Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in Fisheries monitoring in Babel: fish ethnotaxonomy in a hotspot of common names

Fig. 1. Map of the study region showing the location of Cumuruxatiba within the Marine Extractive Reserve of Corumbau, Bahia, Northeastern Brazil.

Fig. 7. Correspondence between the 89 in Fisheries monitoring in Babel: fish ethnotaxonomy in a hotspot of common names

Fig. 7. Correspondence between the 89 names given by 14 Cumuruxatiba fishers to fresh specimen photographs' shown six months later. Numbers represent the number of species.

Fig. 4 in Fisheries monitoring in Babel: fish ethnotaxonomy in a hotspot of common names

Fig. 4. Richness of common names by species for the main fishing gears utilized in Cumuruxatiba, Bahia.

Fig. 2 in Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)

Fig. 2. Scores of the first two axes derived via principal component analysis (PCA), which analysed CPUE data on fish captured by the artisanal fisheries in the two reservoirs during the study period. cross = Jurumirim Reservoir; circle = Barra Bonita Reservoir.

Fig. 3 in Fisheries monitoring in Babel: fish ethnotaxonomy in a hotspot of common names

Fig. 3. Collector's curve: cumulative number of species according to the number of landings sampled in Cumuruxatiba, Bahia.

Fig. 5 in Fisheries monitoring in Babel: fish ethnotaxonomy in a hotspot of common names

Fig. 5. Number of fish species captured by each fishing gear used by Cumuruxatiba fisherfolks (n = 141 landings).

Fig. 6 in Fisheries monitoring in Babel: fish ethnotaxonomy in a hotspot of common names

Fig. 6. Richness of common names of marine species in Cumuruxatiba, Bahia. a) frequency of species with 0-5 common names, and b) frequency of common names matching 1-4 species.

Fig. 1 in Analysis of artisanal fisheries in two reservoirs of the upper Paraná River basin (Southeastern Brazil)

Fig. 1. Location of the Barra Bonita Reservoir and the Jurumirim Reservoir with sampling sites (black circles).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 1. Размещение трансект (спΛошные черные Λинии) и Αаты провеΑения учетов в Охотском море и сопреΑеΛьных воΑах Тихого океана и Японского моря в февраΛе — мае 2020 г. РыбоΛовные районы: 05.1 — Северо-Охотоморская поΑзона; 05.2 — ЗапаΑно-Камчатская поΑзона; 05.3 — Восточно-СахаΛинская поΑзона; 05.4 — Камчатско-КуриΛьская поΑзона; 03 — Северо-КуриΛьская зона; 04 — Южно-КуриΛьская зона; 06 — зона Японское море. Пунктиром показана 200-метровая изобата Fig. 1. Transect locations (solid black lines) and dates of surveys in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan in February–May 2020. Codes of the fishery areas are as follows: 05.1 — Northern Sea of Okhotsk Subzone; 05.2 — West Kamchatka Subzone; 05.3 — East Sakhalin Subzone; 05.4 — Kamchatka-Kuril Subzone; 03 — North Kuril Zone; 04 — South Kuril Zone; 06 — Sea of Japan Zone. Dotted line indicates a 200 m isobath in Population of seabirds in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan during the winter-spring period of 2020

Рис. 1. Размещение трансект (спΛошные черные Λинии) и Αаты провеΑения учетов в Охотском море и сопреΑеΛьных воΑах Тихого океана и Японского моря в февраΛе — мае 2020 г. РыбоΛовные районы: 05.1 — Северо-Охотоморская поΑзона; 05.2 — ЗапаΑно-Камчатская поΑзона; 05.3 — Восточно-СахаΛинская поΑзона; 05.4 — Камчатско-КуриΛьская поΑзона; 03 — Северо-КуриΛьская зона; 04 — Южно-КуриΛьская зона; 06 — зона Японское море. Пунктиром показана 200-метровая изобата Fig. 1. Transect locations (solid black lines) and dates of surveys in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan in February–May 2020. Codes of the fishery areas are as follows: 05.1 — Northern Sea of Okhotsk Subzone; 05.2 — West Kamchatka Subzone; 05.3 — East Sakhalin Subzone; 05.4 — Kamchatka-Kuril Subzone; 03 — North Kuril Zone; 04 — South Kuril Zone; 06 — Sea of Japan Zone. Dotted line indicates a 200 m isobath

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Figure 1 in Accounting for variability in life-history traits for the definition of amphidromous goby fry fisheries closure periods

Figure 1. – Ranking of the 4096 alternatives of fisheries closure periods based on the MULTIMOORA analysis on the abundance and life-history traits of Sicyopterus lagocephalus and Cotylopus acutipinnis. The best alternative is ranked 1 and the worst 4096. Fisheries closure periods are colour coded.

Figure 11 in French research on fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic, from its origins to the present

Figure 11. – Results of a 10-minute dredging on the Saint-Pierre Bank Iceland scallop beds aboard the R/V Cryos in 1974 (Photo A. Forest).

Figure 6 in The fisheries of the sea around Saint-Pierre and Miquelon: from cod to sea cucumber

Figure 6. – Contrasting the growth of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) with that of orange-footed sea cucumber (Cucumaria frondosa) as representative of two, radically different fisheries in St Pierre and Miquelon. The growth parameters of G. morhua (L∞ = 98 cm total length, K = 0.15 year–1 and t = –0.5 year) are from May et al. 0 (1966), with W = 0.0075·L3 (g; cm) from Mello and Rose (2005) used for the conversion to growth in weight. Those for C. frondosa (L = 20 cm mouth-to-vent, K = 0.18 year–1 and t = –0.7 year) ∞ 0 were computed by the authors based on data in figure 7 of Hamel and Mercier (1996), with W = 16·L1.34 (g; cm, caliper length) from Harper et al. (2020) used for growth in weight.

Figure 10. – Plankton sampling aboard the R in French research on fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic, from its origins to the present

Figure 10. – Plankton sampling aboard the R/V Cryos in 1975 to study herring pre-recruitment on George's Bank as part of an ICNAF project (Photo A. Forest).

Figure 8 in French research on fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic, from its origins to the present

Figure 8. – Study of the Gulf of St. Lawrence cod stock: results of a 30-minute trawl haul aboard the R/V Cryos in 1977 (Photo A. Forest).

Figure 9 in French research on fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic, from its origins to the present

Figure 9. – Recording of a thermal profile using an expendable bathythermograph probe temperature recorder aboard the R/V Cryos in 1985 (Photo A. Forest).

Figure 6. – The R in French research on fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic, from its origins to the present

Figure 6. – The R/V Président Théodore Tissier of the Office Scien-Scien- tifique et Technique des Pêches Maritimes carried out surveys in the North West Atlantic mainly during the 1950s (source: www.lepetit-manchot.fr).

Figure 7 in French research on fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic, from its origins to the present

Figure 7. – The Saint-Pierre and Miquelon research center and the R/V Cryos in the 1970s (Photo A. Forest).

Figure 4 in French research on fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic, from its origins to the present

Figure 4. – Map of areas claimed by Canada and France as their Economic Exclusive Zones and the Court of Arbitration decision (from Parsons, 1993).

Figure 7 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 7. – Evolution of the number of employees per sector in the past two decades in Saint-Pierre and Miquelon: primary sector, including fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture (in black), secondary sector, including industry and construction (in dark grey), and tertiary sector including commerce, transport, personal services, accommodation, food service activities, public administration, education, health and social work (light grey). Data are from Iedom (2021).

Figure 4 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 4. – Official captures for the Saint-Pierre and Miquelon's fleet from 1950-2020 (data come from the FAO database).