Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

Text-fig. 6. Fossil endocasts of large mammals from Gánovce-Hrádok Neanderthal site. a) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21008); b) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21007); c) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21006); d) Bovidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21009); e) Ursus ex gr. spelaeus (NM R-604); f) Ursus ex gr. spelaeus (NM-Rv 21010); lateral and dorsal (except for f: ventral) views; lateral view for d and f are inverted. in Revised Floral And Faunal Assemblages From Late Pleistocene Deposits Of The Gánovce-Hrádok Neanderthal Site -Biostratigraphic And Palaeoecological Implications

Text-fig. 6. Fossil endocasts of large mammals from Gánovce-Hrádok Neanderthal site. a) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21008); b) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21007); c) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21006); d) Bovidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21009); e) Ursus ex gr. spelaeus (NM R-604); f) Ursus ex gr. spelaeus (NM-Rv 21010); lateral and dorsal (except for f: ventral) views; lateral view for d and f are inverted.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Text-fig. 2. General geological map of the Emsian (Suchomasty Limestone) and Eifelian (Acanthopyge Limestone) rocks at Zadní Kobyla ridge with marked Calceola- and trilobite-bearing locality. Modified after Svoboda and Prantl (1949) and Mergl (2014). in Trilobite Assemblage Of Calceola -Bearing Beds In Acanthopyge Limestone (Choteč Formation, Middle Devonian, Eifelian, Prague Basin, The Czech Republic)

Text-fig. 2. General geological map of the Emsian (Suchomasty Limestone) and Eifelian (Acanthopyge Limestone) rocks at Zadní Kobyla ridge with marked Calceola- and trilobite-bearing locality. Modified after Svoboda and Prantl (1949) and Mergl (2014).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Text-fig. 5. A pie chart of trilobite taxa abundance at Zadní Kobyla – small quarry outcrop (Calceola-bearing locality). in Trilobite Assemblage Of Calceola -Bearing Beds In Acanthopyge Limestone (Choteč Formation, Middle Devonian, Eifelian, Prague Basin, The Czech Republic)

Text-fig. 5. A pie chart of trilobite taxa abundance at Zadní Kobyla – small quarry outcrop (Calceola-bearing locality).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Text-fig. 1. Sketch map of the Devonian of the Prague Basin, and generalised stratigraphy of the Koněprusy Limestone (Pragian), Suchomasty Limestone (Upper Emsian), Acanthopyge Limestone (Eifelian) and the top of the Acanthopyge Limestone and the Srbsko Formation (transition Eifelian-Givetian) in the Koněprusy area (with marked neptunian dykes and approximate positions of Calceola-bearing limestone beds). Modified after Chlupáč et al. (1986), Hladil et al. (1992) and Mergl (2014). in Trilobite Assemblage Of Calceola -Bearing Beds In Acanthopyge Limestone (Choteč Formation, Middle Devonian, Eifelian, Prague Basin, The Czech Republic)

Text-fig. 1. Sketch map of the Devonian of the Prague Basin, and generalised stratigraphy of the Koněprusy Limestone (Pragian), Suchomasty Limestone (Upper Emsian), Acanthopyge Limestone (Eifelian) and the top of the Acanthopyge Limestone and the Srbsko Formation (transition Eifelian-Givetian) in the Koněprusy area (with marked neptunian dykes and approximate positions of Calceola-bearing limestone beds). Modified after Chlupáč et al. (1986), Hladil et al. (1992) and Mergl (2014).

Fig. 3 in Spatial and temporal structure of fish assemblages in a hyperhaline coastal system: Ría Lagartos, Mexico

Fig. 3. Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling ordination plot derived from a Bray-Curtis similarity matrix constructed from the fish abundance data (log X + 1 transformation) in different types of habitat (a) and climatic seasons (b) in the Ría Lagartos system between October 2004 and December 2008. hyperhaline: H, rocky: R, seagrass: S, channel: C, marine: M. %: Rainy, % Northerlies, + Dry.

Fig. 4 in Spatial and temporal structure of fish assemblages in a hyperhaline coastal system: Ría Lagartos, Mexico

Fig. 4. Canonical Correspondence Analysis bi-plot. Length and direction of arrows indicate the relative importance and force of change in the environmental variables. CCA axis 1 and CCA axis 2 had eigen values of 0.629 and 0.214 respectively. The habitats and seasons are indicated. Only the species approximately 90% of IVI are shown. Species abbreviations are the first letter of the genus name and first four letters of the species name. DO: dissolved oxygen.

Fig. 2 in Spatial and temporal structure of fish assemblages in a hyperhaline coastal system: Ría Lagartos, Mexico

Fig. 2. Spatial (type of habitat) and seasonal variations in temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen (±1 STD).

Fig. 1 in Spatial and temporal structure of fish assemblages in a hyperhaline coastal system: Ría Lagartos, Mexico

Fig. 1. Study area showing the Ría Lagartos Lagoon system, Mexico and sampling stations. Letters show different types of habitats and numbers are replicas in the same habitat. (hyperhaline: H, rocky: R, seagrass: S, channel: C, and marine: M).

Fig. 6 in Spatio-temporal segregation and size distribution of fish assemblages as related to non-native species occurrence in the middle rio Doce Valley, MG, Brazil

Fig. 6. Least-square means and 95% confidence intervals from ANCOVA of the first three environmental factors from PCA. Different markers represent significantly different means as detected by planned contrasts with 5% significance level, first comparing lakes with any non-native species with those without them, and then comparing the two categories of lakes with non-natives (non-piscivores vs. piscivores).

Fig. 4 in Spatio-temporal segregation and size distribution of fish assemblages as related to non-native species occurrence in the middle rio Doce Valley, MG, Brazil

Fig. 4. Scatterplot of species body size (mean standard length) vs. a relative index of native affinity to lakes containing piscivorous invaders (the proportion of biomass of a given native species in lakes with piscivorous invaders). The estimated regression line is also presented (Y = 0.044*X - 0.279; R2 = 0.443; p = 0.007). Species codes: ast = Astyanax sp.; aus = Australoheros facetus; cyp = Cyphocharax gilbert; cre = Crenicichla lacustris; geo = Geophagus brasiliensis; gym = Gymnotus gr. carapo; hop = Hoplias malabaricus; lep = Leporinus steindachneri; lor = Loricariidae (unidentified species); lyc = Lycengraulis sp.; moe = Moenkhausia doceana; oli = Oligosarcus solitarius; pac = Pachyurus adspersus; pro = Prochilodus vimboides; tra = Trachelyopterus striatulus.

Fig. 5 in Spatio-temporal segregation and size distribution of fish assemblages as related to non-native species occurrence in the middle rio Doce Valley, MG, Brazil

Fig. 5. Least-square means and 95% confidence intervals from ANCOVA of mean individual size and temporal turnover as related to the three lake categories. Different markers represent significantly different means as detected by planned contrasts with 5% significance level, first comparing lakes with any non-native species with those without them, and then comparing the two categories of lakes with non-natives (non-piscivores vs. piscivores).

Fig. 2 in Spatio-temporal segregation and size distribution of fish assemblages as related to non-native species occurrence in the middle rio Doce Valley, MG, Brazil

Fig. 2. Alpha (mean) and beta richness. a) Comparison among the temporal and spatial components of richness. b) Species richness for each lake. The alpha (mean) and beta richness were taken along the temporal component. Lake codes: No = Nova; Ca = Capim; Fe = Ferrugem; Cr = Crentes; Po = Poço Redondo; Ro = Romoalda; Ti = Timburé; Ag = Águas Claras; Pa = Palmeirinha; Ar = Ariranha. "Natives" represents lakes without non-native species; "Non-piscivores" represents lakes with non-piscivorous non-native species; "Piscivores" represents lakes with invasive piscivorous species.

Fig. 5 in Changes in the structure of fish assemblages in streams along an undisturbed-impacted gradient, upper Paraná River basin, Central Brazil

Fig. 5. ABC curves per year of fish assemblages from stream stretches located in impacted areas. NP1 = Palmito; NP2 = Onça; NP3 = Unnamed Stream 3. W = statistical value for each stream.

Fig. 2 in Changes in the structure of fish assemblages in streams along an undisturbed-impacted gradient, upper Paraná River basin, Central Brazil

Fig. 2. Fish assemblage rarefaction plot by stream stretches. P1 = Macaúba; P2 = Carapina; P3 = Barreiro; P4 = Cana Brava; NP1 = Palmito; NP2 = Onça; NP3 = Unnamed Stream 3; NP4= Bandeira; NP5 = Pedreira; NP6 = Unnamed Stream 2.

Fig. 1 in Changes in the structure of fish assemblages in streams along an undisturbed-impacted gradient, upper Paraná River basin, Central Brazil

Fig. 1. Location of the streams sampled in the João Leite River basin, Goiás, Central Brazil. The broken line represents the limits of the basin. Clear grey area = Altamiro de Moura Pacheco State Park; Goiânia and Anápolis are the main cities in the basin. P1 = Macaúba; P2 = Carapina; P3 = Barreiro; P4 = Cana Brava; NP1 = Palmito; NP2 = Onça; NP3 = Unnamed Stream 3; NP4 = Bandeira; NP5 = Pedreira; NP6 = Unnamed Stream 2.

Fig. 3 in Changes in the structure of fish assemblages in streams along an undisturbed-impacted gradient, upper Paraná River basin, Central Brazil

Fig. 3. Fish assemblage dendogram resulting from the Morisita-Horns analysis. Roman numerals indicate the groups and the small box the scale of variance. P1 = Macaúba; P2 = Carapina; P3 = Barreiro; P4 = Cana Brava; NP1 = Palmito; NP2 = Onça; NP3 = Unnamed Stream 3; NP4 = Bandeira; NP5 = Pedreira; NP6 = Unnamed Stream 2.

Fig. 4 in Fish assemblage in a dammed tropical river: an analysis along the longitudinal and temporal gradients from river to reservoir

Fig. 4. Ordination diagram from Canonical Correspondence Analysis of the abundance of the 14 most numerous species with abiotic variables. Zone codes: 1 = Zone 1; 2 = Zone 2; 3 = Zone 3; and 4 = Zone 4. Species codes: Aspar = Astyanax parahybae; Astbim = Astyanax cf. bimaculatus; Cickel = Cichla kelberi; Geobra = Geophagus brasiliensis; Hopmal = Hoplias malabaricus; Hypaur = Hypostomus auroguttatus; Hoplit = Hoplosternum littorale; Hypaff = Hypostomus affinis; Lepcop = Leporinus copelandii; Lepcon = Leporinus conirostris; Metmac = Metynnis maculatus; Olihep = Oligosarcus hepsetus; Pimmac = Pimelodus maculatus; Plasqu = Plagioscion squamosissimus.

Fig. 3 in Fish assemblage in a dammed tropical river: an analysis along the longitudinal and temporal gradients from river to reservoir

Fig. 3. Spatial variation in species number and biomass by zone (1, 2, 3, 4) in Paraíba do Sul River and Funil Reservoir.

Fig. 1 in Fish assemblage in a dammed tropical river: an analysis along the longitudinal and temporal gradients from river to reservoir

Fig. 1. Paraíba do Sul River - Funil Reservoir system. The four sampled zones are shown (1 = Zone 1; 2 = Zone 2; 3 = Zone 3, and 4 = Zone 4).

Fig. 7. a in Ecomorphological patterns of the fish assemblage in a tropical floodplain: effects of trophic, spatial and phylogenetic structures

Fig. 7. a) Diagram of Canonical Discriminant Analysis for the ecomorphological indices of the fish assemblage grouping in habitat types in the upper Paraná River floodplain (rivers, channels, connected and disconnected lagoons). b) Histograms with the scores of the habitat types for Canonical axis 1.