Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 1 in Hydrogen peroxide is involved in drought stress long-distance signaling controlling early stomatal closure in tomato plants

Figure 1. Growth analysis of tomato BS II0020 grown in split-root scheme under full or partial irrigation. (a) fresh weight; (b) dry weight; (c) foliar area; (d) height. Control plants received full irrigation throughout the experiment. The values are the means of each treatment (n= 4), followed by the standard error. The letters over the bars represent the differences in the means between biochemical treatments within each condition, and the asterisks the differences of the same biochemical treatment between the conditions, calculated by Scott-knott test at 5% probability.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 7 in Hydrogen peroxide is involved in drought stress long-distance signaling controlling early stomatal closure in tomato plants

Figure 7. Schematic representation of the proposed model for the role of H 2O2 in drought stress responses in tomato plants before and after the decline in shoot turgor. Thus, when there is a mild drought stress, the H O produced by the roots can travel to the shoot 2 2 where it will induce stomatal closure and thus reduce water loss, even before there is a reduction in the leaves water status. On the other hand, when drought stress becomes severe, other signals become part of the drought response complex, such as hormones, pH changes and electrical current, among others. Currently, H O appears to exert a lesser effect on drought signaling. *Several signals, such 2 2 as hormones, chemical elements, reactive nitrogen species, electrical currents, hydraulic signals and pH changes (Christmann et al., 2013; Silva et al., 2015; Karuppanapandian et al., 2017; Huber et al., 2019; Fichman and Mittler, 2020; Mahmood et al., 2020).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 3 in Hydrogen peroxide is involved in drought stress long-distance signaling controlling early stomatal closure in tomato plants

Figure 3. Water relations of tomato BS II0020 grown in split-root scheme under full or partial irrigation. (a) relative water content; (b) total transpiration of plants throughout the evaluation period; (c) transpiration per cm2 of leaf area; (d) water use efficiency. Control plants received full irrigation throughout the experiment. The values are the means of each treatment (n= 4), followed by the standard error. The letters over the bars represent the differences in the means among biochemical treatments within each condition, and the asterisks the differences of the same biochemical treatment between the conditions, calculated by Scott-knott test at 5% probability.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Data used in "The Backscatter Gating method for time, energy, and position resolution characterization of long form factor organic scintillators" by Hunter N. Ratliff et al.

This repository contains the raw experimental and PHITS-simulated data used in the JINST article “The Backscatter Gating method for time, energy, and position resolution characterization of long form factor organic scintillators” by Hunter N. Ratliff et al., available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/07/P07002">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/07/P07002</a> (the accepted manuscript can also be found at <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3145287">https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3145287</a> and <a href="https://hratliff.com/publications/">https://hratliff.com/publications/</a>).   The data consists of three top-level directories, each with various subdirectories.  Within the “PHITS-simulated-data” directory are the PHITS simulations (including input and output files) used in producing Figures 4 and 5 in the manuscript, showing energy spectra in the bar for BSG events from a Cs-137 emission for placement of the source on the bar and on the BSG detector and with spacings between the bar and BSG detector of 20, 80, and 150 mm, along with the energy-dependent spatial distribution of these recoil electrons in the bar.   The other two top-level directories contain raw data produced by the CAEN CoMPASS software when acquiring data experimentally.  In the analysis for each measurement, the contents of the “RAW” folders were used.  The “Energy-calibrations-of-CeBr3” directory contains the energy spectra of the CeBr3 detector (used as the BSG detector) when exposed to a variety of radioactive sources, used together to energy-calibrate the CeBr3 detector.  The “Backscatter-gating-measurements” directory contains all of the list-mode data acquired with CoMPASS used for all of the other experimental measurements presented in the manuscript.  It contains subdirectories for varied sources, source positions along the bar, distances between the bar and BSG detector, measurements with the source affixed to the BSG detector instead, and a few miscellaneous measurements.  The “images” directories within each measurement’s directory (at the same level as the “RAW” folders) contain images produced by the analysis script written for this work used for diagnostics and presenting analyzed data.

Fig. 10 in Pseudamnicola Paulucci, 1878 (Caenogastropoda: Truncatelloidea) from the Aegean Islands: a long or short story?

Fig. 10 Penes of PseudVmnicolV: A–A Andros, E Naxos, F–G Tinos, H–K Khios (P. chiV), L–O Crete (P. WrVchiV), P–S Karpathos (P. pieperi) and T–Z Rhodes (T–W R02, X–Z R06); WVr represents 0.5 mm

Fig. 9 in Pseudamnicola Paulucci, 1878 (Caenogastropoda: Truncatelloidea) from the Aegean Islands: a long or short story?

Fig. 9 Renal and pallial section of the female reproductive organs of PseudVmnicolV chiV from Khios Island, locality CH02: Wc bursa copulatrix, cWc duct of bursa copulatrix, dgp gono-pericardial duct, gV albuminoid gland, gn nidamental gland, gp gonoporus, ov pallial oviduc, ovl loop of (renal) oviduct, rs receptaculum seminis, vc ventral canal

Fig. 11 in Pseudamnicola Paulucci, 1878 (Caenogastropoda: Truncatelloidea) from the Aegean Islands: a long or short story?

Fig. 11 Penes biometry (PCA) of PseudVmnicolV for main clades. PC1 explains 58.73 %, PC2 explains 18.52 %, cumulatively 77.25 %

Fig. 4 in Pseudamnicola Paulucci, 1878 (Caenogastropoda: Truncatelloidea) from the Aegean Islands: a long or short story?

Fig. 4 Geographical distribution of 16 recognised clades, based on COI analysis. Compare with Figs. 1 and 2

Fig. 3 in Pseudamnicola Paulucci, 1878 (Caenogastropoda: Truncatelloidea) from the Aegean Islands: a long or short story?

Fig. 3 The maximum-likelihood phylogram for the COI+16S rRNA+18S gene. The ML tree was rooted by using the AdrioinsulVnV conovulV. @ootstrap support (>75 %) and @ayesian posterior probabilities (>0.95) were shown. Division into 16 clades (potential species) and connotations with earlier described PseudVmnicolV species are also shown

Fig. 1 in Pseudamnicola Paulucci, 1878 (Caenogastropoda: Truncatelloidea) from the Aegean Islands: a long or short story?

Fig. 1 The maximum-likelihood phylogram (GTR+I+G, 10,000 bootstrap replicates) for the COI gene. The ML tree was rooted by using the AdrioinsulVnV conovulV. @ootstrap support is shown only if above 70 %. Division into 16 clades (potential species) and connotations with earlier described PseudVmnicolV species are also shown. Divergence times of main clades are also shown

Figure 5 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier survival curves depicting the proportion of bottlenose dolphins in zoological care surviving to each age (calculated in days, then transformed to years) during four time periods.

Figure 2 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 2. ASR (95% confidence intervals) of bottlenose dolphin calves <1 yr old in zoological care across historical time periods.

Figure 4 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 4. The population age structure for bottlenose dolphins in zoological care on the last day of each time period.

Figure 3 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 3. Survivorship to each age as calculated for age-at-death data for modern-day dolphins in zoological care and two wild populations.

Figure 1 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 1. ASR (95% confidence intervals) of bottlenose dolphins>1 yr old in zoological care across historical time periods.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

Datasets and code for Rapljenović et al. 2024: Adsorption of trace metals onto different plastics during long-term exposure in an estuarine environment: influence of time, stratified water column, and specific surface area

This repository contains datasets and R code to reproduce results from Rapljenović et al. 2024: Adsorption of trace metals onto different plastics during long-term exposure in an estuarine environment: influence of time, stratified water column, and specific surface area.

Fig. 1 in Long-term efficacy of two cricket and two liver diets for rearing laboratory fire ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Solenopsis invicta)

Fig. 1. Results of a 1 yr diet study using sugar water and either raw beef liver, raw chicken liver, or crickets to rear colonies of the imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta. A) Mean brood production rating of test colonies with brood: 4 = excel- lent, substantially more brood than workers; 3 = good, brood about equal to workers; 2 = poor, brood substantially less than workers; 1 = bad, only a little brood visible; and 0 = no brood. Colonies were fractionally rated if they ap- peared intermediate. Early in the study, about the end of Mar, we switched from domestic crickets (black squares) to banded crickets (crossed squares) and then back to domestic crickets (black squares) for 6 ant colonies on 6 Jun and then the remaining 7 colonies on 1 Jul. Colonies were eliminated from rating means when the queen died or brood production ceased. B) Percentage of test colonies containing brood plotted against time in months for colonies receiving either beef liver (N =10), chicken liver (N = 10), or crickets (N = 13).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2022View details →

◂Fig. 6 Gynoecial development, fruit and seedling of C. crenata %yellow frames), C. cf. grandicalyx %blue frames) and C. sinensis %pink frames; A–F light microscopy, G–K stereo microscopy of endocarp, mesocarp removed; L–O field images; TS in horizontal orientation). A, B TS of anthetic flower %note two to three abortive ovules and strongly stained, peripheral tissue). C, D TS of anthetic flower %note two to three abortive ovules and lignifying portions of prospective mesocarp). E Young fruit %note developing endocarp and flashily pink portions of the mesocarp). F TS of postanthetic flower %note three abortive ovules and lignifying portions of prospective mesocarp). G TS of endocarp, with three developed embryos removed %note scanty endosperm). H Endocarp. J TS of endocarp. K Endocarp. L Immature fruits. M Mature fruits. N Seedlings %note short hypocotyl and long petioles of cotyledons). O Seedlings %note long hypocotyl and short petioles of cotyledons; image taken from cultivated plant, accession number 2012–0005, in the Botanical Garden Munich) %LS, longisection; TS, transverse section; ao, abortive ovule; cot, cotyledon; db, dorsal bundle; c, calyx; ec, endocarp; ens, endosperm; ex, exocarp; fr, fruit; h, hypocotyl; int, integument; lb, lateral bundle; mc, mesocarp; o, ovule; pet, petiolus; sty, style; ut, peripheral tissue; vs, ventral slit) in Observations on flower and fruit anatomy in dioecious species of Cordia (Cordiaceae, Boraginales) with evolutionary interpretations

◂Fig. 6 Gynoecial development, fruit and seedling of C. crenata %yellow frames), C. cf. grandicalyx %blue frames) and C. sinensis %pink frames; A–F light microscopy, G–K stereo microscopy of endocarp, mesocarp removed; L–O field images; TS in horizontal orientation). A, B TS of anthetic flower %note two to three abortive ovules and strongly stained, peripheral tissue). C, D TS of anthetic flower %note two to three abortive ovules and lignifying portions of prospective mesocarp). E Young fruit %note developing endocarp and flashily pink portions of the mesocarp). F TS of postanthetic flower %note three abortive ovules and lignifying portions of prospective mesocarp). G TS of endocarp, with three developed embryos removed %note scanty endosperm). H Endocarp. J TS of endocarp. K Endocarp. L Immature fruits. M Mature fruits. N Seedlings %note short hypocotyl and long petioles of cotyledons). O Seedlings %note long hypocotyl and short petioles of cotyledons; image taken from cultivated plant, accession number 2012–0005, in the Botanical Garden Munich) %LS, longisection; TS, transverse section; ao, abortive ovule; cot, cotyledon; db, dorsal bundle; c, calyx; ec, endocarp; ens, endosperm; ex, exocarp; fr, fruit; h, hypocotyl; int, integument; lb, lateral bundle; mc, mesocarp; o, ovule; pet, petiolus; sty, style; ut, peripheral tissue; vs, ventral slit)

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2021View details →

◂Fig.15 Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) showing transverse rows of dentition on Dinaride Zospeum and Iberozospeum radulae; (a) Z. pretneri, (NMBE 553290), Gornja Cerovačka pećina, Croatia, transverse rows of teeth on long, slender basal plates (bp), rachidian (r) and lateral teeth (l), arrows indicate medial grooves on mesocones of individual teeth; (b) Z. isselianum, NMBE 553389, Turjeva jama, Slovenia, ibid.; (c) Iberozospeum sp. (RMNH.MOL.234,116), Cueva a Sul, straight transverse rows of small, seemingly bi-cuspid lateral teeth (l) with reduced mesocones on compact basal plates; (d) ibid., close up view of rachidian teeth (r), lateral fang-like teeth (l) and transitional teeth (t); (e) I. vasconicum, (AJC 1848), Cueva Ermita de Sandaili, rachidian teeth (r) flanked by 4-cuspid lateral teeth (l), C. ibazoricum-like in form; (f) Iberozospeum sp. (RMNH. MOL.234108), Cueva la Torcona, lateral teeth showing reduced mesocones (me) flanked by long, fang-like endo- and ectocones (e), rachidian tooth (r) (flipped over in upper righthand corner of image); (g) I. zaldivarae (AJC 1876a), Cueva de Las Paúles, transverse rows of teeth showing varying cusp lengths; (h) ibid., close up view (left to right) of marginal (m) and transitional teeth (t) on short, compact basal plates (bp). — Magnification varies for each perspective, see scale bars; all Figs taken by M. Ruppel, (ret.) Goethe University Frankfurt am Main in Molecular investigation and description of Iberozospeum n. gen., including the description of one new species (Eupulmonata, Ellobioidea, Carychiidae)

◂Fig.15 Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) showing transverse rows of dentition on Dinaride Zospeum and Iberozospeum radulae; (a) Z. pretneri, (NMBE 553290), Gornja Cerovačka pećina, Croatia, transverse rows of teeth on long, slender basal plates (bp), rachidian (r) and lateral teeth (l), arrows indicate medial grooves on mesocones of individual teeth; (b) Z. isselianum, NMBE 553389, Turjeva jama, Slovenia, ibid.; (c) Iberozospeum sp. (RMNH.MOL.234,116), Cueva a Sul, straight transverse rows of small, seemingly bi-cuspid lateral teeth (l) with reduced mesocones on compact basal plates; (d) ibid., close up view of rachidian teeth (r), lateral fang-like teeth (l) and transitional teeth (t); (e) I. vasconicum, (AJC 1848), Cueva Ermita de Sandaili, rachidian teeth (r) flanked by 4-cuspid lateral teeth (l), C. ibazoricum-like in form; (f) Iberozospeum sp. (RMNH. MOL.234108), Cueva la Torcona, lateral teeth showing reduced mesocones (me) flanked by long, fang-like endo- and ectocones (e), rachidian tooth (r) (flipped over in upper righthand corner of image); (g) I. zaldivarae (AJC 1876a), Cueva de Las Paúles, transverse rows of teeth showing varying cusp lengths; (h) ibid., close up view (left to right) of marginal (m) and transitional teeth (t) on short, compact basal plates (bp). — Magnification varies for each perspective, see scale bars; all Figs taken by M. Ruppel, (ret.) Goethe University Frankfurt am Main