Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
19,468
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
19,468 results for “p”
FIGURE 2 in Genetic comparison of populations of Piaractus brachypomus and P. orinoquensis (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) of the Amazon and Orinoco basins
FIGURE 2 | Haplotype genealogies of Piaractus brachypomus. The circle size is proportional to the haplotype frequency. Each line represents a single mutation. Colors correspond to localities.
FIGURE 1 in Genetic comparison of populations of Piaractus brachypomus and P. orinoquensis (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) of the Amazon and Orinoco basins
FIGURE 1 | Map of the study area for sampling sites for Piaractus brachypomus and P. orinoquensis samples. The number inside the circle indicates the sampling location. The green circle indicates the samples that were analyzed for nDNA and the blue circle the samples analyzed with nDNA and mDNA. Orinoco basin (1. San José del Guaviare, 2. Puerto López, 3. Puerto Carreño, 4. San Fernando de Apure, 5. San Felix). Amazon basin (1. Guajará-Mirim, 2. Boca do Acre, 3. Leticia, 4. La Pedrera, 5. Cidade Japurá, 6. Parimé River, 7. Humaitá, 8. Cidade Juruá, 9. Tefé, 10. Beruri, 11. Janauacá, 12. Borba, 13. Itaituba. 14. Óbidos, 15. Santarém).
FIGURE 5 in Genetic comparison of populations of Piaractus brachypomus and P. orinoquensis (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) of the Amazon and Orinoco basins
FIGURE 5 | Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) based in seven microsatellite loci of 300 individuals of Piaractus brachypomus.
FIGURE 4 in Genetic comparison of populations of Piaractus brachypomus and P. orinoquensis (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) of the Amazon and Orinoco basins
FIGURE 4 | A. Barplots created from Structure representing assignments of genotypes to each local population for Piaractus brachypomus, the blue color cluster represents individuals related to the Amazon sedimentary basin and the purple color cluster represents individuals related to the crystalline shields of the Amazon basin. B. Barplots hierarchical from crystalline shields of the Amazon basin.
Annual crop-specific management history of phosphorus fertilizer input (CMH-P) in the croplands of United States from 1850 to 2022: Application rate, timing, and method
<p>This dataset presents spatiotemporal dynamics of phosphorus (P) fertilizer management (application rate, timing, and method) at a 4km × 4 km resolution in agricultural land of the contiguous U.S. from 1850 to 2022. By harmonizing multiple data sources, we reconstructed the county-level crop-specific P fertilizer use history. We then spatialized and resampled P fertilizer use data to 4 km × 4 km gridded maps based on historical U.S. cropland distribution and crop type database developed by Ye et al. (2024).</p> <p>This dataset contains (1) P fertilizer total consumption and mean application rate at the national level (Tabular); (2) P fertilizer consumption of 11 crops at the state level (Tabular); (3) P fertilizer consumption of permanent pasture (Tabular); (4) P fertilizer consumption of non-farm at the state level (Tabular); (5) P fertilizer application rate of 11 crop types at the state level (Tabular); (6) P fertilizer application rate of 11 crop types at the county level (Tabular); (7) P fertilizer application timing ratio at the state level (Tabular); (8) P fertilizer application method ratio at the state level (Tabular); (9) Gridded maps of P fertilizer application rate based on state-level data; (10) and (11) Gridded maps of P fertilizer application rate based on county-level data; (12)-(20) Gridded maps of P fertilizer application rate for each crop.</p> <p>A detailed description of the data development processes, key findings, and uncertainties can be found in Cao, P., Yi, B., Bilotto, F., Gonzalez Fischer, C., Herrero, M., Lu, C.: Crop-specific Management History of Phosphorus fertilizer input (CMH-P) in the croplands of United States: Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up data sources, is under review for the journal Earth System Science Data (ESSD). https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2024-67/#discussion. </p> <p>This work is supported by the Iowa Nutrient Research Center, the ISU College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Dean's Faculty Fellowship, and NSF CAREER grant (1945036).</p> <p> </p>
Figure 1. A – P in Expression analysis of phosphate induced genes in contrasting maize genotypes for phosphorus use efficiency
Figure 1. A – P-efficient and P-inefficient maize plants grown in the Cerrado under low Pi conditions.B – Dry weight of maize genotypes. C – Root/shoot ratio of maize plants. D and E – Phosphorus content. F – Anthocyanin concentration. G and H – Units of APA activity. B to H, The maize plants were grown in hydroponics culture in the presence (250 µM Pi - gray bar) or absence (0 µM Pi – black bar) of phosphate harvested after 15 days in treatment. Each bar is the mean of three replicates with a standard deviation.
Figure 4b. H1 - P in Remarks on the genus Plexippus C. L. Koch, 1846 (Araneae: Salticidae)
Figure 4b. H1 - P. "coccineus" [identification questionable - see text] from Greece, I - P. baro Wesolowska & Tomasiewicz, 2008, J - P. auberti Lessert, 1925, N- P. kondarensis (Charitonov, 1951) - by Charitonov, O - P. kondarensis - by Andreeva, P - P. fibulatus Dawidowicz & Wesolowska, 2016, Q - P. [?] rubroclypeatus (Lessert, 1927) (comb. n.), R- P. [?] lutescens Wesolowska, 2011 (misplaced in this genus), S - P. [?] pokharae Zabka, 1990.
Figure 2. - Aspect macroscopique des gonades chez P in Dynamique de la reproduction et fécondité de Pagellus acarne (Sparidae) de la région Centre du littoral algérien
Figure 2. - Aspect macroscopique des gonades chez P. acarne: bisexués du groupe I (A), II (B) et III (C), mâle (D) et femelle (E). TO: territoire ovarien; TT: territoire testiculaire. Échelle = 1 cm. [Macroscopic aspects of gonads in P. acarne: bisexuals of group I (A), II (B) and III (C), male (D), female (E). TO: ovarian territory; TT: testicular territory. Scale = 1 cm].
Fig. 12M–P in A revision of the simplex species group of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Triepeolus Robertson, 1901 (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
Fig. 12M–P (continued from preceding page). Distribution maps. M. Triepeolus saturninus Cockerell & Sandhouse, 1924. N. T. segregatus (Cockerell, 1900). O. T. shoshone sp. nov. P. T. simplex Robertson, 1903. Approximate geographic ranges are indicated in orange and were estimated from occurrence records known to the authors (yellow, blue, and red circles, with the latter two indicating localities of DNA barcoded specimens and the different colors corresponding to separate clusters of BINs assigned to the same species).
(07)-Ratke2020A-DS0003 – Drosophila melanogaster w[*]; P{w[+mC]=His2Av-EGFP.C}2/SM6a line long-term live imaging dataset of embryonic development acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy
<p>(07)-Ratke2020A-DS0003 – <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em> w[*]; P{w[+mC]=His2Av-EGFP.C}2/SM6a line long-term live imaging dataset of embryonic development acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy</p>
(07)-Ratke2020A-DS0001 – Drosophila melanogaster y[1] w[67c23]; P{w[+mC]=Ubi-GFP.nls}ID-2; P{Ubi-GFP.nls}ID-3 line long-term live imaging dataset of embryonic development acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy
<p>(07)-Ratke2020A-DS0001 – <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em> y[1] w[67c23]; P{w[+mC]=Ubi-GFP.nls}ID-2; P{Ubi-GFP.nls}ID-3 line long-term live imaging dataset of embryonic development acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy</p>
(07)-Ratke2020A-DS0002 – Drosophila melanogaster w[*]; P{w[+mC]=Tub84B-EGFP.NLS}3 long-term live imaging dataset acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy
<p>(07)-Ratke2020A-DS0002 <em>–</em> <em>Drosophila melanogaste</em>r y[1] w[67c23]; P{w[+mC]=Ubi-GFP.nls}ID-2; P{Ubi-GFP.nls}ID-3 (Bloomington <em>Drosophila</em> Stock Center #29724) long-term live imaging dataset acquired with light sheet fluorescence microscopy</p>
Klinisch relevant oder statistisch signifikant: Effekte, p-Werte und Konfidenzintervalle
<p><span>Bei der Auswertung und Interpretation medizinischer Studien ist zu unterscheiden, ob das Ergebnis klinisch relevant und/oder statistisch signifikant ausfällt. Für diese Entscheidung berechnet man am besten Effekte, p-Werte und Konfidenzintervalle. In Abhängigkeit von den Effekten und der p-Werte bzw. Konfidenzintervalle (z. B. 95 %-CI) kann eine Entscheidung getroffen werden. </span></p> <p><span>Die Grafik veranschaulicht die unterschiedlichen Szenarien eines klinisch relevanten und/oder statistisch signifikanten Ergebnisses. </span></p>
Clinically relevant or statistically significant: effects, p-values and confidence intervals
<p><span>When evaluating and interpreting medical studies, a distinction must be made as to whether the result is clinically relevant and/or statistically significant. For this decision, it is best to calculate effects, p-values and confidence intervals. A decision can be made depending on the effects and the p-values or confidence intervals (e.g. 95% CI). </span></p> <p><span>The diagram illustrates the different scenarios of a clinically relevant and/or statistically significant result. </span></p>
Figure 1 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
Figure 1. Lateral view of SMF 58282, the only surviving syntype of Sphenopsis ochracea (von Berlepsch & Taczanowski, 1884), collected by Siemiradzki at Chaguarpata, Chimborazo, Ecuador, on 5 March 1883. The original field label reads: 'Hemispingus? / ♀? / Chaguarpata (5700') [= 1,737 m] / 5/III 83 / Siemiradzki'. The identification on the secondary (Berlepsch) label reads: 'Chlorospingus [in black ink] ochraceus, Berl. & Tacz. [in pencil]', with 'Chloro' crossed out and replaced by 'Hemi' in pencil, and 'melanotis' in pencil (© Gerald Mayr)
FIG. 2 in Identité d'Amphorkis inermis Thouars et d'Arnottia mauritiana A.Rich.: deux espèces distinctes, traitées en synonymie comme Cynorkis inermis (Thouars) Hermans & P. J. Cribb dans la Flore des Mascareignes
FIG. 2. — Lectotype de Arnottia mauritiana A. Rich (Richard 1828) (Cynorkis mauritiana (A. Rich) Pailler & Baider, comb. nov.) (MNHN, P00738183).
FIG. 1 in Identité d'Amphorkis inermis Thouars et d'Arnottia mauritiana A.Rich.: deux espèces distinctes, traitées en synonymie comme Cynorkis inermis (Thouars) Hermans & P. J. Cribb dans la Flore des Mascareignes
FIG. 1. — Holotype de Amphorkis inermis Thouars (Cynorkis inermis (Thouars) Hermans & Cribb) (MNHN, P00693148).
TABLE 1 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
<p>TABLE 1 Five alternative taxonomies of the genus <i>Sphenopsis</i> as presented in (from left to right) the present study; eBird/Clements checklist v.2021 (Clements <i>et al</i>. 2021); IOC world bird list v.12.1 (Gill <i>et al</i>. 2021); Howard & Moore v.4 (Dickinson & Christidis 2014); HBW/Birdlife International digital checklist v.6 (HBW & BirdLife International 2021). The South American Checklist Committee (SACC) of the American Ornithological Society (AOS) currently recognises two species (<i>S. melanotis</i>, <i>S. frontalis</i>) in line with eBird/ Clements and Howard & Moore. The ‘linearised’ taxonomic sequence used in this study (see Appendix) was based on Price-Waldman (2019), wherein <i>S. melanotis</i> (<i>sensu lato</i>, as treated by eBird/Clements and Howard & Moore) was reconstructed as paraphyletic. Taxa recognised at species rank within each taxonomy are shown in boldface. Taxa for which study skins were not personally examined in the present study are denoted thus (—).</p><table><thead><tr><th>Present study</th><th>eBird/Clements</th><th>IOC</th><th>Howard & Moore</th><th>HBW/Birdlife</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th>S. melanotis melanotis</th><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td><td>S. m. melanotis</td></tr><tr><th>S. m. castaneicollis</th><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td><td>S. m. castaneicollis</td></tr><tr><th>S. frontalis frontalis</th><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td><td>S. f. frontalis</td></tr><tr><th>S. f. hanieli</th><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td><td>S. f. hanieli</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td><td>S. f. ignobilis</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td><td>S. f. flavidorsalis</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td><td>S. f. iterata</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. piurae</i></th><td>S. m. piurae</td><td><i>S. p. piurae</i></td><td>S. m. piurae</td><td>S. p. piurae</td></tr><tr><th>S. ochracea</th><td>S. m. ochracea</td><td><i>S. ochracea</i></td><td>S. m. ochracea</td><td><i>S. ochracea</i></td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td><td>S. m. berlepschi</td></tr><tr><th>—</th><td>S. m. macrophrys</td><td>S. p. macrophrys</td><td>S. m. macrophrys</td><td>S. p. macrophrys</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 2 in Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
<p>TABLE 2 Plumage colour of species in the genus <i>Sphenopsis</i>, scored using study skins (<i>n</i> = 43) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia (ANSP) and Delaware Museum of Nature & Science, Greenville (DMNH) collections (see Appendix for lists of specimens examined). The codes ‘tail-D’ and ‘tail-V’ denote the dorsal and ventral surface of the tail, respectively. Numbers are taken from Smithe (1975): (18) Orange Yellow; (23) Raw Umber; (28) Olive-Brown; (49) Greenish Olive; (51) Citrine; (82) Blackish Neutral Gray; (83) Dark Neutral Gray; (89) Jet Black; (119A) Hair Brown; (121) Vandyke Brown; (121A) Prout’s Brown; (123A) Cinnamon; (123B) Clay Color; (123C) Yellow Ocher; (124) Buff; (129) Dark Brownish Olive; (136) Raw Sienna; (223D) Tawny Olive.</p><table><thead><tr><th>Species</th><th>Crown</th><th>Back</th><th>Tail-D</th><th>Tail-V</th><th>Throat</th><th>Breast</th><th>Belly</th><th>Vent</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><th><i>S. melanotis melanotis</i></th><td>833</td><td>837</td><td>283</td><td>23</td><td>123A</td><td>123A</td><td>124</td><td>123A</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. m. castaneicollis</i></th><td>82</td><td>837</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>893</td><td>136</td><td>124</td><td>1364</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. frontalis frontalis</i></th><td>491,3,5</td><td>493</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>186</td><td>515</td><td>515</td><td>515</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. f. hanieli</i></th><td>493</td><td>491,3</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>123C 4</td><td>123B</td><td>123B</td><td>123A</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. piurae</i></th><td>893</td><td>119A</td><td>283</td><td>284</td><td>893</td><td>136</td><td>1364</td><td>1364</td></tr><tr><th><i>S. ochracea</i></th><td>831</td><td>1292</td><td>283</td><td>28</td><td>223D</td><td>123B 3</td><td>223D</td><td>123A</td></tr></tbody></table><p><sup>1</sup> slightly browner <sup>5</sup> slightly more yellow <sup>2</sup> slightly lighter and more olive <sup>6</sup> slightly duller, less bright <sup>3</sup> slightly darker <sup>7</sup> slightly more olive <sup>4</sup> slightly lighter</p>
TABLEAU 1 in Identité d'Amphorkis inermis Thouars et d'Arnottia mauritiana A. Rich.: deux espèces distinctes, traitées en synonymie comme Cynorkis inermis (Thouars) Hermans & P. J. Cribb dans la Flore des Mascareignes
<p>TABLEAU 1. — Caractères distinctifs de <i>Cynorkis inermis</i> et <i>Cynorkis mauritiana</i> comb. nov. établis à partir des diagnoses et des spécimens types.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Cynorkis <i>inermis</i></th><th><i>Cynorkis mauritiana</i> <b>comb. nov.</b></th></tr><tr><th></th><th>Diagnose</th><th>Type</th><th><b>Diagnose</b></th><th><b>Type</b></th></tr><tr><th></th><th>(Thouars 1822)</th><th>(P00693148)</th><th>(Richard 1828)</th><th><b>(P00738183)</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Fleur</th><td>Non résupinée</td><td>Non résupinée</td><td>Résupinée</td><td>Résupinée</td></tr><tr><th>Couleur de la fleur</th><td>Marbrée</td><td>–</td><td>Pourpre</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Sépales latéraux</th><td>Largement oblongs</td><td>Largement oblongs</td><td>Spathulés-ovales</td><td>Spathulésovales</td></tr><tr><th>Feuille</th><td>Lanceolée</td><td>–</td><td>Ovale-oblongue</td><td>Ovale-oblongue</td></tr></tbody></table>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.