Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
11,177
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
11,177 results for “identify”
Figure 1. Diagnostic characteristics identifying NMV P252567 in Suction feeding preceded filtering in baleen whale evolution
Figure 1. Diagnostic characteristics identifying NMV P252567 as an aetiocetid. A, explanatory line drawing of the skull; B, photograph of the skull (left) and mandible (right), both in dorsal view.
Natural history specimens collected and/or identified and deposited.
Natural history specimen data collected and/or identified by Marlin Krouse, <a href="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q117457437">http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q117457437</a>. Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia, <a href="http://bionomia.net">https://bionomia.net</a> using specimen data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org">https://gbif.org</a>.
Figures 8–11. Tentacularioid metacestodes incompletely identified. 8 in Diversity of trypanorhynch metacestodes in teleost fishes from coral reefs off eastern Australia and New Caledonia
Figures 8–11. Tentacularioid metacestodes incompletely identified. 8. Nybelinia sp. A from Herklotsichthys quadrimaculatus (Rüppell, 1937). Scolex, basal and metabasal armature, hook profiles. Scale-bars: scolex and tentacle, 0.1 mm; hooks, 0.01 mm. 9. Nybelinia sp. B from Parupeneus multifasciatus (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825). Scolex, basal and metabasal armature, hook profiles. Scale-bars: scolex and tentacle, 0.1 mm; hooks, 0.01 mm. 10. Heteronybelinia sp. C from Sufflamen fraenatus (Latreille, 1804). Scolex, bothrial metabasal armature and antibothrial metabasal armature. Scale-bars: scolex 0.1 mm; hooks 0.01 mm. 11. Nybelinia basimegacantha Carvajal, Campbell & Cornford, 1976, specimen from Neoniphon sammara (Forsskål, 1775). Scolex, basal and metabasal armature. Scale-bars: scolex 0.1 mm; tentacle 0.01 mm.
Supplementary Simulation Data for "A contact-based analysis of local energetic frustration dynamics identifies key residues enabling RfaH fold-switch"
<p>Additional simulation data for "A contact-based analysis of local energetic frustration dynamics identifies key residues enabling RfaH fold-switch"</p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <p>'clusters_foldswitch': Contains representative structures in PDB format of the refolding landscape of RfaH using all-atom structure-based models. The QA and QB values indicated in each filename correspond to the fraction of native contacts contain in the representative structure in comparison to the total number of contacts in the structure of the autoinhibited ⍺-folded (A) and active β-folded (B) states of the C-terminal domain of RfaH.</p> <p>'input_one_fs': Contains a trajectory of RfaH refolding from the ⍺-folded to the β-folded state, with each frame contained into a separate PDB file, totalling 400 PDB files. These files can be used with the frustration-based windowing method scripts and Colab notebook made available at https://github.com/pb3lab/RfaH-frustration</p> <p>'input_many_fs': Contains several trajectory of RfaH reversible refolding between the ⍺-folded and β-folded states, with each frame contained into a separate PDB file, totalling 11,999 PDB files. These files can be used with the frustration-based windowing method scripts and Colab notebook made available at https://github.com/pb3lab/RfaH-frustration</p> <p>'output_one_fs': Contains output results from the analysis of local energetic frustration dynamics of the 400 frames contained in 'input_one_fs' using the windowing method available in the Colab notebook at https://github.com/pb3lab/RfaH-frustration.</p> <p>'output_many_fs': Contains output results from the analysis of local energetic frustration dynamics of the 11,999 frames contained in 'input_many_fs' using the windowing method available in the Python script at https://github.com/pb3lab/RfaH-frustration.</p>
Natural history specimens collected and/or identified and deposited.
Natural history specimen data collected and/or identified by Elizabeth Lomax, <a href="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q22018864">http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q22018864</a>. Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia, <a href="http://bionomia.net">https://bionomia.net</a> using specimen data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org">https://gbif.org</a>.
Natural history specimens collected and/or identified and deposited.
Natural history specimen data collected and/or identified by Velma Dare Matthews, <a href="http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q21520138">http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q21520138</a>. Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia, <a href="http://bionomia.net">https://bionomia.net</a> using specimen data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org">https://gbif.org</a>.
FIGURE 4 in HOW DO WE IDENTIFY MICRONYCTERIS (SCHIZONYCETRIS) SANBORNI SIMMONS, 1996 (CHIROPTERA, PHYLLOSTOMIDAE) RELIABLY AND WHERE WE CAN FIND THIS SPECIES IN BRAZIL?
FIGURE 4: Diagnostic cranial traits for the differentiation of M. minuta (UFPB 8695) and M. sanborni (A, B, C: UFPB 6543, D and E: UFPB 6535). White arrow: A = P3; B = anterior portion of the zygomatic arch; C = Dorsal profile of skull; D = p; E = articular 3 process. See Table 2.
FIGURE 2 in HOW DO WE IDENTIFY MICRONYCTERIS (SCHIZONYCETRIS) SANBORNI SIMMONS, 1996 (CHIROPTERA, PHYLLOSTOMIDAE) RELIABLY AND WHERE WE CAN FIND THIS SPECIES IN BRAZIL?
FIGURE 2: Occlusal view of the upper dentition of M. sanborni (upper: UFPB 6536; middle: UFPB 6734; lower: UFPB 6793). The insets to the right highlight differences in the spacing of p3 and p4 and the variation in the development of the posterolingual cingulum of p4 (white arrow).
FIGURE 3 in HOW DO WE IDENTIFY MICRONYCTERIS (SCHIZONYCETRIS) SANBORNI SIMMONS, 1996 (CHIROPTERA, PHYLLOSTOMIDAE) RELIABLY AND WHERE WE CAN FIND THIS SPECIES IN BRAZIL?
FIGURE 3: Differences in fur color between M. sanborni e M. minuta. A: Pale gray ventral fur of Micronycteris minuta and pure white ventral fur of Micronycteris sanborni. B: Short white basal dorsal hair in M. minuta and long white basal dorsal hair in M. sanborni.
FIGURE 5 in HOW DO WE IDENTIFY MICRONYCTERIS (SCHIZONYCETRIS) SANBORNI SIMMONS, 1996 (CHIROPTERA, PHYLLOSTOMIDAE) RELIABLY AND WHERE WE CAN FIND THIS SPECIES IN BRAZIL?
FIGURE 5: Recorded localities for Micronycteris sanborni in relation to Brazilian biomes. Circles: previous records; Triangles: new records. The sites are numbered as in Table 3. "?" refers to a doubtful records
FIGURE 1 in HOW DO WE IDENTIFY MICRONYCTERIS (SCHIZONYCETRIS) SANBORNI SIMMONS, 1996 (CHIROPTERA, PHYLLOSTOMIDAE) RELIABLY AND WHERE WE CAN FIND THIS SPECIES IN BRAZIL?
FIGURE 1: Oblique frontal view of the upper dentition in M. sanborni (A: UFPB 6793; B: UFPB 6795; C: UFPB 6536) and M. minuta (D: UFPB 8695). Note the variation in the gap between the outer upper incisor and the canine (white arrow).
FIGURE 15 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 15. Allometric shape variation in the M1-3 of Sparassodonta as shown by the Procrustes-transformed coordinates. (A) Superimposed differences in allometric shape at the smallest (black) and largest (gray) extremes of the size range of the dataset. (B-C) Deformation grids showing differences in allometric shape variation between the sample average and (B) minimum size and (C) maximum size. Differences between loci are magnified by a factor of 2 to better illustrate patterns of variation.
FIGURE 6 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 6. Inter-locus variation in the M1-3 of Sparassodonta as shown by the Procrustes-transformed coordinates of the geometric morphometric analysis. (A) Superimposed differences between tooth loci in the Procrustes-transformed coordinates of the average shape of M1 (large gray circles) and M3 (small black circles). The other three images show deformation grids from the average shape of all 114 examined specimens relative to the average shape of (B) M1, (C) M2, and (D) M3. Differences between loci are magnified by a factor of 3 to better illustrate patterns of variation.
FIGURE 7 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 7. Plot of shape data (as regression score; see Drake and Klingenberg, 2008 for definition) versus natural log centroid size for all teeth of known locus in the trigon + talon dataset, showing the allometric signal in the data and the slight clustering of the teeth by locus. The extreme outlier in centroid size is the M3 of Proborhyaena gigantea, which is very large compared to the other teeth examined.
FIGURE 11 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 11. Similar to Figure 10, but with the trigon-only dataset. Plot of the first two canonical variates (CVs) of the all-taxon, trigon-only discriminant analysis with tooth locus coded by symbol and incorrectly-classified specimens uncolored. Convex hulls represent morphospace occupied by each tooth locus.
FIGURE 3 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 3. Right upper molar row of Borhyaena tuberata (MACN-A 6203), showing the change in absolute and relative sizes of the paracone and metacone from M1-3 and the relatively little inter-locus variation in stylar shelf morphology. Scale equals 5 mm.
FIGURE 2. Right M2 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 2. Right M2 of Acyon myctoderos (UATF-V-000926), a specimen close to the mean shape of the entire dataset, showing the morphological features of interest (A) and geometric morphometric landmarks and semilandmarks (B) used in this study. Anatomical abbreviations: alc, anterolabial cingulum (often extensive and continuous with preparaconular crista); cc, centrocrista; ef, ectoflexus; mco, metaconule; met, metacone; msl, metastylar lobe of stylar shelf; par, paracone; pco, paraconule; pmc, postmetacrista; ppc, preparacrista; pro, protocone; psl, parastylar lobe of stylar shelf; ss, stylar shelf; StA, stylar cusp A; StB, stylar cusp B. In B, squares represent fixed landmarks and circles represent semilandmarks.
FIGURE 16 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 16. (A) TPS deformation grid showing allometric shape variation extrapolated beyond the lower bounds of the present dataset by a factor of 3 compared to (B) a photograph of the M3 of Pediomys elegans (modified from Davis, 2007: fig. 3c). Scale equals 1 mm.
FIGURE 14 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 14. Visualization of shape changes in two Miocene borhyaenids that show little change between tooth loci. (A) M1 (gray) and M3 (black) of Borhyaena tuberata (MACN-A 6404) and (B) M2 (gray) and M3 (black) of Arctodictis sinclairi (AMNH 27909).
FIGURE 13. Superimposed landmark diagrams visualizing shape changes between M1 in Identifying tooth position of isolated teeth of sparassodonts (Mammalia: Metatheria) using geometric morphometrics
FIGURE 13. Superimposed landmark diagrams visualizing shape changes between M1 (large gray circles) and M3 (small black circles) of selected non-borhyaenid sparassodonts: (A) Allqokirus australis (MNHC 8267), (B) Patene coluapiensis (AMNH 28448), (C) Procladosictis anomala (MACN-A 10327), (D) Hondadelphys fieldsi (UCMP 37960), (E) Sipalocyon gracilis (AMNH 9254), (F) Lycopsis longirostrus (UCMP 38061), (G) Prothylacynus patagonicus (MACN-A 707), (H) Thylacosmilus atrox (MMP 1443).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.