Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
858
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
858 results for “monitoring data”
Meteorology and soil moisture data collected at multiple frequencies from the Cross-scale Interactions Study (CSIS) Block-12 site automated monitoring stations: Jornada Basin LTER, 2013 - ongoing
This dataset contains summary data collected at the Jornada Basin LTER program's Cross Scale Interactions Study (CSIS) Block-12 site automated weather station and associated soil substation at several temporal scales. Air temperature and wind are summarized every 5-minutes, and all aboveground sensors are summarized at 30-minute, hourly and daily frequencies. Soil moisture is measured at a 30-minute frequency and summarized daily. Observed values include average/maximum/minimum air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed; average wind direction; soil moisture, temperature and conductivity. Aboveground sensors are measured and calculated based on 1-second scan rate. Soil moisture is measured every 30-minutes near the weather station and approximately 30-meters distance at a nearby substation. Wind speed is measured at 37cm, 75 cm, 150 cm, and 300 cm, wind direction at approximately 3m, and air temperature and relative humidity at approximately 2.5m. Soil sensors are installed at 10, 20 and 30cm depths. The nearest precipitation data is available from CSIS Block-13 site automated weather station located 290m distance.
Meteorology and soil moisture data collected at multiple frequencies from the Cross-scale Interactions Study (CSIS) Block-13 site automated monitoring stations: Jornada Basin LTER, 2013 - ongoing
This dataset contains summary data collected at the Jornada Basin LTER program's Cross Scale Interactions Study (CSIS) Block-13 site automated weather station and associated soil substation at several temporal scales. Precipitation data are collected at 1-second frequency during rain events, air temperature and wind are summarized every 5-minutes, and all aboveground sensors are summarized at 30-minute, hourly and daily frequencies. Soil moisture is measured at a 30-minute frequency and summarized daily. Observed values include average/maximum/minimum air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed; average wind direction; soil moisture, temperature and conductivity. Aboveground sensors are measured and calculated based on 1-second scan rate. Soil moisture is measured every 30-minutes near the weather station and approximately 30-meters distance at a nearby substation. Wind speed is measured at 37cm, 75 cm, 150 cm, and 300 cm, wind direction at approximately 3m, and air temperature and relative humidity at approximately 2.5m. Soil sensors are installed at 10, 20 and 30cm depths.
Meteorology and soil moisture data collected at multiple frequencies from the Cross-scale Interactions Study (CSIS) Block-14 site automated monitoring stations: Jornada Basin LTER, 2013 - ongoing
This dataset contains summary data collected at the Jornada Basin LTER program's Cross Scale Interactions Study (CSIS) Block-14 site automated weather station and associated soil substation at several temporal scales. Precipitation data are collected at 1-second frequency during rain events, air temperature and wind are summarized every 5-minutes, and all aboveground sensors are summarized at 30-minute, hourly and daily frequencies. Soil moisture is measured at a 30-minute frequency and summarized daily. Observed values include average/maximum/minimum air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed; average wind direction; soil moisture, temperature and conductivity. Aboveground sensors are measured and calculated based on 1-second scan rate. Soil moisture is measured every 30-minutes near the weather station and approximately 30-meters distance at a nearby substation. Wind speed is measured at 37cm, 75 cm, 150 cm, and 300 cm, wind direction at approximately 3m, and air temperature and relative humidity at approximately 2.5m. Soil sensors are installed at 10, 20 and 30cm depths.
Meteorology and soil moisture data collected at multiple frequencies from the Cross-scale Interactions Study (CSIS) Block-15 site automated monitoring stations: Jornada Basin LTER, 2013 - ongoing
This dataset contains summary data collected at the Jornada Basin LTER program's Cross Scale Interactions Study (CSIS) Block-15 site automated weather station and associated soil substation at several temporal scales. Precipitation data are collected at 1-second frequency during rain events, air temperature and wind are summarized every 5-minutes, and all aboveground sensors are summarized at 30-minute, hourly and daily frequencies. Soil moisture is measured at a 30-minute frequency and summarized daily. Observed values include average/maximum/minimum air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed; average wind direction; soil moisture, temperature and conductivity. Aboveground sensors are measured and calculated based on 1-second scan rate. Soil moisture is measured every 30-minutes near the weather station and approximately 30-meters distance at a nearby substation. Wind speed is measured at 37cm, 75 cm, 150 cm, and 300 cm, wind direction at approximately 3m, and air temperature and relative humidity at approximately 2.5m. Soil sensors are installed at 10, 20 and 30cm depths.
EPSRC HEED Data Repository: Stove Use Monitoring System
<p>The dataset deposited here was prepared under the EPSRC-funded <a href="http://heed-refugee.coventry.ac.uk/">Humanitarian Engineering and Energy for Displacement</a> research project (EP/P029531/1). The project aimed to understand energy needs of displaced communities, create an evidence base on the usage of different energy interventions and provide recommendations for improved design of future energy interventions to better meet the needs of people.</p> <p>As part of the project, we deployed Stove Use Monitoring Systems (SUM) on clay cook stoves in Kigeme camp, Rwanda. The aim was to (a) measure and evaluate temperature profiles within stove enclosure and on the surface of stoves (b) evaluate frequency and duration of stove use. The SUM consisted of 2 sensors - a thermocouple (to measure temperature within the stove) and a Si7021 sensor (to measure temperature and humidity outside the stove), connected to an Arduino MKR GSM 1400 board. The data measured by the sensors was stored only if the change in values exceeded a set threshold for either of the readings. The SUM was powered by a re-chargeable Li-Ion battery of 3.7V and a rating of 7.59Wh.</p> <p>The study was conducted in 2 phases. In phase 1 (02 July 2019 to 30 September 2019), data was collected from 15 SUM and stored locally on SD card as well as communicated to a remote server via GSM. The time of data collection was recorded using GSM functionality. However, several GSM and MQTT failures were noted leading to loss of timestamp values as well as shorter battery lifetime due to re-transmission tries. In phase 2 (02 October 2019 to 17 October 2019), data was collected from 9 SUM and only stored locally on SD cards. The time of data collection was recorded using an external RTC clock connected to the Arduino board. The data from both phases of study is deposited here along with the metadata.</p>
EPSRC HEED Data Repository: Lantern Monitoring System
<p>The dataset deposited here was prepared under the EPSRC-funded <a href="http://heed-refugee.coventry.ac.uk/">Humanitarian Engineering and Energy for Displacement</a> research project (EP/P029531/1). The project aimed to understand energy needs of displaced communities, create an evidence base on the usage of different energy interventions and provide recommendations for improved design of future energy interventions to better meet the needs of people.</p> <p>As part of the project, we deployed Lantern Monitoring Systems in Nyabiheke camp, Rwanda. The aim was to (a) evaluate lantern usage pattern – static or mobile (b) evaluate lantern charge and discharge pattern to understand consumption behaviour. The mobile lantern monitors comprise of a D.light S30 solar lantern fitted with an Arduino-based monitoring device. The most integral part of the device is the Arduino MKR GSM 1400 board connected to an ADXL345 inertial motion unit sensor. The ADXL is used to generate activity and freefall interrupts based on acceleration readings when the lantern is in use. These interrupts are, in turn, processed to calculate the step count of the user. Additionally, the voltage of lantern battery is measured using an in-house designed voltage monitor to evaluate the discharging and charging patterns. The updated values of step count, rate of change of steps and device and lantern battery voltage are stored only if a significant change in the step count is detected. The device is packaged within the lantern casing and powered through a re-chargeable Li-Ion battery of 3.7V and a rating of 7.59Wh.</p> <p>The study was conducted in 2 phases. In phase 1 (03 July 2019 to 30 September 2019), data was collected from 60 lanterns and stored locally on SD card as well as communicated to a remote server via GSM. The time of data collection was recorded using GSM functionality. However, several GSM and MQTT failures were noted leading to loss of timestamp values as well as shorter battery lifetime due to re-transmission tries. Moreover, several incidents of theft and device failures were reported leading to loss of data. In phase 2 (09 October 2019 to 18 December 2019), the design of lantern monitors was modified to fix these issues. The data was collected from 54 lanterns data and only stored locally on SD cards. The time of data collection was recorded using an external RTC clock connected to the Arduino board and internal watchdog timer was used to reset the device in case of failures. While certain failures persisted, the data yield was considerably higher than phase 1 of the study. The data from both phases of study is deposited here along with the metadata.</p>
Data for: Application Performance Monitoring: Trade-Off between Overhead Reduction and Maintainability
<p>Monitoring of a software system provides insights into its runtime behavior, improving system analysis and comprehension. System-level monitoring approaches focus, e.g., on network monitoring, providing information on externally visible system behavior. Application-level performance monitoring frameworks, such as Kieker or Dapper, allow to observe the internal application behavior, but introduce runtime overhead depending on the number of instrumentation probes.<br /> We report on how we were able to significantly reduce the runtime overhead of the Kieker monitoring framework. For achieving this optimization, we employed micro-benchmarks with a structured performance engineering approach. During optimization, we kept track of the impact on maintainability of the framework. In this paper, we discuss the emerged trade-off between performance and maintainability in this context.<br /> To the best of our knowledge, publications on monitoring frameworks provide none or only weak performance evaluations, making comparisons cumbersome. However, our micro-benchmark, presented in this paper, provides a basis for such comparisons. Our experiment code and data are available as open source software such that interested researchers may repeat or extend our experiments for comparison on other hardware platforms or with other monitoring frameworks.</p> <p>This dataset supplements the paper and contains the raw experimental data as well as several generated diagrams for each experiment.</p>
Data from: The effect of probe density coverage on the detection of oenological tannins in quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) experiments
<p>Polyphenols, crucial compounds in grapes, musts, and wines, influence grape ripening, must fermentation, and final wine quality. Current detection methods for polyphenols are expensive, time-consuming, and reliant on specialized laboratories and personnel. This study proposes the use of a functionalized acoustic sensor to address these limitations and efficiently detect oenological polyphenols.</p> <p>The method employs a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) combined with a gelatin-based probe layer to detect the target analyte. The sensor is functionalized by optimizing probe coverage density, accomplished through the use of 12-mercaptododecanoic acid (12-MCA) for probe immobilization onto the gold sensor surface, along with dithiothreitol (DTT) as a reducing and competitive binding agent. Varying concentrations of 12-MCA and DTT allow for control over probe density, with QCM-D measurements demonstrating effective adjustment, ranging from 0.2 × 10^13 to 2 × 10^13 molecules cm^−2. The study also explores the interaction between the probe and tannins, confirming the ability of the sensor to detect them. Notably, lower probe coverage yields higher detection signals when normalized to probe immobilization signals. Additionally, significant alterations in the mechanical properties of the functionalization layer occur after interaction with samples.</p> <p>Combining QCM-D with gelatin functionalization presents promising applications in the wine industry. This approach enables real-time monitoring, requires minimal sample preparation, and offers high sensitivity for quality control purposes.</p>
EJPSOIL ARTEMIS on-farm monitoring of soil health and ecosystems services (meta)data
<p>This database includes the data and metadata from the initial on-farm monitoring od soil health and soil related ecosystem services of the EJPSOIL ARTEMIS project. </p>
Local survey network and monitoring data of VLBI telescope at Metsähovi
<p>Observations of local surveying network and monitorin at Metsähovi. More information is in file Data_description.pdf.</p>
Monitoring open access publishing of NWO funded research (2015-2021) data set
<p>This is the dataset underlying the report "Monitoring open access publishing of NWO funded research" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7041897">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7041897</a>)</p> <p>The report presents statistics on the extent to which publications from the period 2015–2021 funded by NWO are available in Open Access. The analyses presented in this report also cover publications funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMw. This report builds on two earlier reports, published in <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/4446042">2020</a> and <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/5056043">2021</a>, covering publications from the period 2015–2018 and 2015-2020, respectively.</p>
[Data] Qualify-As-You-Go: Sensor Fusion of Optical and Acoustic Signatures with Contrastive Deep Learning for Multi-Material Composition Monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process
<p><br>Growing demand for multi-material Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) faces process control and quality monitoring challenges, particularly in ensuring precise material composition. This study explores optical and acoustic emission signals during LPBF processes with multiple materials, addressing challenges in process control and ensuring accurate material composition. Experimental data from processing five powder compositions were collected using a custombuilt monitoring system in a commercial LPBF machine. The research categorised signals from LPBF processing various compositions, enhancing prediction accuracy by combining optical with acoustic data and training convolutional neural networks using contrastive learning. Latent spaces of trained models using two contrastive loss functions, clustered acoustic and optical<br>emissions based on similarities, aligning with five compositions. Contrastive learning and sensor fusion were found to be essential for monitoring LPBF processes involving multiple materials. This research advances the understanding of multi-material LPBF, highlighting sensor fusion strategies’ potential for improving quality control in additive manufacturing. Data set for this work is hosted here</p>
Raw Data for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Structural Health Monitoring Systems Under Temperature Influence
<p>The documentation on these laboraty tests is titled "Documentation.pdf"</p> <p> </p> <p>Raw data from distance measurements using laser triangulation sensors acquired under different temperatures are provided. Six sensors were tested per experiment (CSV file), and in each experiment the boundary conditions are varied as follows:<br><br>00RawData_LTS_1m: The entire measurement system is subject to temperature change, with initial distances chosen as LTS1/LTS2=17 mm, LTS3/LTS4=21 mm nd LTS5/LTS6=25 mm.<br><br>01RawData_LTS_1m_SwitchedDistances: The entire measurement system is subject to temperature change, with the selected initial distances of LTS1/LTS2=25 mm, LTS3/LTS4=17 mm nd LTS5/LTS6=21 mm.<br><br>02RawData_LTS_1m_SwitchedDistances2: The entire measurement system is subject to temperature change, with initial distances selected as LTS1/LTS2=21 mm, LTS3/LTS4=25 mm nd LTS5/LTS6=17 mm.<br><br>03RawData_LTS_1m_OnlySensor: Only the sensors of the measuring system are subject to temperature change, where the selected initial distances are LTS1/LTS2=21 mm, LTS3/LTS4=25 mm nd LTS5/LTS6=17 mm.<br><br>04RawData_LTS_1m_OnlyMeasuringAmplifier: Only the measuring amplifiers of the measuring system are subject to temperature change. The selected initial distances are LTS1/LTS2=21 mm, LTS3/LTS4=25 mm nd LTS5/LTS6=17 mm.<br><br>05RawData_LTS_1m_OnlyCable: Only the cables of the measurement system are subject to the temperature change. The selected initial distances are LTS1/LTS2=21 mm, LTS3/LTS4=25 mm nd LTS5/LTS6=17 mm.<br><br>Tested temperature range: -10°C to 50°C<br>Measuring frequency: 1 Hz<br>Measuring amplifier: Q.bloxx.XL A107 Gantner Instruments<br>Cable: 4-pole, 1.00 m length<br>Sensor: OM20-P0026.HH.YIN laser triangulation sensor from Baumer</p>
Detailed sap flow monitoring data at Weierbach catchment, Luxembourg
<p>The current repository contains the dasometric data of monitored trees, hourly sap flow data, and tree surveys carried out at the Weierbach catchment during 2019 and 2020. The monitored trees include the following species:</p> <p>- Beech (<em>Fagus sylvatica </em>L.)</p> <p>- Douglas Fir (<em>Pseudotsuga menziesii</em> (Mirbel) Franco)</p> <p>- Spruce (<em>Picea abies </em>L.)</p> <p>- Oak (hybrids of <em>Quercus petraea</em> (Matt.) Liebl. and <em>Quercus robur </em>L.)</p> <p>The sap flow data for all the trees is presented in cm/hr.</p> <p>The bark data presented in the "dasometry_individual_trees.csv" was obtained from the literature.</p>
Long-term moss monitoring network for atmospheric deposition in Germany, link to research data and scientific software
<p>Research data and scientific software related to a study that aims to restructure a long-term monitoring network using moss as biomonitor for atmospheric deposition in Germany. Data from the European Moss Survey 2005 and a statistically based methodology including a decision support system were used to design the spatial network for the 2005 survey.</p>
Monitoring of the Vistula estuary into the Baltic Sea using Sentinel-2 data
<p>Senitnel-2 data and dedicated presentations were used during the Daily Animation. The aim of the exercise was to familiarize the participants with the structure of Senitnel-2 data and creating RGB compositions in SNAP and QGIS software.</p> <p>Links to the presentation:</p> <p>http://fabspace.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/RGB-w-QGIS.pdf</p> <p>http://fabspace.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/RGB-w-SNAP.pdf</p> <p> </p>
Titration_DB: NMR-monitored protein pH titration chemical shift data.
<p>This archive contains a backup of the NMR titration_db database raw chemical shift data.<br> Reference: D. Farrell et al., “Titration_DB: Storage and analysis of NMR-monitored protein pH titration curves.,” Proteins, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 843–857, 2009.</p> <p>This data was formerly hosted on an interactive website which is no longer active. The files are stored as csv format, one per protein. They are also split into three folders according to the nuclei whose chemical shifts were used to detect the measurement (1H,13C or 15 N). Much of this data was obtained from literature. A table in the zip file (titration_dataset_info.csv) associates the protein name with the original paper. </p> <p>Note that the database stored the pka values fit using a model to each residue dataset. This is not stored here.</p> <p>Also present is a file titdb.fs. This is a binary file that can only be opened using the PEATDB software. PEATDB (Protein Engineering Analysis Tool - Database) was an application for sharing, analysing and storing experimental and theoretical data from Protein Engineering experiments.<br> This is now legacy software and no longer maintained. It was used to allow interactive fitting of the titration data using the Ekin module.<br> It is still possible to install this software if you really need to. It is stored on github at https://github.com/dmnfarrell/peat.</p> <p>D. Farrell May 2019</p>
Monitoring and evaluation of UKRI's Open Access Policy: Exploring the use of open data sources to inform baseline values - Dataset
<p>This dataset accompanies the report <em>"Monitoring and evaluation of UKRI's Open Access Policy: Exploring the use of open data sources to inform baseline values"</em>, which is available via Zenodo.<br><br>It provides record-level data of UKRI-funded and UK-affiliated research output (limited to journal articles with Crossref DOIs) published between 2012 and 2022 - including bibliographic metadata as well as data on open access availability, publisher, national and international collaborations, citations, views and downloads, altmetrics and subjects (fields). All variables are documented in the data dictionary included in this Zenodo record.</p> <p>The code used to generate the dataset from open data sources is available on GitHub. </p> <p>The following data sources were used:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Gateway to Research (records downloaded between 2023-11-05 and 2023-11-13)</p> </li> <li> <p>Crossref (Metadata Plus snaphot 2023-10-31, Crossref member route API 2024-01-23)</p> </li> <li> <p>OpenAlex (data snapshot 2023-10-18)</p> </li> <li> <p>Unpaywall (data snapshot 2023-11-27)</p> </li> <li> <p>IRUS UK (2024-04-03)</p> </li> <li> <p>Crossref Event Data (2023-04-01)</p> </li> </ul> <p><strong></strong><br><br>The project made use of Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative (COKI) infrastructure, which is documented on GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/The-Academic-Observatory">https://github.com/The-Academic-Observatory</a>. </p>
Data_Fig1_Monitoring Changes in the Oxidizing Milieu in the Endoplasmic Reticulum of Mammalian Cells Using HyPerER
<p>Data of JB_10.21769_BioProtoc.4076_Figure 1,</p> <p>The Dataset (Original publication Doi:10.21769/BioProtoc.4076) contains the original figure as PNG-format (JB_10.21769_BioProtoc.4076_Fig1.PNG). Corresponding raw data from confocal microscopy measurements provided as two files (31003A_179400_10.21769_BioProtoc.4076_JB_Hyper_14_1/2.avi). Related information provided as one meta-data-file (31003A_179400_10.21769_BioProtoc.4076_JB_Hyper_14_M1.txt) in txt format and two files in pdf format (31003A_179400_10.21769_BioProtoc.4076_JB_Hyper_14_M2/3. pdf).</p>
Dataset linking to the publication "An assessment of data sources, data quality and changes in national forest monitoring capacities in the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005–2020"
<p>This dataset links to the study “An assessment of data sources, data quality and changes in national forest monitoring capacities in the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005–2020”. This study is published in the journal “Environmental Research Letters” which can be found at <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abd81b">https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/abd81b</a>. The dataset contains two files, one csv file, and one shape file. The two files contain the same data to meet the different users' needs. The dataset contains variables for assessing national forest monitoring data sources i.e., RS and/or NFI. Separate indicators namely 'Use of RS', and 'Use of NFI' were used to analyze the two data sources (RS and NFI). The description of each variable for these two indicators contained in the dataset is given in the Table below.</p> <table> <caption><strong>The description of the variables in the datase</strong>t <strong>for country capacity assessment</strong></caption> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Variables Name</strong></td> <td><strong>Description of the variables</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Country</td> <td>Country</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ISO_A3_CODE</td> <td>ISO A3 Code for country</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ADM0_CODE</td> <td>ADMO Code for country</td> </tr> <tr> <td>CONTINENT</td> <td>Continent</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Region</td> <td>Region</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSInd_05</td> <td>Use of remote sensing (RS) for forest area (change) monitoring 2005 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSSc_05</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2005 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSInd _10</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2010 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSSc _10</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2010 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSInd_15</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2015 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSSc _15</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2015 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSInd_20</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2020 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>RSSc _20</td> <td>Use of RS for forest area (change) monitoring 2020 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>DRS05_20</td> <td>Difference ‘use of RS’ 2005-2020</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFIInd_05</td> <td>Use of national forest inventories (NFI) for forest monitoring 2005 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFISc_05</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2005 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFIInd _10</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2010 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFISc _10</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2010 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFIInd_15</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2015 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFISc _15</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2015 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFIInd_20</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2020 Indicator</td> </tr> <tr> <td>NFISc _20</td> <td>Use of NFI for forest monitoring 2020 Score</td> </tr> <tr> <td>DNFI05_20</td> <td>Difference ‘Use of NFI’ 2005-2020</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Indicators and Scores in the above Table for showing the use of RS and NFI data for forest monitoring in Figure 1 (1a, 1b, and 2a, 2b) are related in the following way.</p> <table> <caption><strong>The indicator values and scores of the country capacity assessment</strong></caption> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Indicator</strong></td> <td><strong>Score</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Low</td> <td>0</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Limited</td> <td>1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Intermediate</td> <td>2</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Good</td> <td>3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Very Good</td> <td>4</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>The capacity changes from 2005 to 2020 in Figure 1 (1c & 2c) are related in the following way.</p> <table> <caption><strong>The indicator values and levels for country capacity changes</strong></caption> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Capacity change values</strong></td> <td><strong>Capacity change levels</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>1,2,3,4</td> <td>Increase</td> </tr> <tr> <td>0</td> <td>No change</td> </tr> <tr> <td>-1,-2,-3,-4</td> <td>Decrease</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.