Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
160
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
160 results for “legal”
Financial and Insurance Assistance- Oncology Financial and Legal Navigation Program
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05876325. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Strengthening Families and Reducing Risk Thru Developmental and Legal Collaboration
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01343940. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Computer-Supported Management of Medical-Legal Issues Impacting Child Health
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01800669. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Age Estimation of Adolescents for Legal Purposes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01577498. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
Feasibility Testing a Meditation App for Professionals Working With Youth in the Legal System
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06555172. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Substudy in Relation to the GTEx Project
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02887339. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
German legal decision corpus
<p>The corpus belongs to the paper "Design and Implementation of German Legal Decision Corpora" from Urchs et al.[1].</p> <p>Please cite [1] when using the corpus.</p> <p>[1] Urchs Stefanie, Mitrović Jelena, and Granitzer Michael. "Design and Implementation of German Legal Decision Corpora" ICAART. 2021.</p> <p>This corpus consits of 32,748 decisions of Bavarian courts (between 2015 and 2020), enriched with meta data. The decisisons are provided on the website www.gesetze-bayern.de.</p> <p>These decisions are safed in the following JSON format:</p> <p><code>{ </code></p> <p><code>"meta": </code></p> <p><code> { "meta_title": "", </code></p> <p><code> "court": "", </code></p> <p><code> "decision_style": "", </code></p> <p><code> "date": "", </code></p> <p><code> "file_number":"", </code></p> <p><code> "title": "", </code></p> <p><code> "norm_chains": ["", ""], </code></p> <p><code> "decision_guidelines": ["", ""], </code></p> <p><code> "keywords": "", </code></p> <p><code> "lower_court": ["", ""], </code></p> <p><code> "additional_information": "", </code></p> <p><code> "decision_reference": "" </code></p> <p><code>}, </code></p> <p><code>"decision_text":</code></p> <p><code> { "tenor": ["",""], </code></p> <p><code> "legal_facts": ["",""], </code></p> <p><code> "decision_reasons": ["",""] </code></p> <p><code> } </code></p> <p><code>} </code></p> <p>metadata fields (not all fields are always filled):</p> <p>- Meta Title: Title of the decision as stated on the website</p> <p>- Court: Name of the issuing court</p> <p>- Decision Style: Style of the decision</p> <p>- Date: Issuing date</p> <p>- File Number: File number of the descision</p> <p>- Title: Title of the decision as stated by the court</p> <p>- Norm Chains: Norms related to the decision</p> <p>- Decision Guideline: Guidlines that lead to the decision</p> <p>- Keywords: Keywords associated with the decision</p> <p>- Lower Court: Court that worked with this decision beforehand</p> <p>- Additional Information: more information</p> <p>- Decison reference: reference to the decision in beck-online</p> <p> </p> <p>The descision text is structured in three parts, not all parts are always filled.</p> <p>- Tenor: short description of the outcomes of the legal decision issued by the court</p> <p>- Legal Facts: Statment of all facts that lead to a decision</p> <p>- Decision Reasons: Indepth explanaition why a court decided in a certain way.</p>
German legal jugements annotated with judement style components
<p>This corpus consits of 200 annotated German legal judgements. In all judgements the parts "conclusion", "definition" and "subsuption" of the German legal writing style "Urteilsstil" (judgement style) are annotated.</p> <p>It belongs to the paper "Design and Implementation of German Legal Decision Corpora" from Urchs et al.[1].</p> <p>Please cite [1] when using the corpus.</p> <p>The annotation of the corpus was made possible by the research center for legal questions of digitalization processes (“FREDI”) [2].</p> <p> </p> <p>[1] Urchs Stefanie, Mitrović Jelena, and Granitzer Michael. "Design and Implementation of German Legal Decision Corpora" ICAART. 2021.</p> <p>[2] https://www.jura.uni-passau.de/en/faculty/institutes-and-centres/research-center-for-legal-questions-of-digitalization-processes-fredi/</p>
The institutional and legal analysis of the investigated cases
<p>Overview presenting the results of the institutional-legal analysis of the investigated cases. Research conducted under the project <em>From dialog to deliberation. Non-public actors as (non)present participants in local decision-making, </em>financed within the framework of the Programme DIALOG by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland. The project implemented in the years 2018-2020. The project no. DIALOG 0163/2017. </p>
Adjudicating national context – elements of legal pluralism in the practice(s) of the European Court of Human Rights?
<p>Dataset for submission til German Law Journal. See Readme.txt for details.</p>
Data from: Compromised external validity: federally produced cannabis does not reflect legal markets
As the most widely used illicit drug worldwide, and as a source of numerous under-studied pharmacologically-active compounds, a precise understanding of variability in psychological and physiological effects of Cannabis varieties is essential. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is designated as the sole legal producer of Cannabis for use in US research studies. We sought to compare the chemical profiles of Cannabis varieties that are available to consumers in states that have state-legalized use versus what is available to researchers interested in studying the plant and its effects. Our results demonstrate that the federally-produced Cannabis has significantly less variety and lower concentrations of cannabinoids than are observed in state-legal U.S. dispensaries. Most dramatically, NIDA's varieties contain only 27% of the THC levels and as much as 11–23 times the Cannabinol (CBN) content compared to what is available in the state-legal markets. Research restricted to using the current range of federally-produced Cannabis thus may yield limited insights into the chemical, biological and pharmacological properties, and medical potential of material that is available in the state markets. Investigation is urgently needed on the full diversity of Cannabis chemotypes known to be available to the public.
ADMINISTRATION OF DIRECT TAXES AND ITS THEORETICAL AND LEGAL BASIS
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
LEGAL EDUCATION IN INCREASING LEGAL AWARENESS AND LEGAL CULTURE - ISSUES OF ENSURING EDUCATION INTEGRATION
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL NORMS ON LIABILITY FOR CRIMES IN THE CUSTOMS SPHERE IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
LEGAL EDUCATION AND ITS IMPORTANCE
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
FAMILY BUSINESS IN UZBEKISTAN: OBJECTIVE NECESSITY OF DEVELOPMENT, ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
REGULATORY AND LEGAL BASIS OF STABILIZATION OF ENERGY INDUSTRY ENTERPRISES
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
INTEGRATION OF CHATGPT INTO LEGAL PRACTICE: WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL RISKS FOR LAW FIRMS?
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ACTIVITY OF NEW UZBEKISTAN IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL CONVENTIONS
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
AS A LEGAL BASIS FOR THE FORMATION OF FAMILY RELATIONS IN BOYS.
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.