Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 4. The age structure of populations in artificial plant community: a – association of Glechoma hederaceae L. + Pulmonaria obscura (1) + Viola odorata + Lysimachia nummularia L.; association Pulmonaria obscura + Viola odorata + Viola alba + Primula veris (2); b – association of Hepatica nobilis (3) + Anemonoides blanda (4) + Viola odorata + Ficaria verna (5).

Fig. 5 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 5. The age structure of populations of spring ephemeroids in 2011–2012; a – Corydalis solida, b – Anemonoides ranunculoides, c – A. blanda.

Fig. 11 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 11. Dependence of flowering phenophase-starting date onto precipitation in forest herbaceous perennials. a: Anemonoides nemorosa (1), Corydalis marshalliana (2), Anemonoides ranunculoides (3), Gymnospermum odessanum (4), Viola odorata (5), Anemonoides blanda (6). b: Anemona sylvestris (7), November precipitation; Hepatica nobilis (8), July precipitation; Hepatica nobilis (9), January precipitation; Anemona sylvestris previous year July precipitation (10)".

Fig. 3 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 3. The age structure of populations in artificial plant community: a – association of Ficaria verna (1) + Corydalis solida (2) + Viola odorata + Anemonoides blanda (3) + Anemonoides ranunculoides, b – Corydalis paczoskii (5)" - "Corydalis paczoskii (4)"; "Gymnospermium odessanum (6)" – "Gymnospermium odessanum (5)".

Fig. 6 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 6. The age structure of populations in natural plant community: a – association of Corydalis solida (1) + Anemonoides ranunculoides (2) + Ficaria verna (3) + Corydalis marschalliana (4); b –Association Ficaria verna (5) + Corydalis solida (6) + Viola odorata + Fragaria vesca.

Fig. 7 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 7. The age structure of populations of spring ephemeroids under artificial plant community conditions (1) and natural ravine forest (2): a – Corydalis solida, b – Ficaria verna, c – Anemonoides ranunculoides.

Fig. 1 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 1. The age structure of populations in artificial plant community: a – association of Ficaria verna (1) + Anemonoides blanda (2) + Corydalis solida (3), b – "Ficaria verna (3)" to "Ficaria verna (4)"; "Anemonoides blanda (4)" - "Anemonoides blanda (5)"; "Corydalis solida (5)" – "Corydalis solida (6)".

Fig. 10 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 10. Influence of January-April total precipitation value on the date of Primula veris budding onset.

Fig. 2 in Phenology And Population Structure Of Forest Herbaceous Species In Artificial And Natural Communities In The Steppe Zone Of Ukraine

Fig. 2. The age structure of populations in artificial plant community: a - association Anemonoides ranunculoides (1) + Corydalis solida (2) + Corydalis marschalliana, b - association Ficaria verna (3) + Anemonoides ranunculoides (4) + Anemonoides nemorosa, (5) + Corydalis solida (6).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2013View details →

Fig. 2 in Optimisation Of Dna Extraction And Rapd-Pcr Amplification For Population Genetic Analysis Of Daphnia Cucullata Sars, 1862 (Crustacea: Cladocera)

Fig. 2. RAPD fingerprints results from different samples of Daphnia cucullata with primers OPA-03 and OPA-05 (M- marker, 1-11 runners- different samples of Daphnia cucullata; 12- control) using RAPD-PCR 10 × Taq buffer with (NH4)2SO4.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 1 in Assessment Of Flax Population Productivity Under Variable Ecological Factors During Ontogenesis

Figure 1. Hydrothermal coefficients (HTC) during the growth period of flax from 2014 to 2017 (y axis) and long term average (last 10 year data sets according WMO, 2017). Ranges of values (Skowera et al., 2014): HTC <0.4 extremely dry; 0.4 3.0 extremely humid.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2013View details →

Fig.1 in Optimisation Of Dna Extraction And Rapd-Pcr Amplification For Population Genetic Analysis Of Daphnia Cucullata Sars, 1862 (Crustacea: Cladocera)

Fig.1. RAPD fingerprints results from different samples of Daphnia cucullata with primers OPA-03 and OPA-05 (M- marker, 1-16 runners- different samples of Daphnia cucullata; 17- control) using RAPD-PCR 10 × Taq buffer with KCl.

Рис. 2. МежгоΔовое соотношение чисΛенного обиΛия семейств герпетобионтных жесткокрыΛых в пойме (2008–2011 гг.) Fig. 2. Inter-annual ratio of numerical abundance of herpetobiont beetle families in the floodplain (2008–2011) in Population Dynamics For Herpetobiont Beetles (Coleoptera) In The Floodplain Of A Small Tributary In The Lower Reaches Of The Irtysh

Рис. 2. МежгоΔовое соотношение чисΛенного обиΛия семейств герпетобионтных жесткокрыΛых в пойме (2008–2011 гг.) Fig. 2. Inter-annual ratio of numerical abundance of herpetobiont beetle families in the floodplain (2008–2011)

Рис. 1. ÀенΔрограмма схоΔства (коэффициент Жаккара) состава насеΛения герпетобионтных жесткокрыΛых поймы разных Λет (2008–2011 гг.) Fig. 1. The dendrogram of faunistic similarity (Jacquard coefficient) for the population composition of herpetobiont beetles in different years (2008–2011) in Population Dynamics For Herpetobiont Beetles (Coleoptera) In The Floodplain Of A Small Tributary In The Lower Reaches Of The Irtysh

Рис. 1. ÀенΔрограмма схоΔства (коэффициент Жаккара) состава насеΛения герпетобионтных жесткокрыΛых поймы разных Λет (2008–2011 гг.) Fig. 1. The dendrogram of faunistic similarity (Jacquard coefficient) for the population composition of herpetobiont beetles in different years (2008–2011)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 3. РаспреΑеΛение чайковых птиц (А — тихоокеанская чайка, Б — восточносибирская чайка, В — бургомистр, Г — моевка) в Охотском море и сопреΑеΛьных воΑах Тихого океана и Японского моря по резуΛьтатам суΑовых учетов в февраΛе — мае 2020 г. (особей/ км2 на 10-минутных трансектах). СпΛошными Λиниями показаны учетные трансекты, пунктиром — 200-метровая изобата Fig. 3. Distribution of larids — (А) slaty-backed gull, (Б) Vega gull, (В) glaucous gull, (Г) blacklegged kittiwake — in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan in February–May 2020 (birds/km2 on 10-minute transects). Solid lines indicate transects, dotted line indicates a 200 m isobath in Population of seabirds in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan during the winter-spring period of 2020

Рис. 3. РаспреΑеΛение чайковых птиц (А — тихоокеанская чайка, Б — восточносибирская чайка, В — бургомистр, Г — моевка) в Охотском море и сопреΑеΛьных воΑах Тихого океана и Японского моря по резуΛьтатам суΑовых учетов в февраΛе — мае 2020 г. (особей/ км2 на 10-минутных трансектах). СпΛошными Λиниями показаны учетные трансекты, пунктиром — 200-метровая изобата Fig. 3. Distribution of larids — (А) slaty-backed gull, (Б) Vega gull, (В) glaucous gull, (Г) blacklegged kittiwake — in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan in February–May 2020 (birds/km2 on 10-minute transects). Solid lines indicate transects, dotted line indicates a 200 m isobath

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 2. РаспреΑеΛение трубконосых птиц (А — темноспинный аΛьбатрос, Б — гΛупыш, В — тонкокΛювый буревестник, Г — сизая качурка) в Охотском море и сопреΑеΛьных воΑах Тихого океана и Японского моря по резуΛьтатам суΑовых учетов в февраΛе — мае 2020 г. (особей/км2 на 10-минутных трансектах). СпΛошными Λиниями показаны учетные трансекты, пунктиром — 200-метровая изобата Fig. 2. Distribution of tubenoses — (А) Laysan albatross, (Б) Northern fulmar, (В) shorttailed shearwater, (Г) fork-tailed storm-petrel — in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan in February–May 2020 (birds/km2 on 10-minute transects). Solid lines indicate transects; dotted line indicates a 200 m isobath in Population of seabirds in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan during the winter-spring period of 2020

Рис. 2. РаспреΑеΛение трубконосых птиц (А — темноспинный аΛьбатрос, Б — гΛупыш, В — тонкокΛювый буревестник, Г — сизая качурка) в Охотском море и сопреΑеΛьных воΑах Тихого океана и Японского моря по резуΛьтатам суΑовых учетов в февраΛе — мае 2020 г. (особей/км2 на 10-минутных трансектах). СпΛошными Λиниями показаны учетные трансекты, пунктиром — 200-метровая изобата Fig. 2. Distribution of tubenoses — (А) Laysan albatross, (Б) Northern fulmar, (В) shorttailed shearwater, (Г) fork-tailed storm-petrel — in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan in February–May 2020 (birds/km2 on 10-minute transects). Solid lines indicate transects; dotted line indicates a 200 m isobath

Рис. 3. Спектры многоΛетней цикΛичности в разΛичных попуΛяциях Λесного Λемминга (а — ЗапаΔная ФинΛянΔия, б — Восточная ФинΛянΔия, в — АΛтай, оз. ТеΛецкое) in Long-Term Variability In Forest Lemming Population Numbers ( Liljeborg, 1844): Cyclicity

Рис. 3. Спектры многоΛетней цикΛичности в разΛичных попуΛяциях Λесного Λемминга (а — ЗапаΔная ФинΛянΔия, б — Восточная ФинΛянΔия, в — АΛтай, оз. ТеΛецкое)

Fig. 1 in Long-Term Variability In Forest Lemming Population Numbers ( Liljeborg, 1844): Cyclicity

Fig. 1. Assessment of the population dynamics of forest lemming by animal remains (Eskelinen et al. 2004)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Рис. 1. Размещение трансект (спΛошные черные Λинии) и Αаты провеΑения учетов в Охотском море и сопреΑеΛьных воΑах Тихого океана и Японского моря в февраΛе — мае 2020 г. РыбоΛовные районы: 05.1 — Северо-Охотоморская поΑзона; 05.2 — ЗапаΑно-Камчатская поΑзона; 05.3 — Восточно-СахаΛинская поΑзона; 05.4 — Камчатско-КуриΛьская поΑзона; 03 — Северо-КуриΛьская зона; 04 — Южно-КуриΛьская зона; 06 — зона Японское море. Пунктиром показана 200-метровая изобата Fig. 1. Transect locations (solid black lines) and dates of surveys in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan in February–May 2020. Codes of the fishery areas are as follows: 05.1 — Northern Sea of Okhotsk Subzone; 05.2 — West Kamchatka Subzone; 05.3 — East Sakhalin Subzone; 05.4 — Kamchatka-Kuril Subzone; 03 — North Kuril Zone; 04 — South Kuril Zone; 06 — Sea of Japan Zone. Dotted line indicates a 200 m isobath in Population of seabirds in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan during the winter-spring period of 2020

Рис. 1. Размещение трансект (спΛошные черные Λинии) и Αаты провеΑения учетов в Охотском море и сопреΑеΛьных воΑах Тихого океана и Японского моря в февраΛе — мае 2020 г. РыбоΛовные районы: 05.1 — Северо-Охотоморская поΑзона; 05.2 — ЗапаΑно-Камчатская поΑзона; 05.3 — Восточно-СахаΛинская поΑзона; 05.4 — Камчатско-КуриΛьская поΑзона; 03 — Северо-КуриΛьская зона; 04 — Южно-КуриΛьская зона; 06 — зона Японское море. Пунктиром показана 200-метровая изобата Fig. 1. Transect locations (solid black lines) and dates of surveys in the Sea of Okhotsk and adjacent waters of the Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan in February–May 2020. Codes of the fishery areas are as follows: 05.1 — Northern Sea of Okhotsk Subzone; 05.2 — West Kamchatka Subzone; 05.3 — East Sakhalin Subzone; 05.4 — Kamchatka-Kuril Subzone; 03 — North Kuril Zone; 04 — South Kuril Zone; 06 — Sea of Japan Zone. Dotted line indicates a 200 m isobath

Рис. 5. Спектр ритмов в многоΛетнем хоΔе чисΛенности Λесного Λемминга в заповеΔнике «Кивач», КареΛия (а), и в Баргузинском заповеΔнике (б) Fig. 5. The spectrum of rhythms in the long-term course of the number of forest lemming in the Kivach Reserve, Karelia (a) and in the Barguzinsky reserve (b) in Long-Term Variability In Forest Lemming Population Numbers ( Liljeborg, 1844): Cyclicity

Рис. 5. Спектр ритмов в многоΛетнем хоΔе чисΛенности Λесного Λемминга в заповеΔнике «Кивач», КареΛия (а), и в Баргузинском заповеΔнике (б) Fig. 5. The spectrum of rhythms in the long-term course of the number of forest lemming in the Kivach Reserve, Karelia (a) and in the Barguzinsky reserve (b)