Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 6 in Geographical variation of Rhinolophus affinis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in the Sundaic subregion of Southeast Asia, including the Malay Peninsula, Borneo and Sumatra

FIG. 6. Dorsal view of R. affinis skulls from Borneo (A — TK168483, ♀), Sumatra (B — MZB35882, ♀), Java (C — MZB34475, ♀), Malay Peninsula (D — IS110823.10, ♂; E — IS120122.1, ♂) and India (F — HZM4.28148, ♂). Scale = 5 mm

FIG. 1 in Geographical variation of Rhinolophus affinis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in the Sundaic subregion of Southeast Asia, including the Malay Peninsula, Borneo and Sumatra

FIG. 1. Sample localities and echolocation frequencies of R. affinis in the Sundaic subregion. M = Peninsular Malaysia, Sa = Sarawak, S = Sumatra, and T = Thailand. Abbreviations for localities are given in the methods and materials. The grey shading indicates the Sundaic biogeographic subregion following Woodruff (2010), green (zone A) and orange (B) shadings are the echolocation zones recognized in the Malay Peninsula. Dashed arrows indicate type localities and subspecies names, solid arrows indicate the transition zone of biota within the Malay Peninsula, dashed lines indicate the echolocation frequencies (min–max), and the two-headed arrows indicate the echolocation frequencies (min–max) as a whole from each echolocation zone. Note: the northern boundary of the Sundaic subregion is sometimes placed at the Isthmus of Kra (e.g., Lekagul and McNeely, 1988 and Corbet and Hill, 1992)

FIG. 5 in Geographical variation of Rhinolophus affinis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in the Sundaic subregion of Southeast Asia, including the Malay Peninsula, Borneo and Sumatra

FIG. 5. Sella variation of R. affinis in the Sundaic Subregion (specimen from northern India included for comparison). Kabumen, Central Java (A — MZB34475, ♀); Musoorie, northern India (B — HZM.4.28148, ♂); Sarawak, northwest Borneo (C — TK152216, ♀); Lampung, southwestern Sumatra (D — MZB34965, ♀); Narathiwat, southern Malay Peninsula (E — IS120122.1, ♂); Songkhla, southern Malay Peninsula (F — IS110823.10, ♂). Scale = 5 mm

FIG. 8 in Geographical variation of Rhinolophus affinis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in the Sundaic subregion of Southeast Asia, including the Malay Peninsula, Borneo and Sumatra

FIG. 8. Bacula of R. affinis from the Sundaic Subregion in lateral view (l), ventral view (v) and dorsal view (d); Sarawak, northwestern Borneo (A — TK152217); Lampung, southwestern Sumatra (B — MZB31501); Narathiwat, southern Malay Peninsula (C — IS120124.1). Scale = 1 mm

Supplementary Table S1A in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Table S1A. Original sequences and sequences from GenBank used in the molecular genetic analysis

Supplementary Fig. S8 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Fig. S8. Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the R. hipposideros group: results of the canonical discriminant analysis of selected nine plain and seven relative dimensions (see Results for details)

Supplementary Fig. S6 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Fig. S6. Maximum likelihood tree of the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the R. hipposideros group and selected species of the genus Rhinolophus based on STAT. Branch support values are shown above/below the branches in order SH-aLRT/ UFBoot

Supplementary Fig. S7 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Fig. S7. Chronogram of the family Rhinolophidae based on a Bayesian inference of the nuclear dataset (according to the model by Dool et al., 2016). The numbers at nodes show mean divergence time estimates (Ma) and horizontal boxes 95% highest posterior density intervals of these estimates. The asterisk (*) indicates nodes with low branch support, the rest of the nodes were supported (PP ≥ 0.95)

Supplementary Fig. S5 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Fig. S5. Maximum likelihood tree of the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the R. hipposideros group and selected species of the genus Rhinolophus based on ROGDI. Branch support values are shown above/below the branches in order SHaLRT/UFBoot

Supplementary Fig. S4 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Fig. S4. Maximum likelihood tree of the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the R. hipposideros group and selected species of the genus Rhinolophus based on COPS. Branch support values are shown above/below the branches in order SH-aLRT/UFBoot

Supplementary Fig. S3 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Fig. S3. Maximum likelihood tree of the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the R. hipposideros group and selected species of the genus Rhinolophus based on BGN. Branch support values are shown above/below the branches in order SHaLRT/UFBoot

FIG. 4 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 4. Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group: condylocanine length of skull (LCc) against length of the upper tooth-row (CM3); values in mm

FIG. 3 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 3. Chronogram of the family Rhinolophidae based on a Bayesian inference of the nuclear dataset (according to the model by Stoffberg et al., 2010). The numbers at nodes show mean divergence time estimates (Ma) and horizontal boxes 95% highest posterior density intervals of these estimates. The asterisk (*) indicates nodes with low branch support, the rest of the nodes were supported (PP ≥ 0.95)

FIG. 9 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 9. Portraits of Rhinolophus midas Andersen, 1905 from Oman; A, B — ♂ (NMP 93782), Misfah, Ad Dakhiliyah Province, 9 April 2011, lateral and frontal views; C — ♀ (NMP 93994), Sal Alah, Masandam Province, 13 March 2012, lateral view. Photos by A. Reiter

FIG. 8 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 8. Spectrograms of echolocation call examples of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (original data); A — an individual recorded inside the Aksamitka Cave, Slovakia; B — an individual foraging at Arjank, Iran (cf. Benda et al., 2012); C — a handled individual recorded at Zingrogh, Tajikistan; D — a handled individual recorded at Misfah, Oman. For details see Materials and Methods

Supplementary Fig. S2 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Fig. S2. Maximum likelihood tree of the reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the R. hipposideros group and selected species of the genus Rhinolophus based on ACOX. Branch support values are shown above/below the branches in order SH-aLRT/UFBoot

Supplementary Fig. S1 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

Supplementary Fig. S1. Maximum likelihood tree of reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the R. hipposideros group based on as complete as possible cytochrome-b dataset (1,103 bp). Branch support values are shown at the nodes

FIG. 6 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 6. Bivariate plot of tooth dimensions of the examined samples of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group: relative crown size of third upper molar (LM3×LaM3/LM1×LaM1) against crown size of upper canine (LCs×LaCs)

FIG. 2 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 2. Maximum likelihood tree of reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group with selected species of the families Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae based on the nuclear (left) and mitochondrial (right) datasets, respectively. Branch support values are shown by pie charts on the nodes

FIG. 1 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 1. Map of the distribution range of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (pale grey; after numerous sources) and the localities of origin and grouping of the examined samples (some symbols can denote more sites); full squares indicate the samples examined in both molecular genetic and morphological comparisons, open squares indicate the samples examined in the morphological comparison only, and open circles the samples used in molecular genetic analysis only. Grey dots denote isolated records out of the known distribution range