 1798) - a valid giant clam species separated from T. maxima (Röding, 1798) by morphological and genetic data

Fig. 2. Neighbour joining tree of Tridacninae using Kimura 2-parameter model based on Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1(COI) gene sequence. Bootstrap values: 1,000; outgroup: Corculum cardissa.

Fig. 3 in Tridacna noae (Röding, 1798) - a valid giant clam species separated from T. maxima (Röding, 1798) by morphological and genetic data

Fig. 3. Neighbour joining tree of Tridacninae using Kimura 2-parameter model based on 16S rRNA gene sequence. Bootstrap values: 1,000; outgroup: Corculum cardissa.

Fig. 5 in Tridacna noae (Röding, 1798) - a valid giant clam species separated from T. maxima (Röding, 1798) by morphological and genetic data

Fig. 5. Neighbour joining tree of Tridacninae using Kimura 2-parameter model based on 28S rRNA gene sequence. Bootstrap values: 1,000; outgroup: Corculum cardissa.

Fig. 7 in Tridacna noae (Röding, 1798) - a valid giant clam species separated from T. maxima (Röding, 1798) by morphological and genetic data

Fig. 7. Mantle colour pattern and hyaline organs of Tridacna maxima (A, B) and Tridacna noae (C, D). E, Enlarged hyaline organs of T. maxima; F, Enlarged hyaline organs of T. noae. →: Hyaline organs.

Fig. 3 in Hybridisation In The Wild Between The Great Hornbill (Buceros Bicornis) And The Rhinoceros Hornbill (Buceros Rhinoceros) In Thailand And Its Genetic Assessment

Fig. 3. Nucleotide sequences of core tandem repeats of hypervariable mitochondrial control region III (CR III) in four hornbill individuals; the female great hornbill (GU560189), the male rhinoceros hornbill (GU560192), and two interspecific hybrids (GU560190 for 2004- hybrid and GU560191 for 2008-hybrid). Underlined sequence shows the core sequence of 11 bp in 23 bp tandem repeats in the rhinoceros hornbill that is similar to that of the great hornbill. Bold letters indicate nucleotide sequences at 10th nucleotide position of 11 bp core sequences in the four birds.

Fig. 2 in Hybridisation In The Wild Between The Great Hornbill (Buceros Bicornis) And The Rhinoceros Hornbill (Buceros Rhinoceros) In Thailand And Its Genetic Assessment

Fig. 2. Comparative features among the chicks of the hybrid (I and a–f), the great hornbill (II and g–l), the rhinoceros hornbill (III and m–r), and adult males and females of both species (A–C). Descriptions of morphological features of the hybrid chick and chicks of the great hornbill and the rhinoceros hornbill were given in Table 1. Please note that the female great hornbill and the male rhinoceros hornbill in II and III are not the real hybrid parents.

Fig. 1 in Hybridisation In The Wild Between The Great Hornbill (Buceros Bicornis) And The Rhinoceros Hornbill (Buceros Rhinoceros) In Thailand And Its Genetic Assessment

Fig. 1. Capture locations of two interspecific hybrids and a mother great hornbill in 2004 at Budo Mountain within the National Park (a) and in 2008 at 4 km from the National Park (b).

Fig. 2 in Genetically Determined Colour Polymorphism In Larvae Of Ceriagrion Chaoi (Insecta: Odonata: Coenagrionidae)

Fig. 2. Alignment of 454 bp partial sequences 16S rDNA of representative Ceriagrion chaoi and Ceriagrion cerinorubellum. CCHA1 = adult female of C. chaoi; CCHA2 = female exuvia of C. chaoi; CCHA4 = male brown larva of C. chaoi; CCHA6 = male black larva of C. chaoi; CCHA13 = dark larva* of C. chaoi; CCHA15 = brown larva* of C. chaoi; CCHA16 = brown larva of C. chaoi; CCER1 = C. cerinorubellum. *sex not determined.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2012View details →

Fig. 2. Full length d in Low Genetic Variability In The Recovering Urban Banded Leaf Monkey Population Of Singapore

Fig. 2. Full length d- loop of Presbytis melalophos (1.08kbp) and target region of d-loop (variable site for P. femoralis is position 190). The complete mitochondrial genome of this specimen is published under Sterner et al. (2006), and the specimen is identified as P. melalophos following Groves (2001) and Brandon-Jones et al. (2004).

Fig. 4 in Spatial genetic structure in the vulnerable smooth-coated otter (Lutrogale perspicillata, Mustelidae): towards an adaptive conservation management of the species

Fig. 4. Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) plot (stress: 0.0045) performed using average pairwise TN93 (Tamura & Nei, 1993) distances among investigated Lutrogale perspicillata groups created according to the country of origin of samples (modern + museum DNA and GenBank entries).

Fig. 3. A in Spatial genetic structure in the vulnerable smooth-coated otter (Lutrogale perspicillata, Mustelidae): towards an adaptive conservation management of the species

Fig. 3. A, Lutrogale perspicillata network computed using haplotypes (h) from the 305 bp-long sequence alignment (modern + museum DNA and GenBank entries). A scale to infer the number of sequences for each pie (i.e., haplotype) was provided together with a length bar to compute the number of mutational changes. The colour of each country and the number of each haplotype are indicated. See Table S1 for more details. B, Mismatch Distributions (MD) of the mtDNA pairwise differences (dotted: observed; line: expected) calculated for South East Asia haplogroup (Fig. 3A). Estimates of FS and R2 statistics (with related P values), r (raggedness index) and the outcome of SSD and SSD* test under a model (H0) of sudden demographic and spatial population expansion, respectively, are provided.

Fig. 2 in Spatial genetic structure in the vulnerable smooth-coated otter (Lutrogale perspicillata, Mustelidae): towards an adaptive conservation management of the species

Fig. 2. Photos of MNHN-ZM-MO-2001-350, L. p. perspicillata holotype resident in the mammal collection of the National Museum of Natural History of Paris, France. A, right side, lateral view (bar length = 20 cm); B, left forelimb, lateral view; C, basement, in French "Lutra perspicillata = Lutra leptonix Horsf., loutre de Java par m Diard, mai 1821, la tête est au lab d'anatomie", which can be translated into and interpreted as: "Lutra perspicillata = Lutra leptonix (Horsfield, 1824), Java otter from M. Diard, May 1821, skull is in the lab of anatomy" (see also Material and Methods). Photos courtesy and copyright: © MNHN - RECOLNAT - Laura Flamme - 2014.

Fig. 1 in Spatial genetic structure in the vulnerable smooth-coated otter (Lutrogale perspicillata, Mustelidae): towards an adaptive conservation management of the species

Fig. 1. Lutrogale perspicillata distribution (in yellow; see insets for Iraq and Pakistan) including sampling localities of modern (white circles) and museum (green squares) individuals. As far as the latter are concerned, we reported only sites for which samples were successfully investigated (see Table S1 for the entire sample size of this study; symbol "?" stands for unknown locality). The white stars indicate, in Iraq, the locality (TaqTaq, Kurdistan) where the sample of Omer et al. (2012) was collected, in Cambodia/Thailand and Malaysia, the country/ies of origin of EF472348 and KY117557 GenBank sequence, respectively. In Iraq, Pakistan, and supposedly Java, Indonesia, the green squares indicate localities (when known) of L. p. maxwelli, L. p. sindica, and L. p. perspicillata museum holotypes, respectively. Finally, Naga Hills at the border between Myanmar and India as well as Bahoo-Kalat River Basin between Iran and Pakistan are indicated (see text for more details). The species' geographic range was adapted from IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) 2015. Lutrogale perspicillata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019-3 was modified using CorelDraw!12 (2003). Digital images (insets) were obtained from Google Earth 7.1.5.1557 (2015 Google Inc.) and Google Earth map data (Data SIO, NOAA, U.S. Navy, NGA, GEBCO - Image Landsat). Please note that thick dotted lines mark out new borders for L. p. sindica and L. p. perspicillata subspecies as established in this study (see text for more details).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2000View details →

Fig. 51 in Hybridization Among Western Whiptail Lizards (Cnemidophorus Tigris) In Southwestern New Mexico: Population Genetics, Morphology, And Ecology In Three Contact Zones

Fig. 51. Electrophoretic phenotypes of proteins of several subspecies of C. tigris. Left. ESTD polymorphism in C. t. septentrionalis. The fluorescent patterns were photographed in ultraviolet light. Right. Banding patterns of PGM2 that distinguish septentrionalis (SEP, genotype cc) from punctilinealis (PUN genotype dd), marmoratus (MAR, genotype dd), and aethiops (genotype dd, not illustrated). Arrows indicate sites of sample application; anode is to the right.