Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 21 in Taxonomy, morphology, and new distribution data of Menenotus (Coreidae, Coreinae, Spartocerini)

Fig. 21. Distribution map of Menenotus Laporte, 1832 species with the biogeographic domains according to MORRONE (2013), based on literature and examined material.

Figs 13–16 in Taxonomy, morphology, and new distribution data of Menenotus (Coreidae, Coreinae, Spartocerini)

Figs 13–16. Female genitalia Menenotus lunatus (Laporte, 1832) (13, 14) and M. diminutus Walker, 1871 (15, 16) in ventral view. Subtitle: gs, ginatrium strap; ltVIII, laterotergites VIII; ltIX, laterotergites IX; p, plica; pf, posterior fibula; stVII, urosternite VII; sph, spermatheca; vaIX, valvulae IX; vfVIII, valvifers VIII; vfIX, valvifers IX. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 17–20 in Taxonomy, morphology, and new distribution data of Menenotus (Coreidae, Coreinae, Spartocerini)

Figs 17–20. Valvulae and valvifer VIII in dorsal view (17, 19) and spermatheca in ventral view (18, 20) of Menenotus lunatus (Laporte, 1832) (17, 18) and M. diminutus Walker, 1871 (19, 20). Subtitle: af, anterior fibula; al, anterior leaflet; ap, apodeme; bb, bulb base; bu, bulb; dds, distal duct of the spermatheca; g, gonangulum; lp, lobular papillae; pds, proximal duct of the spermatheca; pep, proximal expansion of pump; prp, proximal rim of pump; s, setae; vaVIII, valvulae VIII; vfVIII, valvifers VIII. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figs 5–12 in Taxonomy, morphology, and new distribution data of Menenotus (Coreidae, Coreinae, Spartocerini)

Figs 5–12. Pygophore in dorsal view (5, 9), phallus in lateral view (6, 10) and right paramere in ventral (7, 11) and dorsal view (8, 12) of Menenotus lunatus (Laporte, 1832) (5–8) and M. diminutus Walker, 1871 (9–12). Subtitle: cls, cuplike sclerite; dp, dorsal processes of conjunctiva; pr, paramere; vp, ventral process of conjunctiva; X, anal tube. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figs 1–4 in Taxonomy, morphology, and new distribution data of Menenotus (Coreidae, Coreinae, Spartocerini)

Figs 1–4. Habitus of Menenotus lunatus (Laporte, 1832) (1, 2) and M. diminutus Walker, 1871 (3, 4). Red circles highlight posterolateral angles of pronotum. Scale bars: 5.0 mm.

Figs 15-22 in A new species of rake-legged mite Neocaeculus (Acari, Caeculidae) from Brazilian semiarid and new data on distribution of Andocaeculus caioi

Figs 15-22. Neocaeculus setecidades sp. nov.: 15, 17, 19, 21, trochanter, basifemur, femur and genu, respectively Legs I, II, III, IV, dorso-prolateral view; 16, 18, 20, 22, tibia and tarsus, respectively Legs I, II, III, IV, prolateral view (bt, tarsal bothridium; sol, solenidion; ts, tarsal solenidion). Scale bar: 250 μm. Dotted circles indicate solenidia and eupathidia at retrolateral positions.

Figs 1-5 in A new species of rake-legged mite Neocaeculus (Acari, Caeculidae) from Brazilian semiarid and new data on distribution of Andocaeculus caioi

Figs 1-5. Neocaeculus setecidades sp. nov., paratype ♀: 1, dorsal view; 2, ventral view; 3, lateral view; 4, anterior portion of aspidosomal sclerite, dorsal view; 5, tarsi of legs I, dorso-anterior view. Scales bars: 1, 2, 3, 1000 μm; 4, 250 μm; 5, 100 μm

Figs 39-42 in A new species of rake-legged mite Neocaeculus (Acari, Caeculidae) from Brazilian semiarid and new data on distribution of Andocaeculus caioi

Figs 39-42. Neocaeculus setecidades sp. nov. habitats in the Parque Nacional Sete Cidades, Piracuruca, Piauí, Brazil. 39, 40, grasslands; 41, 42, dry semideciduous Forest.

Figs 31-38 in A new species of rake-legged mite Neocaeculus (Acari, Caeculidae) from Brazilian semiarid and new data on distribution of Andocaeculus caioi

Figs 31-38. Neocaeculus setecidades sp. nov., paratype ♂, scanning electron microscope images: 31, 32, Leg II; 33-36, Leg III; 37, 38, Leg IV. Fig. 31, tarsus, dorso-prolateral view; 32, tibial solenidion, dorso-retrolateral view; 33, tarsus, retrolateral view (arrow: tarsal bothridium); 34, tarsal bothridium, dorso-retrolateral view; 35, tibial solenidion, retrolateral view; 36, tarsal claws, retrolatertal view (arrow: foliar seta); 37, tarsus, retrolateral view (arrow: tarsal bothridium); 38, tarsal bothridium base, dorso-retrolateral view. Scale bars: 31, 50 μm; 32, 34, 36, 38, 10 μm; 33, 37, 100 μm; 35, 5 μm.

Figs 6-9 in A new species of rake-legged mite Neocaeculus (Acari, Caeculidae) from Brazilian semiarid and new data on distribution of Andocaeculus caioi

Figs 6-9. Neocaeculus setecidades sp. nov., holotype ♂, cleared: 6, 8, dorsal view; 7, 9, ventral view. Scale bars: 500 μm.

Figs 23-30 in A new species of rake-legged mite Neocaeculus (Acari, Caeculidae) from Brazilian semiarid and new data on distribution of Andocaeculus caioi

Figs 23-30. Neocaeculus setecidades sp. nov., paratype ♂, scanning electron microscope images, Leg I: 23, tarsus, dorso-retrolateral view; 24, tarsal claws, dorsal view (arrows: foliar setae); 25, same, retrolateral view (arrow: foliar seta); 26, tarsal distal eupathidium, ventral view; 27, tarsal medial eupathidium elevated base, lateral view (arrow: eupathidium); 28, tibial solenidion, retrolateral view; 29, tarsus, prolateral view (arrow: tarsal solenidion); 30, same, solenidion detail. Scale bars: 23, 100 μm; 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 10 μm; 26, 5 μm; 29, 50 μm.

Figs 10-14 in A new species of rake-legged mite Neocaeculus (Acari, Caeculidae) from Brazilian semiarid and new data on distribution of Andocaeculus caioi

Figs 10-14. Neocaeculus setecidades sp. nov., holotype ♂: 10, anterior portion of tarsus of leg I, prolateral view; 11, anterior portion of aspidosomal sclerite, dorsal view; 12, palp, dorsal view; 13, palp, ventral view; 14, internal genital sclerite, ventral view (bo, bothridium; eu, eupathidium; fs, foliar seta; Po, naso seta; sol, solenidion; ts, tarsal solenidion). Scale bars: 10, 12, 13, 50 μm; 11, 250 μm; 14, 100 μm.

Fig. 10 in Hipparion macedonicum revisited: New data on evolution of hipparionine horses from the Late Miocene of Greece

Fig. 10. Body mass of Hipparion macedonicum from the various Greek localities calculated by various methods and its change in relation to the time. The body mass is estimated using the metapodials (Eisenmann and Sondaar 1998); W1. ln(body mass) = -5,768+3.011 x (lnMc10); W2. ln(body mass) = 3.151+2.665 x (lnMc13); W3. ln(body mass) = -4.525+1.434 x (ln(Mc10 x Mc13)); W4. ln(body mass) = -4.362+2.634 x (lnMt10); W5. ln(body mass) = -4.552+3.100 x (lnMt13); W6. ln(body mass) = -4.585+1.443 x (ln(Mt10 x Mt13)).

Fig. 8 in Hipparion macedonicum revisited: New data on evolution of hipparionine horses from the Late Miocene of Greece

Fig. 8. Logarithmic ratio diagram comparing the RPl skull (A) and third metatarsal (B) with the Vallesian hipparions from Sinap, Turkey. Hipparion mediterraneum from Pikermi (Koufos 1987a) is used as standard of comparison. The metrical data for the Sinap material were provided to me by Raymond L. Bernor (unpublished material, personal communication, 2007).

Fig.12 in Hipparion macedonicum revisited: New data on evolution of hipparionine horses from the Late Miocene of Greece

Fig.12. Plication number of the upper cheek teeth of Hipparion macedonicum from the various Greek localities.

Fig. 9 in Hipparion macedonicum revisited: New data on evolution of hipparionine horses from the Late Miocene of Greece

Fig. 9. Stratigraphic table indicating the distribution of Hipparion macedonicum in Europe. The geomagnetic time scale is from Cande and Kent (1995). The shaded area in the MN zones express the different opinions for the MN 12/13 boundary; according to Sen (1997) it is at ~7.0 Ma while according to Steininger et al. (1999) it is at ~6.6 Ma.

Fig. 7 in Hipparion macedonicum revisited: New data on evolution of hipparionine horses from the Late Miocene of Greece

Fig. 7. Logarithmic ratio diagram comparing the RPl third metatarsal with Hipparion macedonicum and other small-sized hipparions from various localities. Hipparion mediterraneum from Pikermi (Koufos 1987a) is used as standard of comparison. The metrical data for the hipparions from Greek localities and AKK are from my own archive; those for Hipparion moldavicum from TAR and Hipparion elegans from PAV are taken from http://www. vera-eisenmann.com.

Fig. 5 in Hipparion macedonicum revisited: New data on evolution of hipparionine horses from the Late Miocene of Greece

Fig. 5. Logarithmic ratio diagram comparing the RPl skull with Hipparion macedonicum and other small-sized hipparions from various localities. Hipparion mediterraneum from Pikermi (Koufos 1987a) is used as standard of comparison. The metrical data for the hipparions from Greek localities and AKK are from author's archive; those for Hipparion moldavicum from TAR and H. elegans from PAV are taken from http://www.vera-eisenmann.com.

Fig. 4 in Hipparion macedonicum revisited: New data on evolution of hipparionine horses from the Late Miocene of Greece

Fig. 4. Principal component analysis of the skull (A), mandible (B), and third metatarsal (C) of the RPl small-sized hipparion in comparison with other small-sized forms of Eurasia, indicating its strong size-similarities with Hipparion macedonicum. As the available specimens are fragmentary, lacking measurements the mean cranial dimensions for each locality are used. The used variables (various measurements of the skull, mandible and MtIII) and their influence to the distinction of the specimens is given in the left part of the diagrams. The convex hulls indicate the allocation of the measurements in the space for its sample. Hipparion dietrichi, Hipparion mediterraneum, and Hipparion proboscideum or Hipparion cf. proboscideum are used as comparative samples. Hipparion macedonicum: 1, NKT; 2, NIK; 3, RZO; 4, PXM; 5, VATH; 6, PER. Hipparion matthewi: 7, Samos (unknown locality), holotype; 8, KTA-B. Hipparion cf. matthwei: 9, MTLA. Hipparion sithonis: 10, NIK. aff. Hipparion forstenae: 11, MTLA; 12, Samos Q1. Hipparion →

Fig. 6 in Hipparion macedonicum revisited: New data on evolution of hipparionine horses from the Late Miocene of Greece

Fig. 6. Logarithmic ratio diagram comparing the RPl mandible with Hipparion macedonicum and other small-sized hipparions from various localities. Hipparion mediterraneum from Pikermi (Koufos 1987a) is used as standard of comparison. The metrical data for the hipparions from Greek localities and AKK are from my own archive; those for Hipparion moldavicum from TAR and Hipparion elegans from PAV are taken from http://www.vera-eisenmann.com.