Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

965

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

965 results for “Theropods”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo20/100

Figure 25 in Cranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the theropod dinosaur Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910) from the Middle Jurassic of England

Figure 25. Body size evolution in basal coelurosaurs and tyrannosauroids. Size classes: 0–10 kg (white); 10–100 kg (); 100–1000 kg (); more than 1000 kg ().

opennotspecifiedJan 2010View details →
zenodo20/100

Figure 16 in Cranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the theropod dinosaur Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910) from the Middle Jurassic of England

Figure 16. Proceratosaurus bradleyi, stereophotographs and interpretative drawing of the skull in posterior (occipital) view. Abbreviations: bo, basioccipital; boc, basioccipital condyle; bpt, basipterygoid process; bs, basisphenoid; bsr, basisphenoid recess; bsw, basisphenoid web; bt, basal tuber; fre, facet for the attachment of the musculus depressor mandibulae on the retroarticular process of the mandible; man, mandible; ptq, quadrate wing of the pterygoid; q, quadrate; qf, quadrate foramen; qma, quadrate mandibular articulation. Scale bar: 5 cm.

opennotspecifiedJan 2010View details →
zenodo20/100

Figure 13 in Cranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the theropod dinosaur Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910) from the Middle Jurassic of England

Figure 13. Proceratosaurus bradleyi. Saggital CT slice of the skull in right lateral view, showing elements of the palate and braincase. Abbreviations: bpt, basipterygoid process; bs, basisphenoid; pal, palatine; pt, pterygoid; rp, retroartticular process of the mandible.

opennotspecifiedJan 2010View details →
zenodo20/100

Figure 15 in Cranial osteology and phylogenetic position of the theropod dinosaur Proceratosaurus bradleyi (Woodward, 1910) from the Middle Jurassic of England

Figure 15. Proceratosaurus bradleyi, horizontal CT slice of the posterior part of the skull, showing the ectopterygoid and the ventral end of the pterygoid wing of the quadrate. Abbreviations: ect, ectopterygoid; ectr, ectopterygoid recess; q, quadrate; qptw, pterygoid wing of the quadrate.

opennotspecifiedJan 2010View details →
zenodo8/100

Data from: Macroevolutionary trends in theropod dinosaur feeding mechanics

<p>Figure S1. Comparison of von Mises stress plots of non-avialan theropod mandibles under a posterior-bite scenario. Left: original mandible; Right: simulated deformed mandible, showing the deformation (displacement) of the original mandible under loading and the biomechanical performance of this simulated form (see methods). Silhouettes modified from PhyloPic.</p> <p>Figure S2. Ancestral state reconstruction of (A) average mandibular stress and (B) bite efficiency of the non-avialan theropods studied under an anterior-bite scenario using linear parsimony.</p> <p>Figure S3. Ancestral state reconstruction of (A) average mandibular stress and (B) bite efficiency of theropods under posterior-bite scenario using linear parsimony.</p> <p>Figure S4. Workflow of the analyses conducted in this study, using the oviraptorosaurian <em>Gigantoraptor erlianensis</em> as an example.</p> <p>Figure S5. Biomechanical performance of the original and simulated deformed mandibles of non-avialan theropods under an anterior-bite scenario. Average mandibular stress of (A) major clades; (B) dietary groups; (C) theropod taxa. Bite efficiency of (D) major clades; (E) dietary groups; (F) theropod taxa. See Figure S5B for legend. Silhouettes modified from PhyloPic.</p> <p>Figure S6. Biomechanical performance of the original and simulated deformed mandibles of non-avialan theropods under a posterior-bite scenario. Average mandibular stress of (A) major clades; (B) dietary groups; (C) theropod taxa. Bite efficiency of (D) major clades; (E) dietary groups; (F) theropod taxa. See Figure S6B for legend. Silhouettes modified from PhyloPic.</p> <p>Figure S7. Ancestral state reconstruction of average mandibular stress of theropods under anterior-bite scenario using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Figure S8. Ancestral state reconstruction of average mandibular stress of theropods under posterior-bite scenario using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Figure S9. Ancestral state reconstruction of bite efficiency of theropods under anterior-bite scenario using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Figure S10. Ancestral state reconstruction of bite efficiency of theropods under posterior-bite scenario using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Figure S11. Comparison of maximum principal strain plots of non-avialan theropod mandibles under an anterior-bite scenario. Left: original mandible; Right: simulated deformed mandible, showing the deformation (displacement) of the original mandible under loading and the biomechanical performance of this simulated form (see methods). Silhouettes modified from PhyloPic.</p> <p>Figure S12. Comparison of maximum principal strain plots of non-avialan theropod mandibles under a posterior-bite scenario. Left: original mandible; Right: simulated deformed mandible, showing the deformation (displacement) of the original mandible under loading and the biomechanical performance of this simulated form (see methods). Silhouettes modified from PhyloPic.</p> <p>Figure S13. Comparison of maximum principal strain plot of the tyrannosauroids <em>Tyrannosaurus</em> and <em>Tarbosaurus</em> through ontogeny.</p> <p>Figure S14. Ancestral state reconstruction of the phylogenetic generalized least square regression residuals of (A) relative average mandibular stress and (B) relative bite efficiency of the non-avialan theropods studied under an anterior-bite scenario using linear parsimony.</p> <p>Figure S15. Ancestral state reconstruction of the phylogenetic generalized least square regression residuals of (A) relative average mandibular stress and (B) relative bite efficiency of the non-avialan theropods studied under a posterior-bite scenario using linear parsimony.</p> <p>Figure S16. Ancestral state reconstruction of the phylogenetic generalized least square regression residuals of average mandibular stress of theropods under anterior-bite scenario using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Figure S17. Ancestral state reconstruction of the phylogenetic generalized least square regression residuals of average mandibular stress of theropods under posterior-bite scenario using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Figure S18. Ancestral state reconstruction of the phylogenetic generalized least square regression residuals of bite efficiency of theropods under anterior-bite scenario using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Figure S19. Ancestral state reconstruction of the phylogenetic generalized least square regression residuals of bite efficiency of theropods under posterior-bite scenario using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Figure S20. Time-scaled composite phylogeny used in this study. Outgroup taxa relationships follow Novas, et al. <sup>1</sup>. Coelurosaurian phylogenetic relationships follow Pei, et al. <sup>2</sup>. The placement of <em>Raptorex</em> in Tyrannosauroidea follows Brusatte and Carr <sup>3</sup>. The placement of <em>Deinocheirus</em> in Ornithomimosauria follows Lee, et al. <sup>4</sup>. The placement of <em>Jianchangosaurus</em> in Therizinosauria follows Yao, et al. <sup>5</sup>. The detailed phylogeny of Oviraptorosauria follows Qiu, et al. <sup>6</sup> (for early-diverging taxa) and Funston <sup>7</sup> (for Caenagnathidae and Oviraptoridae).</p> <p>Figure S21. Phylogeny used in this study with node numbers labelled. See Data S1F-G&nbsp;for reconstructed ancestral states of biomechanical characters using maximum likelihood.</p> <p>Supplementary references</p>

restrictedDec 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record