Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 5. Pyrops whiteheadi ♂, Sabah, Danum Valley (RMNH). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 11 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 11. Pyrops synavei sp. nov. in natura. A–B. Borneo, Kalimantan, Long Alango, Lalut Birai Sacred Forest, 2 Sep. 2011, J. Woltering. C–D. Borneo, Kalimantan, Lalut Birai Forest, 13 Mar. 2009, D. Forney.

Fig. 4 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 4. Pyrops synavei sp. nov. ♀, holotype (RBINS). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 12. Pyrops whiteheadi and P in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 12. Pyrops whiteheadi and P. intricatus, in natura, trophobiosis. — A–E. P. whiteheadi. A–B. Tended by cockroaches (Blattodea, Dorylaea, probably D. magna (Schelford, 1909)), Sabah, Danum Valley, 4 Jul. 2013, A. Sorokin. C. Tended by small cockroach (Blattodea, Pseudophyllodromiinae), Sabah, Danum Valley, 15 Dec. 2008, C.C. Lee. D. Sabah, Lower Kinabatangan River, 9 Aug. 2012, N. Messina. E. Tended by an adult gecko, Gehyra mutilata (Wiegmann, 1835) (Squamata: Gekkonidae), Sabah, Sepilok, 6 Jun. 2013, C.C. Lee. — F. P. intricatus tended by cockroach (Blattodea, Dorylaea sp.), Sarawak, Mulu National Park, 15 Oct. 2009, C.C. Lee.

Fig. 2 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 2. Pyrops effusus ♀, Kalimantan, Batulicin (RBINS). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 3 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 3. Pyrops gunjii ♂, E Kalimantan, Samarinda, Mt Beratus (RBINS). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 1 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 1. Pyrops intricatus ♀, Kalimantan, Mt Bawan (RBINS). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 31. Paracletus cimiciformis von Heyden, 1837 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 31. Paracletus cimiciformis von Heyden, 1837. Aptera in nest of Tetramorium caespitum (Linnaeus, 1758).

Fig. 29 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 29. Neomyzus circumflexus (Buckton, 1876). Aptera. (from Dransfield & Brightwell 2015, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0, downloaded 30 Jun. 2015).

Fig. 24. Aphis beccabungae Koch, 1855 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 24. Aphis beccabungae Koch, 1855. Apt. and juv. on Galeopsis speciosa. A. beccabungae is very similar to A. gossypii Glover, 1877.

Fig. 27 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 27. Sitobion avenae (Fabricius, 1775). Apterae and juveniles on A. Dactylis glomerata and B. Elytrigia repens.

Fig. 19 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 19. Gootiella, Pachypappa and Pachypappella. Apt. alienicolae (born on secondary host). A–B. Spinal wax gland on abd. terg. 6 of Pachypappa populi (Linnaeus, 1758) (A) and P. vesicalis Koch, 1856 (B). C. Hind leg of Gootiella tremulae Tullgren, 1925. D–G. Hind tibia and tarsus of Pachypapella lactea (Tullgren, 1909) (D), Pachypappa tremulae Tullgren, 1925 (E), P. populi (Linnaeus, 1758) (F) and P. vesicalis Koch, 1856 (G). A–B and D–G after Carter & Danielsson 1991, C after Danielsson 1990b. All modified.

Fig. 21 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 21. Prociphilus xylostei (deGeer, 1773). A–B. Apt. on mycorrhizal Picea abies roots under Pleurozium schreberi.

Fig. 20 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 20. Pachypappa populi (Linnaeus, 1758). Apt. from mycorrhizal Picea abies root in the moor layer of a shady spruce forest.

Fig. 22 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 22. Prociphilus pini (Burmeister, 1835). A. Colony on thin Pinus sylvestris root in the moor layer of a pine forest on rock. B–C. Apt. from Polytrichum commune sample.

Fig. 14 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 14. Muscaphis cuspidata (Stroyan, 1955). A–B. Apt. on Brachythecium rivulare. C. Ovip on Brachythecium rivulare.

Fig. 9 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 9. Pseudacaudella rubida (Börner, 1939). A. Apt. and juv. from Hylocomium splendens sample (grid 1 mm). B. Apt. and C. hibernating juv. on Pleurozium schreberi. D–E. Hibernating juv on Calliergon cordifolium.

Fig. 11. Jacksonia papillata Theobald, 1923 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 11. Jacksonia papillata Theobald, 1923. Aptera (photo Roger Blackman, from Blackman 2010, with license from The Royal Entomological Society).

Fig. 7 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 7. Decorosiphon corynothrix Börner, 1939. A. Apt. and juv. in Polytrichum commune sample. B. Apt. on Sphagnum magellanicum (with interpersed Polytrichum strictum). C. Apt. juv. on Polytrichum commune. D. Apt. juv. on S. magellanicum, showing rupture line.

Fig. 4 in Identification guide to Nordic aphids associated with mosses, horsetails and ferns (Bryophyta, Equisetophyta, Polypodiophyta) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Aphidoidea)

Fig. 4. Dioecious one-year holocycle accompanied by a continuous anholocycle on the secondary host, e.g., Pachypappella lactea (leaf galls on aspen, Populus tremula; roots of spruce, Picea abies) or Tetraneura ulmi (leaf galls on elm, Ulmus; subterraneous parts of grasses, Poaceae). Zones as in Fig. 3. In some years the Finnish populations on the primary hosts (for P. lactea in South Finland) may be more or less absent, and their existence is dependent on the populations on the secondary hosts.