Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Fig. 2 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 2. Distribution of Bactrocera zonata, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Bactrocera cucurbitae in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa as projected on elevation (a, b, c), land cover (d, e, f), and climatic zones (g, h, i) maps.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Fig. 4 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 4. Annual population dynamics of (a) number of fruit flies, (b) flies per trap per d, (c) number of species, (d) number of Bactrocera dorsalis, (e) number of Bactrocera zonata, (f) number of Bactrocera cucurbitae flies in relation to climatic factors in Peshawar District.

Fig 5 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 5. Phylogenetic tree based on a portion of the COI barcoding segment showing the relationships of selected non-target moth specimens (g54xxx) isolated from fall armyworm pheromone traps relative to selected GenBank sequences. GenBank sequences are indicated by species name followed by accession number. Fall armyworm R-strain and fall armyworm C-strain are consensus sequences for the 2 fall armyworm host strains.

Fig 3 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 3. Field screening of home-made trap design (Jar2 and Jar4) in comparison to Unitrap model using pheromone lures (all combined) over 2 maize cropping systems (maize monoculture and maize-cowpea intercrops) during the second planting season. The traps were installed on 30 Sep 2019 during the second maize growing season, and the moth collection period covered Oct to Dec. The data denotes average numbers per trap type for overall 3-d intervals moth collections with standard errors.

Fig 2 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 2. Preliminary field test of pheromone traps using the 2-component fall armyworm pheromone PSU lure during the first maize growing season: comparison between home-made Jar2 trap and Unitrap model (A) (average number per trap type for overall weekly moth collections; error bars represent standard error and different lowercase letters denote statistical difference), and fluctuation in moth trap catch of the Unitrap-2-component lure combination (B) (moth collections were done every 3 d).

Fig 4 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 4. Moth trap catch of 3 pheromone lures over 2 cropping systems (maize monoculture and maize-cowpea intercrops) using Unitraps. The traps were installed on 30 Sep 2019 during the second maize growing season and allowed to collect moths Oct to Dec 2019. The 4-component lure type (4C) contained Z9-14:Ac (78.3%), (Z)-11-hexadecenyl acetate (Z11-16:Ac) (3.6%), Z7-12:Ac (11.2%), and (Z)-9-dodecenyl acetate (Z9-12:Ac) (7.0%); whereas the 3-component lure type (3C) was composed of Z9-14:Ac (66.1%), Z11-16:Ac (4.7%), and Z7-12:Ac (29.3%); and the 2-component lure type (2C) of Z9-14:Ac (90.5%) and Z7-12:Ac (9.5%). The data represents average numbers for overall 3-d intervals moth collections.

Fig 1 in Monitoring Spodoptera frugiperda in Benin: assessing the influence of trap type, pheromone blends, and habitat on pheromone trapping

Fig 1. Traps used in study: commercially available Unitrap (A); home-made Jar2 trap constructed from 2 L plastic jar (B). The Jar2 trap was designed by G.T. TepaYotto and J.K. Winsou.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in A bucket-type emergence trap for detecting overwintered Dasineura oxycoccana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and its parasitoids in cranberry

Fig. 1. Bucket-type emergence trap seated into cranberry field. Inner bucket with mesh lid is descending into support bucket.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in A bucket-type emergence trap for detecting overwintered Dasineura oxycoccana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and its parasitoids in cranberry

Fig. 2. Number (mean + SEM) of overwintered cranberry tipworms and parasitoids detected per emergence trap per wk in 2015. Julian Date 124 = 4 May; 152 = 1 Jun; 187 = 6 Jul; 215 = 3 Aug. Number of traps per wk was 30, 50, 59, 60, 60, 46, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 51, 51, respectively, for the 17 wk.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 1. Multilure trap baited with 300 in Myrmecological fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) collected with Multilure-type traps in a Neotropical transitional region from northeastern Mexico

Fig. 1. Multilure trap baited with 300 mL of Strepha Trap® on a tree in the biosphere reserve "El Cielo."

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Figure 2 in Notes on the origin of Müller and Henle's illustration and type material of the blue-spotted maskray Neotrygon kuhlii (Myliobatoidei: Dasyatidae)

Figure 2. – Vanikoro maskray (raie bleue; foro; Raia coerula), dorsal side. Original watercolour by J.R.C. Quoy executed at Vanikoro in 1828, during the Astrolabe expedition (Dumont d'Urville, 1833); p. 89 of Quoy and Gaimard field notes assembled as MS 840 at Bibliothèque centrale du MNHN, Paris (Bauchot, 1994). Quoy represented ocellated blue spots (N = 14), dark-brown spots (N = 13), dark speckles (N = 3), and lighter-brown scapular blotches (N = 2, one on each shoulder). Edited from a photograph by Bibliothèque centrale du MNHN. Copyright: Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Paris) – Direction des bibliothèques et de la documentation, 2016.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Fig. 1. Location and vegetation types where small mammals were sampled between November 2012 and September 2013 in Small mammals from the lasting fragments of Araucaria Forest in southern Brazil: a study about richness and diversity

Fig. 1. Location and vegetation types where small mammals were sampled between November 2012 and September 2013, at Piraí do Sul National Forest, ParanÁ state, Brazil (A, Pine Plantation; B, Riparian Forest; C, Araucaria Plantation; D, Natural Regeneration forest; E, High Altitude forest). Original distribution of Atlantic Forest biome (light gray) and Araucaria forest (dark gray).

Figs 16‒24 in First illustrated description of the male of Diphya macrophthalma, the type species of the genus (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

Figs 16‒24. Male palp and epigyne of Diphya macrophthalma Nicolet, 1849: 16, 17 terminal part of palp with removed bulb, ventro-retrolateral, retrolateral and dorso-retrolateral; 19‒21 bUlb, dorsal, anterior and prolateral-anterior; 22 epigyne, ventral; 23 epigyne, dorsal; 24 anterior chamber of receptacle with glands (Am, accompanying membrane; Co, conductor; Cd, copulatory ducts; Da, dorso-retrolateral apophysis; Em, embolus; Ef, epigynal furrow; Ev, embolus ventrally; Fo, fovea; Gc, gland cilia; Mp, median plate; Oc, copulatory opening; Pc, central plate; Pd, dorsal part of paracymbium; Pi, pit; Pm, marginal plate. Scale = 0.1 mm if not otherwise indicated.

Figs 9‒15 in First illustrated description of the male of Diphya macrophthalma, the type species of the genus (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

Figs 9‒15. Male palp of Diphya macrophthalma Nicolet, 1849: 9, whole palp, retrolateral; 10, 11, terminal part of palp, retro-ventral and antero-ventral; 12, same, prolateral; 13, 14 same, anterior and dorsal; 15, terminal part of the bulb, retrolateral (Am, accompanying membrane; Co, conductor; Da, dorso-retrolateral apophysis; Em, embolus; Ev, embolus ventrally; Pd, spine like dorsal part; Tg, tegulum). Scale = 0.2 mm.

Figs 1‒8 in First illustrated description of the male of Diphya macrophthalma, the type species of the genus (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

Figs 1‒8. Somatic characters of Diphya macrophthalma Nicolet, 1849: 1, 2, female habitus, dorsal; 3, female habitus, ventral; 4, 5, male prosoma, frontal and dorsal; 6, male habitus, dorsal; 7, male prosoma, ventral; 8, female prosoma, ventral. Fig. 2, holotype, made by Tanikawa. Scale = 0.2 mm if not otherwise indicated.

Figs 25‒35. Diphya macrophthalma Nicolet, 1849 in First illustrated description of the male of Diphya macrophthalma, the type species of the genus (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

Figs 25‒35. Diphya macrophthalma Nicolet, 1849 (Figs 25‒30, 33‒35) and D. rugosa Tullgren, 1902 (Figs 31, 32): 25, 26, 29‒32 epigyne, ventral; 27, 28 epigyne, dorsal; 33 paracymbium and tibia, ventro-retrolateral; 34, male epigastral area showing epiandrous spigots; 35, male spinnerets; 29, 30 holotype; 31, 32 syntype. Figs 30, 32 after TANIKAWA (1995). Figs 29, 31 made by A. Tanikawa (Ap, anterior pockets; Cd, copulatory ducts; Pc, central plate; Pl, mating plug; Pm, marginal plate; Ra, anterior chambers of receptacles; Rp, posterior chambers of receptacles).

Fig. 11 in A new type of shell malformation caused by epizoans in Late Jurassic ammonites from Central Russia

Fig. 11. SEM photographs of the pits on the craspeditid ammonite Kachpurites fulgens (Trautschold, 1861) shells from the Late Volgian, Kachpurites fulgens Zone, Eganovo (A) and Mnevniki (B) localities, Moscow region, Central Russia. A. MSU 118/1. Transverse (A1, A2) and longitudinal (A3, A4) cross-sections of the shell layers in the pit area. The bending of shell wall inside the pit is clearly visible. B. MSU 118/9. The phosphatic mineral inside the pit (B1) and the tubercle (reflection of the pit) (B2) located on the dorsal side of the specimen.

Fig. 10 in A new type of shell malformation caused by epizoans in Late Jurassic ammonites from Central Russia

Fig. 10. The pits on the aragonitic shell layers of the craspeditid ammonite Kachpurites fulgens (Trautschold, 1861) from the Late Volgian, Kachpurites fulgens Zone, Mnevniki, Moscow region, Central Russia; MSU 118/10. A. Body chamber with slightly dissolved shell layers. General view in ventro-lateral (A1), ventral (A2), and dorsal (A3) views; on the dorsal side the small tubercle is visible, which reflect the pit on the previous whorl. B. Two pits on the specimen, SEM photograph. C. Two pits on the specimen, optical binocular microscope photographs.

Fig. 6 in A new type of shell malformation caused by epizoans in Late Jurassic ammonites from Central Russia

Fig. 6. Craspeditid ammonite Kachpurites fulgens (Trautschold, 1861) from the Late Volgian, Kachpurites fulgens Zone, Moscow region, Eganovo locality, Central Russia; shell with pits and deformed growth lines, MSU 118/1. A. General lateral view. B. Dorsal view, two tubercles located on the dorsal side of the body chamber, reflecting pits which are located on the previous shell whorl. C. The pits and deformed growth lines, which are related with pits, on the lateral surface of the specimen. D. Outer shell layer with phosphatic mineral inside pits and curved growth lines connected with these pits. Photographs (A, B, C1, D1), explanatory drawings (C2, D2).

Fig. 9 in A new type of shell malformation caused by epizoans in Late Jurassic ammonites from Central Russia

Fig. 9. Craspeditid ammonites Kachpurites fulgens (Trautschold, 1861) from the Late Volgian, Kachpurites fulgens Zone, Moscow region, Central Russia, Eganovo (A, B) and Mnevniki (C, D) localities; shells with pits and epizoans, lateral (A1, B1, C, D) and dorsal (A2, B2) views. A. MSU 118/7, abnormal " scaphitoid" shell shape. There are several pits on the ventral side of the shell (A2). B. MSU 118/16, fragment of the abnormal shell. The fragment of bivalve shell which caused distortion of the shell growth can be seen on the dorsal side (B2). There are no pits on this specimen. C. MSU 118/8, body chamber with pits on both sides of the shell. D. MSU 118/9, fragment of the body chamber with pits, many of them are merged with each other.