Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,952
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,952 results for “limb”
Figure 6 from: Perez J, Barquez R, Diaz M (2017) Morphology of the limbs in the semi-fossorial desert rodent species of Tympanoctomys (Octodontidae, Rodentia). ZooKeys 710: 77-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.710.14033
Figure 6 - Caudal and distal views of the right tibia and fibula. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. Fi, fibula; lc, lateral condyle; mc, medial condyle; mm, medial malleolus; n, notch; pp, posterior process; Ti, tibia. Scale bars 5 mm for all views except distal view where the scale bars are 1 mm.
Figure 2 from: Perez J, Barquez R, Diaz M (2017) Morphology of the limbs in the semi-fossorial desert rodent species of Tympanoctomys (Octodontidae, Rodentia). ZooKeys 710: 77-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.710.14033
Figure 2 - Left humerus, proximal, anterior, posterior, and distal views. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. bg, bicipital groove; dc, deltoid crest; gt, greater tuberosity; hh, humeral head; le, lateral epicondyle; lec, lateral epicondylar crest; lt, lesser tuberosity; me, medial epicondyle; sf, supratrochlear foramen. Scale bars 5 mm for all views except distal view where the scale bars are 1 mm.
Figure 7 from: Perez J, Barquez R, Diaz M (2017) Morphology of the limbs in the semi-fossorial desert rodent species of Tympanoctomys (Octodontidae, Rodentia). ZooKeys 710: 77-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.710.14033
Figure 7 - Proximal view of the tibia. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. a, intercondylar area; lc, lateral condyle; mc, medial condyle; tt, tibial tuberosity. Scale bars 5mm.
FIGURE 4 in A new euarthropod with 'great appendage'-like frontal head limbs from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte, Southwest China
FIGURE 4. Reconstruction of A, Bushizheia yangi gen. et sp. nov. juxtaposed with B, Kiisortoqia soperi Stein 2010 (modified from Stein, 2010) in dorsal view. Both scale bars are 10 mm.
FIGURE 3 in A new euarthropod with 'great appendage'-like frontal head limbs from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte, Southwest China
FIGURE 3. Bushizheia yangi gen. et sp. nov. (YKLP 11421). A-B, enlarged from Fig. 1A; A, detail of pygidium; B, detail of exopod setae. Scale bar 3A is 10 mm. Scale bar 3B is 1 mm. Abbreviation: en, endopod; exs, exopod setae; pyg, pygidium; ts, tailspine.
Evaluation of potential effects and genetic parameters in conformational limb defects in Pura Raza Española horses
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Supplementary material 1 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
SOM Table : Data type: Adobe PDF file
Figure 6 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 6 Bone histology of Hemidactylus long bones. Adult specimen CA2017_001 (cross section no. H63_FR_B5; A, C), ZMB 87078 (cross section no. A12_FL_6b, one year old, SVL 47 mm; B, D, E), and developmental stage I specimen CA2017_015 (F) and CA2017_014 (G). (A–E) Longitudinal sections (HE staining) of the humeral shaft showing a clear pattern of alternating bone lamellae in the periosteal cortex and remodeling in the endosteal region. (C) Close-up of boxed area in (A). (D, E) Magnification of cortical bone of similar areas in (B). (F, G) Onset of ossification in individuals, 25 days before hatching, as seen in histological sections (F) and µCT scans (G). Abbreviations: eb – endosteal bone; f – femur; h – humerus; hl – Howship lacunae; mc – medullary cavity; pb – periosteal bone; r – radius; u – ulna. Scale bars in (A, B) equal 200 µm, in (C–E) 100 µm, in (F) 500 µm, and 1 mm in (G).
Figure 5 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 5 Forelimb of juvenile Hemidactylus, stained with azan (A, B) and scanned by µCT (C). (A) and (C) are of the hatchling ZMB 87077 (cross section no. in A is A5_F_13a), and (B) of the juvenile ZMB 87076 (cross section no. A4_F_21a). Note the yet unossified paraphalanges in both. In contrast, reduced phalangeal elements have started ossifying. Radius and ulna are not yet fully ossified, and carpal elements are as yet unossified. Numericals indicate: 1 – trapezium; 2 – metacarpal; 3 – phalanx; 4 – paraphalanx; 5 – metacarpal; 6 – phalanx; 7 – paraphalanx. Scale bars in (A) and (B) equal 200 µm, and scale bar in (C) is 550 µm.
Figure 4 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 4 µCT images of the manus of an adult Hemidactylus (ZMB 87075). Left (A) and right (B, C) manus in dorsal (A, B) and ventral (C) view. Large lateral paraphalanges are shown in red, small nubbin-like ones laterally and dorsally in orange, and ventral ones in yellow. Note the reduced antepenultimate in pink in (B, C). Scale bar is 500 µm. Abbreviations: dc – distal carpals; m – metacarpals; p –pisiform; pp – paraphalanges; R – radius; r – radiale; rp – reduced phalanges; U – ulna; u – ulnare; 1-5 – phalanges 1-5; I-V – digits I-V.
Figure 3 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 3 Overview of embryonic developmental stages G to L, erected in this study, including µCT data. Stage G is shown in (A–C), its representative is CA2017_004. CA2017_011 represents stage H in (D–F). (G–I) show stage I represented by CA2017_014. Stage J is depicted in (J–M), represented by CA2017_008. Stage K is CA2017_013 and shown in (N, O). (P–R) show CA2017_002 for stage L. (B) and (E) are in cranial view, (R) in dorsal view, and all others in lateral view. Scale bars equal 1mm. Abbreviations: at – adhesive toepads; ca – cornea; cw – claw formation; l – lens; np – nose pit; ot – otic capsule; s – scansors; sp – swollen pads; ub – urogenital bud; ws – wrinkly skin.
Figure 7 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 7 Lamellar bone histology and endosteal remodeling in other squamate lizards. (A) Cross section of an Iguana iguana femur (AC1896 288). (B) Cross section of a Varanus timorensis femur (MK52920). (C) Cross section of Tupinambis teguixin femur (MK53531). All images were taken under cross polarized light. Note the cross cutting relations in the endosteal bone of V. timorensis and Tupinambis. Also note the more extensive layer of remodeling with secondary osteons in the innermost cortex of Tupinambis. Abbreviations: eb – endosteal bone; pb – periosteal bone; so – secondary osteon. Scale bar in (A) equals 1 mm, in (B) 250 µm, and in (C) 500 µm.
Figure 2 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 2 Overview of embryonic developmental stages A to F, erected in this study. Stage A is depicted in (A, B) and represented by CA2017_007. (C, D) show the representative CA2017_003 for stage B. Stage C (E–G) is represented by CA2017_006. CA2017_005 represents stage D in (H–J). Note the immunohistochemistry for SOX9 expression in a limb cross section in (J). Stage E is shown in (K–L), represented by CA2017_010. CA2017_012 represents stage F in (M-O). Except for (J), all pictures in lateral view. Scale bars equal 1mm. Abbreviations: aer – apical ectodermal ridge; au – autopod; cc – cartilage capsule; cf – choroid fissure; en – external nares; ep – eye pigmentation; fp – frontal nasal process; ha – hyoid arch; lb – limb bud; ll – lateral lines; mda – mandibular arch; mxa – maxillary process; oc – optic cup; of – olfactory pit; op – otic pit; pa – pharyngeal arches; st – stylopod; tc – thorac cavity; zu – zeugopod.
Figure 6 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 6 - Bone histology of Hemidactylus long bones. Adult specimen CA2017_001 (cross section no. H63_FR_B5; A, C), ZMB 87078 (cross section no. A12_FL_6b, one year old, SVL 47 mm; B, D, E), and developmental stage I specimen CA2017_015 (F) and CA2017_014 (G). (A–E) Longitudinal sections (HE staining) of the humeral shaft showing a clear pattern of alternating bone lamellae in the periosteal cortex and remodeling in the endosteal region. (C) Close-up of boxed area in (A). (D, E) Magnification of cortical bone of similar areas in (B). (F, G) Onset of ossification in individuals, 25 days before hatching, as seen in histological sections (F) and µCT scans (G). Abbreviations: eb – endosteal bone; f – femur; h – humerus; hl – Howship lacunae; mc – medullary cavity; pb – periosteal bone; r – radius; u – ulna. Scale bars in (A, B) equal 200 µm, in (C–E) 100 µm, in (F) 500 µm, and 1 mm in (G).
Figure 3 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 3 - Overview of embryonic developmental stages G to L, erected in this study, including µCT data. Stage G is shown in (A–C), its representative is CA2017_004. CA2017_011 represents stage H in (D–F). (G–I) show stage I represented by CA2017_014. Stage J is depicted in (J–M), represented by CA2017_008. Stage K is CA2017_013 and shown in (N, O). (P–R) show CA2017_002 for stage L. (B) and (E) are in cranial view, (R) in dorsal view, and all others in lateral view. Scale bars equal 1mm. Abbreviations: at – adhesive toepads; ca – cornea; cw – claw formation; l – lens; np – nose pit; ot – otic capsule; s – scansors; sp – swollen pads; ub – urogenital bud; ws – wrinkly skin.
Figure 2 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 2 - Overview of embryonic developmental stages A to F, erected in this study. Stage A is depicted in (A, B) and represented by CA2017_007. (C, D) show the representative CA2017_003 for stage B. Stage C (E–G) is represented by CA2017_006. CA2017_005 represents stage D in (H–J). Note the immunohistochemistry for SOX9 expression in a limb cross section in (J). Stage E is shown in (K–L), represented by CA2017_010. CA2017_012 represents stage F in (M-O). Except for (J), all pictures in lateral view. Scale bars equal 1mm. Abbreviations: aer – apical ectodermal ridge; au – autopod; cc – cartilage capsule; cf – choroid fissure; en – external nares; ep – eye pigmentation; fp – frontal nasal process; ha – hyoid arch; lb – limb bud; ll – lateral lines; mda – mandibular arch; mxa – maxillary process; oc – optic cup; of – olfactory pit; op – otic pit; pa – pharyngeal arches; st – stylopod; tc – thorac cavity; zu – zeugopod.
Supplementary material 1 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
SOM Table : Data type: Adobe PDF file
Figure 7 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 7 - Lamellar bone histology and endosteal remodeling in other squamate lizards. (A) Cross section of an Iguana iguana femur (AC1896 288). (B) Cross section of a Varanus timorensis femur (MK52920). (C) Cross section of Tupinambis teguixin femur (MK53531). All images were taken under cross polarized light. Note the cross cutting relations in the endosteal bone of V. timorensis and Tupinambis . Also note the more extensive layer of remodeling with secondary osteons in the innermost cortex of Tupinambis . Abbreviations: eb – endosteal bone; pb – periosteal bone; so – secondary osteon. Scale bar in (A) equals 1 mm, in (B) 250 µm, and in (C) 500 µm.
Figure 5 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 5 - Forelimb of juvenile Hemidactylus , stained with azan (A, B) and scanned by µCT (C). (A) and (C) are of the hatchling ZMB 87077 (cross section no. in A is A5_F_13a), and (B) of the juvenile ZMB 87076 (cross section no. A4_F_21a). Note the yet unossified paraphalanges in both. In contrast, reduced phalangeal elements have started ossifying. Radius and ulna are not yet fully ossified, and carpal elements are as yet unossified. Numericals indicate: 1 – trapezium; 2 – metacarpal; 3 – phalanx; 4 – paraphalanx; 5 – metacarpal; 6 – phalanx; 7 – paraphalanx. Scale bars in (A) and (B) equal 200 µm, and scale bar in (C) is 550 µm.
Figure 4 from: van der Vos W, Stein K, Di-Poï N, Bickelmann C (2018) Ontogeny of Hemidactylus (Gekkota, Squamata) with emphasis on the limbs. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(1): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.22289
Figure 4 - µCT images of the manus of an adult Hemidactylus (ZMB 87075). Left (A) and right (B, C) manus in dorsal (A, B) and ventral (C) view. Large lateral paraphalanges are shown in red, small nubbin-like ones laterally and dorsally in orange, and ventral ones in yellow. Note the reduced antepenultimate in pink in (B, C). Scale bar is 500 µm. Abbreviations: dc – distal carpals; m – metacarpals; p –pisiform; pp – paraphalanges; R – radius; r – radiale; rp – reduced phalanges; U – ulna; u – ulnare; 1-5 – phalanges 1-5; I-V – digits I-V.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.