Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Prevalence of protozoan parasites in small and medium mammals in Texas, USA

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of 18S rRNA gene sequence alignments for Babesia spp. purified from this study (*) and relevant host species extracted from GenBankṜ. In parenthesis are referenced all the GenBankṜ accession numbers of the sequences used to generate this alignment. As a note, the Babesia Spanish Dog isolate (AY534602) is now reffered to as B. vulpes. Babesia microti -like sequences from this study: M001 = GenBankṜ MN011931; M006 = GenBankṜ MN011932; M050 = GenBankṜMN011933; M051 = GenBankṜ MN011934; M052 = GenBankṜ MN011935. Babesia sp Coco in this study M001 = GenBankṜ MN013190. Babesia sp: M052 = GenBankṜ MN013191.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 2 in Small-mammal characteristics affect tick communities in southwestern Tennessee (USA)

Fig. 2. Mean number of ticks per host by sex and age of rodent hosts (Peromyscus leucopus, Sigmodon hispidus, Peromyscus maniculatus, Microtus pinetorum, and Ochrotomys nuttalli) captured at Hobart Ames Plantation, Fayette and Hardeman counties, Tennessee.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Small-mammal characteristics affect tick communities in southwestern Tennessee (USA)

Fig. 1. Number of ticks present on rodent hosts (Peromyscus leucopus, Sigmodon hispidus, Peromyscus maniculatus, Microtus pinetorum, and Ochrotomys nuttalli) captured at the Hobart Ames Plantation, Fayette and Hardeman counties, Tennessee. (a) Number of ticks by host sex x weight interaction (males y = 0.009x + 2.135; females y = 0.022x - 0.09). (b) Number of ticks by host age x weight interaction (adult y = 0.051x + 0.203; subadult = 0.310x - 3.499).

Fig. 4 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 4. Dendrogram from the cluster analysis of the similarity of small mammals sampled at five vegetation types of Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil (PP, Pine Plantation; RF, Riparian Forest; AP, Araucaria Plantation; NR, Natural Regeneration forest; HA, High Altitude forest).

Fig. 3 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 3. True diversity values (TD), order q = 1, of small mammals sampled at five vegetation types of Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil. Equal letters indicate overlap of the 95% confidence intervals (PP, Pine Plantation; RF, Riparian Forest; AP, Araucaria Plantation; NR, Natural Regeneration forest; HA, High Altitude forest).

Fig. 5 in Small mammals in high fragmented landscape in Cerrado/ Atlantic Forest ecotone, Southeastern Brazil

Fig. 5. Diagram of ordering of species of small mammals and environmental variables in the 24 small forest fragments in southeastern Brazil, produced by canonical correspondence analysis. The Acronyms represent "uc" to understory closure, "co" to canopy openness, "ep" to epiphytism, "lia" to lianas, "ft" to cattle, "cs" to creeks and streams, "we" to wetlands, "se" to soil exposure, "ro" to rocky outcrop, "lit" to litter, "ab" to arthropod biomass, "vr" to vegetal richness, "va" to vegetal abudance, and "ath" to average tree height.

Fig. 2 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 2. Rarefaction curves of small mammals sampled at five vegetation types of Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil, with a 95% confidence interval (A, Pine Plantation; B, Riparian Forest; C, Araucaria Plantation; D, Natural Regeneration forest; E, High Altitude forest).

Fig. 1. Location and vegetation types where small mammals were sampled between November 2012 and September 2013 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 1. Location and vegetation types where small mammals were sampled between November 2012 and September 2013, at Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil (A, Pine Plantation; B, Riparian Forest; C, Araucaria Plantation; D, Natural Regeneration forest; E, High Altitude forest). Original distribution of Atlantic Forest biome (light gray) and Araucaria forest (dark gray).

Fig. 1 in Small mammals in high fragmented landscape in Cerrado/ Atlantic Forest ecotone, Southeastern Brazil

Fig. 1. Location of the forest communities studied in 24 forest fragments located in southeastern Brazil. A description of individual forest fragments can be found in Supplementary Material Tab. A1.

Fig. 4 in Small mammals in high fragmented landscape in Cerrado/ Atlantic Forest ecotone, Southeastern Brazil

Fig. 4. Beta (β) diversity values for small mammals related to nesting (βsne), turnover (βsim) and general dissimilarity (βsor) in the 24 small forest fragments located in southeastern Brazil. The figures on the right represent the final percentage for each index.

Fig. 2 in Small mammals in high fragmented landscape in Cerrado/ Atlantic Forest ecotone, Southeastern Brazil

Fig. 2. Species accumulation curves to 24 fragments together for small mammals located in southeastern Brazil.

Fig. 14 in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 14. Ctenodactyloid rodent Yuomys sp. from the Eocene of Wulanhuxiu, Nei Mongol, China. A. Right maxilla with M1 (IVPP V20829.1). B. Right mandible with m2–m3 (IVPP V20829.2). All in occlusal view.

Fig. 13. Ctenodactyloid rodent Gobiomys exiguus Wang, 2001 in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 13. Ctenodactyloid rodent Gobiomys exiguus Wang, 2001 from the Eocene of Wulanhuxiu, Nei Mongol, China. A. Right M2 (IVPP V20827.1). B. Right M3 (IVPP V20827.2). C. Left m1 (IVPP V20827.3). D. Right m2 (IVPP V20827.4). All in occlusal view.

Fig. 9 in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 9. Lagomorph Gobiolagus aliwusuensis Fostowicz-Frelik, Li, Meng, and Wang, 2012 from the Eocene of Wulanhuxiu, Nei Mongol, China. A. Cross section of the right DI2 (IVPP V20265.1). B. Cross section of the right di2 (IVPP V20265.1). C. Left P3 (IVPP V20265.3) in occlusal (C1), posterior C2), anterior (C3), and lingual (C4) views. D. Associated left M1–M2 (IVPP V20263.1) in occlusal view. E. Left M2 (IVPP V20265.9) in posterior (E1), occlusal (E2), buccal (E3), and anterior (E4) views. F. Right juvenile M2 (IVPP V20265.8) in occlusal view. G. Right M3 (IVPP V20265.11) in posterior G1), occlusal (G2), anterior (G3), lingual (G4), and buccal (G5) views.

Fig. 8 in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 8. Lagomorph Gobiolagus aliwusuensis Fostowicz-Frelik, Li, Meng, and Wang, 2012 from the Eocene of Wulanhuxiu, Nei Mongol, China. A. Fragment of the right maxilla with M1–M2 (IVPP V20262) in ventral (A1), medial (A2), and lateral (A3) views. B. Left m2 in mandible fragment (IVPP V20263.2) in buccal (B1, note the knob-like masseteric tubercle un- der the trigonid) and lingual (B2) views.

Fig. 10 in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 10. Lower cheek dentition of the lagomorph Gobiolagus aliwusuensis Fostowicz-Frelik, Li, Meng, and Wang, 2012 from the Eocene of Wulanhuxiu, Nei Mongol, China. A. Right p3 (IVPP V20265.13) in anterior (A1), buccal (A2), lingual (A3), posterior (A4), and occlusal (A5) views. B. Right m1 (IVPP V20265.14) in buccal (B1), anterior (B2), lingual (B3), posterior (B4), occlusal (B5), and apical (B6) views. C. Right m2 (IVPP V20265.16) in anterior (C1), buccal (C2), lingual (C3), posterior (C4), and occlusal (C5) views. D. Right m3 (IVPP V20265.17) in lingual (D1), anterior (D2), posterior (D3), buccal (D4), occlusal (D5), and apical (D6) views.

Fig. 11 in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 11. Limb bones of the lagomorph Gobiolagus aliwusuensis Fostowicz-Frelik, Li, Meng, and Wang, 2012 from the Eocene of Wulanhuxiu, Nei Mongol, China. A. Distal part of left humerus (IVPP V20265.19) in ventral (A2), cranial (A1), and caudal (A3) views. B. Proximal part of right ulna (IVPP V20265.21) in medial (B1) and lateral (B2) views. C. Proximal part of radius (IVPP V20265.20) in cranial view. D. Right calcaneus (IVPP V20265.22) in medial (D1), plantar (D2), lateral (D3), dorsal (D4), and caudal (D5) views.

Fig. 5 in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 5. Lagomorph Erenlagus anielae Fostowicz-Frelik and Li, 2014 from the Eocene of Wulanhuxiu, Nei Mongol, China. Left M1 (IVPP V20260) in occlusal (A) and posterior (B) views.

Fig. 1. A in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 1. A. Location of the Wulanhuxiu mammalian fossil site in the western part of the Erlian Basin (elevations given in meters; modified from Russell and Zhai 1987). B. Map of continental China (Nei Mongol Autonomous Region in gray). C. Typical landscape at the Wulanhuxiu locality showing fossiliferous beds with the Irdinmanhan–Sharamurunian transition. D. Stratigraphic section of the studied sediment series at Wulanhuxiu (after a field sketch by Bin Bai).

Fig. 12 in Small mammal fauna from Wulanhuxiu (Nei Mongol, China) implies the Irdinmanhan-Sharamurunian (Eocene) faunal turnover

Fig. 12. Ischyromyid rodent Asiomys dawsoni Qi, 1987 from the Eocene of Wulanhuxiu, Nei Mongol, China. A. Left P4 (IVPP V20828.1). B. Left M1 (IVPP V20828.2). C. Right M1 (IVPP V20828.4). D. Right M2 (IVPP V20828.5). E. Left dp4 (IVPP V20828.6). F. Left m3 (IVPP V20828.7). All in occlusal view.