Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2023View details →

Figures 9–14 in On the systematic position of the genus Proaegeria Le Cerf 1916 (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae) with description of a new species

Figures 9–14. Genitalia. Proaegeria murzini sp. n.: 9–14. Paratype, male, genitalia preparation № 010–2023. 9. Tegumen-uncus complex; 10. Valva; 11. Saccus; 12. Juxta, ventral view; 13. Phallus. 14. Paratype, female, genitalia preparation № 011–2023. Scale bar 1.0 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2006View details →

Fig. 1. A. Eodelphis browni Matthew, 1916 in Stagodontid marsupials from the Late Cretaceous of Canada and their systematic and functional implications

Fig. 1. A. Eodelphis browni Matthew, 1916, incomplete left maxilla, TMP 85.53.3, from the Dinosaur Park Formation, Judithian Land Mammal Age (late Campanian), Dinosaur Provincial Park, Alberta, containing P1–2, M1 in occlusal (A1) and labial (A2) views. B. Eodelphis cutleri (Smith Woodward, 1916), incomplete right maxilla, UALVP 7031, from the Dinosaur Park Formation, Judithian Land Mammal Age (late Campanian), mouth of Sand Creek, Dinosaur Provincial Park, Alberta, containing M1 (broken), M2–3 in occlusal view; arrow shows posterior alveolus of P3. C. Didelphodon coyi Fox and Naylor, 1986, incomplete right dentary, TMP 91.161.1, from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation, Edmontonian Land Mammal Age (early Maastrichtian), Paintearth Creek, Alberta, containing i2–3 (broken), c (broken), p1–3, m1–2, m3–4 (broken) in labial (C1), lingual (C2), and lingually oblique (C3) views. A1 and B stereophoto pairs. Scale bar 5 mm.

Fig. 6 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig. 6 Bayesian, ultrametric, unrooted circle tree for COI. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown only for nodes relevant to species delimitations (SDs); interior nodes are in gray. Bars in the inner three

Fig. 2 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig. 2 Type localities of type species of desmosomatid genera. The blue squares reflect the genetic dataset available in this study (compare Fig. 1). 1—Chelantermedia composita Brix, 2007, 2—Chelator insignis (Hansen, 1916), 3—Cryodesma agnari Svavarsson, 1988, 4—Desmosoma lineare G.O. Sars 1864, 5—Disparella valida Hessler, 1970, 6—Echinopleura aculeata (G.O. Sars, 1864), 7—Eugerda tenuimana (G.O. Sars, 1866), 8—Eugerdella coarctata (G.O. Sars, 1899),

Fig. 1 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig. 1 World map indicating sampling spots for the molecular dataset. White circles indicate nannoniscids in the samples, black squares desmosomatids in the samples. Orange dots with numbers indicate nannoniscid genera where sequences of the type species are available,

Fig. 4 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig. 4 Prochelator angolensis Brenke, Brix & Knuschke, 2005 as SEM photo to illustrate a typical desmosomatid habitus. In this species, P I is forming a chelate condition using a large composed seta at the carpus (see Fig. 5J) as counterpart to the propodus. Abbrevations: A1, antennula; A2, antenna; Md, mandible; Mxp, maxil- liped; 1–7, pereonites 1 to 7; PI, pereopod I; PII, pereopod II; PIII, pereopod III; PIV, pereopod IV; PV, pereopod V; PVI, pereopod VI; PVII, pereopod VII; Op, operculum; Plt, pleoteson; Ur, uropod; spine, posterolateral spine

Fig.3 in Evolution and phylogeny of the deep-sea isopod families Desmosomatidae Sars, 1897 and Nannoniscidae Hansen, 1916 (Isopoda: Asellota)

Fig.3 Type localities of type species of nannoniscid genera. The orange dots reflect the genetic dataset available in this study (compare Fig. 1). 1—Austroniscus ovalis (Vanhöffen, 1914), 2—Exiliniscus clipeatus Siebenaller & Hessler, 1981, 3—Ketosoma ruehlmanni Kaiser & Janssen, 2018, 4—Hebefustis vafer Siebenaller & Hessler, 1981, 5—Nannoniscoides angulatus (Hansen, 1916), 6—Nannoniscus oblon-

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

FIGURE 56. Carpolithus prangosoides Berry, 1916 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA

FIGURE 56. Carpolithus prangosoides Berry, 1916: 1) UF15820-048318, a large fruit with elliptic fruit body and three wings (indicated by arrows). Scale bar equals 4 mm; 2) Enlargement of Figure 56.1 to show reticulate venation of the fruit wing. Scale bar equals 1 mm; 3) UF15820-059471', seven immature, elliptic fruits about 5 mm long and 1.8 mm wide. Note that two fruits on the left and two fruits at the lower right overlap. Scale bar equals 3 mm; 4) UF15820-048319, a fruit with rounded wing apices. Scale bar equals 4 mm; 5) Enlargement of two fruits in Figure 56.3 to show thin fruit wing (indicated by lower right arrow) and fruit body (dark area indicated by upper left arrow). Scale bar equals 1 mm; 6) Enlargement of distal part of fruit in Figure 56.4 to show at least four wings (indicated by arrows). Scale bar equals 1 mm; 7) UF15820-059459, a laterally compressed floral structure with attached pedicel. Scale bar equals 2 mm; 8) Enlargement of the apical portion of Figure 56.7 to show the light-colored perianth parts (indicated by arrow) and enclosed darker structure. Scale bar equals 1 mm; 9) Enlargement of the basal portion of Figure 56.7 to show the pedicel (indicated by arrow). Scale bar equals 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

FIGURE 26. Paraengelhardtia eocenica Berry, 1916 in Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Puryear clay pit (middle Eocene Cockfield Formation), western Tennessee, USA

FIGURE 26. Paraengelhardtia eocenica Berry, 1916: 1) UF15820-004854, specimen showing a small nutlet (n) impression and the prophyllum (p) extending almost four-fifths of the fruit wing (w). Scale bar equals 3 mm; 2) CONN-Q3-02, compressed specimen showing nutlet and fruit wing. Scale bar equals 3 mm.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Revision of the Australian bee fly genus Sisyromyia White, 1916 (Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Acrophthalmydini).

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Revision of the Australian bee fly genus Sisyromyia White, 1916 (Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Acrophthalmydini)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/01608b37-4404-49ba-a0b9-df231d20006d">https://bionomia.net/dataset/01608b37-4404-49ba-a0b9-df231d20006d</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/01608b37-4404-49ba-a0b9-df231d20006d">https://gbif.org/dataset/01608b37-4404-49ba-a0b9-df231d20006d</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: One hundred years of solitude ended: A second species of Marmasoma White, 1916 (Diptera, Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Eclimini) from Australia.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "One hundred years of solitude ended: A second species of Marmasoma White, 1916 (Diptera, Bombyliidae, Bombyliinae, Eclimini) from Australia". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/98c8228e-a395-48d7-a988-4aa01c6936f8">https://bionomia.net/dataset/98c8228e-a395-48d7-a988-4aa01c6936f8</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/98c8228e-a395-48d7-a988-4aa01c6936f8">https://gbif.org/dataset/98c8228e-a395-48d7-a988-4aa01c6936f8</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Linked collectors and determiners for: Reevaluation of Rhipidomys emiliae (J. A. Allen 1916) and description of a new Rhipidomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae) species from Amazonia and Cerrado.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Reevaluation of Rhipidomys emiliae (J. A. Allen 1916) and description of a new Rhipidomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae) species from Amazonia and Cerrado". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/2b2e056e-f17a-4e90-ba94-74450e15f891">https://bionomia.net/dataset/2b2e056e-f17a-4e90-ba94-74450e15f891</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/2b2e056e-f17a-4e90-ba94-74450e15f891">https://gbif.org/dataset/2b2e056e-f17a-4e90-ba94-74450e15f891</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Fig. 5 in Is the northern chevrotain, Tragulus williamsoni Kloss, 1916, a synonym or one of the least-documented mammal species in Asia?

Fig. 5. Camera trap photograph of a chevrotain taken at Xishuangbanna forest dynamics plot, Mengla County, Yunnan, China likely to be Tragulus williamsoni. Photo by Cao Lin from Zhang et al. (2016) reproduced with permission.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in Is the northern chevrotain, Tragulus williamsoni Kloss, 1916, a synonym or one of the least-documented mammal species in Asia?

Fig. 3. Principal Component Analysis of nine measurements on 60 Tragulus skulls from mainland Asia. Brown dots = T. napu (n = 13); red dots = T. kanchil (n = 42); green dots = T. versicolor (n = 3), blue dot = T. williamsoni (n = 1); magenta dot = Yunnan specimen KIZ 6401.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Fig. 4 in Is the northern chevrotain, Tragulus williamsoni Kloss, 1916, a synonym or one of the least-documented mammal species in Asia?

Fig. 4. Skulls of adult Tragulus spp. (ventral view). Top to bottom: KIZ 6401, T. napu (ZRC 4.4753, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand), T. kanchil (ZRC 4.4800, Kompong Sun, Cambodia). Scale bar = 10 mm.

Fig. 3 in A First Record Of Freshwater Sponge From Singapore And Redescription Of Eunapius Conifer (Annandale, 1916) (Haplosclerida: Spongillina: Spongillidae)

Fig. 3. Eunapius conifer (ZRC.POR.0274). Skeletal cross-section, with gemmules scattered at the base. Scale bar = 200 μm.

Fig. 5. Eunapius conifer. A, ZRC.POR.0274 in A First Record Of Freshwater Sponge From Singapore And Redescription Of Eunapius Conifer (Annandale, 1916) (Haplosclerida: Spongillina: Spongillidae)

Fig. 5. Eunapius conifer. A, ZRC.POR.0274, Gemmule viewed from the side to show gemmuloscleres localised around the foramen (indicated by arrow). Scale bar = 60 μm. B, Paratype USNM 21524, smooth gemmuloscleres around foramen (indicated by arrow). Scale bar = 50 μm.

Fig. 1 in A First Record Of Freshwater Sponge From Singapore And Redescription Of Eunapius Conifer (Annandale, 1916) (Haplosclerida: Spongillina: Spongillidae)

Fig. 1. Eunapius conifer individual encrusting on sloping concrete surface of a shallow drain channel in a storm canal in Singapore. Scale bar = 2 cm. Inset shows the drain channel (water depth about 20 cm) inside storm canal (about 10 m wide).

Fig. 4 in A First Record Of Freshwater Sponge From Singapore And Redescription Of Eunapius Conifer (Annandale, 1916) (Haplosclerida: Spongillina: Spongillidae)

Fig. 4. Eunapius conifer (ZRC.POR.0274). A, gemmulosclere. Scale bar = 5 μm. B, skeletal oxea. Scale bar = 20 μm.

Fig. 2. Eunapius conifer. A, Holotype ZEV 7105 – 6 in A First Record Of Freshwater Sponge From Singapore And Redescription Of Eunapius Conifer (Annandale, 1916) (Haplosclerida: Spongillina: Spongillidae)

Fig. 2. Eunapius conifer. A, Holotype ZEV 7105 – 6/7 from ZSI showing encrusting sponge on surface of leaf blade of Vallisneria spiralis. B, Paratype USNM 21524 (dry material). C, Paratype USNM 21524 (slide).