Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Roosting-sites of black-necked cranes in the Caohai wetland, China, and the study quadrats sampled in this study.

Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Mean ± SE of species richness in the understory and the shrub layer of three different vegetation types. LP = L. camara plots, IBP = Indigenous bush-dominated plots and IGP = Indigenous grass-dominated plots inside the Groenkloof Nature Reserve, South Africa.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Fig. 1. A in Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. A map showing four sampling locations (St. 1, St. 2, St. 3, and St. 4; (A) of C. brevipedalia specimens (B) collected from the southern coastal regions (SCR) and eastern coastal regions (ECR) of Korea.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Fig. 4 in Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Mantel test showing relationships between genetic distance and the logarithm of geographic distance between all pairs of 42 COI haplotypes of C. brevipedalia populations from two coastal regions of Korea.

Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. The test results of the ROC curve. Note: the diagonal represents that the model had no judgment ability (50% area and below), while above the diagonal represents that the model had judgment ability (50% or above).

Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Mean ± SE of morphospecies richness (top left), abundance (top right) and biomass (bottom left) of invertebrate recorded in pitfall and window traps in the three different vegetation types in the Groenkloof Nature Reserve. Means are shown for all invertebrates, herbivores, predators and detrivores. LP = L. camara plots; IBP = Indigenous bush-dominated plots; IGP = Indigenous grass-dominated plots.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Fig. 3 in Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. The haplotype TCS network (A) and Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree (B) show phylogeography and relationships among the 42 COI haplotypes of C. brevipedalia collected from the southern (SCR; orange colors) and eastern coastal regions (ECR; blue colors) of Korea. Each circle on the haplotype network represents individual haplotypes, and the size of the cycle is the proportion of haplotype frequency. The colors indicate the geographical origin of the haplotypes. Each line between haplotypes represents a 1-nucleotide mutational change. Small black dots indicate unsampled haplotypes. On the phylogenetic tree, numbers on branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities/bootstrap support values.

Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 6. Lateral view of the female spermathecal. A, Aphractus acuminatus; B, Polycleptis scutellifera; C, Paraphractus abbreviatus; D, Polycleptidella chilensis. AcGld, accessory gland; Dct, duct of the spermatheca; GC, genital chamber; Odl, lateral oviduct; Sgp, subgenital plate; Spt, spermatheca; St, abdominal sternite; VI, ovipositor blade. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 5. Female abdomen. A, C, E, G in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 5. Female abdomen. A, C, E, G, ventral view of subgenital plate, scale bar = 1 mm; B, D, F, G, lateral view of subgenital plate and ovipositor, scale bar: 3 mm. A, B, Aphractus acuminatus; C, D, Polycleptis scutellifera; E, F, Paraphractus abbreviatus; G, H, Polycleptidella chilensis.

Fig. 4 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Micrographs of male titillator and apex process. A, B, Aphractus acuminatus; C, D, Polycleptis scutellifera; E, F, Polycleptidella chilensis; G, H, Paraphractus abbreviatus. Scale bars: A, C = 500 µm; E, G = 250 µm; B, D, F, H = 50 µm.

Fig. 3. Paraphractus abbreviatus male paraproct. A in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Paraphractus abbreviatus male paraproct. A, ventral view; B, lateral view. Scale bars 1mm; arrows indicate ventral tubercle.

Fig. 2. Male abdominal apex. A, B, C in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Male abdominal apex. A, B, C, Aphractus acuminatus; D, E, F, Polycleptis scutellifera; G, H, I, Polycleptidella chilensis; J, K, L, Paraphractus abbreviatus. A, D, G, I ventral view; B, E, H, K dorsal view; C, F, I, K lateral view. Scale bars = 2 mm.

Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Live habitus of Aphractini genera, females and males: A, Aphractus acuminatus (Los Ruiles); B, Polycleptis scutellifera (Vilches Alto); C, Paraphractus abbreviatus (ñ Los Ruiles, ò Licán Ray); D, Polycleptidella chilensis (Anticura). Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 6. Photograph of a head of the nutria in dorsal view. The dotted line indicates the outline of eyeballs and lenses, and the dashed line indicates anterior-posterior direction (axial direction). The straight line in red connects the retinal periphery to the lens center. The visual overlap between the two eyes is measured to be approximately 56 degrees.

Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Macrobiotus naginae sp. nov. – cuticular structures on legs: A, garter-like structure on leg II under PCM; B, garter-like structure on leg III under PCM; C, garter-like structures and claws III under SEM. Flat arrowheads indicate pores on the leg cuticle, flat empty arrowheads indicate garter-like structures. Scale bars: A–B = 20 μm; C = 10 μm.

Fig. 3. Light photomicrographs from a in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Light photomicrographs from a radial section of the nutria retina. The retina is a 10-layered structure. The pigmented epithelial layer is a brown color. The photoreceptor layer is pink with eosin staining, and the cell nuclei in the inner and outer nuclear layer and ganglion cell layer are stained purple with hematoxylin. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Radial section of the nutria eyeball around ciliary body. In the ciliary body, muscles, which should stain with eosin, could not be observed. Ac, Anterior chamber; Cb, Ciliary body; Co, Cornea; Cp, Ciliary portion; Sc, Sclera. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Frontal view (a) and lateral view (b) of nutria eyeball. The eyeball of the adult nutria is approximately spherical. The pupil seems to be vertically elongated (a) and the cornea surface is curved convexly (b). The lens is ellipsoidal shape compressed in the axial direction (c). Lateral view of the lens (c). Eyeball diameter was measured in four bearing angles (ED1~ED4). PL, pupil length; PW, pupil width; Ax. L, axial length; LD, lens diameter; LT, lens thickness. D, dorsa; V, ventral; A, anterior; P, posterior.

Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. PCR-amplified target segments from genomic DNA, eyeball cDNA, and brain cDNA. (A) LWS-R transcripts of guppy, (B) LWS-R transcripts of green swordtail, and (C) LWS-R intron of guppy and green swordtail.

Fig. 7. Claws IV in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 7. Claws IV of Macrobiotus pseudohufelandi complex species. A, Macrobiotus gretae ZA.373; B, Macrobiotus gr. pseudohufelandi PL.360. Arrowhead indicates lunulae (when present). Scale bar = 20 μm.