Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2019View details →

Text-fig. 4. Distribution of Glyptostroboxylon rudolphii in the Miocene (solid circles) and Glyptostrobus pensilis at present (open circles). It grows in the subtropical swamps of Vietnamese and China (Eckenwalder 2009, Farjon 2010). in The First Glyptostroboxylon And Taxodioxylon Descriptions From The Late Miocene Of Turkey And Palaeoclimatological Evaluation

Text-fig. 4. Distribution of Glyptostroboxylon rudolphii in the Miocene (solid circles) and Glyptostrobus pensilis at present (open circles). It grows in the subtropical swamps of Vietnamese and China (Eckenwalder 2009, Farjon 2010).

Fig. 1 in Scientific Note Evaluation of fish passage through the Igarapé Dam fish ladder (rio Paraopeba, Brazil), using marking and recapture

Fig. 1. Total number of fish specimens marked per year and cumulative recovery rates in rio Paraopeba, from 1997 to 2001.

Fig. 1 in Fish passage ladders from Canoas Complex - Paranapanema River: evaluation of genetic structure maintenance of Salminus brasiliensis (Teleostei: Characiformes)

Fig. 1. Partial view of the Paranapanema River and its principal affluents (Tibagi and Cinzas Rivers). Featured are the two collection sites: HEP Canoas I and HEP Canoas II.

Fig. 4 in Preliminary study on the application of radio-telemetry techniques to evaluate movements of fish in the Lateral canal at Itaipu Dam, Brazil

Fig. 4. Movements of Prochilodus lineatus (fish no 1 and 4) and Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum (fish no 9, 10 and 13) in the lateral channel located near Itaipu Dam (detections in the fixed stations, in number of hours post-release, are shown in the white circles).

Fig. 3 in Preliminary study on the application of radio-telemetry techniques to evaluate movements of fish in the Lateral canal at Itaipu Dam, Brazil

Fig. 3. Radio-telemetry fixed station at "Lago das Grevilhas", in the lateral channel near Itaipu Dam.

Fig. 1 in Preliminary study on the application of radio-telemetry techniques to evaluate movements of fish in the Lateral canal at Itaipu Dam, Brazil

Fig. 1. Locations of the fixed-station receivers (numbers inside the white circles) during the pilot study conducted in the lateral channel located near Itaipu Dam.

Fig. 2 in Preliminary study on the application of radio-telemetry techniques to evaluate movements of fish in the Lateral canal at Itaipu Dam, Brazil

Fig. 2. Surgical implantation of a radiotransmitter in Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum, captured in the lateral channel located near Itaipu Dam.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2006View details →

Fig. 4 in Modeling energy flow in a large Neotropical reservoir: a tool do evaluate fishing and stability

Fig. 4. Simulated Total catch (solid line) and catch values observed (triangles). Simulations performed on ITAIPU-2 model, under constant fishing effort (values were close to 1998). Simulations made in Ecopath with Ecosim (Subroutine: Run Ecossim, module: Results).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2006View details →

Fig. 1 in Modeling energy flow in a large Neotropical reservoir: a tool do evaluate fishing and stability

Fig. 1. Itaipu Reservoir, its tributaries and the upper Paraná River Floodplain upstream (spawning areas for the reservoir migratory fish species).

Figures 53–58 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 53–58. Stereoscan photographs of Pimplinae. Figs 53, 54, mesopleuron; 53, Dolichomitus annulicornis; 54, Pimpla azteca. Figs 55–58, propodeum, dorsal; 55, Xanthopimpla aurita; 56, Echthromorpha atrata; 57, Lissopimpla excelsa; 58, Zatypota percontatoria.

Figures 87–90 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 87–90. Hind end of mesosoma with hind legs and metasoma dis-articulated; 87, Neotheronia mellosa; 88, Pimpla sumichrasti; 89, Scambus annulatus; 90, Dolichomitus annuicornis.

Figures 41–46 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 41–46. Stereoscan photographs of Pimplinae. Fig. 41, Sinarachna pallipes, head, posterior. Fig. 42, Dreisbachia avivae, mandible. Figs 43–46, Head, lateral; 43, Dolichomitus irritator, 44, Zaglyptus simonis; 45, Echthromorpha atrata; 46, Hymenoepimecis bicolor.

Figures 71–76 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 71–76. Stereoscan photographs of Pimplinae. Figs 71, 72, tergites II—IV, dorsal; 71, Polysphincta tuberosa; 72, Zatypota petronae. Figs 73–75, apex of ovipositor; 73, Liotryphon crassiseta; 74, Endromopoda detrita; 75, Dolichomitus imperator. Fig. 76, Zatypota petronae, ovipositor entire.

Figures 23–28 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 23–28. Stereoscan photographs of Pimplinae, head, anterior; 23, Ephialtes manifestator; 24, Paraperithous gnathaulax; 25, Xanthephialtes oculatus; 26, Schizopyga frigida; 27, Theronia melanocera ♀; 28, Theronia melanocera ♂.

Figures 47–52 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 47–52. Stereoscan photographs of Pimplinae, pronotum, lateral; 47, Dolichomitus irritator; 48, Pimpla azteca; 49, Schizopyga frigida; 50, Clistopyga calixtoi; 51, Hymenoepimecis bicolor; 52, Acrodactyla degener.

Figure 22 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figure 22. Cladogram resulting from secondary analysis: section 9 (of 9), the Polysphincta genus-complex. Although there are some similarities in topology with the primary analysis (Figs 11–13) – such as the basal position of Piogaster and the composition of two more derived clades – all genera are apparently monophyletic.

Figures 29–34 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 29–34. Stereoscan photographs of Pimplinae. Figs 29–32,head, anterior; 29, Acropimpla didyma; 30, Sericopimpla australis; 31, Dolichomitus irritator ♂; 32, Xanthopimpla aurita; Figs 33, 34, base of antennae; 33, Pimpla azteca; 34, Acrodactyla degener.

Figures 94–97 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 94–97. Posterior end of metasoma of female, showing position and shape of tergites VII−IX and associated apodemes, slightly diagrammatic; 94, Pimpla sumichrasti; 95, Neotheronia mellosa; 96, Scambus brevicornis; 97, Acrotaphus tibialis. Note the great enlargement of the apodeme on tergite VIII in Pimpla.

Figures 35–40 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figures 35–40. Stereoscan photographs of Pimplinae, head, posterior; 35, Dolichomitus annulicornis; 36, Pseudopimpla pygidiator; 37, Camptotypus stigmaticus; 38, Dreisbachia avivae; 39, Eruga yehi; 40, Schizopyga frigida.

Figure 20 in The suprageneric groups of the Pimplinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): a cladistic re-evaluation and evolutionary biological study

Figure 20. Cladogram resulting from secondary analysis: section 7 (of 9), the Ephialtes genus-group. The topology of this cladogram broadly resembles that of the primary analysis, but note that Dolichomitus is apparently monophyletic. The results support the primary analysis in that Endromopoda (excluding Fredegunda) and Holcopimpla are not demonstrably monophyletic.