Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
958
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
958 results for “Data quality”
The dataset of Hong Kong Housing transaction records (1997-2018, after an incoming data quality processing)
<p>These detailed housing transaction records of over 2 million property rights entries in Hong Kong's property markets over the past 23 years (1997 - 2018).</p>
Assessing Quality Variations in Early Career Researchers' Data Management Plans: Quantitative Data of the Content Analysis
<p>The data includes the numerical results of the ranking of the data management plans created during the Basics of Research Data Management (BRDM) courses worth 3 ECTS credits in the years 2020 - 2022. The ranking was made using the Finnish DMP Evaluation Guidance (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4729831). Additionally, the data contains the results of the analysis of the best RDM practices included in the DMPs.</p> <p>Note 1: The comma-separated coded CSV version 1 (5.2.2024) may not open correctly on MacOS. You can use the comma-delimited CSV file version 2 or 3 (31.5.2024).</p> <p>Note 2: Versions 1 (Quality_variations_in_ECRs_DMPs_data) and 3 (Quality_variations_in_ECRs_DMPs_data_ver_3) contain evaluations of DMPs, best practices for data management, as well as methods for data sharing, storage, and preservation. In version 2 (Quality_variations_in_ECRs_DMPs_data_ver_2), the methods for data sharing, storage, and preservation are missing.</p> <p>Data is related to the research article https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v18i1.873.</p>
UK shale gas air and water quality data
<p>Datasets for UK coal bed methane compositions (Airth field), shale gas composition from Bowland shale operations and produced water composition from UK Airth field.</p>
Air quality data created by the hackAIR Horizon2020 project
<p>The current datasets comprise of air quality data collected or created within the hackAIR project (https://platform.hackair.eu/) all around Europe from February 2018 until November 2018.</p> <p>i) "measurements_arduino.xlsx": PM10 and PM2.5 measurements collected by hackAIR users with stationary hackAIR sensors (https://www.hackair.eu/hackair-home-v2/). These sensing devices are based either on an Arduino or a Wemos board. The first column is the unique identifier for the measurement in the hackAIR database. The date/time is in UTC timezone, while the unit of the pollutant value is μg/m3.</p> <p>ii) "measurements_bleair.xlsx": PM10 and PM2.5 measurements collected by hackAIR users with mobile hackAIR sensors (https://www.hackair.eu/hackair-mobile/). The first column is the unique identifier for the measurement in the database. The date/time is in UTC timezone, while the unit of the pollutant value is μg/m3.</p> <p>iii) "measurements_sky_photos.xlsx": Air pollution estimations from photos depicting sky. The hackAIR platform estimates the particulate matter content in the air from Flickr photos, photos from webcams and sky photos that users upload on the hackAIR mobile application, based on the colour of the sky. This is expressed as Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD). In the current dataset, the timezone is UTC, while AOD is unitless.</p> <p>The pollutant index is based on a scale created for the purposes of the hackAIR project.</p>
US Hospitals Quality Data
<p>Cleaned and merged dataset about US hospital-level quality measures, culled from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services open data API as of July 2019. Assumptions and preprocessing to derive dataset can be found at <a href="https://github.com/emigre459/hospital-chargemaster">https://github.com/emigre459/hospital-chargemaster</a>.</p>
AirHeritage Datalake: Multi-site, Multi-season, Multi Unit dataset including Fixed and Mobile Citizen science data from networked Air Quality Low-Cost Multi-Sensors devices and reference stations
<p>This datalake comprises several datasets from <strong>37 networked low cost air quality multisensors</strong> (<strong>30</strong> <strong>mobile</strong> ENEA MONICA(tm) + <strong>7</strong> <strong>fixed</strong>) along with <strong>3</strong> (fixed) + <strong>1</strong> (mobile) <strong>reference stations</strong> operated by Campania Regional Envronmental Protection Agency. The datalake is organized in 3 main directories respectively related to fixed nodes, mobile nodes and nearby reference stations including a mobile laboratory used for colocation campaigns; each subdirectory include its own metadata description file.</p> <p>Data, curated by Energy and Data Science Laboratory of ENEA, include multi-weeks colocation periods when low cost devices have been colocated with reference stations as well as operational periods during which sensors are deployed for fixed or mobile monitoring campaigns. Data have been recorded during 2021 and 2022 in a<strong> pervasive, multi-site, multi-seasonal deployment</strong> in Portici, a densely populated small area city (4km2, 55k + inhabitants) located 7km south of Naples, Italy.</p> <p>The datalake consists in actual sensors and reference intrumentations timeseries along with metadata description files with deployment dates and location data. The dataset files include high sampling frequency raw sensor data of quality-controlled sensor network along with co-located reference stations data sets. Sensor data include electrochemical sensors data (intended target pollutants: NO2, O3, CO), Optical sensor data (PM2.5, PM10, PM1) readings along with meteorological parameters. .</p> <p>Further description of sensors and reference instruments are reported in the accompanying paper (see citation request).</p> <p>The dataset can be used for </p> <ul> <li> <strong>advanced (remote/universal/in field) data driven calibration strategies</strong> test or development including <strong>machine learning </strong>models</li> <li><strong>mobile opportunistic data fusion</strong> methods development</li> <li><strong>geomatics and data assimilation</strong> models studies</li> </ul> <p>as well as low cost sensor characterization performance studies. </p>
Supplementary data: Breeding wheat for organic farming: can the high grain protein gene Gpc-B1 help to tackle challenges in view of end-use quality?
<p>Agronomic and quality data of organic wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em>), mean comparisons and supplementary figures related to the publication "Breeding wheat for organic farming: can the high grain protein gene Gpc-B1 help to tackle challenges in view of end-use quality?" by Grausgruber et al. (2024) published in the Journal of Cereal Science.</p>
Supplementary Data: Fungal biostarter and bacterial occurrence of dry-aged beef: the sensory quality and volatile aroma compounds after 21 days of aging
<p>This dataset contains data generated during realisation of the project Tango-IV-C/0005/2019: Biostarters development for dry aged beef production, funded by National Centre for Research and Development (Poland). These data were used to prepare paper entitled "Fungal biostarter and bacterial occurrence of dry-aged beef: the sensory quality and volatile aroma compounds after 21 days of aging" by Wiesław Przybylski , Danuta Jaworska, Paweł Kresa, Grzegorz Michał Ostrowski, Magdalena Płecha, Dorota Korsak, Dorota Derewiaka, Lech Adamczak, Urszula Siekierko, Julia Pawłowska.</p>
Dataset linking to the publication "An assessment of data sources, data quality and changes in national forest monitoring capacities in the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005–2020"
<p>This dataset links to the study “An assessment of data sources, data quality and changes in national forest monitoring capacities in the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005–2020”. This study is published in the journal “Environmental Research Letters” which can be found at <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abd81b">https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abd81b</a>. The dataset contains two files, one csv file, and one shape file. The two files contain the same data to meet the different users' needs. The dataset contains variables for assessing national forest monitoring data sources i.e., RS and/or NFI. Separate indicators namely 'Use of RS', and 'Use of NFI' were used to analyze the two data sources (RS and NFI). The description of each variable for these two indicators contained in the dataset is given in the Table below.</p> <table> <caption><strong>The description of the variables in the datase</strong>t <strong>for country capacity assessment</strong></caption> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Variables Name</strong></td> <td><strong>Description of the variables</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Country</td> <td>Country</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ISO_A3_CODE</td> <td>ISO A3 Code for country</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ADM0_CODE</td> <td>ADMO Code for country</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CONTINENT</td> <td>Continent</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Region</td> <td>Region</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSInd_05</td> <td>Use of remote sensing (RS) for forest area (change) monitoring 2005 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSSc_05</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2005 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSInd _10</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2010 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSSc _10</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2010 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSInd_15</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2015 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSSc _15</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2015 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSInd_20</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2020 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSSc _20</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2020 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>DRS05_20</td> <td>Difference ‘use of RS’ 2005-2020</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFIInd_05</td> <td>Use of national forest inventories (NFI) for forest monitoring 2005 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFISc_05</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2005 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFIInd _10</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2010 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFISc _10</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2010 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFIInd_15</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2015 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFISc _15</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2015 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFIInd_20</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2020 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFISc _20</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2020 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>DNFI05_20</td> <td>Difference ‘Use of NFI’ 2005-2020</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Indicators and Scores in the above Table for showing the use of RS and NFI data for forest monitoring in Figure 1 (1a, 1b, and 2a, 2b) are related in the following way.</p> <table> <caption><strong>The indicator values and scores of the country capacity assessment</strong></caption> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Indicator</strong></td> <td><strong>Score</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Low</td> <td>0</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Limited</td> <td>1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Intermediate</td> <td>2</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Good</td> <td>3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Very Good</td> <td>4</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>The capacity changes from 2005 to 2020 in Figure 1 (1c & 2c) are related in the following way.</p> <table> <caption><strong>The indicator values and levels for country capacity changes</strong></caption> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Capacity change values</strong></td> <td><strong>Capacity change levels</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>1,2,3,4</td> <td>Increase</td> </tr> <tr> <td>0</td> <td>No change</td> </tr> <tr> <td>-1,-2,-3,-4</td> <td>Decrease</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Does size matter? Quality assessment of the size property in research data repositories
<p>Code and data for master's thesis on quality assessment of the size property in research data repositories. Research questions:</p> <ul> <li> <p> For what semantic concepts is the size property of repositories being used?</p> </li> <li> <p>What kind of quality factors can be detected when assessing the size property in a registry for research data repositories?</p> </li> <li> <p>Which automated and intellectual measures can improve the quality of the size property?</p> </li> </ul> <p>Method 1: Data analysis of size and related properties over all re3data records</p> <ul> <li> <p>Property selection</p> </li> <li> <p>Data extraction from API</p> </li> <li> <p>Data normalization</p> </li> <li> <p>Typing of patterns: mainly units of size</p> </li> <li> <p>Analysis: ~quantitative, mainly univariate, but also some multivariate / time</p> </li> </ul> <p>[Included in the publication:</p> <p>Method 2: Case Study of size in individual repositories</p> <ul> <li> <p>Repository selection: purposive sampling</p> </li> <li> <p>Data capture from GUI / API</p> </li> <li> <p>Analysis: ~qualitative]</p> </li> </ul>
Data from: Vegetation change in acidic dry grasslands in Moravia (Czech Republic) over three decades: slow decrease in habitat quality after grazing cessation
<p>This dataset contains the original data used in the article:</p> <p>Harásek M., Klinkovská K. & Chytrý M. (2023) Vegetation change in acidic dry grasslands in Moravia (Czech Republic) over three decades: slow decrease in habitat quality after grazing cessation. <em>Applied Vegetation Science</em>, 26, e12726. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12726</p> <p>The data contain plant species composition data from resurveyed vegetation plots in southwestern and central Moravia (Czech Republic). The plots were first surveyed by Milan Chytrý in 1986–1991 (“old plots”) and resurveyed by Martin Harásek, under the supervision of Milan Chytrý, in 2018–2019 (“new plots”).</p> <p>Of the old plots, 86 were sampled between 26 June and 16 September and 8 in May. Their size ranged from 5 to 49 m<sup>2</sup> (mean 33 m<sup>2</sup>). These plots were subjectively selected at different sites to document maximum variation in species composition and environmental conditions of the grasslands and heathlands studied. In each plot, all vascular plant species were recorded, and their covers were estimated using the nine-grade Braun-Blanquet scale (van der Maarel 1979). Plot locations were recorded in the form of text descriptions. Geographic coordinates of approximate location were added for each plot prior to the resurvey by the original surveyor using georeferenced aerial photographs and various information recorded in the field during the first survey, including slope, aspect and elevation. Location uncertainty (mean = 139 m) was indicated as the possible distance of the actual location from the given coordinates.</p> <p>The resurvey was conducted between 4 June and 16 August. Care was taken to select the most likely location of the original plot based on the coordinates of the approximate location, the original site description, and the occurrence of the species recorded during the first survey. New plots always had the same plot size as in the original sampling. Each old plot was resurveyed using 1–3 new plots depending on the uncertainty of the location of the old plot. A total of 94 old plots were resurveyed at 47 sites with 153 new plots. Of these, 71 old plots at 32 sites were in current protected areas, while 23 old plots at 15 sites were outside protected areas. All new plots were located using GPS with a location uncertainty of approximately 5 m.</p> <p>For each old plot resurveyed with more than one new plot, the most similar new plot (based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity in species composition) was selected, resulting in a dataset of 94 old and 94 new plots (“best-fit dataset”). To test the robustness of the results, we created another dataset (“validation dataset”) that included the least similar of the corresponding new plots for each old plot. This dataset also included the 94 old and 94 new plots. If the old plot was resurveyed using a single new plot, that new plot was included in both the best-fit and validation datasets.</p> <p>The header data structure follows that of the ReSurveyEurope Database (<a href="http://euroveg.org/eva-database-re-survey-europe">http://euroveg.org/eva-database-re-survey-europe</a>). In addition, fields are added to indicate whether the new plot was used in the best-fit dataset (Best_fit) or the validation dataset (Validation). The information about location within or outside the protected area is given in the field Protection.</p> <p>The data on species composition and environmental variables are provided in two formats:</p> <ul> <li>Turboveg 2 database (see <a href="https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/turboveg/">https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/turboveg/</a>) – file <strong>TurbovegDbBackup_SW_moravia_acidgrass.zip</strong>. For using this dataset in Turboveg, the database dictionary (TurbovegDdBackup_Default dictionary.zip) and the species list (TurbovegSlBackup_Czechia_slovakia_2015.zip) must be installed.</li> <li>Three TXT files with columns separated by tabs: <ul> <li><strong>SW_moravia_acidgrass_species.txt</strong> contains the percentage covers of plant species in the plots, which are mid-values for cover-abundance categories of the Braun-Blanquet scale. Plant nomenclature was harmonised according to Danihelka et al. (2012).</li> <li><strong>SW_moravia_acidgrass _head.txt</strong> contains information on the number of species in each plot (number_species), the number, proportion and relative cover of threatened species (IUCN categories CR, EN, VU, NT, columns CR_NT_number, CR_NT_perc_number and CR_NT_perc_cover), alien species (alien_number, alien_perc_number, alien_perc_cover), species characteristic of dry grasslands (TH_number, TH_perc_number, TH_perc_cover), sand and rock-outcrop grasslands (TF_number, TF_perc_number, TF_perc_cover), mesotrophic grasslands (TD_number, TD_perc_number, TD_perc_cover) and herbaceous ruderal vegetation (XA_XC_number, XA_XC _perc_number, XA_XC _perc_cover) and unweighted means of Ellenberg-type indicator values for light (light), temperature (temperature), moisture (moisture), soil reaction (reaction) nutrients (nutrients) and salinity (salinity) used to test changes in these variables through time.</li> <li><strong>SW_moravia_life_forms.txt </strong>contains information about the assignment of individual species to the life form, which was used to analyse changes in frequency and cover of the life forms.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>These data are also stored in the Czech National Phytosociological Database (Chytrý & Rafajová 2003; <a href="https://botzool.cz/vegsci/phytosociologicalDb">https://botzool.cz/vegsci/phytosociologicalDb</a>) and the ReSurveyEurope database (Knollová et al. 2023; <a href="http://euroveg.org/eva-database-re-survey-europe">http://euroveg.org/eva-database-re-survey-europe</a>).</p>
Data underlying the publication: "Effects of hatching system on chick quality, welfare and health of young breeder flock offspring"
<p>The aim of the current study was to evaluate effects of two alternative hatching systems (hatchery-feeding and on-farm hatching)<br> compared to conventional hatching systems with respect to chick quality, welfare and health of a young breeder flock.<br> To study the effect of treatments on the competence of the humoral immune response, blood titres after a live attenuated NCD<br> vaccination was assessed.<br> To study differences in disease resilience, the susceptibility to develop tracheal inflammation after infection with a<br> life attenuated infectious bronchitis vaccine virus was assessed by trachea lesion scoring and expression of genes related<br> to epithelial integrity and inflammatory responses.</p>
Data set and classification method for low quality web traffic identification in video marketing campaigns
<p>Final outcomes of the InPreVi (AI4Media) project developed in 2022. </p> <p>1. Data set describing the statistics of the video ad marketing campaigns</p> <p>2. Script for web traffic classification</p>
Data of the publication Optimizing ion implantation to create shallow NV centre ensembles in high-quality CVD diamond
<p>Data of the publication published by IOP under the reference: Midrel Wilfried Ngandeu Ngambou <em>et al</em> 2022 <em>Mater. Quantum. Technol.</em> <strong>2</strong> 045001 .</p>
Monthly lake water quality data (May-September 2022) following the Greenwood Fire in northeastern Minnesota v1.0
<p>This repository contains lake water quality responses to the 2021 Greenwood Fire in Superior National Forest, Minnesota, USA (near Isabella, MN in northeastern MN). Thirty lakes (15 burned watershed, 15 control) were sampled monthly from May-September 2022 along various fire disturbance gradients (e.g., % watershed burned) and in relation to hydrologic connectivity (i.e., drainage vs. isolated lakes). Much of the non-water quality data we used came from published sources, which are described and referenced below. This repository also contains R code used to analyze and visualize data, as well as some output figures.</p>
InTheMED WP2 Data Archive - Groundwater Quality Literature Review
<p>The data archive InTheMED_WP2_DS_GWQualityLitReview is part of Task 2.2 “Review and collect the available groundwater quantity and quality data sets in the MED region” and contains a literature review of groundwater quality data collected from various sites in Mediterranean countries. The data includes measurements of different water quality parameters, providing valuable insights into the characteristics of groundwater in different regions. The dataset was compiled from a literature review of published research articles.</p>
Low-energy Museum Storage Buildings: Climate, Energy Consumption and Air Quality. Data Set for Final Data Report
<p>The 43 txt-files included in this dataset relate to the report: Ryhl-Svendsen, Jensen, Bøhm, and Klenz Larsen (2012): <em>Low-energy Museum Storage Buildings: Climate, Energy Consumption and Air Quality. UMTS Research Project 2007</em>–<em>2011: Final Data Report</em>, Kgs. Lyngby: National Museum of Denmark, 122 pp.</p> <p>The document <a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/145584b0-46b5-4341-8b02-7dfea90fa97c/00_List-of-data-files.pdf?versionId=a3e9691f-6e73-4a7b-aaab-c8ccee7c419b">00_List-of-data-files.pdf</a> contain a full list of the data files with a description of their structure and content, and is the key to how the individual data files relate to the report. </p> <p>The research project focussed on four modern museum storage facilities in Denmark, for which the indoor climate, air quality, and the energy consumption of the climate control systems was measured at several locations, typically for a period of between two and four years. The storage facilities were Museum of Southwest Jutland’s storage building in Ribe (‘Ribe’), The Shared Storage Facility at The Centre for Preservation of Cultural Heritage in Vejle (‘Vejle’), The Joint Storage Facility for museums in East Jutland/ Museum Østjylland (‘Randers’), and from The National Museum of Denmark the storage building Hall P at the Ørholm Storage Facility (‘Ørholm’). For description of the sites, monitoring campaigns, and graphed data, the report should be consulted.</p> <p>For completeness, the report is included with the dataset (<a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/145584b0-46b5-4341-8b02-7dfea90fa97c/Report_low-energy-museum-storage-buildings.pdf?versionId=44097d39-775b-4031-9e07-6978c68912a9">Report_low-energy-museum-storage-buildings.pdf</a>).</p>
Southwest United States Wetland Water Quality and Macroinvertebrate Data 2018-2022
Water quality and macroinvertebrate data were collected between 2018 and 2020 from 14 different wetland and riparian sites spanning across West Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. Water quality data such as Cl, SO4, and conductivity were collected as well as nutrients such as NO3, PO4, and Total Dissolved Nitrogen. Macroinvertebrate data were collected from all sites during the summer months (June, July, and August).
Petit-lac-Saint-François surface water quality monitoring data
Water Quality samples were collected at Lake Inlet, Outlet, and In-Lake sites between October 2009 and September 2020. Water Samples were collected on a weekly, same-day-of-the-week basis, between 10 a.m. and noon, year-round. Field sampling was conducted by the same technician during the entire period to ensure method consistency and sampling frequency was maintained throughout, except for the winter of 2017, during which sampling was suspended. Epilimnion samples were collected using a swing sampler with a wide neck, polyethylene bottle (Nasco Sampling, Madison, WI, USA), and composited in an acid-washed, opaque, 4-L polyethylene bottle pre-conditioned with lake water. Four grab samples were taken to account for spatial heterogeneity that can be substantial within distances of a few meters, particularly when surface phytoplankton blooms are present. The grab samples were collected by tilting the swing sampler bottle approximately 45 degrees and allowing it to fill as it was submerged 8 to 15 cm below the surface. During periods of ice cover, access holes were drilled or cut through the ice to collect samples. For dissolved parameters, samples were filtered on the same day as collection. Quality control measures, including field, transport, and laboratory blanks, consisting of HPLC grade water and preservative where required, as well as split samples for interlaboratory comparisons, were included quarterly in the sampling program along with regular samples. These were used to establish practicable detection limits and to monitor for levels of contaminants to which field samples might be exposed.
Caloosahatchee River Estuary Optical Water Quality Data (May 2008 - May 2020)
This dataset is an aggregated dataset from various sources including the South Florida Water Management District and Lee County (Florida) Environmental Lab and includes parameters of optical water quality. Optical water quality samples were collected throughout the Caloosahatchee River Estuary from the head of the estuary to its outlet in San Carlos Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. Parameters within the dataset include light attenuation coefficient, Secchi disk depth, chlorophyll-a concentration, turbidity, total suspended solid concentration, color, water temperature, specific conductivity, and salinity. Samples were collected from various agencies from May 2008 to May 2020. Other water quality parameters were also collected and some of the monitoring continued to present but is not presented here.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.