Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 20–27 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 20–27. Male terminalia of Physciolagria Pic, 1930. 20—P. liturata Pic, 1930, tergite VII, dorsal view; 21—ditto, morphological sternite VII, ventral view; 22—P. singularicornis (Pic, 1935), ♂ from Sebele, Botswana, tergite VII, dorsal view; 23—ditto, morphological sternite VII, ventral view; 24—P. smithi sp. nov., paratype, tergite VII, dorsal view; 25—ditto, morphological sternite VII, ventral view; 26—P. singularicornis (Pic, 1935), ♂ from Sebele, Botswana, spiculum gastrale; 27—P. smithi sp. nov., paratype, spiculum gastrale [not to scale].

FIGURES 9–11. Physciolagria liturata Pic, 1930 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 9–11. Physciolagria liturata Pic, 1930, ♂ from Homa, Kenya. 9—Habitus, dorsal view; 10—Head, dorsal view; 11—Left antenna, ventral view [not to scale].

FIGURES 1–4. Physciolagria liturata Pic, 1930 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 1–4. Physciolagria liturata Pic, 1930, holotype ♀. 1—Habitus, dorsal view; 2—ditto, lateral view; 3—Forebody, anterodorsal view; 4—Labels [not to scale].

FIGURES 36–44 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 36–44. Median lobe of Physciolagria Pic, 1930. 36—P. liturata Pic, 1930; 37—ditto, apical portion (note apical pores); 38—ditto, gonopore armature; 39—P. singularicornis (Pic, 1935), ♂ from Sebele, Botswana; 40—ditto, apical portion (note apical spines); 41—ditto, gonopore armature; 42—P. smithi sp. nov., paratype; 43—ditto, apical portion (note apical spines); 44—gonopore armature [not to scale].

FIGURES 28–35 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 28–35. Tegmen of Physciolagria Pic, 1930. 28—P. liturata Pic, 1930; 29—ditto, parameres, apical portion (note moderately long apical setation); 30—P. singularicornis (Pic, 1935), ♂ from Sebele, Botswana; 31—ditto, paramere, apical portion, apical setation removed; 32—ditto, parameres, apical portion (note long apical setation); 33—P. smithi sp. nov., paratype; 34—ditto, paramere, apical portion, apical setation removed; 35—ditto, parameres, apical portion (note long apical setation) [not to scale].

FIGURES 15–17 in Redefinition of Physciolagria Pic, 1930 (Coleoptera: Mycteridae) with a new family placement, genus-rank synonymy, new description, and a key

FIGURES 15–17. Physciolagria smithi sp. nov., holotype ♂. 15—Habitus, dorsal view; 16—ditto, lateral view; 17—Forebody, anterodorsal view [not to scale].

Fig. 6 in Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma

Fig. 6. Morphology of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& adult ktructurek. %;) Trogoparvus kp.& pterothorax& ventral; %B) Trogoparvus kp.& head ventral; %C) Phradonoma nobile %Reitter)& protibia; %D) Anthrenus verbasci %Linnaeuk)& terminal ventrite; %E) Dermestes maculatus De Geer& hind coxa; %F) Eurhopalus australis %Hope)& terminal ventrite; %G) Trogoderma granarium Evertk& terminal ventrite; %H) Eurhopalus australis %Hope)& elytral apex& ventral kide; %I) Trogoderma granarium Evertk& elytral apex& ventral kide.

Fig. 5 in Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma

Fig. 5. Morphology of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& adult prothorax ktructurek. %;) Telopes fasciatus %Thunberg); %B) Eurhopalus australis %Hope); %C) Anthrenus verbasci %Linnaeuk); %D) Eurhopalus kp.; %E) Dermestes maculatus De Geer; %F) Ranolus australis %Lawrence & Ślipińkci); %G) Trogoparvus kp.; %H) Evorinea kp.

Fig. 8 in Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma

Fig. 8. Morphology of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& larval ktructurek. %; & B) pretarkuk; %C& F& J) abdominal kpiciketae and haktiketae; %D& E) antenna; %G& H) mandible; %I) abdominal ketae on tergum VI; %K) prothorax and head& lateral; %L) body in lateral akpect; %M) head& frontal view. %; & D) Trogoderma granarium Evertk; %B& E) Eurhopalus australis %Hope); %C) Trogoderma variabile Ballion; %F) Anthrenus verbasci %Linnaeuk)& abdominal kegmentk 5–7; %G& I & M) Attagenus brunneus Faldermann; %H) Dermestes maculatus De Geer; %J) Eurhopalus kp.& tergite VI; %K) Trichelodes kp.; %L) Ranolus kp.

Fig. 3 in Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationkhipk of the family Dermektidae Latreille& 1804. %;) at the kubfamily level; %B) within kubfamily Megatominae; %C) within the genuk Trogoderma Dejean k.ktr.; %D) within the genuk Eurhopalus Solier in Gay rev. nov.The topology ik baked on a maximum licelihood analykik of the amino acid dataket %;;) tranklated from 10&446 nucleotidek derived from 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genek& partitioned by gene. Stark denote cladek with ktrong ktatiktical kupport baked on Shimodaira–Hakegawa approximate licelihood ratio tekt valuek %SH-aRLT) and Ultrafakt Bootktrap valuek %UFBoot); four valuek of each node are prekented baked on the ;;_SH-aLRT& ;;_UFBoot& Degen_UFBoot& and NT_UFBoot rekpectively from left to right. Orange ktark denote cladek with all four valuek above 99.5 while the blacc ktark reprekent cladek either SH-aLRT> 80 or 95

Fig. 1 in Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma

Fig. 1. Diverkity of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& adultk. %; & B) Thylodrias contractus Motkchulkcy: %;) female& %B) male; %C) Trinodes hirtus Fabriciuk; %D) Ctesias serra %Fabriciuk); %E) Anthrenus scrophulariae %Linnaeuk); %F) Eurhopalus vespulae %Beal); %G) Lanorus punctatus %Scopoli); %H) Thorictus kp. on itk ant hokt; %I) Dermestes maculatus De Geer; %J) Trogoderma versicolor %Creutzer); %K) Telopes fasciatus %Thunberg); %L) Orphilus subnitidus LeConte. Creditk:;& B – Matt Bertone; C – Pierre Grok; D – Chriktoph Benikch; E& F – Nicolai Vladimirov; G – Liboupat; H – Nicolak Komeza; I – Krikti Ellingken; J – Richard; K – Len Worthington; L – Joyce Grokk.

Fig. 4 in Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma

Fig. 4. Diverkity of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& immaturek. %;) Ctesias serra %Fabriciuk); %B) Thylodrias contractus Motkchulkcy; %C) Anthrenus verbasci %Linnaeuk); %D) Dermestes lardarius Linnaeuk; %E) Eurhopalus kp. & teneral adult in pupal exuvium; %F) Trogoderma variabile Ballion; %G) Trogoderma granarium Evertk; %H) Attagenus woodroffei Halktead & Green; %I) Eurhopalus fasciatus %Hava). Creditk:; – David W. Williamk; B – Matt Bertone; C – Joyce Grokk; D – Tony Daley; E& I – Zhenhua Liu; F – Ji-Shen Wang; G – Tomakz Klejdykz; H – Jarmo Hoplainen.

Fig. 7 in Molecular Phylogeny of Dermestidae (Coleoptera) Reveals the Polyphyletic Nature of Trogoderma Latreille and the Taxonomic Placement of the Khapra Beetle Trogoderma

Fig. 7. Morphology of Dermektidae Latreille& 1804& adult ktructurek. %;& B) pterothorax& ventral; %C–I) aedeaguk; %J–L) abdominal ventritek; %M–T) antennae. %;) Trogoderma granarium Evertk; %B) Thylodrias contractus Motkchulkcy; %C) Ranolus australis %Lawrence & Ślipińkci); %D& P) Dermestes maculatus De Geer; %E& O) Adelaidia rigua Blaccburn; %F) Eurhopalus australis %Hope); %G) Eurhopalus kp.; %H& N) Evorinea kp.; %I) Anthrenus scrophulariae %Linnaeuk); %J) Eurhopalus froggatti %Blaccburn); %K) Trichelodes delicatula Carter; %L) Trogoparvus kp.; %M) Orphinus kp.; %Q) Eurhopalus attagenoides %Pakcoe); %R) Eurhopalus ocellifer %Blaccburn); %S) Eurhopalus vespulae %Beal); %T) Attagenus pelio %Linnaeuk)& male.

opennotspecifiedJan 2023View details →

FIGURE 2 in Phylogenetic placement of Tretospeira cheirospora in Phaeosphaeriaceae

FIGURE 2. Tretospeira cheirospora (MFLU 22-0204, holotype) a, b Colonies on natural substrate. c–g Conidiophores and conidia. h–l Conidia. Scale bars: a = 500 µm, b = 100 µm, c–l = 20 µm

opennotspecifiedJan 2023View details →

FIGURE 1 in Phylogenetic placement of Tretospeira cheirospora in Phaeosphaeriaceae

FIGURE 1. Maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree based on the combined LSU-ITS rDNA sequences. Bootstrap support values for ML greater than 75% and PP greater than 0.95 are given near nodes as ML-BS/PP. The tree is rooted with Noosia banksiae (CBS 129526), Periconia byssoides (MAFF 243872) and Periconia thailandica (MFLUCC 17-0065). Abbreviation T, ET, LT, NT, PT denote ex-type, ex-epitype, ex-lectotype, ex-neotype and ex-paratype strains. The new taxon is indicated in bold and blue. Three previously introduced hyphomycetous genera are indicated in blue.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2023View details →

FIGURE 2 in Phylogenetic placement of Specklinia ordinata in Madisonia (Pleurothallidinae, Orchidaceae)

FIGURE 2. Maximum likelihood tree of Pleurothallidinae based on analysis of combined nuclear and plastid data, emphasizing the placement of Specklinia ordinata (red arrow). Numbers at the nodes represent maximum likelihood bootstrap percentages/Bayesian posterior probabilities.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2023View details →

FIGURE 1 in Phylogenetic placement of Specklinia ordinata in Madisonia (Pleurothallidinae, Orchidaceae)

FIGURE 1. Madisonia ordinata (cultivated specimen Ponert 1789). A., B. Flower. C. Habit. Photo by J. Ponert.

opennotspecifiedMar 2023View details →

FIGURE 1. Coniocarpon rubrocinctum. A in Placement of Arthonia rubrocincta in Coniocarpon (lichenized Ascomycota: Arthoniaceae), with an extended range for the species in southeastern North America and the Caribbean

FIGURE 1. Coniocarpon rubrocinctum. A. Coastal habitat with phorophyte Sabal palmetto on right (Bald Head Island, North Carolina). B. Thallus from South Carolina showing prothallus, ascomata and pycnidia (Perlmutter 182a). C. Ascomatal section in water (Perlmutter 4307). D. Asci with spores in K/I (Anonymous s.n.). E. Ascospore in water (Perlmutter 4307). Scale bars: B = 2.0 mm; C = 50 μm; D = 20 μm; E = 10 μm.

dryad32/100

Data for: Widespread wood placement and regrading drive lateral connectivity and reworking of the channel and floodplain in a valley bottom reset to stage 0

<p>Valley bottom process reset, or the excavation of high surfaces and fill of incised channels combined with large wood addition, is a new method for creating multi-channel river-wetland corridors (also referred to as Stage 0 valley bottoms). Valley bottom process reset seeks to increase lateral flow and sediment connectivity to retain flow and sediment and kickstart geomorphic processes that may sustain aquatic and riparian habitats. This anthropogenic intervention provides an opportunity to examine relationships among wood-induced hydraulic roughness, valley bottom topography, and geomorphic processes such as overbank flow and sediment transport, avulsion, sediment retention, and pool scour. Here, I present a 6-year case study of a two-phase valley bottom process reset along Deer Creek, OR which indicates that kickstarting processes that reshape the floodplain requires a substantial increase in roughness and hydrologic connectivity. A first phase of construction enhanced hydrologic but not sediment connectivity, largely failing to kickstart avulsion and floodplain reworking even during a likely 2- to 5-year recurrence interval flood. A second, more intensive phase of construction substantially reduced the threshold flow necessary for overbank flow and incision of floodplain reworking, as evidenced by the occurrence of these processes after only a < 2-year recurrence interval flood. During this flood, a spatially distributed wood lattice rearranged into discrete jams that scoured pools, retained sediment, and drove geomorphically effective overbank flows. While valley bottom regrading likely contributed to these geomorphic effects, the spatial correlation between newly incised floodplain channels and areas of wood aggregation indicates a substantial role of wood-induced hydraulic roughness and channel blockage. Wood drove floodplain reworking via two mechanisms: in-channel wood jams backwatered and constructed flow into the floodplain, and small wood jams formed in the floodplain forest further constricted flow through nascent channels to facilitate channel incision.</p>

opencc-zeroApr 2023View details →