Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Predicting size at first sexual maturity from length/weight relationship: a case study with an Amazonian catfish

Fig. 2. Length/weight relationship of male Auchenipterichthys longimanus. A and C represent Huxley regular length/weight relationship and its distribution of proportional residuals. B and D represent polyphasic length/weight relationship its and distribution of proportional residuals.

Fig. 1 in Predicting size at first sexual maturity from length/weight relationship: a case study with an Amazonian catfish

Fig. 1. Sampling area in the National Forest of Caxiuanã, Pará State, showing the rivers where the fish were collected; Curuá River - Ferreira Penna Research Station (ECFPn), Caxiuanã River; Puraquequara River and Caquajó River. A single point on the map may represent more than one colleting site.

Fig. 4 in Predicting size at first sexual maturity from length/weight relationship: a case study with an Amazonian catfish

Fig. 4. Frequency of mature individuals as a function of the total length. Female sexual maturity identified by visual inspection of ovarian (A) and G SI values (B). Male sexual maturity identified by visual inspection of testes (C) and G SI values (D).

Fig. 3 in Predicting size at first sexual maturity from length/weight relationship: a case study with an Amazonian catfish

Fig. 3. Length/weight relationship of female Auchenipterichthys longimanus. A and C represent Huxley regular length/ weight relationship and its distribution of proportional residuals. B and D represent polyphasic length/weight relationship its and distribution of proportional residuals.

FIGURE 6 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 6. Box-plots of Von Mises stress distributions when Quasi-Ideal Meshes (QUIM) are assumed for the 20 Cingulata mandibles analysed. The 80% of the values of the Von Mises stress distribution are represented between the upper and lower whiskers

FIGURE 3 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 3. Evolution of the values of Arithmetic Mean (AM), Mesh-Weighted Arithmetic Mean (MWAM), Median (M), Mesh-Weighted Median (MWM), Percentage Error of the Arithmetic Mean (PEofAM) and Percentage Error of the Median (PEofM) in front of the size of the elements (1) and the uniformity of the mesh (2). Meshes from a Chlamyphorus truncates. S07 refers to Mesh S7 (mesh size), SE refers to Mesh SE (mesh homogeneity).

FIGURE S2 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE S2. Map of Von Mises stress distribution in the six meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of the homogeneity of the mesh.

FIGURE 2 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 2. Six meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of the homogeneity of the mesh.

FIGURE 1 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 1. Twelve meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of size of the elements in the mesh.

FIGURE 5 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 5. Evolution of the box-plots of the Von Mises stress distribution. X-axes refers to meshes S01 to S12: the size of the elements (1); and meshes SA to SF: the uniformity of the mesh (2). Meshes from a Chlamyphorus truncates.

FIGURE 4 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE 4. Evolution of the convergence error of each iteration of Arithmetic Mean (AM), Mesh-Weighted Arithmetic Mean (MWAM), Median (M), Mesh-Weighted Median (MWM) in front of the number of nodes (1) and the percentage of Refined Area (percent value of area with homogeneous mesh) (2). Meshes from a Chlamyphorus truncates. S07 refers to Mesh S7 (mesh size), SE refers to Mesh SE (mesh homogeneity).

FIGURE S1 in Accounting for differences in element size and homogeneity when comparing Finite Element Models: Armadillos as a case study

FIGURE S1. Map of Von Mises stress distribution in the 12 meshes of Chlamyphorus truncates obtained when evaluating the influence of size of the elements in the mesh.

FIGURE 10. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 10. 1, Trackway Gl6; 2, Close up of the Gl6-Pd interference; 3, Interpretative drawing of Gl6-Pd interference; 4, Orthophoto of trackway Gl6; 5, Shaded grey photogrammetric model of the interference. White arrows and letters a, b and c indicate interruption (a), displacement (b) of the tail trace, and trackway Gl6 last set (c). Scale bar is 5 cm.

FIGURE 9. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 9. 1, Drawing of different parts making up the slab; 2, 3D photogrammetric false coloured model; 3, 3D photogrammetric shaded grey model. Scale bar is 0,5 m.

FIGURE 8 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 8. Slab MPUR NS 34/28. 1, Interference between trackways Gl4 and Pd indicating the relative antecedence of Gl4 trackmaker; 2, Trackway Pd, sets 2 and 3 interfering with Gl2, Gl4, Gl5 and Jb trackways. Scale bar is 5 cm.

FIGURE 7 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 7. Slab MPUR NS 34/28. 1, Swimming traces (indicated by black and white arrows) belonging to trackway Gl1; 2-3, Close-up of the best Gl1 tracks. Scale bar is 5 cm (1) and 1 cm (2-3).

FIGURE 4. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 4. 1, Ganasauripus ladinus; 2, Pachypes dolomiticus manus; 3-4, Pachypes dolomiticus pedes. Scale bar is 1 cm (1) and 5 cm (2-4). Roman numerals refer to digits.

FIGURE 5. Event timeline. 1 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 5. Event timeline. 1, Ripple marks and Gl1 tracks formation; 2, Gl2 and Gl3 tracks formation; 3; Gl4 trackway formation; 4, Jb trackway formation; 5, Gl5 and Ct1 trackways formation; 6, Ct2 trackway formation; 7, Gl6 and Gl7 trackways formation; 8, Pd trackway formation; 9, Final interpretative drawing of the slab MPUR NS 34/28; 10, Trackmakers advancement directions. rip, ripple marks; Pd, Pachypes dolomiticus trackway; Ct1-Ct2, Chelichnus tazelwürmi trackways; Gl1-Gl7, Ganasauripus ladinus trackways; Jb, Janusichnus bifrons trackway; dcr,? desiccation cracks. Scale bar is 50 cm.

FIGURE 6 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 6. Slab MPUR NS 34/28. 1, Ripple marks counterprints; 2, Interference between ripple marks counterprints and Gl7 trackway. Scale bar is 5 cm.

FIGURE 3. 1-2 in Unveiling trampling history through trackway interferences and track preservational features: a case study from the Bletterbach gorge (Redagno, Western Dolomites, Italy)

FIGURE 3. 1-2, Chelichnus tazelwürmi; 3, Janusichnus bifrons; 4, Ganasauripus ladinus. Scale bar is 1 cm. Roman numerals refer to digits.