Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,372
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,372 results for “engagement”
Engaging urban residents in the appropriate actions to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts
<p>Data that supports the following publication: Puri, M., Goode, K.O., Johannsen, K.L., and Pienaar, E.F. (2024) <span>Engaging urban residents in the appropriate actions to mitigate </span><span>human–wildlife</span><span> conflicts. <em>Conservation Science and Practice</em>.</span></p> <p><span>Article DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13074</span></p>
Engagement
<p>We collected engagement data from 712 posts published on the Spain.info fan page, 93,385 positive reactions and 3,516 positive comments on these posts. We are interested in studying only the positive engagement, then neutral and negative valenced reactions and comments have been dismissed in our research. We used reactions, comments, and shares to calculate indexes of positive engagement, positive popularity, positive commitment, and positive virality. These variables were categorized into three groups: 25% bottom, middle, 25% top. The Facebook posts collected were publish in 2020. We then classified each post according to characteristics such as the Spanish destination promoted, the topic of the post, the presence of interaction between the brand and the audience, the language used and the tourist season at the time of publication. All these variables are categorical, but they were transformed by Optimal Scaling.</p>
Relationships between needs satisfaction and the quality of motivation with academic engagement in pre-service physical education teachers
<p><span>Academic engagement has been identified as a key determinant in the learning process. Although research on initial teacher education has focused on understanding the mechanism that can foster strong academic engagement, little is known about the roles that basic psychological need satisfaction and academic motivation may perform. The objective of this research was to examine the predictive relationships between basic psychological need satisfaction (i.e., autonomy, competence, relatedness, and novelty) and academic engagement, considering the role of academic motivation. A cross-sectional and non-randomized design was used. A total of 920 students (61.8% male; <em>M</em><sub>age </sub>= 24.73; <em>SD </em><sub>age </sub>=5.34) participated from different universities. The results from structural equation modelling revealed that competence and novelty satisfaction significantly and positively predicted academic engagement. Autonomous motivation significantly mediated the association of competence and autonomy satisfaction with academic engagement. This research underscores the importance of considering competence and autonomy satisfaction as facilitators of autonomous motivation and academic engagement in pre-service teachers. </span></p>
Questionnaire and interview guidelines related to Süsser et al. (2024) on how the COVID-19 pandemic changed stakeholder engagement processes in sustainability research in the long-term
<p>The survey questionnaire and the interview guidelines have been designed in the framework of the EU H2020 projects SENTINEL to study the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the stakeholder engagement processes in susatinability research in the longterm. We conducted interviews with researchers and engaged stakeholders, using a semi-structured interview guideline. We designed the survey as an explorative, semi-quantitative, self-completion online questionnaire, using the online tool “LimeSurvey”. The survey was reworked based on our previous survey. The study was a follow-up study on our own work (<em>Süsser, D., Ceglarz, A., Stavrakas, V., & Lilliestam, J. COVID-19 vs. stakeholder engagement: the impact of coronavirus containment measures on stakeholder involvement in European energy research projects [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. Open Research Europe 2021,1:57. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13683.1">https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.13683.1</a>). </em></p> <p>If you use this questionnaire or the interview guideline in an academic publication, please cite the following article:</p> <p><em>Süsser, D., Schibline, A. Ceglarz, A., Lilliestam, J., Stavrakas, V., & Schweizer, P.J. (2024), How the COVID-19 pandemic changed stakeholder engagement processes in sustainability research in the long-term, F1000 Research (to be published).</em></p> <p><em> </em></p>
Data file for consumer moral identity effects on engagement in sustainable consumption in personal life and workplace environments project
<p>The survey data was collected in year 2018 to identify effects of moral identity on consumer engagement in sustainable consumption. Two environments were considered when collecting data for the project - work and home environments. The data contains survey responses to a number of questions which measure consumer engagement in sustainable consumption at home, consumer engagement in sustainable consumption at work, two dimensions of moral identity and offers demographic data about the respondents. </p>
Survey Data | Public Engagement with Science: A Survey for India Alliance Grantees |
<p>Lately, the Indian research ecosystem has seen an upward trend in scientists showing interest in communicating their science and engaging with non-scientific audiences; however, the number and variety of science communication or public engagement activities undertaken formally by scientists remains low in the country. There could be many contributing factors for this trend. To explore this further, the science funding public charity in India, DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance (India Alliance), in a first of its kind of study by a funding agency in India, surveyed its 243 research grantees in November 2020 requesting their views on public engagement with science in India through an online survey. The survey included both quantitative as well as open-ended questions to assess the understanding of, participation in, and attitude of India Alliance Fellows/Grantees towards public engagement with research, identify the enablers, challenges, and barriers to public engagement for India Alliance Fellows/Grantees, understand the specific needs (training/capacity-building, funding, etc.) and develop recommendations for India Alliance as well as for the larger scientific ecosystem in the country. The survey showed that India Alliance grantees are largely motivated to engage with the public about science or their research but lack professional recognition and incentives, training and structural support to undertake public engagement activities.</p> <p>A shareable survey was designed using Microsoft Forms. The survey employed a mixed methods strategy and included 24 closed-ended questions (multiple choice and Likert scale) and nine qualitative questions, similar to open-ended questions. The questions were modelled on a similar survey carried out by Wellcome in 2016 to gather views of researchers on public engagement in Asia and Africa.</p> <p>The survey was shared by email with 243 Indian researchers in receipt of India Alliance fellowships or grants, out of which 137 (male – 78; female – 59) responded to the survey. Of these, 90 respondents were basic science researchers, 22 were clinical researchers, and 25 were public health researchers. A majority, i.e. 81% of the respondents indicated working as an independent researcher for more than 4 years (time post-PhD). Furthermore, 58% of the respondents were based at research institutions, 18% at higher education institutions, and 17% at central, state and private universities; these organisations geographically represent around 31 cities of India (9 respondents chose to not reveal their host institution in the survey). Periodic reminders were sent by email to the fellows to complete the survey. Three fellows who received funding from India Alliance for their public engagement projects were contacted via email after the survey for their views (in 50-150 words) on the public engagement funding programme of India Alliance. They were informed that their input is intended to be included in a report of the survey results, and they can choose to either stay anonymous or be credited. The data was collected from 27 November 2020 until 28 April 2021.</p> <p>Following the end of the survey, the data automatically mapped on Microsoft Excel was cleaned for duplication and errors. Microsoft Excel tools were used to analyse and visualise the data.</p> <p>The study did not undergo a formal ethical clearance process as the primary objective of the study was to gather insights of grantees to inform India Alliance’s public engagement support mechanisms. At the start of the survey, the objectives of the survey were clearly stated and the respondents were informed that the anonymized data of the survey may be communicated in the future. Participation in the survey was entirely voluntary.</p>
Data Graphs | Public Engagement with Science: A Survey for India Alliance Grantees
<p>Lately, the Indian research ecosystem has seen an upward trend in scientists showing interest in communicating their science and engaging with non-scientific audiences; however, the number and variety of science communication or public engagement activities undertaken formally by scientists remains low in the country. There could be many contributing factors for this trend. To explore this further, the science funding public charity in India, DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance (India Alliance), in a first of its kind of study by a funding agency in India, surveyed its 243 research grantees in November 2020 requesting their views on public engagement with science in India through an online survey. The survey included both quantitative as well as open-ended questions to assess the understanding of, participation in, and attitude of India Alliance Fellows/Grantees towards public engagement with research, identify the enablers, challenges, and barriers to public engagement for India Alliance Fellows/Grantees, understand the specific needs (training/capacity-building, funding, etc.) and develop recommendations for India Alliance as well as for the larger scientific ecosystem in the country. The survey showed that India Alliance grantees are largely motivated to engage with the public about science or their research but lack professional recognition and incentives, training and structural support to undertake public engagement activities.</p> <p>A shareable survey was designed using Microsoft Forms. The survey employed a mixed methods strategy and included 24 closed-ended questions (multiple choice and Likert scale) and nine qualitative questions, similar to open-ended questions. The questions were modelled on a similar survey carried out by Wellcome in 2016 to gather views of researchers on public engagement in Asia and Africa.</p> <p>The survey was shared by email with 243 Indian researchers in receipt of India Alliance fellowships or grants, out of which 137 (male – 78; female – 59) responded to the survey. Of these, 90 respondents were basic science researchers, 22 were clinical researchers, and 25 were public health researchers. A majority, i.e. 81% of the respondents indicated working as an independent researcher for more than 4 years (time post-PhD). Furthermore, 58% of the respondents were based at research institutions, 18% at higher education institutions, and 17% at central, state and private universities; these organisations geographically represent around 31 cities of India (9 respondents chose to not reveal their host institution in the survey). Periodic reminders were sent by email to the fellows to complete the survey. Three fellows who received funding from India Alliance for their public engagement projects were contacted via email after the survey for their views (in 50-150 words) on the public engagement funding programme of India Alliance. They were informed that their input is intended to be included in a report of the survey results, and they can choose to either stay anonymous or be credited. The data was collected from 27 November 2020 until 28 April 2021.</p> <p>Following the end of the survey, the data automatically mapped on Microsoft Excel was cleaned for duplication and errors. Microsoft Excel tools were used to analyse and visualise the data.</p> <p>The study did not undergo a formal ethical clearance process as the primary objective of the study was to gather insights of grantees to inform India Alliance’s public engagement support mechanisms. At the start of the survey, the objectives of the survey were clearly stated and the respondents were informed that the anonymized data of the survey may be communicated in the future. Participation in the survey was entirely voluntary.</p>
Data for: Citizen science as an ecosystem of engagement: Implications for learning and broadening participation
<p>The bulk of research on citizen science participants is project-centric, based on an assumption that volunteers experience a single project. Contrary to this assumption, survey responses (n=3,894) and digital trace data (n=3,649) from volunteers, who collectively engaged in 1,126 unique projects, revealed that multi-project participation was the norm. Only 23% of volunteers were singletons (who participated in only one project), and multi-project participants split evenly between disciplines specialists (39%) and discipline spanners (38% joined projects with different disciplinary topics), and unevenly between mode specialists (67%) and mode spanners (33% participated in online and offline projects). Public engagement was narrow: multi-project participants were eight times more likely to be white, and five times more likely to hold advanced degrees, than the general population. We propose a volunteer-centric framework that explores how the dynamic accumulation of experiences in a project ecosystem can support broad learning objectives and inclusive citizen science. </p>
Development of classifier of engagement in occupation with machine learning (CEOML) for quantifying context
<p>These are the raw data, code, and development model from the development of the classifier of engagement in occupation with machine learning (CEOML).</p>
Dataset for "Tackling global challenges with coherent policies producing more researchers and diaspora engagement"
<p>A list of science policies that were published between 2002 and 2021 by the African Union, Southern African Development Community, and the Government of Zimbabwe.</p>
Optogenetic activation of striatal D1R and D2R cells differentially engages downstream connected areas beyond the basal ganglia
<p>This dataset supports the Cell Reports publication entitled '<em>Optogenetic activation of striatal D1/D2 medium spiny neurons differentially engages downstream connected areas beyond the basal ganglia</em>' (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110161). Please refer to this publication for detailed information. </p> <p>The dataset contains functional (GE-BOLD) and anatomical (T1-weighted) scans of a total of 34 subjects (Cre-mouse lines Drd1-Cre, Drd2-Cre, A2A-Cre, and wildtype mice) in NIFTI format, multiplied by 10. The 'StimulationProtocol' text file specifies the precise onset (in seconds) and duration (in seconds) of the optogenetic stimulation during a 480 seconds functional scan. The 'SubjectDetails' file lists the subject IDs, their gender, their genotype, the number of functional scans, and whether they have an associated anatomical scan.</p>
User engagement analysis report
<p>This study looks at classification (transcribed) data from the three citizen research projects in <em>Engaging Crowds</em>, which were set up on the <a href="https://www.zooniverse.org/">Zooniverse</a> platform: <a href="https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/msalmon/hms-nhs-the-nautical-health-service"><em>HMS NHS: The Nautical Health Service</em></a>, <a href="https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/bogden/scarlets-and-blues"><em>Scarlets and Blues</em></a> and <a href="https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/emhaston/the-rbge-herbarium-exploring-gesneriaceae-the-african-violet-family"><em>The RBGE Herbarium: Exploring Gesneriaceae, the African violet family</em></a>.</p> <p>Each project presents volunteers with a series of tasks (known as ‘workflows’ in Zooniverse terminology). The projects and their workflows are summarised in Tables 1, 2 and 3 below. From these we can see that <em>HMS NHS</em> is the largest and longest-running of the three projects and so gives us our best sample of volunteer behaviour. We can also see that the workflows in <em>The RBGE Herbarium </em>were completed most quickly by volunteers, possibly aided by the project’s familiarity: it is perhaps most similar to the majority of Zooniverse projects, which deal with observational scientific data in simple workflows with short tasks. Volunteers tended to contribute to just one of the <em>Engaging Crowds </em>projects. Within the data analysed, only 13 volunteers contributed to all three projects.</p>
Leveraging Diversity in Software Engineering Education through Community Engaged Learning and a Supportive Network
<p>This replication package contains the schedule for the first cohort of our program described in the paper titled "Leveraging Diversity in Software Engineering Education through Community Engaged Learning and a Supportive Network".</p>
Spotlight Project Data - How people of colour experience and engage with climate change in Britain
<div> <div> <div> <div> <p>This repository contains data from a survey which was designed by Charles Ogunbode and Jeremy Kidwell to capture climate change-related experiences, perceptions, emotions, actions and policy preferences among UK people of colour. We are grateful for input on instrument design and analysis by Nick Anim, Dr Amiera Sawas and Serayna Solanki as well as from the project steering group: Zarina Ahmad (University of Manchester), Sara Jane Nii-Adjei (Christian Aid), Meena Rajput (Greenpeace), Reuben Fakoya-Brooks (REED Ecological Network/British Ecological Society) and Dr Neema Begum (University of Nottingham).</p> <p>Respondents included ethnic minority UK residents aged 18 years or over (N = 1,008) and the sample was gathered in March 2022 by Qualtrics Research Services. The instrument was pre-tested with a smaller number of respondents (N = 180) on 25 Feb 2022.</p> <p>The data is provided in plain-text tab-separated values format (.tsv) as well as in SPSS .sav file format. The latter is recommended for analysis, and there is an associated code repository (linked below) which contains R code used to load and analyse this data (using the haven() SPSS library). We have also included the original instrument used to collect survey data in qualtrics .qsf format and docx format. Please note: some data columns have been redacted and are not included in this data release.</p> <p>The research was funded by a Research England QR-PSF award made through the University of Birmingham.</p> <p>We very much hope that by making this data as widely available as possible, other colleagues may find opportunities to expand on this research. Towards that end, we have also made available (a) <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/11130504">an open-access plain language report </a>analysing this data, (b) <a href="https://github.com/climate-experiences/spotlight-report">all of the R code written to produce the analysis in our report</a> which others may freely use and appropriate and (c) an open access online textbook which introduces the R programming language to researchers who may not have existing data science expereince. <a href="https://kidwellj.github.io/hacking_religion_textbook/chapter_2.html">Chapter two of that textbook</a> makes explicit (and more basic) use of this dataset with specific examples and explanations of how to build the code.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div>
COMMUNI.CARE (Communication and Patient Engagement at Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer): Study Protocol
<div> <div> <div> <div> <p>Consecutive PDAC patients were enrolled at the time of diagnosis after obtaining informed consent in a single-center study for a total of 32 doctor-patient interactions. Data were audio-recorded, fully anonymized, and then transcribed. All data are in Italian.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div>
FIGURE 7 in The Belgrade PaleoBlitz: A pilot project to engage amateur paleontologists
FIGURE 7. Participants' deliverables two months after the PaleoBlitz.
Comparative Engagement: Political vs. Socio-humanitarian
<p>The war in Ukraine and the resulting flight of millions of people have once again put the reception of refugees at the centre of the public debate in Europe. Similar to 2015, volunteers are pitching in and organising support or politically campaigning for the rights of refugees. It is remarkable that many people are opening the doors of their houses and flats to those seeking protection. Private accommodation is currently making a significant contribution to ensuring the accommodation of arrivals from Ukraine. At the same time, there is a need for other forms of engagement for refugees, be it in accompanying them to the authorities, in language acquisition or in sponsorships.</p> <p>At the moment, however, we know little about what exactly engagement looks like in times of war in Ukraine. We don't know who is getting involved, for what reasons and with what attitude patterns. Are they the same people who were already active in 2015/2016, or is the Ukraine war activating other population groups? Similarly, we know little about the concrete practice of housing, such as the spatial conditions, the support and counselling needs of people hosting refugees, and the challenges. Has their engagement in general and private hosting in particular changed how they perceive refugees? By answering these questions, we can capture the current extent, shape, opportunities and challenges of refugee engagement. The findings will also enable us to better support engaged people and the government agencies, initial reception centres and charities that work with them.</p> <p>In order to close the research gap and address the acute lack of data, the project pursues an integrated research design that combines findings from different surveys with different sampling strategies, content-related foci and cooperation partners. This includes firstly a quantitative survey of private accommodation providers (including the extent, form and duration of accommodation, access to support services, practices and challenges of private accommodation (in short "private accommodation survey") and secondly a population survey of engaged people (in short "engagement survey"). Building on and inspired by previous surveys on refugee engagement (Volunteer Survey 2019, Allensbach Study on Refugee Engagement 2018), the survey allows for more differentiated insights into fields of activity, motivations, and experiences in engagement (including reasons for engagement termination). Finally, we supplement the quantitative surveys with qualitative background interviews to gain relevant contextual knowledge, an analysis of social media debates, and possibly, from 2023 onwards, discussion rounds on selected key questions with volunteers ("focus groups").</p> <p>The results of the project will enable us to formulate recommendations for action for politics and society on how to sustainably strengthen the engagement for refugees and improve the accommodation situation.</p>
CATCH-EyoU: Public Authorities engaging with youth: Interviews: UK
<p>The data set includes discourse analysis and thematic content analysis of interview transcripts collected with UK and regional politicians, local government youth policy officers, public officials and representatives of youth umbrella organizations. The data set consists of a 38 page preliminary report that summarizes themes and discourses emerging from transcribed extracts derived from 14 audio-recorded interviews in the UK. Personal data has been anonymized in order to protect participants’ privacy. </p> <p> </p> <p>This dataset aims to identify discourses and themes emerging from interviews with policy makers regarding whether and to what extent European Youth policies have been implemented at national, regional and local levels in various member states. </p> <p> </p> <p>Previous research has only partially answered these questions; comparing different policy makers’ perspectives, will allow researchers to identify tensions and contradictions in policies implementation, providing new insight for improving policy implementation.</p>
CATCH-EyoU: Public Authorities engaging with youth: Policy Documents: UK
<p>The specific data collected are written public documents by UK governmental and civil society actors regarding youth at European, national and local levels, produced during a three-year period between 2012-2014. The aim of the collection of public documents is to characterize contemporary European Union policy discourses and examine how policies and pronouncements about youth are both conceptualized and enacted in the UK. The dataset contains 10 primary documents selected and summarized in an Excel spreadsheet. Full citation of data sources is provided via excel spreadsheet. The dataset consists of original source document summaries that are catalogued in an excel spreadsheet by identifying information (author/title/year) and summaries of the general character of each document.</p>
Awareness creation, dissemination and stakeholder engagement dataset
<p>This dataset has been developed with a view to assessing the results and impact of the awareness creation, dissemination and stakeholder engagement activities of INNO-4-AGRIFOOD project.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.