Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
23,351
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
23,351 results for “Comparative”
Figs 122‒131 in Comparative genitalic morphology in ten genera of thread-legged bugs of the tribe Metapterini, and its phylogenetic importance (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae)
Figs 122‒131. Phallus in dorsal view. 122–124 – Ghinallelia Wygodzinsky, 1966; 125–126 – Liaghinella Wygodzinsky, 1966; 127 – Onychomesa Wygodzinsky, 1966; 128–129 – Pseudometapterus Wygodzinsky, 1966; 130–131 – Schidium Bergroth, 1916. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: dps – dorsal phallothecal sclerite; duc – ductifer.
Fig. 6. Schematic representations comparing the copulatory apparatus. A in Systematic revision of the family Pleioplanidae Faubel, 1983 (Polycladida, Acotylea): new genus and combinations
Fig. 6. Schematic representations comparing the copulatory apparatus. A. Laqueusplana bocki gen. et sp. nov. B. L. megala (Marcus, 1952) comb. nov. C. Melloplana ferruginea (Schmarda, 1859). D. M. japonica (Kato, 1937).
Fig. 5. Schematic representations comparing the copulatory apparatus. A in Systematic revision of the family Pleioplanidae Faubel, 1983 (Polycladida, Acotylea): new genus and combinations
Fig. 5. Schematic representations comparing the copulatory apparatus. A. Pleioplana automata (O.F. Müller, 1776). B. P. mortenseni (Bock, 1913). C. P. delicata (Yeri & Kaburaki, 1918). D. P. californica (Plehn, 1898). E. P. bosphorensis Bulnes, Kalkan, & Karhan, 2009. F. P. okusi Bulnes, Kalkan, & Karhan, 2009. G. Izmira cinari Bulnes, 2010. H. I. turkeyi Bulnes, 2010. I. Persica qeshmensis Maghsoudlou et al. 2015.
Fig. 13 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 13. Habitat and habits of Laius spp. A. Type locality (Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia) of Laius baliensis sp. nov. and L. satoi Yoshitomi, 2008, three Laius species living sympatrically. B. L. baliensis sp. nov., female. C. L. satoi, male. D. L. asahinai Nakane, 1955 (at Miyake-jima). Photographs by HY.
Fig. 11 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 11. Larva of Laius rodriguesensis sp. nov. A. Maxillae and labium in ventral view. B. Labrum in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views. C. Mandible in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views.
Fig. 12 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 12. Laius andamanensis sp. nov., ♂, paratype. A. Inner part of fore leg, showing enlarged femur and tibia. B. Antennomere III. C. Aedeagal apex. D. Spinous area (SEM photographs).
Fig. 8 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 8. Male antennomere III of Laius spp. A. Laius baliensis sp. nov. (paratype). B. L. andamanensis sp. nov. (paratype). C. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. (paratype). D. L. maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). E. L. marchei Pic, 1922. F. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. G. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). H. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. I. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype).
Fig. 5 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 5. Dorsal habitus of Laius spp. of ♂ (holotypes A, C, E) and ♀♀ (paratypes B, D, F). A–B. Laius baliensis sp. nov. C–D. L. andamanensis sp. nov. E–F. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. Scale bars = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 4 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 4. Endophallic sclerites of Laius spp. A. Laius etsukoae Satô, Yoshitomi & Ohbayashi, 2006 (paratype). B. L. flavicornis (Fabricius, 1801). C. L. keiichii Satô, Yoshitomi & Ohbayashi, 2006 (paratype). D. L. lutaoensis Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010 (paratype). E. L. madli Yoshitomi, 2010 (paratype). F. L. miyamotoi Nakane, 1955. G. L. satoi Yoshitomi, 2008. H. L. taiwanus Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010 (paratype). I. L. pankowi Wittmer, 1999.
Fig. 6 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 6. Dorsal habitus of Laius spp. (left: ♂; right: ♀). A. Laius maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). B. L. marchei Pic, 1922. C. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. D. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). E. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. F. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 2 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 2. Aedeagus of Laius lutaoensis Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010, showing the terminology and abbreviations for measurement of endophallic structures. A. Aedeagus with extracted endophallus. B. Aedeagus with holding endophallus (from Yoshitomi & Lee 2010). C. Gonoporal piece. D. Ligula.
Fig. 7 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 7. Left antennae of Laius spp. (above: male; below: female). A. Laius baliensis sp. nov. (paratype). B. L. andamanensis sp. nov. (paratype). C. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. (paratype). D. L. maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). E. L. marchei Pic, 1922. F. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. G. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). H. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. I. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype).
Fig. 1 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species
Fig. 1. Copulation of Laius baliensis sp. nov. A. Endophallus fully engaged with female structures in dorsal view. B. Endophallus fully engaged with female structures in dorsal view, close up. Abbreviations: M = male, F = female.
Fig. 2 in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?
Fig. 2. Body proportions of polpys (shown as percentage). Error Bars show standard deviation. Abbreviations: see Table 2.
Fig. 1 in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?
Fig. 1. Measurements of: A. Scyphistomae. B. Ephyrae. C. Lappets of an ephyra: the marginal lappet can be divided into rhopalial lappet and lappet stem; also visible are the rhopalial and velar canals. D. Rhopalial lappet and gastric canal forms of ephyrae in this study: 1. Rhopalial lappet forms (i.e. left lappet): (a) pointed spoon-like, (b) round spatula-like, (c) lancet-like and (d) bread knife-like; 2. Rhopalial canal forms: (a) forked, sharp points, (b) club-shaped, forked, sharp points and (c) spade-like; 3. Velar canal forms: (a) spade-like and (b) rhombic. Abbreviations: RH = rhopalium; RhC = rhopalial canal; RL = rhopalial lappet; Sta = statolith; UR = umbrella rim; VC = velar canal. Other abbreviations: see Table 2. Modified after Straehler-Pohl & Jarms (2010).
Fig. 4 in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?
Fig. 4. Linear Discriminant Analysis based on the morphology. A. Scyphistomae (17 cultures) of Aurelia congeners. B. Ephyrae (7 of the 17 cultures) of Aurelia congeners. In each case, cultures can be distinguished from one another by different symbols and corresponding numbers (see legend).
Fig. 3 in Can Aurelia (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) species be differentiated by comparing their scyphistomae and ephyrae?
Fig. 3. Body proportions of ephyrae (shown as percentages). Error bars show standard deviation. Abbreviations: see Table 2.
ERC Locus Ludi. Images en jeu: transferts et continuité. Comparer les jeux de l'Antiquité gréco-romaine et du monde rural nord-africain
<p>Jean-Pierre Rossie, anthropologue qui pour longtemps a travaillé sur le terrain avec les enfants amazighs de l’Anti-Atlas marocain, compare les jeux des anciens avec ceux qu’il est possible de trouver aujourd’hui dans les zones rurales de l’Afrique du Nord, en soulignant les continuités et les différences.</p> <p>More about: www.locusludi.ch</p>
Data to Richter et al. 2020 Comparative analysis of worker head anatomy of Formica and Brachyponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny
<p>This dataset contains the ant head µCT-Sanning Datasets used for the article "Comparative analysis of worker head anatomy of <em>Formica</em> and <em>Brachyponera</em> (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)" by Richter et al. published in <em>Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny </em>2020. In addition, the image plates from that article (in highest resolution as TIF files) and a series of supplementary 3D-volume render video files are deposited.</p> <p>The datasets for CASENT0709409, CASENT0709411 and CASENT0790267 are deposited as they were used in this study (with transformation to adjust the orientation of the ant head to the global axes and cropped to reduce file size) while CASENT0709419 is deposited as the original scanning result as it was not modified for the work in this article.</p> <p>Scanning details can be found in the materials and methods section of the article. Scanning parameters were as follows:</p> <p>Power (W): 3W all specimens</p> <p>Voltage (kV): 40kV all specimens</p> <p>Voxel Size: CASENT0709409: 1,1557 µm<sup>3</sup>; CASENT0709419: 1,2244 µm<sup>3</sup>; CASENT0709411: 2,5527µm<sup>3 </sup>; CASENT0790267: 2,8337 µm<sup>3</sup> </p> <p>Exposure Time (s): CASENT0709409: 25 s; CASENT0709419: 15 s; CASENT0709411: 7 s<sup> </sup>; CASENT0790267: 5 s</p> <p>Source Distance (mm): CASENT0709409: -9,5038 mm; CASENT0709419: -9,5321 mm; CASENT0709411: 10,038 mm<sup> </sup>; CASENT0790267: 13,0037 mm</p> <p>Detector Distance (mm): CASENT0709409: 46 mm; CASENT0709419: 43,0166 mm; CASENT0709411: 16,5043 mm<sup> </sup>; CASENT0790267: 18,0015 mm</p>
Fig. 14. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology
Fig. 14. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from two medium-sized specimens (BIOICE sample 2060, IINH-40471). A. Anterior end, ventral view. B–C. Unciniger 2, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. D–E. Unciniger 7, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. F. Scaphal hooks and scaphal basis ciliary patches.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.