Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10,699
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
10,699 results for “easting”
Figure 1 in Review of leaf beetles of the family Megalopodidae (Coleoptera: Chrysomeloidea) from Siberia and the Russian Far East
Figure 1. Zeugophora spp.: A–B. Z. annulata, habitus, dorsal view; C. Z. bicolor, habitus, dorsal view; D. Z. bicolor, habitus, ventral view; E. Z. bicolor, aedeagus, apex of median lobe, dorsal view; F. Z. nigricollis, habitus, dorsal view; G. Z. nigricollis, habitus, ventral view; H. Z. nigricollis, aedeagus, apex of median lobe, dorsal view; I, J, K. Z. bimaculata, habitus, dorsal view; L. Z. bimaculata, aedeagus, lateral view; M. Z. bimaculata, aedeagus, apex of median lobe, dorsal view; N. Z. cupka, habitus, dorsal view; O. Z. hozumii, dorsal view; P. Z. subspinosa, dorsal view.
Figure 2 in Review of leaf beetles of the family Megalopodidae (Coleoptera: Chrysomeloidea) from Siberia and the Russian Far East
Figure 2. Zeugophora spp., habitus, dorsal view: A – Z. flavicollis; B – Z. frontalis; C – Z. subspinosa; D – Z. turneri. Scale bar = 0.5 mm for D.
Fig. 5 in Possible hybridization between East Pacific Green Chelonia mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtles in northwest Mexico
Fig. 5. Healthy neonate turtles presenting characteristics of both East Pacific Green and Olive Ridley Turtles photographed before release. Photos by C.E. Hart (A) and F. Sanchez (B).
Fig. 6 in Possible hybridization between East Pacific Green Chelonia mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtles in northwest Mexico
Fig. 6. Olive Ridley neonate from Nayarit with the commonly found coloration of fine white border to carapace and fore flippers. This coloration is not reported in the literature for this species. Photos by C.E. Hart.
Fig. 4 in Possible hybridization between East Pacific Green Chelonia mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtles in northwest Mexico
Fig. 4. Deceased hatchling presenting (A) white coloration to the carapace and flipper border, and (B) the white plastron characteristic of East Pacific Green Turtles, while presenting (C) a typical Olive Ridley carapace and head. Photos by C.E. Hart.
Fig. 3 in Possible hybridization between East Pacific Green Chelonia mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtles in northwest Mexico
Fig. 3. Embryo from an Olive Ridley nest, clearly displaying East Pacific Green Turtle coloration on both (A) plastron and flippers, and (B) carapace. Photos by C.E. Hart. Table 1. Morphological features of putative hybrid neonate turtles compared to those usually reported for Lepidochelys olivacea and Chelonia mydas.
Fig. 2 in Possible hybridization between East Pacific Green Chelonia mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtles in northwest Mexico
Fig. 2. Carapace (A) and plastron (B) of Lepidochelys olivacea (L.o.) and Chelonia mydas (C.m.) hatchlings.
Fig. 1 in Possible hybridization between East Pacific Green Chelonia mydas and Olive Ridley Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtles in northwest Mexico
Fig. 1. Northwest Mexico. Circles denote nesting beaches where suspected hybrid hatchlings have been observed.
Figures 11-12 in A new water mite species of the genus Hygrobates Koch, 1837 (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae) from Far East of Russia
Figures 11-12. Hygrobates (Rivobates) ezoensis: 11-12 – genital field, 11 – female, 12 – male (after Matsumoto et al. 2005).
Figures 7-10 in A new water mite species of the genus Hygrobates Koch, 1837 (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae) from Far East of Russia
Figures 7-10. Hygrobates (Rivobates) primoryensis sp. n.: 7 – I-Leg-4-6, 8 – IV-Leg-4-6, 9 – leg claw; 10 – genital field; 7-9 male, 10 – female. Scale bars: 7, 8, 10 = 100 μm, 9 = 50 μm.
Figures 1-6 in A new water mite species of the genus Hygrobates Koch, 1837 (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae) from Far East of Russia
Figures 1-6. Hygrobates (Rivobates) primoryensis sp.n.: 1 – seta Fch, 2 – ventral view, 3-4, 6 – genital field, 5 – pedipalp; 1-5 – male, 6 – female. Scale bars: 1, 5 = 50 μm, 2-4, 6 = 100 μm
Fig. 2. Statistical parsimony cladogram network representing relationships among the 45 haplotypes for a 615 in Genetic diversity of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) in Korea and comparison with COI sequence datasets from East Asia, Europe, and North America
Fig. 2. Statistical parsimony cladogram network representing relationships among the 45 haplotypes for a 615 bp fragment of the COI gene of Halyomorpha halys. Each circle is labeled with haplotype number, and the size of each circle is proportional to the frequency of each haplotype [H3 (n = 353); H1 (n = 285); H22 (n = 43); H8 (n = 34); H33 (n = 23); H2 (n = 16); H32 (n = 8); H7, H9–H13, and H43 (n = 3); H6, H14, H34, H39, and H40 (n = 2); H4–H5, H12, H15–H21, H23, H30–H31, H35–H38, H41, H42, and H44–H51 (n = 1)]. Differing colors indicate countries in which samples were collected.
Fig. 4. A, B. Trackway S3 in Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: Evidence for Late Triassic sauropods
Fig. 4. A, B. Trackway S3 (Evazoum sp.). This bipedal trackway can possibly be attributed to a non-sauropod sauropodomorph trackmaker. Two smaller tridactyl trackways can be identified in close association with trackway S3. C, D. Detail of the best preserved pes impression RP1 (total depth represented by the color scale is 58 mm). Photogrammetric orthophoto (A), depth-color images (B, C), interpretative drawing (D).
Fig. 3. Trackway S2 in Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: Evidence for Late Triassic sauropods
Fig. 3. Trackway S2 (Eosauropus sp.), which probably represents the same trackmaker species, or even the same individual, as trackway S1; trackmaker is moving towards the southwest. A. Photogrammetric orthophoto. B. Depth-color image. C. Interpretative drawing. Abbreviations: LM, left manus; LP, left pes; RM, right manus; RP, right pes.
Fig. 2. A–C. Trackway S1 in Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: Evidence for Late Triassic sauropods
Fig. 2. A–C. Trackway S1 (Eosauropus sp.), here attributed to a sauropod trackmaker based on pedal synapomorphies; trackmaker is moving towards the south-west. Two consequtive pes impressions of a tridactyl Grallator trackway can be seen left to the S1 trackway. D, E. Detail of representative pes-manus set RP1/RM1. F, G. Detail of representative pes-manus set RP2/RM2. Photogrammetric orthophoto (A), depth-color images (B, D, F), interpretative drawings (C, E, G). Abbreviations: LM, left manus; LP, left pes; RM, right manus; RP, right pes.
Fig. 1. A in Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: Evidence for Late Triassic sauropods
Fig. 1. A. Location of the "Track Mountain" locality (star) on a ridge on the northeastern slope of Wood Bjerg in the Late Triassic sediments at the west side of Carsberg Fjord. B. Location of Jameson Land (A) in central East Greenland. C. Photograph of the "Track Mountain" locality showing the approximate location of trackways S1, S2, and S3 (view towards the east).
Fig. 9 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules
Fig. 9. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine (A–V, X–Z) and Lithuania (W); Markovka, middle Eocene (A, D, E), Verhnee, lower Eocene (B, Z), Glâdov Âr, Upper Creatceous (C, J, K, P, Q, T, U, V, Y), Pesčanoe, upper Eocene (F, O), Kiselevka, middle Eocene (G, L, R), Markovka, upper Eocene (H, X), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (I, S), Lipcy, middle Eocene (M), Monastyrek, lower Eocene (N), and Neravai borehole, Paleocene (W). A, C, E, H, L, O, P, R. Phyllotriaenes. B. Sphaeroclone. D, F, G. Discotriaenes. I. Anchorate spicule. J, K, N, Q, S–W, Y. Megaclones. M. Siliceous plate. X, Z. Tetracrepid desmas. After Ivanik (2003); modified.
Fig. 10 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules
Fig. 10. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Kiselevka, middle Eocene (A, F, H, I, L), Staroverovka, middle Eocene (B), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (C, D, E, J, M), Russkie Tiŝki, upper Eocene (G), and Russkie Tiŝki, middle Eocene (K). A, B. Pentactines. C–F, H, I. Pinnular hexactines. G. Smooth hexactine. J. Tautactine. K, L, Hexactines. M. Stauractine. After Ivanik (2003); modified.
Fig. 6 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules
Fig. 6. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Russkie Tiŝki, Middle Eocene (A, H, O, Y, Z), Kiselevka, upper Eocene (B, C), Markovka, middle Eocene (D), Russkie Tiŝki, upper Eocene (E), Kiselevka, upper Eocene (F, G, M), Pogonovka borehole, upper Eocene (I), Markovka, upper Eocene (J, K, N), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (L, P), Grigorevka borehole, upper Eocene (Q, R, S, T), Melovoe, upper Eocene (U, V), and Kiselevka, middle Eocene (W, X). A. Spherostyle. B–D. Tylostyles. E, F, I–K, M. Acanthostyles. G, H. Exotyles. L. Clavidisc. N, O. Acanthoxeas. P–R. Acanthostrongyles. S, T. Sigmas. U, V. Anisochelae. W. Isochela. X. Spheraster. Y, Z. Tylotes. After Ivanik (2003); modified.
Fig. 8 in Uncovering the hidden diversity of Paleogene sponge fauna of the East European Platform through reassessment of the record of isolated spicules
Fig. 8. Spicule morphotypes from south-central Ukraine; Verhnee, lower Eocene (A, K, L, P), Russkie Tiŝki, middle Eocene (B, D, N, Q), Nikol'skoe, upper Eocene (C, E, G, J), Markovka, upper Eocene (F, O), Lipcy, middle Eocene (H), Melovoe, upper Eocene (I), and Kantemirovka, upper Eocene (M). A.?Fragment of dictional skeleton. B. Pentactine. C. Hexactine. D, E.?Oxeas. F, G, O. Amphiclads. H. Broken lophodiactine. I, J. Lophocalthrops. K.?Lophocalthrop. L. Spicule fragment. M.?Spicule fragment. N. Dichotriaene. P. Calthrop. Q. Fragment of a diatom. After Ivanik (2003); modified.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.