Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,344
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,344 results for “: phylogenomics”
Figure 7 from: Derkarabetian S, Starrett J, Tsurusaki N, Ubick D, Castillo S, Hedin M (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements. ZooKeys 760: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937
Figure 7 Representative penis morphology of Travunioidea. Clockwise from left: Trojanella serbica redrawn from Karaman (2005), Travunia hofferi redrawn from Karaman (2005), Cryptomaster behemoth adapted from Starrett et al. (2016), Holoscotolemon jaqueti redrawn from Martens (1978), Briggsus hamatus, Yuria pulcra, Paranonychus brunneus, Metanonychus setulus navarrus, Nippononychus japonicus redrawn from Suzuki (1975), Kaolinonychus coreanus coreanus redrawn from Suzuki (1975), Izunonychus ohruii, Zuma acuta. All Travuniidae and Cladonychiidae are drawn in ventral view; Cryptomastridae, Yuria, and Paranonychidae drawn in lateral. For simplicity, not all travunioid genera are included.
Figure 5 from: Derkarabetian S, Starrett J, Tsurusaki N, Ubick D, Castillo S, Hedin M (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements. ZooKeys 760: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937
Figure 5 Phylogenomic relationships among travunioid genera. Left: 70% SVDQuartets. Right: 70% ASTRAL. Nodes are fully supported (100% bootstrap), unless indicated.
Figure 3 from: Derkarabetian S, Starrett J, Tsurusaki N, Ubick D, Castillo S, Hedin M (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements. ZooKeys 760: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937
Figure 3 Phylogenetic relationships among major laniatorean lineages. Lower phylogenies correspond to results presented in this study. Nodes are fully supported (100% bootstrap or 1.0 posterior probability), unless indicated otherwise. Numbers in lower left phylogeny correspond to support values from 50% RAxML concatenated (top), and from 70% RAxML partitioned (bottom) analyses. Numbers in ASTRAL phylogeny based on 50% (top) and 70% (bottom) matrices.
Figure 2 from: Derkarabetian S, Starrett J, Tsurusaki N, Ubick D, Castillo S, Hedin M (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements. ZooKeys 760: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937
Figure 2 Geographic distribution of travunioid genera. Colors correspond to classification proposed in this study. Abbreviations: wNA = western North America, eNA = eastern North America, EUR = central and southern Europe, JPN/KOR = Japan and South Korea.
Figure 1 from: Derkarabetian S, Starrett J, Tsurusaki N, Ubick D, Castillo S, Hedin M (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements. ZooKeys 760: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937
Figure 1 Photographs of live travunioid harvestmen. A Theromaster brunneus B Erebomaster sp. C Cryptomaster leviathan D Holoscotolemon lessiniense E Peltonychia leprieurii F Trojanella serbica G Briggsus sp. H Isolachus spinosus I Speleonychia sengeri J Yuria pulcra K Paranonychus brunneus L Sclerobunus nondimorphicus M Metanippononychus sp. N Zuma acuta O Kainonychus akamai. All photos by MH, except D, E (courtesy of and copyright A. Schönhofer), and F (courtesy of and copyright I. Karaman).
Figure 4 from: Derkarabetian S, Starrett J, Tsurusaki N, Ubick D, Castillo S, Hedin M (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements. ZooKeys 760: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937
Figure 4 Phylogenomic relationships among travunioid genera. Left: RAxML and 50% BEAST concatenated topologies, with bootstrap support from the partitioned analysis. All nodes in the BEAST topology have posterior probability of 1.0. Abbreviations indicate placement in classification at the time of Kury et al. (2014): Tt = Travuniidae, Travuniinae; Tc = Travuniidae, Cladonychiinae; Tb = Travuniidae, Briggsinae; Pp = Paranonychidae, Paranonychinae; Ps = Paranonychidae, Sclerobuninae; N = Nippononychidae. Right: 70% BEAST concatenated. Nodes are fully supported (100% bootstrap or 1.0 posterior probability), unless indicated.
Figure 6 from: Derkarabetian S, Starrett J, Tsurusaki N, Ubick D, Castillo S, Hedin M (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements. ZooKeys 760: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937
Figure 6 Morphology of Cryptomastridae. A) male Cryptomaster, arrow denotes sexually dimorphic swelling diagnostic of Cryptomastridae; B) Speleomaster, habitus; C) Scanning electron micrograph of tibial swelling, from Starrett et al. (2016); D) Cryptomastrid distribution.
Supplementary material 2 from: Derkarabetian S, Starrett J, Tsurusaki N, Ubick D, Castillo S, Hedin M (2018) A stable phylogenomic classification of Travunioidea (Arachnida, Opiliones, Laniatores) based on sequence capture of ultraconserved elements. ZooKeys 760: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.760.24937
Figures : Explanation note:
Supplementary material 4 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure S4. Relationships within C. baronia + C. bullis_C. neovespera clade :
Supplementary material 5 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Table S1. Voucher and genetic information :
Supplementary material 3 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure S3. RAxML, 50% matrix :
Supplementary material 2 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure S2. ASTRAL, 50 & 70% matrices :
Supplementary material 1 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure S1. SVD Quartets, 50 & 70% matrices :
Supplementary material 6 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Table S2. Troglomorphy Index data :
Figure 6 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure 6 Morphology of adult C. madla with corresponding COI RAxML phylogeny. Previously published sequences with corresponding GenBank numbers (AY#), some with cave location codes as in Paquin and Hedin (2004). Imaged specimens highlighted on phylogeny; images of specimens TK_188519 and TK_188501 from Joel Ledford. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Figure 5 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure 5 Distribution of C. madla and C. cf. madla in Bexar and adjacent counties, with corresponding 399_70 RAxML UCE phylogeny (not all bootstrap values shown). Different geographic populations designated by different colors. Cave locations approximate.
Figure 12 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure 12 Male palpal morphology of C. madla and C. vespera (left palp, ventral view). Specimens from Stevens Ranch Trash Hole Cave (CIC_1745) and Robbers Cave (TX_241) from PP personal collection. Image of specimen TK_188519 from Joel Ledford. Abbreviations: CB = cymbium, T = tegulum, E = embolus. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Figure 1 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure 1 Phylogenetic tree from RAxML analysis of 399 UCE loci, 70% (399_70) occupancy matrix. Bootstrap values below 75 not shown. Geography and morphology highlighted. Abbreviations: ME (= mostly elongate) spermathecae clade, R (= rounded) spermathecae clade. Further details regarding specimen codes and locations found in Suppl. material 5. Inset: sampled Texas counties.
Figure 9 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure 9 Morphology of adult C. loftini with corresponding 399_70 UCE RAxML phylogeny. Imaged specimens highlighted on phylogeny; images of specimen TK_188520 from J. Ledford, specimen TK_188686 from J. Cokendolpher (via Symbiota Collections of Arthropods Network). Scale bar: 0.5 mm.
Figure 8 from: Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Blair J, Paquin P (2018) Sequence capture phylogenomics of eyeless Cicurina spiders from Texas caves, with emphasis on US federally-endangered species from Bexar County (Araneae, Hahniidae). ZooKeys 769: 49-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.769.25814
Figure 8 Distribution of R clade in Bexar and Comal counties, with corresponding 399_70 UCE RAxML phylogeny. Different species designated by different colors. Cave locations approximate.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.