Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
23,351
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
23,351 results for “Comparative”
FIGURE 14 in Comparative Basicranial Anatomy Of Extant Terrestrial And Semiaquatic Artiodactyla Maureen A. O'Leary
FIGURE 14. Left basicranium of Odocoileus virginianus (Cetruminantia, Ruminantia, Cervidae; AMNH-M 244789) with auditory bulla in situ. Scale bar = 1 cm. Photograph: S. Goldberg.
FIGURE 17 in Comparative Basicranial Anatomy Of Extant Terrestrial And Semiaquatic Artiodactyla Maureen A. O'Leary
FIGURE 17. Left basicranium of Tragulus javanicus (Cetruminantia, Ruminantia, Tragulidae; AMNH-M 102091) with bulla removed to reveal petrosal in situ. Scale bar = 1 cm. Artist: U. Kikutani.
FIG. 2 in Feeding habits of the first European colobine, (Mammalia, Primates): evidence from a comparative dental microwear analysis with modern cercopithecids
FIG. 2. — Dental facets nine of second molars for extant and extinct cercopithecids displaying dental microwear scars: A, Nasalis larvatus (Wurmb, 1787) (ZSM-1907-4023); B, Lophocebus albigena (Gray, 1850) (RMCA-83-006-0276); C, Chlorocebus aethiops (Linnaeus, 1758) (MNHN-CG-1972-309); D, Papio hamadryas hamadryas Linnaeus, 1758 (SNG-15831); E, Mesopithecus delsoni/ pentelicus (HD-340); F, M. pentelicus (NHMW-1998z77-14). Scale bars: 300 μm.
Text-fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs (a, b) and synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy orthoslices (c–e) of flower of Lambertiflora elegans gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous Puddledock locality, Virginia, USA (holotype, PP53796, Puddledock sample 082). a) Flower in lateral view showing long pedicel and overlapping elongated tepals; b) Detail of flower showing overlapping elongated tepals; note the numerous holes indicating the position of probable secretory cells; c) Flower in longitudinal section showing overlapping elongated tepals, remains of probable poorly developed stamens or staminodes and probable poorly developed carpels on the central conical gynoecial region of the receptacle (cut between orthoslices xz0510 and 0570); d) Flower in longitudinal section (comparable to c) showing overlapping tepals, poorly developed stamens or staminodes, and probable poorly developed carpels on the central conical gynoecial region of the receptacle; note the prominent cavities from secretory cells scattered through the tissues (cut between orthoslice xz0560 and 0575); e) Flower in transverse section showing overlapping tepals, poorly developed stamens or staminodes, and remains of probable poorly developed carpels (cut between orthoslices xy1160 and 1180). Scale bars = 1 mm (a), 500 µm (b–e). in Multiparted, Apocarpous Flowers From The Early Cretaceous Of Eastern North America And Portugal
Text-fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs (a, b) and synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy orthoslices (c–e) of flower of Lambertiflora elegans gen. et sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous Puddledock locality, Virginia, USA (holotype, PP53796, Puddledock sample 082). a) Flower in lateral view showing long pedicel and overlapping elongated tepals; b) Detail of flower showing overlapping elongated tepals; note the numerous holes indicating the position of probable secretory cells; c) Flower in longitudinal section showing overlapping elongated tepals, remains of probable poorly developed stamens or staminodes and probable poorly developed carpels on the central conical gynoecial region of the receptacle (cut between orthoslices xz0510 and 0570); d) Flower in longitudinal section (comparable to c) showing overlapping tepals, poorly developed stamens or staminodes, and probable poorly developed carpels on the central conical gynoecial region of the receptacle; note the prominent cavities from secretory cells scattered through the tissues (cut between orthoslice xz0560 and 0575); e) Flower in transverse section showing overlapping tepals, poorly developed stamens or staminodes, and remains of probable poorly developed carpels (cut between orthoslices xy1160 and 1180). Scale bars = 1 mm (a), 500 µm (b–e).
Text-fig. 6. Scanning electron micrographs of multicarpellate and apocarpous floral structures from the Early Cretaceous Puddledock locality, Virginia, USA (a, b: PP43701, Puddledock sample 001; c: PP43000x, Puddledock sample 073). a) Anacostia? sp., strongly compressed, elongated receptacle with spirally arranged carpels (red dots; not all shown); note larger size compared to the other floral structures; b) Numerous Anacostia type pollen grains in proximal view from the base of floral structure in (a); note graded reticulum over the proximal pole of the pollen grains; c) Elongated receptacle with numerous carpels in a spiral arrangement, possibly representing an earlier developmental stage of Anacostia? sp. Scale bars = 1 mm (a, c), 10 µm (b). in Multiparted, Apocarpous Flowers From The Early Cretaceous Of Eastern North America And Portugal
Text-fig. 6. Scanning electron micrographs of multicarpellate and apocarpous floral structures from the Early Cretaceous Puddledock locality, Virginia, USA (a, b: PP43701, Puddledock sample 001; c: PP43000x, Puddledock sample 073). a) Anacostia? sp., strongly compressed, elongated receptacle with spirally arranged carpels (red dots; not all shown); note larger size compared to the other floral structures; b) Numerous Anacostia type pollen grains in proximal view from the base of floral structure in (a); note graded reticulum over the proximal pole of the pollen grains; c) Elongated receptacle with numerous carpels in a spiral arrangement, possibly representing an earlier developmental stage of Anacostia? sp. Scale bars = 1 mm (a, c), 10 µm (b).
Fig. 5 in Comparative movement analysis for a sympatric dhole and golden jackal in a human-dominated landscape
Fig. 5. Dhole (column A) and jackal (column B) step length and turning angle distributions of encamped (black) and exploratory (grey) behavioral states. Turning angles (in degrees) for both the encamped and exploratory states are plotted on the same polar plot for each species.
Fig. 4 in Comparative movement analysis for a sympatric dhole and golden jackal in a human-dominated landscape
Fig. 4. Comparison of both species' daily activity patterns. Smoothing was achieved by averaging over 4 hour time intervals. The 95% confidence intervals were estimated from the standard error of the mean step length.
Fig. 3 in Comparative movement analysis for a sympatric dhole and golden jackal in a human-dominated landscape
Fig. 3. Autocorrelation function (ACF) of: A, the dhole; and B, the jackal step length. Data points above the dotted line are classified as autocorrelated.
Fig. 2 in Comparative movement analysis for a sympatric dhole and golden jackal in a human-dominated landscape
Fig. 2. Decile-shaded isopleths of convex hull home ranges for the dhole and jackal in Khao Ang Rue Nai Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand.
Fig. 1 in Comparative movement analysis for a sympatric dhole and golden jackal in a human-dominated landscape
Fig. 1. Dhole and jackal relocations overlaid on a land cover map of Khao Ang Rue Nai Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand.
Fig. 6. A in Comparative movement analysis for a sympatric dhole and golden jackal in a human-dominated landscape
Fig. 6. A, Semi-variance comparison of dhole and jackal positions. Since the dhole was monitored for a shorter time than the jackal (due to collar malfunctions), we present comparative data for this shorter time period. B, The complete jackal semi-variogram. Both semi-variograms are limited in scope to the first two thirds of the data, since estimates in the last third of the semi-variogram has very large confidence intervals. Semi-variance and 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated from the standard error of the mean semivariance, were smoothed using a moving average over 20 lags.
Text-fig. 6. Comparative analysis of the three genera (Prynadaeopteris RADCZ., Geperapteris S.V.MEYEN, Tumidopteris NAUGOLNYKH) with possible affinity to Gleicheniaceae from the Permian deposits of Angaraland. a–c: Tumidopteris NAUGOLNYKH; d–f: Prynadaeopteris RADCZ. (based on Radczenko 1955, 1956, Naugolnykh 2013); g–i: Geperapteris S.V.MEYEN (based on Meyen 1982, Naugolnykh 2013). Left column – sori in plan (frontal view); central column – leaves; right column – sori in cross-section; FL – flattened sori; HS – hemispherical sori. Scale 1 cm (b, h), 5 mm (e), 1 mm (a, d), 0.5 mm (g); c, f, i – figures schematically drawn without scale. in A New Species Of The Genus Tumidopteris Naugolnykh From The Permian Of The Pechora Cis-Urals, Russia
Text-fig. 6. Comparative analysis of the three genera (Prynadaeopteris RADCZ., Geperapteris S.V.MEYEN, Tumidopteris NAUGOLNYKH) with possible affinity to Gleicheniaceae from the Permian deposits of Angaraland. a–c: Tumidopteris NAUGOLNYKH; d–f: Prynadaeopteris RADCZ. (based on Radczenko 1955, 1956, Naugolnykh 2013); g–i: Geperapteris S.V.MEYEN (based on Meyen 1982, Naugolnykh 2013). Left column – sori in plan (frontal view); central column – leaves; right column – sori in cross-section; FL – flattened sori; HS – hemispherical sori. Scale 1 cm (b, h), 5 mm (e), 1 mm (a, d), 0.5 mm (g); c, f, i – figures schematically drawn without scale.
Text-fig. 7. p4 of U. deningeri from Šandalja I compared with other bear species. a: Šandalja I (specimen H; 1 – occlusal, 2 – lingual view), b: U. etruscus, Casa Frata (private collection), c: U. etruscus, Olivola (IGF 4605), d: U. deningeri, C 718 cave (NM-Rv 20003), e: U. t. mediterraneus, Azykh cave (ZIN 32549) (all in occlussal view). Specimens coated by ammonium chloride; d reversed. in Šandalja I (Croatia) And
Text-fig. 7. p4 of U. deningeri from Šandalja I compared with other bear species. a: Šandalja I (specimen H; 1 – occlusal, 2 – lingual view), b: U. etruscus, Casa Frata (private collection), c: U. etruscus, Olivola (IGF 4605), d: U. deningeri, C 718 cave (NM-Rv 20003), e: U. t. mediterraneus, Azykh cave (ZIN 32549) (all in occlussal view). Specimens coated by ammonium chloride; d reversed.
Text-fig. 6. m2 of U. deningeri from Šandalja I (a: specimen G; 1– occlusal, 2 – lingual view) compared with Late Biharian U. deningeri from C 718 cave (b: NM-R 9740, c: NM-Ra 129; both occlusal view). Specimens coated by ammonium chloride; a reversed. in Šandalja I (Croatia) And
Text-fig. 6. m2 of U. deningeri from Šandalja I (a: specimen G; 1– occlusal, 2 – lingual view) compared with Late Biharian U. deningeri from C 718 cave (b: NM-R 9740, c: NM-Ra 129; both occlusal view). Specimens coated by ammonium chloride; a reversed.
Text-fig. 4. m1 of U. t. mediterraneus from Šandalja I compared with other bear species. All teeth in occlusal view. a: Šandalja I (specimen C), b: U. t. mediterraneus, Mauer (SMNS 10166), c: U. t. mediterraneus, Azykh (ZIN 32549), d: U. etruscus, Olivola (IGF 4605), e: U. etruscus, Upper Valdarno (IGF 913), f: U. deningeri, Koněprusy caves (NM-Rv 20008). Specimens coated by ammonium chloride; a, d, f reversed. in Šandalja I (Croatia) And
Text-fig. 4. m1 of U. t. mediterraneus from Šandalja I compared with other bear species. All teeth in occlusal view. a: Šandalja I (specimen C), b: U. t. mediterraneus, Mauer (SMNS 10166), c: U. t. mediterraneus, Azykh (ZIN 32549), d: U. etruscus, Olivola (IGF 4605), e: U. etruscus, Upper Valdarno (IGF 913), f: U. deningeri, Koněprusy caves (NM-Rv 20008). Specimens coated by ammonium chloride; a, d, f reversed.
Text-fig. 3. m2 and m3 of U. t. mediterraneus from Šandalja I compared with other bear species. a–e: m2, f–g: m3. a: Šandalja I (specimen A; 1 – occlusal, 2 – lingual, 3 – buccal view), b: Šandalja I (specimen B; occlusal view), c: U. t. mediterraneus, Grotta di Reale (IGF 4807V; 1 – occlusal, 2 – lingual view), d: U. etruscus, Olivola (IGF 4605; occlusal view), e: U. etruscus, Upper Valdarno (IGF 908; occlusal view), f: Šandalja I (specimen B; occlusal view), g: U. etruscus, Olivola (IGF 4588; occlusal view). Specimens coated by ammonium chloride; a, b, e, f, g reversed. in Šandalja I (Croatia) And
Text-fig. 3. m2 and m3 of U. t. mediterraneus from Šandalja I compared with other bear species. a–e: m2, f–g: m3. a: Šandalja I (specimen A; 1 – occlusal, 2 – lingual, 3 – buccal view), b: Šandalja I (specimen B; occlusal view), c: U. t. mediterraneus, Grotta di Reale (IGF 4807V; 1 – occlusal, 2 – lingual view), d: U. etruscus, Olivola (IGF 4605; occlusal view), e: U. etruscus, Upper Valdarno (IGF 908; occlusal view), f: Šandalja I (specimen B; occlusal view), g: U. etruscus, Olivola (IGF 4588; occlusal view). Specimens coated by ammonium chloride; a, b, e, f, g reversed.
Text-fig. 4. Frequency diagram of metric variation (M1 length = M1U) in samples of Apodemus spp. representing particular Pleistocene biozones (MN 17 – Q 3), compared to variation span in the Recent samples of A. uralensis, A. sylvaticus and A. flavicollis (a heading strip). in Genus Apodemus In The Pleistocene Of Central Europe: When Did The Extant Taxa Appear?
Text-fig. 4. Frequency diagram of metric variation (M1 length = M1U) in samples of Apodemus spp. representing particular Pleistocene biozones (MN 17 – Q 3), compared to variation span in the Recent samples of A. uralensis, A. sylvaticus and A. flavicollis (a heading strip).
Text-fig. 5. Frequency diagram of metric variation (m1 lenght = m1L) in samples of Apodemus spp. representing particular Pleistocene biozones (MN 17 – Q 3), compared to variation span in the Recent samples of A. uralensis, A. sylvaticus and A. flavicollis (a heading strip). in Genus Apodemus In The Pleistocene Of Central Europe: When Did The Extant Taxa Appear?
Text-fig. 5. Frequency diagram of metric variation (m1 lenght = m1L) in samples of Apodemus spp. representing particular Pleistocene biozones (MN 17 – Q 3), compared to variation span in the Recent samples of A. uralensis, A. sylvaticus and A. flavicollis (a heading strip).
Fig. 1. A in Shoaling behaviour in the pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys collettei (Beloniformes: Zenarchopteridae): comparing populations from contrasting predation regimes
Fig. 1. A, Experimental set-up to determine shoaling tendencies. During the first part of the experiment, no digital screen was present; B, during the second part, a predator was displayed on the screen.
Fig. 3 in Shoaling behaviour in the pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys collettei (Beloniformes: Zenarchopteridae): comparing populations from contrasting predation regimes
Fig. 3. Sampling sites in Singapore and on Pulau Tioman, Malaysia. A, Lorong Banir, Singapore; B, Jurong River, Singapore; C, Sungai Paya, Pulau Tioman, Malaysia; D, Sungai Paya Kecil, Pulau Tioman, Malaysia.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.