Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 1 in Three new synonyms of Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk. (Bryophyta, Orthotrichaceae) based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIG. 1. — Bayesian majority consensus tree calculated from the results of Bayesian analysis of the combined datasets of trnL-F, trnG and ITS2. The Bayesian posterior probabilities are labelled above the branches.

FIG. 3 in Three new synonyms of Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk. (Bryophyta, Orthotrichaceae) based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIG. 3. — Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk.: A-J, branch leaves; K, L, Q, S, upper cells of branch leaves; M-P, R, medial cells of branch leaves. A, K, from syntype of M. bathyodontum Cardot; B, R, from Noguchi 45186; C, S, from Noguchi 5436; D, Q, from Noguchi 22538; E, P, from Noguchi 49319; F, G, L, M, from lectotype of M. japonicum; H-J, N, O, from lectotype of M. insularum Sull. & Lesq. Figure modified from Noguchi 1989. Scale bars: A-J, 0.5 mm; K-S, 50 μm.

FIG. 6 in Three new synonyms of Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk. (Bryophyta, Orthotrichaceae) based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIG. 6. — Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk.: A-G, I-K, M, N, branch leaves; L, perichaetial leaves; H, O, capsules; P, Q, basal cells of branch leaves; R, medial cells of branch leaf; S, basal transverse section of branch leaf; T, upper transverse section of branch leaf; U, calyptra; V, basal cells near margin of branch leaf; W, peristome. All from syntype of M. polygonostomum Dixon & P. de la Varde (H-BR2572016). Scale bars: A-O, U, 0.44 mm; P-T, V, W, 44 μm.

FIG. 5 in Three new synonyms of Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk. (Bryophyta, Orthotrichaceae) based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIG. 5. — Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk.: A-C, branch leaves; D-F, perichaetial leaves; G, stem leaf; H-K, apices of branch leaves; L, M, base of branch leaf; N-P, secondary stem leaves; Q, medial cells of branch leaf; R, lower cells of branch leaf; S, basal cells near margin of branch leaf; T, basal cells of branch leaf; U, V, upper transverse sections of branch leaves; W, vaginula; X, capsules; Y, calyptra; Z, upper cells of perichaetial leaf; AA, medial cells of perichaetial leaf; AB, lower cells of perichaetial leaf; AC, basal cells of perichaetial leaf; AD, AF, peristome; AE, spore; AG, upper cells of stem leaf; AH, medial cells of stem leaf; AI, lower cells of stem leaf; AJ, basal cells of stem leaf. All from holotype of M. dickasonii E.B.Bartram (FH00213603). Scale bars: A-P, W-Y, 1 mm; AF, 200 μm; AD, 100 μm; Q-V, Z-AC, AE, AG-AJ, 67 μm.

FIG. 4 in Three new synonyms of Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk. (Bryophyta, Orthotrichaceae) based on morphological and molecular evidence

FIG. 4. — Macromitrium japonicum Dozy & Molk.: A-F, branch leaves; G, spore; H, capsule; I, basal leaf cells; J, exostome; K, upper cells of branch leaf; L, medial cells of branch leaf; M, calyptra; N, upper transverse section of branch leaf; O, medial transverse section of branch leaf. All from holotype of M. japonicum var. makinoi (Broth.) Nog. (H-BR2572002). Scale bars: A-F, H, M, 0.44 mm; G, I-L, N, O, 44 μm.

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →

FIG. 2 in Two new synonyms and extended distribution of Anastrophyllum ellipticum Inoue (Anastrophyllaceae: Marchantiophyta)

FIG. 2. — Distribution of Anastrophyllum ellipticum Inoue, based on herbarium and literature records.

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →

FIG. 1 in Two new synonyms and extended distribution of Anastrophyllum ellipticum Inoue (Anastrophyllaceae: Marchantiophyta)

FIG. 1. — Gemmae of Anastrophyllum ellipticum Inoue, from TNS-42220,(holotype TNS).Scale bars: 30 μm.

FIG. 4 in The taxonomic position and lectotypification of Frullania diversitexta Steph. (Frullaniaceae, Marchantiophyta) and its synonyms, with notes on the placement of F. ignatovii Sofronova, Mamontov & Potemkin

FIG. 4. — Frullania diversitexta Steph.: A-C, E, J, L, leaves; D, F, H, K, M, underleaves; G, cells of the lobe middle; I, female plant; N, cells of the lobe base. Scale bars: A-F, H, J-M, 0.5 mm; G, N, 100 µm; I, 1.5 mm. All from Makino s.n. (G-00067128, lectotype).

FIG. 3 in The taxonomic position and lectotypification of Frullania diversitexta Steph. (Frullaniaceae, Marchantiophyta) and its synonyms, with notes on the placement of F. ignatovii Sofronova, Mamontov & Potemkin

FIG. 3. — Frullania diversitexta Steph.: A, ultimate branch; B, D, E, I, L, underleaves; C, F, leaves; G, O, cells of the lobe base; H, spore; J, K, N, three circles of bracts with bracteoles, parts of the same gynoecium; M, elaters. Scale bars: A, J, K, N, 1.5 mm; B-F, 0.5 mm; G, 100 µm; H, 50 µm; M, 75 µm. A-G from YuSM- 805-3-1 (MHA), H-O from Inoue 14 (G-00066936, lectotype of F. tosana).

FIG. 1 in The taxonomic position and lectotypification of Frullania diversitexta Steph. (Frullaniaceae, Marchantiophyta) and its synonyms, with notes on the placement of F. ignatovii Sofronova, Mamontov & Potemkin

FIG. 1. — BA tree for 44 specimens from Hentschel et al. (2009) and single specimen from Mamontov et al. (2020) with the inclusion of two Frullania diversitexta specimens and the holotype specimen of Frullania ignatovii. Indication of bootstrap support values achieved in MP/ML calculations and values of Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 50%/0.50 are shown above branches. The length of cut branches is marked.

FIG. 5 in The taxonomic position and lectotypification of Frullania diversitexta Steph. (Frullaniaceae, Marchantiophyta) and its synonyms, with notes on the placement of F. ignatovii Sofronova, Mamontov & Potemkin

FIG. 5. — Frullania diversitexta Steph.: A-C, leaves; D, F, underleaves; E, G, parts of the same female plant; H, enlarged leaf lobule; I, cells of the lobe middle. Scale bars: A-D, F, 0.5 mm; E, G, 1.5 mm; H, 0.2 mm; I, 100 µm. All from Inoue 14 (G-00066936, lectotype of F. tosana).

Figure 11 in The Anchigamasus mite species (Parasitiformes: Parasitidae), synonyms revisited

Figure 11 Anchigamasus geileri, male: A – Tr, Fe, Ge, Ti and basitarsus of leg II, anterolaterally. B – main spur and axillary process on Fe II posterolaterally. Abbreviations as in Figure 6.

Figure 6 in The Anchigamasus mite species (Parasitiformes: Parasitidae), synonyms revisited

Figure 6 Anchigamasus crassicornutus, male: Tr, Fe, Ge and Ti of leg II, anterolaterally. Abbreviations: ad1– ad3 anterodorsal setae;al1, al2 anterolateral setae; pv1 posteroventral setae.

Figure 7 in The Anchigamasus mite species (Parasitiformes: Parasitidae), synonyms revisited

Figure 7 Anchigamasus geileri, female: A – paragynium; B – anterior part of the epigynium with lateral and subapical thickenings; C – reticulation on the anterior part of the epigynium; D – anterior part of the epigynium and an outline of the endogynium; E – endogynium showing reticulation on the posterior wall; F – endogynium differently oriented. Abbreviations:iv3 paragynial pore; lat lateral epigynial thickening;st4 paragynial seta;sub subapical inverted T-shaped thickening.

Figure 4 in The Anchigamasus mite species (Parasitiformes: Parasitidae), synonyms revisited

Figure 4 Anchigamasus crassicornutus, male: A – genital lamina, presternal plates and sternal shield; B – gnathotectum, two aspects; C – palptrochanter ventrally; D – chelicerae, ventrally; E – chelicera, antiaxially. Abbreviations: I–IV openings for coxae I–IV;iv1– iv5 sternal pores; gv1, gv2 gland openings;st1– st5 sternal setae; v1, v2 palptrochanter setae;ZV1 opisthogastral seta.

Figure 9 in The Anchigamasus mite species (Parasitiformes: Parasitidae), synonyms revisited

Figure 9 Anchigamasus geileri, male: A – genital lamina, presternal plates and sternal shield; B – gnathotectum, two aspects; C – palptrochanter laterally; D – palptrochanter ventrally; E – chelicerae, ventrally; F – chelicera, adaxially. Abbreviations as in Figure 4.

Figure 12 A in The Anchigamasus mite species (Parasitiformes: Parasitidae), synonyms revisited

Figure 12 A map showing distribution of points where both species were collected: solid circleA.– crassicornutus, solid triangle –A. geileri, empty triangle – materials of Athias-Henriot (1967). The locations where Willmann and Karg collected the type materials are indicated.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2017View details →

Figure 4 in Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) chabaudi and Phlebotomus riouxi: closely related species or synonyms?

Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree inferred from Phlebotomus chabaudi and Ph. riouxi specimens using the data of elongation factor 1-a gene. Sequences of Ph. chabaudi published by Tabbabi et al. (2014) were added to the analyses. The phylogram results from bootstrapped data sets obtained using the PhyML 3.0 program [21] using the HKY85 [25] + I (proportion of invariant sites) model. The tree was visualized using the TreeDyn program, version 198.3 [7]. Percentages shown above the branches are the frequencies at which a given branch appeared in 500 bootstrap replications. Only bootstrap values higher than 50% on the early branches are shown. A sequence of Ph. sergenti (EF416841) was used as the outgroup. The sequences marked by * were published by Tabbabi et al. (2014); R = sequences found in specimens morphologically characterized as Ph. riouxi. RC = sequences found in specimens morphologically characterized as Ph. chabaudi or Ph. riouxi. Int = sequences found in specimens morphologically characterized as intermediate between Ph. riouxi and Ph. chabaudi. RCint = sequences found in specimens morphologically characterized as Ph. riouxi, Ph. chabaudi and intermediate specimens between the two species.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2017View details →

Figure 7 in Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) chabaudi and Phlebotomus riouxi: closely related species or synonyms?

Figure 7. Differentiation criteria of males (A to F) 100X. A and D: aedeagus and basal lobe of coxite of Ph. chabaudi (SMO562); B and E: aedeagus and basal lobe of coxite of Ph. riouxi from Algeria (RX2); C and F: aedeagus and basal lobe of coxite of Ph. riouxi from Tunisia (TAT63). All photographs are set on the same scale.