Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,120
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,120 results for “fly species”
Fig. 57–60. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 57–60. O. simplex (Loew): 57, 58 — male head; 59 — phallus, ventral view (without basifallus); 60 — same, lateral view (without basifallus). Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 38–43. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 38–43. O. orbiculata (Hendel): 38, 39 — male head; 40 — phallus, lateral view; 41 — female head; 42 — egg guide, left blade; 43 — spermatheca. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 25–31. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 25–31. O. longilingua (Hendel): 25, 26 — male head; 27 — phallus, lateral view; 28 — same, ventral view; 29 — female head; 30 — egg guide, left blade; 31 — spermatheca. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 18–24. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 18–24. O. cunctata (Hendel): 18, 19 — male head; 20 — phallus, ventral view; 21 — same, lateral view; 22 — female head; 23 — egg guide, left blade; 24 — spermatheca. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 5–11. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 5–11. O. aeneonitens (Strobl): 5, 6 — male head; 7 — phallus, ventral view; 8 — same, lateral view; 9 — female head; 10 — egg guide, left blade; 11 — spermatheca. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 61–67. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 61–67. O. vanyushai sp. n., holotype: 61, 62 — male head; 63 — phallus, lateral view; 64 — same, ventral view; paratype: 65 — female head; 66 — egg guide, left blade; 67 — spermatheca. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 1–4. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 1–4. O. adunca sp. n., holotype: 1, 2 — male head; 3 — phallus, ventral view; 4 — same, lateral view. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 50–56. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 50–56. O. pulicaria (Meigen): 50, 51 — male head; 52 — phallus, dorsal view; 53 — same, lateral view; 54 — same, ventral view; 55 — egg guide, left blade; 56 — spermatheca. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 44–49. O in Mining Flies Of The Genus Ophiomyia (Diptera, Agromyzidae) Of Eastern Ukraine And Adjacent Territories: Review Of The Species Without A Fasciculus
Fig. 44–49. O. pinguis (Fallén): 44, 45 — male head; 46 — phallus, lateral view; 47 — same, ventral view; 48 — egg guide, left blade; 49 — spermatheca. Scale bar 0.1 mm.
Fig. 21–26. C. misella. 21 in Fruit Flies Of The Genus Campiglossa (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Iran, With The Key To Species
Fig. 21–26. C. misella. 21 — Ơ, habitus, left; 22 — mesonotum, dorsally; 23 — wing (SIZK); 24 — aculeus, ventrally; 25 — same, enlarged (SMNC); 26 — head (SIZK)
Fig. 4–11. C. difficilis. 4 in Fruit Flies Of The Genus Campiglossa (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Iran, With The Key To Species
Fig. 4–11. C. difficilis. 4 — ♀, habitus, left; 5 — mesonotum, dorsally; 6 — wing (SIZK); 7 — abdomen; 8 — epandrium; 9 — glans; 10 — aculeus, ventrally; 11 — same, apex, enlarged (SMNC).
Fig. 17–20. C. loewiana. 17 in Fruit Flies Of The Genus Campiglossa (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Iran, With The Key To Species
Fig. 17–20. C. loewiana. 17 — ♀, habitus, right; 18 — mesonotum, dorsally; 19 — wing (SIZK); 20 — abdomen (SMNC).
Fig. 12–16. C. grandinata. 12 in Fruit Flies Of The Genus Campiglossa (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Iran, With The Key To Species
Fig. 12–16. C. grandinata. 12 — ♀, habitus, right; 13 — mesonotum, dorsally (SIZK); 14 — wing; 15 — glans; 16 — epandrium (SMNC).
Fig. 27–34. C. producta. 27 in Fruit Flies Of The Genus Campiglossa (Diptera, Tephritidae) In Iran, With The Key To Species
Fig. 27–34. C. producta. 27 — ♀, habitus, right; 28 — mesonotum, dorsally; 29 — wing; 30 — head (SIZK); 31 — aculeus apex, ventrally, enlarged 32 — epandrium; 33 — glans; 34 — abdomen (SMNC);
Fig. 3 in Pyrgotid Flies Assigned To Apyrgota. Ii. New Synonyms In Eupyrgota (Subgenus Taeniomastix) (Diptera, Pyrgotidae), With Key To Subgenera And Species
Fig. 3. Eupyrgota pictiventris ♀ (1, 3–7, 9–10, 12–13 — holotype Apyrgota pictiventris; 2, 8, 11 — holotype Adapsilia facialis): 1 — habitus, dorsal; 2 — same, left; 3 — labels; 4–6 — head (4 — left, 5 — anterior, 6 — dorsal view); 7 — wing; 8 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 9 — fore femur; 10, 11 — mid femur; 12 — hind femur; 13 — abdomen, dorsal view.
Fig 35–42 in New synonymy and two new species of Caucasian moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from Azerbaijan and Georgia
Fig 35–42. Thornburghiella salihi sp. nov., ♂. 35. Frons and facets in detail. 36. Terminal lobes of labium, dorsal view. 37. Cibarium, labrum and epipharynx, dorsal view. 38. Wing. 39. Epandrium, epandrial appendages, epiproct and hipoproct, dorsal view. 40. Gonopod, diagonal view. 41. Aedeagal complex and hypandrium, dorsal view. 42. Aedeagal complex in lateral view. Scale bars: 35–36, 40–41 = 0.1 mm; 37, 39, 42 = 0.2 mm; 38 = 1 mm.
Figs 9–20 in New synonymy and two new species of Caucasian moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from Azerbaijan and Georgia
Figs 9–20. Pneumia fuehzulii sp. nov., ♂. 9. Frons and facets in detail. 10. Apical flagellomeres. 11. Cibarium, labrum and epipharynx, dorsal view. 12. Halter, lateral view. 13. Wing. 14. Epandrial appendages, lateral view. 15. Ventral epandrial plate in detail, dorsal view, epiproct, hypoproct (variability). 16. Hypandrium in detail, dorsal view. 17. Gonopod, lateral view. 18. Gonostylus, lateral view. 19. Aedeagal complex incl. parameres, dorsal view. 20. Same, lateral view. Scale bars: 9–10, 16 = 0.1 mm; 11–12, 14–15, 17–20 = 0.2 mm; 13 = 1 mm.
Figs 21–34 in New synonymy and two new species of Caucasian moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from Azerbaijan and Georgia
Figs 21–34. Thornburghiella salihi sp. nov., ♂. 21. Head, frontal view. 22. Scape, pedicel and basal flagellomeres, ascoids. 23. Apical flagellomeres. 24. Pedicel, basal two flagellomeres (variability). 25. Fusion of apical flagellomeres (variability). 26. Maxilla and palpus maxillaris. 27. Thoracic sclerites, lateral view. 28. Halter, lateral view. 29. Tarsal claw of P1, lateral view. 30. Epandrial appendages, lateral view. 31. Aedeagal complex, gonopods and hypandrium, dorsal view. 32. Gonopod, lateral view. 33. Basiphallus, dorsal view (variability). 34. Distiphallus, dorsal view (variability). Scale bars: 21, 27–28 = 0.3 mm; 22–24, 31–34 = 0.1 mm; 25–26, 30 = 0.2 mm; 29 = 0.03 mm.
Figs 1–8 in New synonymy and two new species of Caucasian moth flies (Diptera, Psychodidae, Psychodinae) from Azerbaijan and Georgia
Figs 1–8. Pneumia fuehzulii sp. nov., ♂. 1. Head, frontal view. 2. Scape, pedicel and basal flagellomeres. 3. Maxilla and palpus maxillaris. 4. Terminal lobes of labium, dorsal view. 5. Thoracic sclerites, lateral view. 6. Tarsal claw of P 1, lateral view. 7. Epandrium and epandrial appendages, dorsal view. 8. Aedeagal complex, gonopod and hypandrium, dorsal view. Scale bars: 1, 3, 7–8 = 0.2 mm; 2, 4 = 0.1 mm; 5 = 0.5 mm; 6 = 0.03 mm.
Alpine butterflies want to fly high: Species and communities shift upwards faster than their host plants
<p>Despite sometimes strong co-dependencies of insect herbivores and plants, responses of individual taxa to accelerating climate change are typically studied in isolation. Thereby, biotic interactions that potentially limit species in tracking their preferred climatic niches are ignored. Here, we chose butterflies as a prominent representative of herbivorous insects to investigate the impacts of temperature changes and their larval host plant distributions along a 1.4 km elevational gradient in the German Alps. Following a sampling protocol of 2009, we re-visited 33 grassland plots in 2019 over an entire growing season. We quantified changes in butterfly abundance and richness by repeated transect walks on each plot and disentangled the direct and indirect effects of locally assessed temperature, site management, and larval and adult food resource availability on these patterns. Additionally, we determined elevational range shifts of butterflies and host plants at both the community and species level. Comparing the two sampled years (2009, 2019), we found a severe decline in butterfly abundance and a clear upward shift of butterflies along the elevational gradient. We detected shifts in the peak of species richness, community composition and at the species level, whereby mountainous species shifted particularly strongly. In contrast, host plants showed barely any change, neither concerning species richness, nor individual species shifts. Further, temperature and host plant richness were the main drivers of butterfly richness, with change in temperature explaining best the change of richness over time. We conclude that host plants are not yet hindering butterfly species and communities from shifting upwards. However, the mismatch between butterfly and host plant shifts might become a problem for this very close plant-herbivore relationship, especially towards higher elevations, if butterflies fail to adapt to new host plants. Further, our results support the value of conserving traditional extensive pasture use as a promoter of host plants and thereby butterfly richness.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.