Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,101
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,101 results for “tables”
Table 1 in Newly Discovered Gastropod Hosts of Japanese Cytaeis Species (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa)
<p>Table 1. Data of newly collected hydrozoan specimens sequenced in this study</p><table><tbody><tr><th>DDBJ accession</th><th>Host gastropods</th><th>Locality</th><th>Depth</th><th>Date</th><th>Sampling methods</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>LC744778</th><td><i>Nassarius splendidulus</i></td><td>Off Kou-yatsu, Tateyama, Chiba,</td><td>15–20 m</td><td>7 July, 2021</td><td>Dredge by R/V Seastar*</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Japan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LC744779</th><td><i>Nassarius splendidulus</i></td><td>Off Saneku, Kakeroma-jima,</td><td>12–19 m</td><td>8 November, 2017</td><td>Scuba**</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Kagoshima, Japan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LC744780</th><td><i>Nassarius albescens</i></td><td>Rocky shore in vicinity of</td><td>0 m</td><td>17 April, 2018</td><td>Baited trap**</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Tokashiki harbor, Tokashiki-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>jima, Okinawa, Japan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LC744781</th><td><i>Nassarius albescens</i></td><td>Rocky shore in vicinity of</td><td>0 m</td><td>17 April, 2018</td><td>Baited trap**</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Tokashiki harbor, Tokashiki-</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>jima, Okinawa, Japan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LC744782</th><td><i>Vexillum exasperatum</i></td><td>Southeast of Hatoma-jima,</td><td>12–15 m</td><td>13 April, 2019</td><td>Scuba***</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Okinawa, Japan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LC744783</th><td><i>Vexillum exasperatum</i></td><td>Southeast of Hatoma-jima,</td><td>12–15 m</td><td>13 April, 2019</td><td>Scuba***</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Okinawa, Japan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LC744784</th><td><i>Argyropeza izekiana</i></td><td>Off Minami-Izu, Shizuoka, Japan</td><td>100–110 m</td><td>12 November, 2015</td><td>Dredge by R/V Tsukuba II****</td></tr><tr><th>LC744785</th><td><i>Argyropeza izekiana</i></td><td>Off Minami-Izu, Shizuoka, Japan</td><td>100–110 m</td><td>12 November, 2015</td><td>Dredge by R/V Tsukuba II****</td></tr><tr><th>LC744786</th><td><i>Sagamilepeta sagamiensis</i></td><td>Off Jogashima, Miura,</td><td>90–100 m</td><td>20 January, 2015</td><td>Dredge by R/V Rinkaimaru****</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Kanagawa, Japan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>LC744787</th><td><i>Sagamilepeta sagamiensis</i></td><td>Off Jogashima, Miura,</td><td>90–100 m</td><td>20 January, 2015</td><td>Dredge by R/V Rinkaimaru****</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>Kanagawa, Japan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table><p>*: Survey by third author (lSeastarz, research vessel of Ochanomizu University).</p><p>**: Surveys undertaken by KUROSHIO project of the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba.</p><p>***: Survey by third author and T. Naruse (Iriomote Station, the University of the Ryukyus).</p><p>****: Surveys performed by JAMBIO (the Japan Association for Marine Biology conducted by the University of Tsukuba and the University of Tokyo). (lTsukuba IIz, research vessel of Shimoda Marine Research Center, the University of Tsukuba; lRinkaimaruz, research vessel of Misaki Marine Biological Station, the University of Tokyo).</p>
Metabolomics Peak Tables of push-pull and control field maize tissue extracts
<p>Data tables of the WP3 maize extracts of the UPSCALE project. Fragment spectra are provided as mgf files.</p>
Table S1. Dataset of the digitized dye molecules along with their experimental λmax
<p>Dye molecules provided by Eastman Chemical company along with their experimental maximum absorption wavelength</p>
Table 1 in Momordica charantia L. extracts against Aedes aegypti larvae
<p><b>Table 1.</b> Duration of development (A) and mortality (B) of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> in L3 larvae treated in a rearing environment with crude ethyl acetate extract (AcOEt) from the flowers and fruits of Momordica charantia.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>Application</b></th><th colspan="2"><b>Larval (days)</b></th><th></th><th></th><th><b>Pupal (days)</b></th><th></th><th colspan="2"><b>L3-Adult (days)</b></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><b>1A</b></th><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td></td><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td></td><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Control</th><td>12.2±2a</td><td>4-15</td><td></td><td>1.7±0.5a</td><td>1-3</td><td></td><td>13.5±1.8a</td><td>5-16</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Testimony</th><td>11±2b</td><td>6-14</td><td></td><td>2.3±0.7b</td><td>1-4</td><td></td><td>13±1.9ab</td><td>9-15</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>100 µg/mL</th><td>7±1.2c****</td><td>5-8</td><td></td><td>2.8±0.9b</td><td>2-5</td><td></td><td>11±1.8c***</td><td>8-13</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>200 µg/mL</th><td>10±1.4bc</td><td>9-11</td><td></td><td>3±1.4b</td><td>2-4</td><td></td><td>13±2.8ab</td><td>11-15</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><b>L3</b></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>L4</b></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>Pupa</b></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><b>1B</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td><b>%</b></td><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td><b>%</b></td><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td><b>%</b></td></tr><tr><th>Control</th><td>0 ± 0a</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0.3 ± 0.5</td><td>13-13</td><td>1.7</td></tr><tr><th>Testimony</th><td>0 ± 0ab</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>100 µg/mL</th><td>17 ± 1.0c***</td><td>2-7</td><td>86.7</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>200 µg/mL</th><td>19 ± 1.0d***</td><td>2-5</td><td>96.7</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Experiments with 20 <i>A. aegypti</i> larvae (L3) for each test and control group were performed in triplicate and with three repetitions. Mean and standard deviation (X ±SD).Range (R). Values followed by the same letter do not present significant differences. Significance levels through the Tukey test, represented as ****P<0.0001; ***P<0.0001.</p>
Table 3 in Momordica charantia L. extracts against Aedes aegypti larvae
<p><b>Table 3.</b> Duration of the development (A) and mortality (B) of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> in L3 larvae treated in a rearing environment with crude methanol (MeOH) extract from the flowers and fruits of <i>Momordica charantia</i>.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>Application</b></th><th colspan="2">Larval (days)</th><th></th><th colspan="2">Pupal (days)</th><th></th><th colspan="2"><b>L3-Adult (days)</b></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><b>3A</b></th><td>X ± SD</td><td>R</td><td></td><td>X ± SD</td><td>R</td><td></td><td>X ± SD</td><td><b>R</b></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Control</th><td>13.2±1.9a</td><td>5-16</td><td></td><td>1.7±0.6a</td><td>1-3</td><td></td><td>14.5±1.8a</td><td>6-17</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Testimony</th><td>11.8±1.9b</td><td>6-14</td><td></td><td>1.6±0.6b</td><td>1-4</td><td></td><td>13.5±1.8b</td><td>7-16</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>100 µg/mL</th><td>11.2±1.9b</td><td>7-13</td><td></td><td>2.1±0.4c**</td><td>2-4</td><td></td><td>13.4±1.7b</td><td>9-15</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>200 µg/mL</th><td>8.5±0.9c****</td><td>7-11</td><td></td><td>4.5±2.2d****</td><td>1-7</td><td></td><td>13±2.5b</td><td>9-15</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td>L3</td><td></td><td></td><td>L4</td><td></td><td></td><td><b>Pupa</b></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><b>3B</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td><b>%</b></td><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td><b>%</b></td><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td><b>%</b></td></tr><tr><th>Control</th><td>0a</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0a</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0.3 ± 0.5a</td><td>13-13</td><td>1.7</td></tr><tr><th>Testimony</th><td>0ab</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0ab</td><td>0</td><td>0</td><td>0ab</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>100µg/mL</th><td>0.3 ± 0.5ab</td><td>1-1</td><td>1.7</td><td>2 ± 3ab</td><td>6-6</td><td>10</td><td>0.3 ± 0.5ab</td><td>1-1</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><th>200µg/mL</th><td>13 ± 4c***</td><td>1-6</td><td>70</td><td>1 ± 0ab</td><td>1-2</td><td>8.3</td><td>1 ± 1ab</td><td>2-2</td><td>1.7</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Experiments with 20 <i>Ae. aegypti</i> larvae (L3) for each test and control group were performed in triplicate and with three repetitions. Mean and standard deviation (X ± SD).Range (R). Values followed by the same letter do not present significant differences.Significance levels through the Tukey test, represented as **** P<0.0001; ***P<0.001; **P <0.01 vs testimony control MeOH:DMSO (1:3).</p>
Table 2 in Momordica charantia L. extracts against Aedes aegypti larvae
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Duration of development (A) and mortality (B) of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> in L3 larvae treated in a rearing environment with crude ethyl acetate extract (AcOEt) from the flowers and fruits of Momordica charantia.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>Application</b></th><th colspan="2"><b>Larval (days)</b></th><th></th><th colspan="2"><b>Pupal (days)</b></th><th></th><th colspan="2"><b>L3-Adult (days)</b></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><b>2A</b></th><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td></td><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td></td><td><b>X ± SD</b></td><td><b>R</b></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Control</th><td>11.7±4.8ª</td><td>2-23</td><td></td><td>2.8±0.7a</td><td>1-5</td><td></td><td>14.4±4.9a</td><td>5-25</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Testimony</th><td>12.5±3.1ab</td><td>7-19</td><td></td><td>2.9±0.6ab</td><td>2-4</td><td></td><td>15.3±3.3ab</td><td>9-22</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>1 µg/mL</th><td>13.1±4.4ab</td><td>5-22</td><td></td><td>2.4±0.8ac*</td><td>1-4</td><td></td><td>15.7±4.5ab</td><td>8-24</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>10 µg/mL</th><td>10±1.9ac**</td><td>7-15</td><td></td><td>3±1.5ab</td><td>1-9</td><td></td><td>12.9±2.8ac*</td><td>8-21</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>50 µg/mL</th><td>8.1±1.7c****</td><td>5-11</td><td></td><td>2.6±0.8ab</td><td>1-4</td><td></td><td>10.8±1.9d****</td><td>8-14</td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td><b>L3</b></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>L4</b></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>Pupa</b></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><b>2B</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th></th><td>X ± SD</td><td>R</td><td>%</td><td>X ± SD</td><td>R</td><td>%</td><td>X ± SD</td><td>R</td><td><b>%</b></td></tr><tr><th>Control</th><td>0.3 ± 0.5ª</td><td>1-1</td><td>3.3</td><td>0.3 ± 0.5a</td><td>1-1</td><td>1.7</td><td>0.3 ± 0.5a</td><td>1-1</td><td>1.7</td></tr><tr><th>Testimony</th><td>0.3 ± 0.5ab</td><td>1-1</td><td>1.7</td><td>0a</td><td>0-0</td><td>0</td><td>1 ± 0a</td><td>1-1</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><th>1 µg/mL</th><td>1 ± 1ab</td><td>1-3</td><td>6.7</td><td>2 ± 2a</td><td>1-4</td><td>10</td><td>0a</td><td>0</td><td>0</td></tr><tr><th>10 µg/mL</th><td>2 ± 3ab</td><td>1-5</td><td>10</td><td>1.2 ± 1a</td><td>1-2</td><td>5</td><td>0.3 ± 0.5a</td><td>1-1</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><th>50 µg/mL</th><td>8 ± 4c**</td><td>3-12</td><td>40</td><td>3 ± 0.5a</td><td>2-3</td><td>13.3</td><td>0.3 ± 0.5a</td><td>1-1</td><td>3.5</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Experiments with 20 <i>A. aegypti</i> larvae (L3) for each test and control group were performed in triplicate and with three repetitions. Mean and standard deviation (X ±SD).Range (R). Values followed by the same letter do not present significant differences. Significance levels through the Tukey test, represented as ****P<0.0001; **P<0.01; *P<0.1 vs testimony control AcOEt:DMSO (1:3).</p>
TABLE 1 in First evidence of cannibalism in Crassimurex (s. s.) calcitrapa (Lamarck, 1803) (Gastropoda, Muricidae) from the Lutetian of the Paris Basin (France)
<p>TABLE 1. — Characteristics of the specimens of <i>C.</i> (<i>s. s.</i>) <i>calcitrapa</i> (Lamarck, 1803) bearing drill holes. The star (<b>*</b>) indicates the specimens bearing two drill holes.</p><table><thead><tr><th>Specimens number</th><th>Specimen lenght mm</th><th>Number of teleoconch whorls</th><th>Drilled whorl</th><th>Diameter of hole (in mm)</th><th>Complete or not</th><th>Location of the hole</th><th>Comment on the location of the holes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91214</th><td>19.38</td><td>5 incomplete</td><td>Fifth</td><td>1.20</td><td>No</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the shoulder, near the suture</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91213</th><td>18.47</td><td>5 incomplete</td><td>Fifth</td><td>1.05</td><td>No</td><td>Apertural side</td><td>On the varix</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91212</th><td>12.87*</td><td>4 incomplete</td><td>Third</td><td>0.8</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>In an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91212</th><td>12.87*</td><td>4 incomplete</td><td>Fourth</td><td>0.6</td><td>No</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the shoulder, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91211</th><td>10.69*</td><td>4 incomplete</td><td>Fourth</td><td>0.95</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the shoulder, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91211</th><td>10.69*</td><td>4 incomplete</td><td>Third</td><td>1.00</td><td>No</td><td>Adapertural side</td><td>On the top of the whorl, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91210</th><td>7.06</td><td>3 incomplete</td><td>1-2th (suture)</td><td>1.20</td><td>Yes</td><td>Adapertural side</td><td>On the suture, in an intervarice, single hole with two opening</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91209</th><td>4.45*</td><td>5</td><td>Fourth</td><td>0.4</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the top of the whorl, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91209</th><td>4.45*</td><td>5</td><td>Third</td><td>0.25</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the suture, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91208</th><td>4.37</td><td>3.5</td><td>1.5th</td><td>0.10</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the shoulder, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91207</th><td>3.15</td><td>3.5</td><td>Third</td><td>0.35</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the top of the whorl, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91206</th><td>3.43</td><td>3</td><td>2-3th (suture)</td><td>0.10</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>Near the shoulder, in an intervarice, single hole with two openings</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91205</th><td>3.30</td><td>3.25</td><td>Third</td><td>0.50</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the centre of the whorl, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91204</th><td>3.95</td><td>1.5</td><td>Second</td><td>0.85</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>On the top of the whorl, in an intervarice, large hole</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91203</th><td>3.25</td><td>2.5</td><td>Beginning of the first</td><td>0.60</td><td>Yes</td><td>Adapertural side</td><td>On the centre of the whorl, in an intervarice</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91202</th><td>3.10</td><td>2.5</td><td>Protoconch/ first (suture)</td><td>0.70</td><td>Yes</td><td>Abapertural side</td><td>In an intervarice, single hole with two openings</td></tr><tr><th>MNHN.F.A91201</th><td>2.50</td><td>1.5</td><td>First</td><td>0.40</td><td>Yes</td><td>Apertural side</td><td>In an intervarice</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Mitochondrial DNA reveals the impact of Pleistocene glaciations on a widespread palearctic bat species
<p><b>Table 1</b> Average values of detected genetic p-distances (±SD) in percentage per lineage of <i>H. savii</i> s.l. according to used marker set</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th></th><th>A</th><th>B</th><th>C</th><th>D</th><th>E</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>A</th><td>ND1:</td><td>0.46± 0.12</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CytB:</td><td>0.32± 0.21</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>COI:</td><td>0.28± 0.24</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>16 S:</td><td>0.13± 0.11</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>B</th><td>ND1:</td><td>9.14± 0.28</td><td>0.47± 0.57</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CytB:</td><td>8.03± 1.31</td><td>1.68± 0.96</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>COI:</td><td>7.90± 0.24</td><td>0.18± 0.19</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>16 S:</td><td>3.90± 0.27</td><td>0.34± 0.41</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>C</th><td>ND1:</td><td>6.79± 0.51</td><td>8.46± 0.35</td><td>0.62 ±0.68</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CytB:</td><td>8.27± 0.68</td><td>9.01± 1.06</td><td>1.44 ±0.71</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>COI:</td><td>7.36± 0.25</td><td>8.92± 0.24</td><td>0.83 ±0.61</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>16 S:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>D</th><td>ND1:</td><td>9.19± 0.30</td><td>9.12± 0.24</td><td>8.55 ±0.64</td><td>0.42±0.54</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CytB:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>COI:</td><td>8.91± 0.18</td><td>7.36± 0.28</td><td>10.15 ±0.38</td><td>0</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>16 S:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>E</th><td>ND1:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td></tr><tr><td>CytB:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td></tr><tr><td>COI:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td></tr><tr><td>16 S:</td><td>12.8± 0.65</td><td>11.81 ±0.89</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>0.59± 0.30</td></tr><tr><th>X</th><td>ND1:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td></tr><tr><td>CytB:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td></tr><tr><td>COI:</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>/</td></tr><tr><td>16 S:</td><td>4.62± 0.23</td><td>5.12± 0.29</td><td>/</td><td>/</td><td>9.97± 0.31</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 3. Uncorrected p in A New Species of Murina (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Yunnan, China
<p><b>Table 3.</b> Uncorrected <i>p</i> -distances (%) between species calculated from 657 bp COI gene fragment. Values less than or equal to <i>p</i> -distances between our specimen and <i>M. chrysochaetes</i> are underlined.</p><table><thead><tr><th>No.</th><th>Taxon</th><th>1</th><th>2</th><th>3</th><th>4</th><th>5</th><th>6</th><th>7</th><th>8</th><th>9</th><th>10</th><th>11</th><th>12</th><th>13</th><th>14</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>1</th><td><i>M. yuanyang</i> sp. Nov. (KIZ20230415)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>2</th><td><i>M. yuanyang</i> sp. Nov. (KIZ20230424)</td><td>0.0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>3</th><td><i>M. yuanyang</i> sp. Nov. (KIZ20230426)</td><td>0.0</td><td>0.0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>4</th><td><i>M. yuanyang</i> sp. Nov. (KIZ20230449)</td><td>0.0</td><td>0.0</td><td>0.0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>5</th><td><i>M. yuanyang</i> sp. Nov. (KIZ20230492)</td><td>0.0</td><td>0.0</td><td>0.0</td><td>0.0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>6</th><td><i>M. yuanyang</i> sp. Nov. (KIZ20230498)</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>7</th><td><i>M. chrysochaetes</i></td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>3.0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>8</th><td><i>M. harpioloides</i></td><td>9.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.0</td><td>9.3</td><td>9.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>9</th><td><i>M. eleryi</i></td><td>16.3</td><td>16.3</td><td>16.3</td><td>16.3</td><td>16.3</td><td>16.3</td><td>17.2</td><td>16.5</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>10</th><td><i>M. leucogaster</i></td><td>17.0</td><td>17.0</td><td>17.0</td><td>17.0</td><td>17.0</td><td>17.4</td><td>16.9</td><td>16.0</td><td>16.6</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>11</th><td><i>M. rongjiangensis</i></td><td>16.6</td><td>16.6</td><td>16.6</td><td>16.6</td><td>16.6</td><td>16.9</td><td>17.0</td><td>16.0</td><td>15.7</td><td>4.3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>12</th><td><i>M. shuipuensis</i></td><td>17.5</td><td>17.5</td><td>17.5</td><td>17.5</td><td>17.5</td><td>17.8</td><td>17.7</td><td>16.4</td><td>16.1</td><td>2.6</td><td>4.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>13</th><td><i>M. gracilis</i></td><td>17.8</td><td>17.8</td><td>17.8</td><td>17.8</td><td>17.8</td><td>17.8</td><td>18.8</td><td>17.5</td><td>9.6</td><td>17.5</td><td>16.6</td><td>17.0</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>14</th><td><i>M. recondita</i></td><td>19.1</td><td>19.1</td><td>19.1</td><td>19.1</td><td>19.1</td><td>19.1</td><td>20.0</td><td>18.6</td><td>10.7</td><td>18.4</td><td>17.2</td><td>17.5</td><td>4.2</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 2 in A New Species of Murina (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Yunnan, China
<p><b>Table 2.</b> Species and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in phylogenetic reconstruction.</p><table><thead><tr><th><b>Taxon</b></th><th><b>Accession Number</b></th><th><b>Taxon</b></th><th><b>Accession Number</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><i>Harpiocephalus harpia</i></th><td>HM540274</td><td><i>Murina huttoni</i></td><td>JQ601452</td></tr><tr><th><i>Harpiola isodon</i></th><td>HM540286</td><td><i>Murina jaintiana</i></td><td>MF537346</td></tr><tr><th><i>Kerivoula kachinensis</i></th><td>MZ438743</td><td><i>Murina jinchui</i></td><td>MN549070</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina aenea</i></th><td>HM540928</td><td><i>Murina kontumensis</i></td><td>KT820760</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina annamitica</i></th><td>HM540969</td><td><i>Murina leucogaster</i></td><td>HM540988</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina balaensis</i></th><td>KY034093</td><td><i>Murina lorelieae</i></td><td>JN082179</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina chrysochaetes</i></th><td>HM540986</td><td><i>Murina peninsularis</i></td><td>HM540972</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina cyclotis</i></th><td>JF443973</td><td><i>Murina puta</i></td><td>KT982277</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina eleryi</i></th><td>KT762293</td><td><i>Murina recondita</i></td><td>KJ198687</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina feae</i></th><td>KF772778</td><td><i>Murina rongjiangensis</i></td><td>MN549085</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina fionae</i></th><td>HM540965</td><td><i>Murina rozendaali</i></td><td>KY034110</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina gracilis</i></th><td>KJ198567</td><td><i>Murina shuipuensis</i></td><td>JN082180</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina guilleni</i></th><td>KY034137</td><td><i>Murina suilla</i></td><td>KY034090</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina harpioloides</i></th><td>JF443974</td><td><i>Murina tubinaris</i></td><td>HM541000</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina harrisoni</i></th><td>MN549045</td><td><i>Murina ussuriensis</i></td><td>HQ974648</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina hilgendorfi</i></th><td>JF442833</td><td><i>Murina walstoni</i></td><td>HM540957</td></tr><tr><th><i>Murina hkakaboraziensis</i></th><td>MF537343</td><td><i>Myotis muricola</i></td><td>MW054913</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 2 in Mitochondrial DNA reveals the impact of Pleistocene glaciations on a widespread palearctic bat species
<p><b>Table 2</b> Estimated divergence times (in MYa) between mitochondrial lineages, obtained by BI analysis of the different marker datasets. Node heights (mean ages) are given, with 95% HPD intervals in square brackets. FIS indicates the first internal split within what we consider <i>H. savii</i> s.l. (including all four lineages – A, B, C and D), while SNN denotes the split from its nearest neighbour in the tree (most commonly <i>H. alaschanicus</i>). In the case of 16 S dataset, SNN does not include lineage E, as it is placed significantly more basal (see Fig. 2d). E is also excluded from <i>H. savii</i>, alongside X (Fig. 1c), in case of concatenated dataset. (C1, C2) refers to dating of the split within lineage C. Hstu – <i>H. stubbei</i>, Hara – <i>H. arabicus</i>, sc – sister clade</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>ND1</th><th>CytB</th><th>COI</th><th>16 S</th><th>Conc.</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>(A, C)</th><td>2.17 [1.62–2.70]</td><td>2.16 [1.75–2.60]</td><td>2.58 [1.94–3.30]</td><td></td><td>3.21 [2.56–3.89]</td></tr><tr><th>(A, B)</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>3.31 [2.13–4.52]</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>(B, D/Hstu)</th><td>2.38 [1.89–2.92]</td><td></td><td>2.54 [1.87–3.24]</td><td></td><td>3.12 [2.46–3.82]</td></tr><tr><th>(B, (A, C))</th><td></td><td>2.50 [2.08–2.94]</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>(C1,C2)</th><td>0.51 [0.32–0.70]</td><td>0.54 [0.36–0.73]</td><td>0.44 [0.24–0.66]</td><td></td><td>0.64 [0.43–0.85]</td></tr><tr><th>(E, sc)</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>11.18 [8.15–14.39]</td><td>9.93 [7.79–12.19]</td></tr><tr><th>(X, (A, B))</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>4.31 [2.97–5.76]</td><td></td></tr><tr><th>(X, Hara)</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>2.47 [0.00-5.44]</td></tr><tr><th>FIS</th><td>2.79 [2.32–3.28]</td><td></td><td>3.29 [2.67–3.95]</td><td></td><td>3.89 [3.22–4.62]</td></tr><tr><th>SNN</th><td>3.12 [2.58–3.67]</td><td>3.36 [2.81–3.93]</td><td>3.61 [2.95–4.34]</td><td>5.96 [4.68–7.37]</td><td>4.51 [3.72–5.30]</td></tr></tbody></table>
Pynbody ionisation fraction tables
<p>These files contain tables of equilibrium ionisation fractions calculated using cloudy and are automatically fetched by pynbody when required.</p> <p>For more information about the creation and use of these files see: https://pynbody.readthedocs.io/latest/reference/_autosummary/pynbody.analysis.ionfrac.html </p>
Supplemental Tables for thesis
<p>Supplemental data files for PhD thesis submitted to Birkbeck, University of London</p> <p>Title: <span><span><span>Using global genomic and transcriptomic approaches to explore host specificity and the role of non-coding RNA in the <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> complex</span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><span>Author: Jennifer Stiens</span></span></span></p>
Table 2 in Agistemus collyerae (Acari: Trombidiformes: Stigmaeidae) in South Africa: first record, introduction pathways and a re-description including additional life stages
<p><b>Table 2</b> <i>Agistemus collyerae</i> specimens detected on agricultural imports from other countries by South Africa.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>country</b></th><th><b>crop</b></th><th><b>commodity</b></th><th><b>import date(s)</b></th><th><b>specimens</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Yemen</th><td>citrus (unspecified <i>Citrus sp</i>.)</td><td>budwood</td><td>Aug 1991</td><td>1 female</td></tr><tr><th>Australia</th><td>mandarin orange (<i>Citrus reticulata</i>) nectarine (<i>Prunus persica var. nucipersica</i>) peach (<i>Prunus persica)</i> citrus (unspecified <i>Citrus sp.</i>)</td><td>budwood budwood budwood budwood</td><td>Jan 2013 Feb 2007, Jan 2010, Feb 2010 Jan 2010, Mar 2013 Jan 2010</td><td>2 deutonymphs 5 females, 6 males 2 females, 1 male 3 females</td></tr><tr><th>Italy</th><td>olive (<i>Olea europaea</i>)</td><td>rooted cuttings</td><td>Oct 2007</td><td>Unable to locate specimen</td></tr><tr><th>Spain</th><td>apricot (<i>Prunus armeniaca</i>) grapes (<i>Vitis vinifera)</i></td><td>fresh fruit fresh fruit</td><td>Jun 2009 Oct 2015</td><td>1 female 1 female</td></tr><tr><th>Chile</th><td>grapevine (<i>Vitis vinifera)</i></td><td>budwood</td><td>Mar 2014</td><td>1 female</td></tr><tr><th>USA</th><td>nectarine (Prunus persica var. nucipersica) peach (<i>Prunus persica)</i> citrus (unspecified C <i>itrus sp.</i>)</td><td>budwood budwood budwood</td><td>Nov 2010 Nov 2011, Jan 2012, Nov 2012 May 2016</td><td>2 females 2 females, 1 male 1 female</td></tr><tr><th>France</th><td>nectarine (<i>Prunus persica var. nucipersica</i>)</td><td>budwood</td><td>Jan 2017</td><td>1 female</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 8 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival
<p><i>Table 8.</i> Weekly survival estimate, standard error, and 95% confidence interval from the top model: {<i>Φ</i> (<i>g</i> + T4)}.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Estimate</th><th>SE</th><th>LCL</th><th>UCL</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>SF</th><td>0.914</td><td>0.021</td><td>0.864</td><td>0.947</td></tr><tr><th>TMMC</th><td>0.886</td><td>0.028</td><td>0.820</td><td>0.930</td></tr><tr><th>TB</th><td>0.972</td><td>0.020</td><td>0.891</td><td>0.993</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 2 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival
<p><i>Table 2.</i> Results for the significant generalized linear model of summed organohalogen contaminants (OH) controlling for group (SF = San Francisco, TB = Tomales Bay and TMMC = The Marine Mammal Center)</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Dependent</th><th>Model</th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>variable</th><td>parameter</td><td>Estimate</td><td>SE</td><td><i>t</i></td><td><i>P</i></td></tr><tr><th>OH</th><td>intercept</td><td>13.853</td><td>1.626</td><td>8.52</td><td><0.005</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>location_TB</td><td><i>−</i> 0.929</td><td>0.319</td><td><i>−</i> 2.91</td><td>0.006</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>location_TMMC</td><td><i>−</i> 1.706</td><td>0.226</td><td><i>−</i> 7.554</td><td><0.005</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>length</td><td><i>−</i> 0.047</td><td>0.019</td><td><i>−</i> 2.486</td><td>0.017</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in A New Species of Murina (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Yunnan, China
<p><b>Table 1.</b> List of cranial and dental measurements used in this study.</p><table><thead><tr><th>Character</th><th><b>Definitions</b></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>STOTL</th><td>total length of skull: from anterior rim of alveolus of I 2 to most projecting point of occipital region</td></tr><tr><th>GTL</th><td>greatest length of skull: from anterior aspect of I 2 to most prominent point of occipital region</td></tr><tr><th>CBL</th><td>condylobasal length: from exoccipital condyle to posterior rim of alveolus of I 2</td></tr><tr><th>CCL</th><td>condylocanine length: from exoccipital condyle to most anterior part of C 1</td></tr><tr><th>ZYW</th><td>zygomatic width: greatest width of skull across zygomatic arches</td></tr><tr><th>BCW</th><td>braincase width: greatest width of braincase</td></tr><tr><th>BCH</th><td>braincase height: skull placed horizontally, measuring from horizontal plane to highest point of cranium</td></tr><tr><th>IOW</th><td>interorbital width: least width of interorbital constriction</td></tr><tr><th>POW</th><td>width of postorbital constriction: least width of postorbital constriction</td></tr><tr><th>MAW</th><td>mastoid width: greatest distance across mastoid region</td></tr><tr><th>BOW</th><td>basioccipital width: least distance between cochleae</td></tr><tr><th>CM3L</th><td>upper canine–molar length: from anterior of C1 to posterior of M3 crown</td></tr><tr><th>IM3L</th><td>maxillary toothrow length: from anterior point of I2 to back of M3 crown</td></tr><tr><th>CP4L</th><td>upper canine–premolar length: from anterior of C1 to posterior of P4 crown</td></tr><tr><th>M1M3L</th><td>upper molar length: from anterior of first upper molar (M1) to posterior of M3</td></tr><tr><th>PWC1C1</th><td>anterior palatal width: least distance between inner borders of C1</td></tr><tr><th>PWM3M3</th><td>posterior palatal width: least distance between inner borders of M3</td></tr><tr><th>C1C1W</th><td>upper canine width: greatest width of outer borders of C1</td></tr><tr><th>M3M3W</th><td>upper molar greatest width: greatest width of outer borders of M3</td></tr><tr><th>MDL</th><td>greatest length of mandible: from anterior point of first lower incisor (I2) to most posterior part of condyle</td></tr><tr><th>ML</th><td>mandible length: from anterior rim of alveolus of I2 to most posterior part of condyle</td></tr><tr><th>CPH</th><td>coronoid process height: least distance from apex of coronoid process to indentation of lower border of ramus mandibula</td></tr><tr><th>CM3L</th><td>lower canine–molar length: from anterior of C1 to posterior of third lower molar (M3) crown</td></tr><tr><th>IM3L</th><td>mandibular toothrow length: from anterior point of I2 to back of M3 crown</td></tr><tr><th>CP4L</th><td>lower canine–premolar length: from anterior of lower canine to back of posterior P4 crown</td></tr><tr><th>M1M3L</th><td>lower molar length: from anterior of first lower molar (M1) to the posterior of M3.</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 1 in Acoustic documentation of temperate odontocetes in the Bering and Chukchi Seas
<p><i>Table 1.</i> Available data: a timeline of PALs deployed at four sites in the Bering and Chukchi Seas. “x” denotes data available for at least part of the year.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Site</th><th>2007</th><th>2008</th><th>2009</th><th>2010</th><th>2011</th><th>2012</th><th>2013</th><th>2014</th><th>2015</th><th>2016</th><th>2017</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>M2</th><td></td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td></td><td></td><td>x</td><td>x</td></tr><tr><th>M5</th><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td>x</td></tr><tr><th>M8</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>x</td><td>x</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>CH</th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>x</td><td>x</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 4 in Changes in a soil microarthropod community in the vicinity of dominant tree species under trampling management at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel
<p><b>Table 4</b> Correlation coefficients (Pearson correlation, <i>r</i>) between the abundance of microarthropods, diversity indices of soil Acari, and soil parameters at the Safari Zoological Center, Israel, December 2013. SM = soil moisture, OM = organic matter, pH = soil pH, SEC = soil electrical conductivity, SD = soil density, WHC = water-holding capacity <i>p</i>. <*0.05, ** <i>p</i> <0.01, *** <i>p</i> <0.001.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Index</b></th><th></th><th><b>SM</b></th><th><b>OM</b></th><th><b>pH</b></th><th><b>SEC</b></th><th><b>SD</b></th><th><b>WHC</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td>Acari</td><td>0.349*</td><td>0.068</td><td>-0.198</td><td>-0.506**</td><td>-0.299</td><td>0.571***</td></tr><tr><th>Abundance</th><td>Collembola Other soil arthropods</td><td>0.153 0.202</td><td>0.210 0.098</td><td>-0.486** -0.294</td><td>-0.506** -0.209</td><td>-0.107 -0.065</td><td>0.207 0.245</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>Total microarthropod</td><td>0.292</td><td>0.158</td><td>-0.403*</td><td>-0.574***</td><td>-0.233</td><td>0.445*</td></tr><tr><th>Diversity indices of Acari</th><td>Taxon richness Shannon index Simpson index</td><td>0.253 0.285 -0.006</td><td>0.023 0.032 -0.175</td><td>-0.098 -0.120 0.165</td><td>-0.392* -0.455** 0.240</td><td>-0.316 -0.293 -0.475**</td><td>0.561*** 0.585*** 0.336</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>Evenness index</td><td>0.387*</td><td>0.009</td><td>-0.203</td><td>-0.466**</td><td>-0.411*</td><td>0.739***</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table 3 in Harbor seal use of glacier ice and terrestrial haul-outs in the Kenai Fjords, Alaska
<p><i>Table 3.</i> Location-habitat categories, regions, and associated acronyms used in this study.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Acronyms</th></tr><tr><th>Fjord-Habitat</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Johnstone Bay Lake Ice</th><td>JBI</td></tr><tr><th>Johnstone Bay Land</th><td>JBL</td></tr><tr><th>Whidbey Bay Land</th><td>WBL</td></tr><tr><th>Day Harbor Land</th><td>DHL</td></tr><tr><th>Resurrection Bay Ice</th><td>RBI</td></tr><tr><th>Resurrection Bay Land</th><td>RBL</td></tr><tr><th>Aialik Bay Glacier Ice</th><td>AGI</td></tr><tr><th>Aialik Bay Land</th><td>AGL</td></tr><tr><th>Pedersen Glacier Ice</th><td>PGI</td></tr><tr><th>Pedersen Glacier Land</th><td>PGL</td></tr><tr><th>Northwestern Fjord Ice</th><td>NWFI</td></tr><tr><th>Northwestern Fjord Land</th><td>NWFL</td></tr><tr><th>McCarty Fjord Ice</th><td>MFI</td></tr><tr><th>McCarty Fjord Land</th><td>MFL</td></tr><tr><th>Regions</th><td></td></tr><tr><th>Resurrection Bay through Johnstone Bay</th><td>RB-JB</td></tr><tr><th>Aialik Bay</th><td>AB</td></tr><tr><th>Northwestern Fjord</th><td>NWF</td></tr><tr><th>McCarty Fjord</th><td>MCF</td></tr><tr><th>Southern Coast (McCarty Fjord-Harris Bay)</th><td>SC</td></tr></tbody></table>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.