Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 17. Female genitalia. a, c, g, j in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 17. Female genitalia. a, c, g, j, Bursa copulatrix (dorsal view); b. Bursa copulatrix (ventral view); d, k. Bursa copulatrix (dorsal view, with ventral labiate plate and seminal depository dissected); e, i, m. Ventral labiate plate and seminal depository (ventral view, with remainder of bursa copulatrix dissected); f, h, l. Bursa copulatrix (ventral view, with ventral labiate plate and seminal depository dissected). a, b. Cylapus marginicollis; c–f. Cylapus ruficeps; g–i. Cylapus tenuicornis; j–m. Cylapus tucuruiensis. dlp = dorsal labiate plate; odl = lateral oviduct; sd = seminal depository; sg = spermathecal gland; sr = sclerotized ring; vlp = ventral labiate plate.

FIGURE 12. Male genitalia. a, d, g, j, p in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 12. Male genitalia. a, d, g, j, p. Endosoma (dorsal view); b, e, h, m, s. Left paramere (right lateral view). c, f, i, o, u. Right paramere (left lateral view); n, t. Left paramere (dorsal view). k, q. Transparent portion of distal sclerotized portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma; l, r. Endosoma (ventral view). a–c. Cylapinus minusculus; d–f. Cylapinus yasunagai; g–i. Cylapoides unicolor; j–o. Peltidocylapus calyciformis; p–u. Peltidocylapus caudatus. ap = apical process; bp = basal process; dss = distal part of ductus seminis inside endosoma; pb = paramere body; sl = sensory lobe. Scale bars 0.2 mm.

FIGURE 2 in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 2. Strict consensus tree obtained from two most parsimonious trees using implied weighting of characters (k=3). Numbers of nodes are in circles. Non–homoplastic changes in character states are represented with black circles, homoplastic changes with white circles. Symmetric resampling supports (SRS) are indicated below branches.

FIGURE 10. Scanning electron micrographs. a in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 10. Scanning electron micrographs. a. Pronotum (left lateral view); b–h. Thoracic pleura; i–m. Metatarsus. n, o. Pretarsal claw. a. Valdasus schoechnerri; b. Amapacylapus amapariensis; c, i. Cylapus tenuicornis; d. Peltidocylapus scutellaris; e, j. Valdasus henryi; f. Bothriomiris dissimulans; g. Cylapocoris sp.; h. Psallops sp.; k, o. Vannius sp.; l. Fulvius sp.; m. Cylapocoris sp.; n. Cylapinus minusculus.

FIGURE 5. Dorsal habitus photographs. a in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 5. Dorsal habitus photographs. a. Peltidocylapus nubilus (lectotype); b. Peltidocylapus pallidus (holotype); c. Peltidocylapus parallelus (holotype); d. Peltidocylapus picatus (holotype); e. Peltidocylapus politus (holotype).

FIGURE 6. Dorsal habitus photographs. a in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 6. Dorsal habitus photographs. a. Peltidocylapus rugosus (lectotype); b. Peltidocylapus scutellaris (♂, Costa Rica); c. Peltidocylapus simplex (holotype); d. Peltidocylapus spinosus (holotype).

FIGURE 1. Strict consensus tree obtained from 12 in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 1. Strict consensus tree obtained from 12 most parsimonious trees under equal weights. Bremer support values are indicated below branches.

FIGURE 4. Dorsal habitus photographs. a in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 4. Dorsal habitus photographs. a. Peltidocylapus calyciformis (paratype, ♂); b. Peltidocylapus caudatus (holotype); c. Peltidocylapus cerbereus (lectotype); d. Peltidocylapus ecuadorensis (holotype); e. Peltidocylapus festinabundus (♀, Peru).

FIGURE 9. Scanning electron micrographs. a–f in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 9. Scanning electron micrographs. a–f. Head and pronotum (left lateral view); g–i. Head (anterior view); j, k. Labium; l. Body (left lateral view). a. Valdasus flavinotum; b, h. Corcovadocola sp.; c, i. Vannius podager; d, k. Bothriomiris dissimulans; e. Fulvius pallens; f. Rhinomiris sp.; g. Valdasus schoechnerri; j. Cylapus tenuicornis Say; l. Cylapocoris sp..

FIGURE 8 in Revised classification of the New World Cylapini (Heteroptera: Miridae: Cylapinae): taxonomic review of the genera Cylapinus, Cylapoides and Peltidocylapus and a morphology-based phylogenetic analysis of tribe Cylapini

FIGURE 8. Head and pronotum, anterior (a–j, l, m) and lateral (k) views. a. Cylapinus yasunagai (paratype); b. Cylapoides unicolor (♀); c. Cylapus ruficeps Bergroth (♂); d. Cylapus tenuicornis (♂); e. Peltidocylapus calyciformis (paratype); f. Peltidocylapus caudatus (paratype); g. Peltidocylapus rugosus (holotype); h. Peltidocylapus simplex (paratype); i. Cylapomorpha sp. (♂); j, k. Vanniusoides clypeatus (paratype); l. Fulvius pallens (♂); m. Rhinocylapus vittatus (♀).

FIGURE 10 in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 10. Male genitalia of the tribe Dicyphini, A—Campyloneuropsis infumatus, A1—Endosoma; A2—Left paramere (Modified from Carvalho 1947, with permission); B—Engytatus itatiaianus, B1—Endosoma, B2—Left paramere, B3—Right paramere; B4—Pygophore front view; B5—Pygophore (Modified from Carvalho 1980A, with permission); C—Engytatus varians male genitalia, C1—Pygophore view from the right side, C2—pygophore view from left side, C3—Left paramere (Modified from Carvalho & Becker 1958, with permission); D—Macrolophus praeclarus D1—Endosoma, D2—Left paramere, D3—Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho 1945A, with permission); E—Tupiocoris cucurbitaceus (Carvalho's private notes include illustrations of male genitalia), E1-Vesica, E2—Right paramere, E3—Left paramere, E4—Pygophore.

FIGURE 8. Subfamily Cylapinae, A in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 8. Subfamily Cylapinae, A—Cylapus striatus; B, C—Valdasoides marisae n. sp.; D, E—Valdasus carpinteroi n. sp.; F—Fulvius bisbistillatus, G—Fulvius minimus.

FIGURE 7. Tribe Monaloniini, A in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 7. Tribe Monaloniini, A—Monalonion annulipes, B—Male Genitalia, B1—Left paramere, B2—Right paramere, B3—Endosoma (modified from Costa et al. 2008).

FIGURE 12 in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 12. Male genitalia of the subfamily Cylapinae, A—Cylapus striatus; A1—Left paramere, A2—Right paramere A3— Endosoma (Modified from Wolsky 2017, with permission); B—Valdasus carpinteroi n. sp., B1—Left paramere, B2—Right paramere; C—Fulvius bisbistillatus, C1—Vesica, C2—Endosoma, C3—Right paramere, C4—Theca, C5—Left paramere, sideview, C6—Left paramere dorsal view (Modified from Carvalho & Costa 1994, with permission); D—Fulvius minimus, D1—Pygophore, D2, D3—Right paramere, D4—Endosoma, D5, D6—Left paramere (Modified from Carvalho 1988B, with permission).

FIGURE 6. Tribe Eccritotarsini, A in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 6. Tribe Eccritotarsini, A—Cyrtocapsus rostratus, B—Eccritotarsus brotaensis, C—Eccritotarsus carioca, D— Eccritotarsus emboabanus (Modified from Carvalho & Gomes, 1971A, with permission), E—Eccritotarsus hyalinus, F— Eccritotarsus nigrocruciatus, G—Eurychilella discoidalis, H, I—Eurychilella incaperanus n. sp.; J, K—Knightocoris carlosleitei n. sp.; L—Neela lutescens, M—Neofurius capichabensis (Modified from Carvalho & Gomes 1971B, with permission), N— Pachymeroceroides bromeliae (Modified from Carvalho & Gomes 1971C, with permission), O—Pycnoderes cataguasensis, P— Pycnoderes quadrimaculatus, Q—Sinervus baerensprungi, R—Sinervus hyalipedes; S, T—Sinervus vendanovensis n. sp.; U, V— Sinervus venturai n. sp.; W—Spartacus albatus, X—Sysinas pallidipes, Y—Tenthecoris nanus, Z—Tenthecoris orchidearum.

FIGURE 4. Tribe Dicyphini, A in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 4. Tribe Dicyphini, A—Campyloneuropsis infumatus; B—Engytatus itatiaianus; C—Engytatus varians; D— Macrolophus praeclarus; E—Tupiocoris cucurbitaceus.

FIGURE 5 in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 5. Identification based on characteristics of male genitalia for the genus Engytatus. A—Engytatus itatiaianus, A1— left paramere, A2—pygophore lateral view, A3—pygophore front view (Modified from Carvalho, 1980A, with permission); B—Engytatus varians, B1—Left Paramere, B2—pygophore left view, B3—pygophore right view (Modified from Carvalho & Becker 1958, with permission).

FIGURE 3. Male genitalia. A in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 3. Male genitalia. A—Pygophore dorsal view, A1—parameres; B—Vesica, B1—basal disc; B2—basal plate; B3— primary gonopore; B4—Endosoma; C—right paramere; D—Left paramere; E—Phallotheca; E1—opening of phallotheca; F— Endosoma, F1—spiny lobe, F2—secundary gonopore; F3—sperm duct; F4—endosome spicules (Modified from Carvalho & Costa 1997, with permission).

FIGURE 13 in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 13. Male genitalia of the subfamily Deraeocorinae, A—Ambracius dufouri, A1-Endosoma with large membranous lobes, A2—Gutter-like structure, A3—Left paramere, A4—right paramere (modified from Ferreira & Henry, 2010, with permission), B—Lundiella reinhardit, B1—Endsoma, B2—Right paramere, B3—Left paramere (Modified from Carvalho & Capriles, 1982, with permission); C—Lundiella rubra, C1—Left paramere, C2—Endosoma, C3—Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho & Capriles, 1982, with permission); D—Annona fuscata, D1—Vesica, D2—Endosoma, D3—Left paramere, D4—Right paramere, (Modified From Carvalho & Schaffner 1977, with permission); E—Carijoanus ruberfasciatus, E1—Left paramere, E2—Endosoma, E3—Right paramere; F—Hyaliodes beckeri, F1—Aedeagus, F2—Left paramere (modified from Carvalho 1953D, with permission), G—Hyaliodocoris clarus, G1—Right paramere, G2—Left paramere-, G3—Endosoma (Modified from Carvalho 1945C, with permission), H—Hyaliodocoris insignis, H1—Endosoma, H2—Left paramere, H3— Right paramere (Modified from Carvalho 1945C, with permission); I—Perissobasis heroni, I1—Endosoma with two spiculate processes and complex sclerotized structures, I2—Left paramere (Modified from Ferreira et al. 2009, with permission).

FIGURE 2 in Synopsis of Miridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in Atlantic Forest Dominion, Espírito Santo State, Brazil: keys, diagnoses, new species, plant associations, and geographic distribution. Part I: Bryocorinae, Cylapinae and Deraeocorinae.

FIGURE 2. Pretarsus claw of the Miridae subfamilies. A—Mirinae, B—Orthotylinae, C—Bryocorinae, D—Dicyphinae, E— Phylinae, F—Cylapinae, G—Deraecorinae. (Modified from Carvalho & Costa 1997, with permission).