Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,137
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,137 results for “morphological revision”
Text-fig. 6. Exbeckettia mastixioides (E.REID et M.CHANDLER) comb. nov. from the London Clay. a–f: Holotype, V. 23002, bilocular fruit. a–d: Surface renderings from micro-CT data. a: Apical view. b: Basal view. c: Lateral view with dorsal surface of locule facing forward. d: lateral view with interlocular septum facing forward. e, f: Digital sections from micro-CT data. e: transverse equatorial showing U-shaped locules and distinct dark endocarp (arrows). f: Median longitudinal intercepting both locules. g: lateral view of bilocular fruit with interlocular septum facing forward. V. 23013(3). h: Apical view of bilocular fruit with two exposed locule casts, V. 23013(1). i–l: Fruits in physical transverse section showing U-shaped locules and distinct locule lining. i: Bilocular fruit shown in (g). j: Bilocular fruit, V. 23007. k: Fruit with one locule larger than the other, V. 23006. l: Tetralocular fruit, V. 22993. Scale bar 5 mm in (a–l), bar in (a) applies also to (b–d), bar in (e) applies also to (f), bar in (j) applies to (i–l). in Mastixioid Fruits (Cornales) From The Early Eocene London Clay Flora: Morphology, Anatomy And Nomenclatural Revision
Text-fig. 6. Exbeckettia mastixioides (E.REID et M.CHANDLER) comb. nov. from the London Clay. a–f: Holotype, V. 23002, bilocular fruit. a–d: Surface renderings from micro-CT data. a: Apical view. b: Basal view. c: Lateral view with dorsal surface of locule facing forward. d: lateral view with interlocular septum facing forward. e, f: Digital sections from micro-CT data. e: transverse equatorial showing U-shaped locules and distinct dark endocarp (arrows). f: Median longitudinal intercepting both locules. g: lateral view of bilocular fruit with interlocular septum facing forward. V. 23013(3). h: Apical view of bilocular fruit with two exposed locule casts, V. 23013(1). i–l: Fruits in physical transverse section showing U-shaped locules and distinct locule lining. i: Bilocular fruit shown in (g). j: Bilocular fruit, V. 23007. k: Fruit with one locule larger than the other, V. 23006. l: Tetralocular fruit, V. 22993. Scale bar 5 mm in (a–l), bar in (a) applies also to (b–d), bar in (e) applies also to (f), bar in (j) applies to (i–l).
Text-fig. 5. Mastixiopsis nyssoides KIRCHH. a, b, g–n: Organic preservation. a, b: Lignitic, unpermineralized, early Eocene Dorset Pipe clays at Arne, V. 40762. a: Ventral view (original illustration from pl. 18, fig. 1 of Chandler 1962). b: Transverse fracture, somewhat distorted by compression. c–f: Pyrite permineralization. c: Ventral view, V. 22963(1) from Sheppey, originally listed as Mastixia cantiensis. d: Lateral view, V. 22969 from Sheppey (identified as Mastixia grandis by Reid and Chandler 1933: pl. 25, fig. 8). e: Equatorial transverse physical section from (c). f: Equatorial transverse physical section from (d). g: Detail of pericarp from (e), showing endocarp formed of dense fibrous tissue, surrounded by mesocarp of anticlinally oriented larger cells. h: Detail of pericarp from (f). i–n: Type material from Eocene of Riestadt, Germany, MNB. i: Ventral view. j, k: Ventral and apical views of holotype. l: View of the transversely fractured surface from (j) showing horseshoe shaped locule. m: Equatorial transverse physical cut of the specimen in (i); note yellow resin cavity (arrow). n: Scanning electron microscopy of pericarp from (l) with locule lining at lower edge of image. Note dense endocarp tissue composed of small cells (fibres and sclereids), extending about 3/5 of distance to periphery, surrounded by mesocarp of larger, anticlinally oriented cells. Scale bars 1 cm in (a–f), (i–k), 1 mm in (g), 2 mm in (h), 3 mm in (l), m, 250 Μm in (n). Bar in (d) applies also to (c). Bar in (l) also applies to (m). Bar in (i) also applies to (j) and (k). in Mastixioid Fruits (Cornales) From The Early Eocene London Clay Flora: Morphology, Anatomy And Nomenclatural Revision
Text-fig. 5. Mastixiopsis nyssoides KIRCHH. a, b, g–n: Organic preservation. a, b: Lignitic, unpermineralized, early Eocene Dorset Pipe clays at Arne, V. 40762. a: Ventral view (original illustration from pl. 18, fig. 1 of Chandler 1962). b: Transverse fracture, somewhat distorted by compression. c–f: Pyrite permineralization. c: Ventral view, V. 22963(1) from Sheppey, originally listed as Mastixia cantiensis. d: Lateral view, V. 22969 from Sheppey (identified as Mastixia grandis by Reid and Chandler 1933: pl. 25, fig. 8). e: Equatorial transverse physical section from (c). f: Equatorial transverse physical section from (d). g: Detail of pericarp from (e), showing endocarp formed of dense fibrous tissue, surrounded by mesocarp of anticlinally oriented larger cells. h: Detail of pericarp from (f). i–n: Type material from Eocene of Riestadt, Germany, MNB. i: Ventral view. j, k: Ventral and apical views of holotype. l: View of the transversely fractured surface from (j) showing horseshoe shaped locule. m: Equatorial transverse physical cut of the specimen in (i); note yellow resin cavity (arrow). n: Scanning electron microscopy of pericarp from (l) with locule lining at lower edge of image. Note dense endocarp tissue composed of small cells (fibres and sclereids), extending about 3/5 of distance to periphery, surrounded by mesocarp of larger, anticlinally oriented cells. Scale bars 1 cm in (a–f), (i–k), 1 mm in (g), 2 mm in (h), 3 mm in (l), m, 250 Μm in (n). Bar in (d) applies also to (c). Bar in (l) also applies to (m). Bar in (i) also applies to (j) and (k).
Text-fig. 1. Diplopanax cacaoides (ZENKER) comb. nov. a–d: [Holotype of Mastixia cantia E.REID et M.CHANDLER, V.22953]. a: Lateral view of longitudinally broken specimen, reflected light. b–d: Surface renderings from micro-CT data. b: Lateral view of longitudinal fracture surface. c: Same specimen rotated to show external surface. d: Enlargement of lower half from (a, b), reflected light. e, f: Specimen figured originally as a paratype of M. cantia, V.22954 (Reid and Chandler 1933: pl. 25, fig. 3), reflected light. e: Ventral view with much of the endocarp wall fallen away exposing smooth convex ventral surface of locule cast. f: Transversely fractured surface, showing thick wall of the endocarp, and dehiscence plane leading to the left limb of the locule. g: Transversely sectioned, laterally compressed specimen from Miocene of Wiesa, Germany for comparison, Senckenberg Museum, SM.B. 21034/I. h–j: Digital transverse sections from micro-CT data of the Holotype V.22953. h: Transverse fracture surface from (b), showing curved locule and zone of weakness defining the germination valve (arrow), reflected light. i: Same orientation with clear demarcation of the separation plane of the germination valve (arrow), digital section from micro-CT scan. j: Enlargement from (h). Scale bars 5 mm. in Mastixioid Fruits (Cornales) From The Early Eocene London Clay Flora: Morphology, Anatomy And Nomenclatural Revision
Text-fig. 1. Diplopanax cacaoides (ZENKER) comb. nov. a–d: [Holotype of Mastixia cantia E.REID et M.CHANDLER, V.22953]. a: Lateral view of longitudinally broken specimen, reflected light. b–d: Surface renderings from micro-CT data. b: Lateral view of longitudinal fracture surface. c: Same specimen rotated to show external surface. d: Enlargement of lower half from (a, b), reflected light. e, f: Specimen figured originally as a paratype of M. cantia, V.22954 (Reid and Chandler 1933: pl. 25, fig. 3), reflected light. e: Ventral view with much of the endocarp wall fallen away exposing smooth convex ventral surface of locule cast. f: Transversely fractured surface, showing thick wall of the endocarp, and dehiscence plane leading to the left limb of the locule. g: Transversely sectioned, laterally compressed specimen from Miocene of Wiesa, Germany for comparison, Senckenberg Museum, SM.B. 21034/I. h–j: Digital transverse sections from micro-CT data of the Holotype V.22953. h: Transverse fracture surface from (b), showing curved locule and zone of weakness defining the germination valve (arrow), reflected light. i: Same orientation with clear demarcation of the separation plane of the germination valve (arrow), digital section from micro-CT scan. j: Enlargement from (h). Scale bars 5 mm.
Text-fig. 4. Mastixia cf. oregonensis (R.A.SCOTT) TIFFNEY et HAGGARD from the London Clay, originally included within the concept of M. cantiensis. a–c: V. 22960(1). a: Transverse fracture, showing c-shaped locule, dorsal infold, and sculptured endocarp, reflected light. b: Transverse digital section from micro-CT scan data. c: Surface view of ribbed endocarp extracted from micro-CT data. d: Transverse fracture, reflected light, V. 22955 (originally illustrated in pl. 25, fig. 4 of Reid and Chandler 1933). e, f: Transverse physical section, V. 22963(2) showing U-shaped locule and longitudinal dorsal infold. g–i reflected light. g: Detail from left of (d). h, i: Detail from right of (f). Scale bars 5 mm in (a–f), 1 mm in (g–i). in Mastixioid Fruits (Cornales) From The Early Eocene London Clay Flora: Morphology, Anatomy And Nomenclatural Revision
Text-fig. 4. Mastixia cf. oregonensis (R.A.SCOTT) TIFFNEY et HAGGARD from the London Clay, originally included within the concept of M. cantiensis. a–c: V. 22960(1). a: Transverse fracture, showing c-shaped locule, dorsal infold, and sculptured endocarp, reflected light. b: Transverse digital section from micro-CT scan data. c: Surface view of ribbed endocarp extracted from micro-CT data. d: Transverse fracture, reflected light, V. 22955 (originally illustrated in pl. 25, fig. 4 of Reid and Chandler 1933). e, f: Transverse physical section, V. 22963(2) showing U-shaped locule and longitudinal dorsal infold. g–i reflected light. g: Detail from left of (d). h, i: Detail from right of (f). Scale bars 5 mm in (a–f), 1 mm in (g–i).
Text-fig. 2. Tectocarya spp. a–n: Tectocarya grandis (E.REID et M.CHANDLER) comb. n. Holotype V.22968. a: Lateral view of broken endocarp, reflected light. b–d: Longitudinal views, surface renderings from micro-CT data. e: Translucent volume renderings. f: Apical view, surface rendering. g: View of transversely broken surface showing curved locule, reflected light. h–n: Successive digital transverse sections. Note septum in the dorsal infold (arrows). o, p: Tectocarya rhenana KIRCHH., Miocene of Germany, dorsal view and transverse section [Holotype of Mastixoidea tectocaryoides KIRCHH., Alfred Mine near Konzendorf, photo by Dieter Mai] (Synonym of T. rhenana MAI, 1993). q: T. rhenana transverse section. from Mine Alfred, Düren, Germany, coll. Claire A. Brown 1952, USNM 355632. r, s: Tectocarya sp. from late Eocene of Post, Oregon, USA, physical transverse section, reflected light. UF279-50014. [Surface views of same specimen shown in Manchester and McIntosh 2007: figs 62, 63]. Scale bars 1 cm in (a–r), 0.5 cm in (s). in Mastixioid Fruits (Cornales) From The Early Eocene London Clay Flora: Morphology, Anatomy And Nomenclatural Revision
Text-fig. 2. Tectocarya spp. a–n: Tectocarya grandis (E.REID et M.CHANDLER) comb. n. Holotype V.22968. a: Lateral view of broken endocarp, reflected light. b–d: Longitudinal views, surface renderings from micro-CT data. e: Translucent volume renderings. f: Apical view, surface rendering. g: View of transversely broken surface showing curved locule, reflected light. h–n: Successive digital transverse sections. Note septum in the dorsal infold (arrows). o, p: Tectocarya rhenana KIRCHH., Miocene of Germany, dorsal view and transverse section [Holotype of Mastixoidea tectocaryoides KIRCHH., Alfred Mine near Konzendorf, photo by Dieter Mai] (Synonym of T. rhenana MAI, 1993). q: T. rhenana transverse section. from Mine Alfred, Düren, Germany, coll. Claire A. Brown 1952, USNM 355632. r, s: Tectocarya sp. from late Eocene of Post, Oregon, USA, physical transverse section, reflected light. UF279-50014. [Surface views of same specimen shown in Manchester and McIntosh 2007: figs 62, 63]. Scale bars 1 cm in (a–r), 0.5 cm in (s).
Text-fig. 3. Mastixia parva E.REID et M.CHANDLER. a–g: Holotype, V. 22972. a: Ventral view (original illustration from pl. 25, fig. 13 of Reid and Chandler 1933), reflected light. b–g: from micro-CT data. b: Dorsal view of specimen in (a) now suffering from encrustation due to pyrite decay; isosurface rendering. c: Translucent volume rendering, dorsal view showing two limbs of the locule and longitudinal groove. d–g: Digital transverse sections at various positions showing c-shaped locule, longitudinal dorsal infold, endocarp wall, and degradational cracks. h, i: V. 22983(1). h: Dorsal view showing longitudinal infold. i: Physical transverse section showing c-shaped locule and longitudinal dorsal infold. Scale bars 5 mm in (a–h), applies also to (b–g), 2 mm in (i). in Mastixioid Fruits (Cornales) From The Early Eocene London Clay Flora: Morphology, Anatomy And Nomenclatural Revision
Text-fig. 3. Mastixia parva E.REID et M.CHANDLER. a–g: Holotype, V. 22972. a: Ventral view (original illustration from pl. 25, fig. 13 of Reid and Chandler 1933), reflected light. b–g: from micro-CT data. b: Dorsal view of specimen in (a) now suffering from encrustation due to pyrite decay; isosurface rendering. c: Translucent volume rendering, dorsal view showing two limbs of the locule and longitudinal groove. d–g: Digital transverse sections at various positions showing c-shaped locule, longitudinal dorsal infold, endocarp wall, and degradational cracks. h, i: V. 22983(1). h: Dorsal view showing longitudinal infold. i: Physical transverse section showing c-shaped locule and longitudinal dorsal infold. Scale bars 5 mm in (a–h), applies also to (b–g), 2 mm in (i).
FIGURE 2. Hauffiopteryx typicus, cranial morphology. A–G in A revision of the Early Jurassic ichthyosaur Hauffiopteryx (Reptilia: Ichthyosauria), and description of a new species from southwestern Germany
FIGURE 2. Hauffiopteryx typicus, cranial morphology. A–G, overview of cranial morphology. A, lectotype, GPIT 1491/ 4; B, SMNS 51552; C, MHH 9; D, SMNS 80226. E, basioccipital in ventral view (SMNS 80226); F, maxillary and posterior dentary teeth (GPIT 1491/4); G, anterior mandible with displaced teeth (SMNS 80226). Scale bars in cm (parts B, D, E). Abbreviations: an, angular; bo, basioccipital; de, dentary; hc, hyoid corpus; hy, hyoid element; en, external narial opening; ex, exoccipital; f, frontal; j, jugal; la, lacrimal; lj, lower jaw; mx, maxilla; n, nasal; op, opisthotic; pa, parietal; pal, palatine; pf, prefrontal; pl, palate; pm, premaxilla; po, postorbital; pof, postfrontal; pt, pterygoid; Q, quadrate; qj, quadratojugal; sa, surangular; scr, sclerotic ring; sp, splenial; sq, squamosal; st, supratemporal; s, stapes; utf, supratemporal fenestra.
FIGURE 12. Uduba spp., morphology photos. A–C. U in A Revision of the Malagasy Crack-Leg Spiders of the Genus Uduba Simon, 1880 (Araneae, Udubidae), with Description of 35 New Species from Madagascar
FIGURE 12. Uduba spp., morphology photos. A–C. U. schlingeri, ♂ CASENT9006052 from Talatakely, Ranomafana National Park. D, F. U. schlingeri, ♀ CASENT9006075 from Vatoharanana, Ranomafana National Park. E. U. fisheri, ♀ CASENT9026389 from Anjozorobe. A. Cephalothorax, dorsal. B. Cephalothorax, ventral. C. Habitus, lateral. D. Face, clypeus and divided chilum, anterior. E. Pedicel, dorsal (anterior to top). F. Habitus, lateral. Scale bars: A, B, F = 2 mm, C = 2 mm, D =1 mm, E = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 6. Female genital morphology. See Table 1 for localities and Table 3 for measurements. A in Cochlostoma revised: the subgenus Lovcenia Zallot et al., 2015 (Caenogastropoda, Cochlostomatidae)
Fig. 6. Female genital morphology. See Table 1 for localities and Table 3 for measurements. A. Cochlostoma (Lovcenia) erika (A.J. Wagner, 1906) (HNHM 86387). B. Cochlostoma (Lovcenia) dalmatinum (L. Pfeiffer, 1863) (NHMW 110430/MN/0162). C. Cochlostoma (Lovcenia) tropojanum sp. nov. (NHMW 111248). D1. Cochlostoma (Lovcenia) jakschae sp. nov., Bugarska Peak population (NHMW 111249). D2. Cochlostoma (Lovcenia) jakschae sp. nov., Pejë Pass population (HNHM 97221). E. Cochlostoma (Lovcenia) lanatum sp. nov. (HNHM 99861).
Fig. 7. A–C. Eye and postgena. A. Dipsomyia spinifera Bezzi, 1909 in Revision and morphological analysis of the Ragadidae (Insecta, Diptera)
Fig. 7. A–C. Eye and postgena. A. Dipsomyia spinifera Bezzi, 1909 (MTD). B. Hydropeza longipennae (Miller, 1923) (NZAC 04021412). C. Zanclotus dioktes Wilder, 1982 (USNM). D. Dipsomyia spinifera, prosternum and fore coxa (MTD). E. Hydropeza longipennae, prosternum (NZAC 04021412). F–G. Fore coxa and trochanter. F. Hydropeza longipennae (NZAC 04021412). G. Zanclotus dioktes (USNM).
Fig. 6. Habitus, lateral view. A. Ragas unica Walker, 1837 in Revision and morphological analysis of the Ragadidae (Insecta, Diptera)
Fig. 6. Habitus, lateral view. A. Ragas unica Walker, 1837, head and fore leg (NHRS). B. Iteaphila macquarti Zetterstedt, 1838, antenna (NHRS). C. Iteaphila macquarti, head and fore leg (NHRS). D. Ragas unica, mouthparts (NHRS). E. Iteaphila macquarti, mouthparts (NHRS). F. Ragas unica, 1 ♂, genitalia, lateral (NHRS). G. Ragas unica, 1 ♂, right epandrial lobe, dorsal (NHRS). H. Iteaphila macquarti, 1 ♂, genitalia, lateral (NHRS).
Fig. 8. A–B. Hormopeza obliterata Zetterstedt, 1838. A in Revision and morphological analysis of the Ragadidae (Insecta, Diptera)
Fig. 8. A–B. Hormopeza obliterata Zetterstedt, 1838. A. Antennae and mouthparts, ♀ (NHRS-000061621). B. Apical part of tarsus, ♂ (NHRS-000061670). C–D. Terminalia, ♀. C. Iteaphila macquarti Zetterstedt, 1838, dorsolateral (NHRS). D. Hormopeza obliterata, dorsal (NHRS-000061621).
Fig. 1 in Revision and morphological analysis of the Ragadidae (Insecta, Diptera)
Fig. 1. The strict consensus tree from maximum parsimony analysis with characters mapped. Numbers to the right of character symbols and character numbers show bootstrap support values.
Fig. 4. Habitus, lateral view. A. Zanclotus dioktes Wilder, 1982 in Revision and morphological analysis of the Ragadidae (Insecta, Diptera)
Fig. 4. Habitus, lateral view. A. Zanclotus dioktes Wilder, 1982, ♂, holotype (USNM). B. Iteaphila macquarti Zetterstedt, 1838, ♀, holotype (MZLU 3028:1). C. Anthepiscopus oedalinus (Zetterstedt, 1838), ♂ (NHRS-GULI000058764).
Fig. 2. Habitus, lateral view. A. Ragas unica Walker, 1837 in Revision and morphological analysis of the Ragadidae (Insecta, Diptera)
Fig. 2. Habitus, lateral view. A. Ragas unica Walker, 1837, ♀, lectotype (UZIL 2629:1; photo courtesy of Rune Bygebjerg, UZIL). B. Ragas unica, 1 ♀ (NHRS). C. Dipsomyia spinifera Bezzi, 1909, ♀, holotype (MTD).
Fig. 10. Head morphology. A–C in Revision of the poorly known Neotropical butterfly genus Zischkaia Forster, 1964 (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae), with descriptions of nine new species
Fig. 10. Head morphology. A–C. Zischkaia pacarus (Godart, 1824) (DZ 36.728). A. Ventral view. B. Frontal view. C. Lateral view. D–F. Z. saundersii (Butler, 1867) (DZ 36.029). D. Ventral view. E. Frontal view. C. Lateral view.
Fig. 1 in Revision of the genus Thinophilus Wahlberg (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) from Singapore and adjacent regions: A long term study with a prudent reconciliation of a genetic to a classic morphological approach
Fig. 1. Present extension of Singapore's mangroves (in green). The numbers indicate the sites that were sampled during the 1-month Singapore Mangrove Insect Project (SMIP 2009); and the 2-year Mangrove Insect Project (MIP 2012-2014). 1, Mandai mangroves; 2, Kranji Nature Trail; 3, Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve; 4, Lim Chu Kang; 5, Sarimbun mangroves; 6, Berlayer Creek; 7, Pulau Semakau original or old mangrove (SMO); 8, Pulau Semakau, replanted or new mangrove (SMN); 9, Changi creek; 10, Pulau Tekong; 11, Pulau Ubin, Chek Jawa; 12, Pasir Ris; 13, Pulau Seletar; 14, Sungei Cina.
Fig. 4 in Revision of the genus Thinophilus Wahlberg (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) from Singapore and adjacent regions: A long term study with a prudent reconciliation of a genetic to a classic morphological approach
Fig. 4. Thinophilus apicatus sp. nov., male. A, Detail of surstyli ventrally; B, Tips cerci dorsally; C, Ventral view of epandrium; D, Lateral view of epandrium.
Fig. 3 in Revision of the genus Thinophilus Wahlberg (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) from Singapore and adjacent regions: A long term study with a prudent reconciliation of a genetic to a classic morphological approach
Fig. 3. Thinophilus apicatus sp. nov., male. A, Mid femur; B, Hind femur; C, Posterior view of fore leg; D, Anterior view of fore coxa.
Table 1 in A description of the first zoeal stage of Pilumnus vinaceus A. Milne-Edwards, 1880 (Decapoda, Pilumnidae), with a revision of the first zoea morphology of Pilumnus Leach, 1815
<p>Table 1. Larval characters of the first zoeal stage of Indo-West Pacific and Eastern Pacific species of the genus <i>Pilumnus</i> Leach,1815.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th><b>Indo-West Pacific</b></th><th></th><th></th><th><b>Eastern Pacific</b></th><th></th><th><b>western Atlantic</b></th><th></th><th><b>eastern Atlantic</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td><i>Pilumnus kempi</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus longicornis</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus minutus</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus scabriusculus</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus sluiteri</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus vespertilio</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus indicus</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus limosus</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus dasypodus</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus reticulatus *</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus vinaceus</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus hirtellus</i></td><td><i>Pilumnus spinifer</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Size</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>RDL (mm)</b></th><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>0.71</b></td><td><b>0.77</b></td><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>1.78 (0.98)</b> <b>b</b></td><td><b>0.70</b></td><td><b>0.91</b></td><td><b>1.2</b> <b>b</b></td><td><b>1.02</b></td><td><b>0.83</b></td><td><b>1.5 (1.2)</b> <b>c</b></td><td><b>0.9</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>Carapace</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>posterodorsal s</b></th><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>2</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>2</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>s on ventral margin</b></th><td><b>1</b> <b>d</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>1</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0**</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>Antennule</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>a,s</b></th><td><b>7,1</b></td><td><b>4,2</b></td><td><b>3, 3</b></td><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>5,2</b></td><td><b>3,2 (4, 2)</b> <b>c</b></td><td><b>2,2 (4)</b></td><td><b>4,1</b></td><td><b>4,1 (4, 3)</b> <b>b</b></td><td><b>4,1</b></td><td><b>4, 2</b></td><td><b>4,2</b></td><td><b>4,1</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>Antenna</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>endopod</b></th><td><b>Present</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Present</b></td><td><b>Presentb</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td><td><b>Absent</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>Maxillule</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>s on coxal end.</b></th><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td><td><b>6-7</b></td><td><b>7</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>Maxilla</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>s on coxal end.</b></th><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>6 + 4</b></td><td><b>6 + 4</b></td><td><b>6 + 4</b></td><td><b>6 + 4</b></td><td><b>4 + 3 (6 + 4)</b> <b>c</b></td><td><b>6 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4 (4 + 4)</b> <b>c</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>s on basial end.</b></th><td><b>4 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>6 + 4 (5 + 4)</b> <b>b</b> <b></b> <b>c</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td><td><b>5 + 4</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>Maxilliped 1</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>s on basis</b></th><td><b>11 (10)</b> <b>d</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>9 (10)</b> <b>b</b> <b></b> <b>c</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td><td><b>10</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>s on end</b></th><td><b>3, 2,1, 2,5</b></td><td><b>3, 2,1, 2,5</b></td><td><b>3,2, 1, 2,5</b></td><td><b>3,2,1, 2,5</b></td><td><b>3, 2,1, 2, 5</b></td><td><b>2 (3)</b> <b>b</b> <b></b> <b>c</b><b>, 2,1, 2, 5</b></td><td><b>3,2,1, 2, 5</b></td><td><b>3,2,1, 2,5</b></td><td><b>3,2, 1, 2,5</b></td><td><b>3, 2,1, 2, 5</b></td><td><b>3,2,1, 2,5</b></td><td><b>3, 2,1, 2, 5</b></td><td><b>3,2,1, 2,5</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>Pleon</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>dorsomedial s (so1)</b></th><td><b>0</b> <b>d</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>2</b></td><td><b>1</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>posterodorsal s (so1)</b></th><td><b>0</b> <b>d</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>1</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>nd</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td><td><b>0</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>dorsolateral processes</b></th><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 5</b> <b>th</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 5</b> <b>th</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b>nd</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> so</td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 5</b> <b>th</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> <b>so</b></td><td><b>2</b> <b><b>nd-</b> 3</b> <b>rd</b> so</td></tr></tbody></table><p><b>a = aesthetascs;end.= endopod;nd = not described;RDL = rostrodorsal length;s = setae;so = somite;** = data from figures observation.</b></p><p><b>References: <i>P.kempi</i> (Siddiqui & Tirmizi, 1992; Clark & Ng,2004 <sup>d</sup>); <i>P.longicornis</i> (Clark & Paula, 2003); <i>P.minutus</i> (Terada, 1984; Ko, 1994); <i>P.scabriusculus</i> (Terada, 1990); <i>P.sluiteri</i> (Clark & Ng, 2004); <i>P.verpertilio</i> (Lim & Tan,1981; Terada,1990 <sup>b</sup>; Clark & Paula,2003 <sup>c</sup></b>); <i>P.indicus</i> (Terada,1980); <i>P.limosus</i> (García-Guerrero <i>et al.,</i> 2005).</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.