Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedOct 2016View details →

Figure 4 in A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of the suborder Cavernicola within the Tricladida (Platyhelminthes), with the description of a new species of stygobiont flatworm from Benin

Figure 4. Novomitchellia bursaelongata Harrath, Sluys & Riutort, sp. nov. Sagittal reconstruction of the copulatory apparatus of the holotype. Abbreviations: A, atrium; BC, bursal canal; CB, copulatory bursa; COD, common oviduct; G, gonopore; GL, glands; M, mouth; OD, oviduct; PB, penis bulb; PH, pharynx; PP, penis papilla; VD, vas deferens. Scale bar = 150 µm.

opennotspecifiedOct 2016View details →

Figure 2 in A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of the suborder Cavernicola within the Tricladida (Platyhelminthes), with the description of a new species of stygobiont flatworm from Benin

Figure 2. Novomitchellia bursaelongata Harrath, Sluys & Riutort, sp. nov. Holotype. A, photograph of preserved specimen in dorsal view; some protuberances are seen on the head (arrowheads); arrow indicates the tail (T). B, photograph of preserved specimen in ventral view; arrow indicates the pharynx (PH). Scale bars not available.

opennotspecifiedNov 2016View details →

Figure 3 in What if the claws are reduced? Morphological and molecular phylogenetic relationships of the genus Haplomacrobiotus May, 1948 (Eutardigrada, Parachela)

Figure 3. Phylogenetic reconstruction (BI, Bayesian inference; ML, maximum likelihood), based on the combined data set (18S + 28S sequences) under the GTR+Γ model. Values in bold and above branches indicate posterior probability values (BI), whereas values under branches show bootstrap values (ML). Newly analysed specimens are set in bold.

Figure 6 in A scolopocryptopid centipede (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha) from Mexican amber: synchrotron microtomography and phylogenetic placement using a combined morphological and molecular data set

Figure 6. Single shortest cladogram for six genes and morphology in combination (14 570 steps) under parameter set 3221. Numbers above branches are jackknife frequencies> 50%. Navajo rugs (as explained in Fig. 5) for the six parameter sets shown below branches.

Figure 5 in A scolopocryptopid centipede (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha) from Mexican amber: synchrotron microtomography and phylogenetic placement using a combined morphological and molecular data set

Figure 5. Single shortest cladogram for six genes in combination (14 465 steps) under parameter set 3221. Numbers above branches are jackknife frequencies> 50%. Navajo rugs below branches depict monophyly (black) or nonmonophyly (white) of clades under the six parameter sets shown at left; grey box indicates monophyly in some but not all shortest cladograms.

Figure 4 in A scolopocryptopid centipede (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha) from Mexican amber: synchrotron microtomography and phylogenetic placement using a combined morphological and molecular data set

Figure 4. Strict consensus of nine best-fit cladograms based on morphological data in Table 2 under implied weights (k = 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). GC values> 50% shown above branches for concavity constant k = 3. Position of Scolopocryptops simojovelensis highlighted.

Figure 3 in A scolopocryptopid centipede (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha) from Mexican amber: synchrotron microtomography and phylogenetic placement using a combined morphological and molecular data set

Figure 3. Scolopocryptops simojovelensis sp. nov. Visualizations of synchrotron tomography data of holotype. A, B, dorsolateral and oblique anterodorsal views of head. C, ventral view of forcipules. D, lateral view of coxopleuron of left leg 23, anterior to left. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Figure 2 in A scolopocryptopid centipede (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha) from Mexican amber: synchrotron microtomography and phylogenetic placement using a combined morphological and molecular data set

Figure 2. Scolopocryptops simojovelensis sp. nov. Holotype AMNH Ch-SH7. A, nearly dorsal view of tergites 17–22; arrows on TT17 and 18 indicate complete paramedian sutures. B, dorsolateral view of tergites 17–20; inset shows anastomizing ridges parallel to posterior margin on tergite 19. C, dorsal view of segment 23, showing tergite (T23), coxopleural process (cp), dorsomedial spinose process (ds) and ventral spinose process (vs) of prefemur. D, dorsolateral view of leg pairs 21–23. Scale bars: A, B, D = 1 mm; C = 0.5 mm.

Figure 1 in A scolopocryptopid centipede (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha) from Mexican amber: synchrotron microtomography and phylogenetic placement using a combined morphological and molecular data set

Figure 1. Scolopocryptops simojovelensis sp. nov. Holotype AMNH Ch-SH7. A, dorsolateral view of complete specimen. B, distal part of right leg 20, showing tibial spur (ti) and tarsal spur (ta). C, dorsolateral view of cephalic plate and right antenna. D, distal part of tarsus and pretarsus of right leg 20, showing accessory spurs (ac). Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B = 0.5 mm; C = 1 mm; D = 0.1 mm.

Figure 3 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 3. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of the dataset containing all the 16S Aglaopheniidae sequences used in this study. Note that the part of the phylogenetic tree with all the branches of the Aglaophenia pluma complex is represented in a separate figure – Figure 5. Numbers near the nodes indicate the values of bootstrap (left) and posterior probabilities (right) in percentages. Values less than 70% are replaced by <; if equal to 100%, an asterisk is used instead. Values of bootstrap and posterior probabilities are omitted if both were less than 70% for the same node. The branch length indicator represents 0.1 substitutions per site.

Figure 5 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 5. Part of the phylogenetic tree of Figure 3 with all the branches of the Aglaophenia pluma complex represented. Numbers near the nodes indicate the values of bootstrap (left) and posterior probabilities (right) in percentages. Values less than 70% are replaced by <; if equal to 100%, an asterisk is used instead. Values of bootstrap and posterior probabilities are omitted if both were less than 70% for the same node. The branch length indicator represents 0.1 substitutions per site.

Figure 4 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 4. Hydrothecae of Aglaophenia species revealed as distinct by genetic data: A, Aglaophenia sp. 1 from deep waters of the Azores; B, Aglaophenia sp. 2 from coastal waters of Madeira. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. Credits: C. J. Moura.

Figure 2 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 2. Map of the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean with representation of the sites with Aglaopheniidae haplotypes sampled specifically for this study.

Figure 1 in A molecular phylogenetic appraisal of the systematics of the Aglaopheniidae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa, Leptothecata) from the north-east Atlantic and west Mediterranean

Figure 1. Examples of Aglaopheniidae colonies: A, Gymnangium montagui off Berlengas – west Portugal; B, Macrorhynchia philippina off Madeira island; C, undetermined Aglaophenia species off Madeira. Credits: C. J. Moura.

Figure 11 in Molecular phylogenetics and complementary geographical distributions of species of the Western Australian land snail genera Plectorhagada Iredale, 1933 and Strepsitaurus Solem, 1997 (Gastropoda: Camaenidae)

Figure 11. Reproductive system (A) and penial anatomy (B) of Plectorhagada teres sp. nov. Abbreviations: dg, prostate; e, epiphalus caecum; gd, hermaphroditic duct; gg, albumen gland; p, penis; pp, U-shaped pilaster; rm, retractor muscle; s, spermatheca; ut, uterus; uv, oviduct; v, vagina; vd, vas deferens; y, atrium. All notations follow Solem (1997).

Figure 12 in Molecular phylogenetics and complementary geographical distributions of species of the Western Australian land snail genera Plectorhagada Iredale, 1933 and Strepsitaurus Solem, 1997 (Gastropoda: Camaenidae)

Figure 12. Shells of Strepsitaurus milyeringus (A–C), and holotypes of Strepsitaurus susieae sp. nov. (D–F) and Strepsitaurus manduensis sp. nov. (G–I).

Figure 10 in Molecular phylogenetics and complementary geographical distributions of species of the Western Australian land snail genera Plectorhagada Iredale, 1933 and Strepsitaurus Solem, 1997 (Gastropoda: Camaenidae)

Figure 10. Upper spire of holotype (A) and paratypes (B, site PSB; C, site PSJ) of Plectorhagada teres sp. nov., illustrating its lack of sculpture compared with Plectorhagada scolythra (D, site PSH; E, site PSF) and Plectorhagada carcharias (F, site PCF).

Figure 9 in Molecular phylogenetics and complementary geographical distributions of species of the Western Australian land snail genera Plectorhagada Iredale, 1933 and Strepsitaurus Solem, 1997 (Gastropoda: Camaenidae)

Figure 9. Shells of holotype of Plectorhagada teres sp. nov. (A–C), compared with Plectorhagada scolythra from site PSI (D–F) and Plectorhagada carcharias from site PCD (G–I).

opennotspecifiedApr 2021View details →

FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogenetics of Pterocyclus (Apiaceae) based on nrDNA ITS sequences: revised circumscription with a restored species

FIGURE 1. Consensus tree obtained from maximum likelihood analysis of sixty-three nrDNA ITS sequences. Numbers above and below nodes are bootstrap support and posterior probability presented as percentages, respectively. The newly sampled accessions are shown in bold.