Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in "Migratory beekeeping and its influence on the prevalence and dispersal of pathogens to managed and wild bees"

Fig. 1. Flow chart of the process of the systematic review on the different impacts of migratory beekeeping (MB), including the number of studies analysed at each step of the review process. Detailed data in Supplementary Table 1.

Fig. 2 in "Migratory beekeeping and its influence on the prevalence and dispersal of pathogens to managed and wild bees"

Fig. 2. Cumulative number of publications examining in general the impact of migratory beekeeping (blue dots) and in particular the prevalence of pathogens (orange dots) from 1990 to 2022. Exponential trend lines are represented by dashed lines. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Figure 4 in Migratory fishes from rivers to reservoirs: seasonal and longitudinal perspectives

Figure 4. Gonadal maturation stage of migratory species during the wet (right side) and dry (left side) seasons in each group. Groups formed in the system by gonadal maturation stage: 1) immature, 2) initial maturation, 3) mature; 4) post-spawning.

Figure 1 in Migratory fishes from rivers to reservoirs: seasonal and longitudinal perspectives

Figure 1. Geographic location and sampling sites in the Grande River Basin, Minas Gerais.Riv: River; Trans: Transition, Cam: Camargos UHE; Itu: Itutinga UHE. More sampling sites details in Table 2.

Figure 3 in Migratory fishes from rivers to reservoirs: seasonal and longitudinal perspectives

Figure 3. Distribution of migratory fishes during wet (blue) and dry (red) seasons along the sampled system. Represented by adults (ball) and juveniles (square) in both seasons. The symbol size indicates fish abundance.

Figure 2 in Migratory fishes from rivers to reservoirs: seasonal and longitudinal perspectives

Figure 2. Variation (median ± interquartile range and amplitude) along the groups: (A) fish richness; (B) fish numeric abundance; (C) fish abundance.

FIGURE 3 in Anthropogenic river fragmentation reduces long-term viability of the migratory fish Salminus brasiliensis (Characiformes: Bryconidae) populations

FIGURE 3 | A. Salminus brasiliensis population structure from the Bayesian cluster analysis for K = 2 (see also S1). Black lines separate the different sampled populations based on location (Pop1, Pop2, Pop3, Pop4 and Pop5; Fig. 1). B. DAPC scatterplots and membership probabilities show the first two principal components of the DAPC. Populations are represented in different colors: 1 - Lilac (Pop5); 2 - Green (Pop4), 3 - Orange (Pop3), 4 - Lilac (Pop2) and 5 - Brown (Pop1). C. Membership probabilities (in bar plots), represent individuals in different clusters.

FIGURE 2 in Anthropogenic river fragmentation reduces long-term viability of the migratory fish Salminus brasiliensis (Characiformes: Bryconidae) populations

FIGURE 2 | Predicted genetic diversity in Salminus brasiliensis populations with distinct fragmentation levels over the next 100 years. Using BOTTLESIM 2.6, we estimated the retained percentage of effective number of alleles (Ae) and expected heterozygosity (He) under 100%, 75% and 50% of retain bottleneck scenarios. In all populations, the current population size is unable to maintain 80% of current genetic diveristy, which it is indicated by a red line.

FIGURE 1 in Anthropogenic river fragmentation reduces long-term viability of the migratory fish Salminus brasiliensis (Characiformes: Bryconidae) populations

FIGURE 1 | Study area of Salminus brasiliensis populations in the Uruguay River basin, southern Brazil. A. Picture of Canyon Agusto César Gorge, Upper Uruguay River (acquired rights); B. Picture of Yucumã our Moconá Falls (google font: https://7mar.com.ar/mocona). Salminus brasiliensis (personal picture).

FIGURE 2 in Radiotagging a long-distance migratory characid fish: reproduction after surgery, tag losses, and effects in weight

FIGURE 2 | Percentage weight variation of fish that remained alive in the pond until the end of the experiment. Tagging occurred in 16–18/11/2016, survey 1 in 24/08/2016, survey 2 in 28/09/2016, survey 3 in 21/10/2016, survey 4 in 09/11/2016, and survey 5 in 03/05/2017. Reproduction occurred between survey 4 and survey 5.

FIGURE 1 in Radiotagging a long-distance migratory characid fish: reproduction after surgery, tag losses, and effects in weight

FIGURE 1 | Mortality by event, treatment, and sex. Tagging occurred in 16–18/11/2016, survey 1 in 24/08/2016, survey 2 in 28/09/2016, survey 3 in 21/10/2016, survey 4 in 09/11/2016, and survey 5 in 03/05/2017. Reproduction occurred between survey 4 and survey 5. We excluded fishes with unidentified sex from the figure.

FIGURE 3 in The most important fishery resource in the Amazon, the migratory catfish Brachyplatystoma vaillantii (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae), is composed by an unique and genetically diverse population in the Solimões-Amazonas River System

FIGURE 3 | Analysis of the BAPS 6.0 program showing three clusters (green, red, and blue) distributed between the five sampled locations of Brachyplatystoma vaillantii.

FIGURE 2 in The most important fishery resource in the Amazon, the migratory catfish Brachyplatystoma vaillantii (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae), is composed by an unique and genetically diverse population in the Solimões-Amazonas River System

FIGURE 2 | Network of Brachyplatystoma vaillantii haplotypes. The number shown within a circle identifies the number of specimens sharing those haplotypes; circles without numbers represent unique haplotypes. White circles represent hypothetical intermediate haplotypes. Each locality is represented by the same colors in Fig. 1: red – Tabatinga, orange – Tefé, green – Manaus, purple – Santarém and blue – Estuary.

FIGURE 1 in The most important fishery resource in the Amazon, the migratory catfish Brachyplatystoma vaillantii (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae), is composed by an unique and genetically diverse population in the Solimões-Amazonas River System

FIGURE 1 | Sampling sites for Brachyplatystoma vaillantii along the Solimões-Amazonas River axis. The localities were grouped in five fishing landing towns as follow: Red circles: Tabatinga (1 – Benjamin Constant, 2 – Tabatinga), Orange circles: Tefé (3 – Mucura Lake, 4 – Tefé, 5 – Vila Nova), Green circles: Manaus (6 – Manaus, 7 – Careiro da Várzea), Purple circles: Santarém (8 – Santarém, 9 – Tapará) and Blues circles: Estuary (10 – Almeirim, 11 – Gurupá, 12 – Breves, 13 – Belém, 14 – Salvaterra).

FIGURE 4 in The most important fishery resource in the Amazon, the migratory catfish Brachyplatystoma vaillantii (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae), is composed by an unique and genetically diverse population in the Solimões-Amazonas River System

FIGURE 4 | Analysis of the FASTBAPS program. Numbers are individual sequence of Brachyplatystoma vaillantii. Colors ranging from red for the lowest probabilities and clear yellow for the highest probabilities support for bootstrap.

FIGURE 5 in The main channel and river confluences as spawning sites for migratory fishes in the middle Uruguay River

FIGURE 5 | Longitudinal profile of the Uruguay River depicting the upper, middle and lower reaches, the position of dams and the number of migratory species recorded in studies that sampled ichthyoplankton.

FIGURE 3 in The main channel and river confluences as spawning sites for migratory fishes in the middle Uruguay River

FIGURE 3 | Proportion Capture (%) of the different embryonic development stages of fishes captured in the middle Uruguay River and tributaries, between October 2016 and January 2017. Degree of embryonic development: Segmentation (S), Head-Tail (HT) and Free-Tail (FT).

FIGURE 4 in The main channel and river confluences as spawning sites for migratory fishes in the middle Uruguay River

FIGURE 4 | Proportion Capture (%) of the different larval development stages of fishes captured in the middle Uruguay River and tributaries, between October 2016 and January 2017. Degree of larval stages of development: LV = Yolk-sac larvae, PF = Preflexion, F = Flexion and PoF = Postflexion.

FIGURE 2 in The main channel and river confluences as spawning sites for migratory fishes in the middle Uruguay River

FIGURE 2 | Spatial distribution of median, first and third quartile, maximum and minimum densities of fish eggs and larvae collected in the middle Uruguay River and tributaries, between October 2016 and January 2017. Different letters within each graph indicate a statistically significant difference (p <0.05). A. Eggs; and B. Larvae.

FIGURE 1 in The main channel and river confluences as spawning sites for migratory fishes in the middle Uruguay River

FIGURE 1 | The Uruguay River basin, the study area in the middle Uruguay River, and the six sampling sites investigated (Chan-C, Trib-C, Chan-I, Trib-I, Chan-P, and Trib-P).