Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Text-fig. 13. Stereo occlusal views of SQU 290, juvenile left mandible of Omanitherium dhofarense, part of the holotype (scale bar 5 cm). Table 2. Measurements (in mm) of the teeth of Omanitherium dhofarense. in Large Mammals From The Rupelian Of Oman - Recent Finds

Text-fig. 13. Stereo occlusal views of SQU 290, juvenile left mandible of Omanitherium dhofarense, part of the holotype (scale bar 5 cm). Table 2. Measurements (in mm) of the teeth of Omanitherium dhofarense.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Text-fig. 9. Fragmentary left m/3 with reconstructed outline of a bunodont hyracoid from the Ashawq Formation. a) lingual view, b) stereo occlusal view (scale bar 10 mm). in Large Mammals From The Rupelian Of Oman - Recent Finds

Text-fig. 9. Fragmentary left m/3 with reconstructed outline of a bunodont hyracoid from the Ashawq Formation. a) lingual view, b) stereo occlusal view (scale bar 10 mm).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →

Text-fig. 6. Fossil endocasts of large mammals from Gánovce-Hrádok Neanderthal site. a) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21008); b) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21007); c) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21006); d) Bovidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21009); e) Ursus ex gr. spelaeus (NM R-604); f) Ursus ex gr. spelaeus (NM-Rv 21010); lateral and dorsal (except for f: ventral) views; lateral view for d and f are inverted. in Revised Floral And Faunal Assemblages From Late Pleistocene Deposits Of The Gánovce-Hrádok Neanderthal Site -Biostratigraphic And Palaeoecological Implications

Text-fig. 6. Fossil endocasts of large mammals from Gánovce-Hrádok Neanderthal site. a) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21008); b) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21007); c) Equidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21006); d) Bovidae gen. et sp. indet. (NM-Rv 21009); e) Ursus ex gr. spelaeus (NM R-604); f) Ursus ex gr. spelaeus (NM-Rv 21010); lateral and dorsal (except for f: ventral) views; lateral view for d and f are inverted.

Fig. 1 in The highs and lows of serow (Capricornis sumatraensis): multi-scale habitat associations inform large mammal conservation strategies in the face of synergistic threats of deforestation, hunting, and climate change

Fig. 1. Camera-trap image of mainland serow (Capricornis sumatraensis) from the lowlands of the Pasoh Forest Reserve in Peninsular Malaysia at an elevation of ~100 m.

Fig. 4 in The highs and lows of serow (Capricornis sumatraensis): multi-scale habitat associations inform large mammal conservation strategies in the face of synergistic threats of deforestation, hunting, and climate change

Fig. 4. Regional-scale relationships between serow captures and covariates. Displayed are the variables within the top-performing multivariate model as assessed by lower AICc scores. All covariates are averaged at a 20-km radius around the study area.

Fig. 5 in The highs and lows of serow (Capricornis sumatraensis): multi-scale habitat associations inform large mammal conservation strategies in the face of synergistic threats of deforestation, hunting, and climate change

Fig. 5. The relationships between serow predicted abundance and habitat variables at the local scale from Royle-Nichols hierarchical models. Oil palm, roughness and Human Footprint Index were in the top performing multivariate model.

Fig. 3 in The highs and lows of serow (Capricornis sumatraensis): multi-scale habitat associations inform large mammal conservation strategies in the face of synergistic threats of deforestation, hunting, and climate change

Fig. 3. Presence of the serow within its Southeast Asian range. Panel a) shows the IUCN Red List range extent of occurrence (EOO; shaded orange), and the occurrence records coloured by the data source. Panel b) shows the jackknife-based assessment of variable importance. The blue bars showing the explanatory power in the model using only the denoted variable, while the teal bars show the predictive power of the full model without the denoted variable, highlighting whether the variable captures unique information. Panel c) shows the probability of presence of the serow from Maxent modelling mapped within the Southeast Asian region covered by this study. Panel d) shows the forest cover in 2015 that is potentially occupied within the EOO. Panel e) is the Maxent probability of presence of serow inside the remaining forested areas within Southeast Asia. Original artwork courtesy of Tamzin Barber (https://www.talkinganimals.com.au/).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2023View details →

Data for Potential feeding sites for seabirds and marine mammals reveal large conflicting areas with offshore wind energy development worldwide

This dataset contains; 1) The dataset (sample_point_data.Rdata) to develop the Structural Equation model  2) The spatial tiff bivariate maps for small-ranged seabird and marine mammals and fish and zooplankton biomass respectively 3) The Potential Feeding Sites likelihood map in a tiff format 4) The global power density at 200m  5) Dataset of risk category and corresponding values and coordinates for spatial representation

Fig. 12 in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 12. Bivariate plots of natural log−transformed M3, m3, and m2 crown length versus width in Chilga and other fossil elephantiforms. Comparative dimensions are from Fourtau (1920), Cooper (1922), Osborn (1936), Bergounioux and Crouzel (1959), Arambourg (1961), Hamilton (1973), Gaziry (1976, 1987), Tassy (1977b, 1983a, 1983b, 1985), Tassy and Pickford (1983), Gentry (1987), Roger et al. (1994), Göhlich (1998), and Sanders and Miller (2002). A. M3. B. m2. C. m3.

Fig. 10 in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 10. Dental specimens of Phiomia major sp. nov. A. Left p4, CH5−15, in occlusal (A1) and buccal (A2) views. B. Left m2, CHS4−1, in buccal (B1) and occlusal (B2, B3) views. Anterior is to the left. Broken areas indicated by small dotted lines and cross−hatching. Scale bar 1 cm.

Fig. 9 in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 9. Dental specimens of Phiomia major sp. nov. A. Right p3, CH4−4, in lingual (A1) and occlusal (A2, A3) views. B. Left m1, CH25−1, in buccal (B1) and occlusal (B2, B3) views. C. Right m3, CH9−2, in occlusal view. Anterior is to the left. Broken areas indicated by small dotted lines and cross−hatching. Scale bar 1 cm.

Fig. 7 in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 7. Dental specimens of Phiomia major sp. nov. Anterior is to the left. A. Left P3, CH25−5, in buccal (reversed) (A1) and occlusal (A2) views. B. Right M1, CH3−53, in occlusal view; note piece of fossil wood along midline of crown. C. Left M3, CH22−1, in buccal (C1) and occlusal (C2) views. Scale bar 1 cm.

Fig. 6 in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 6. Bivariate plots of natural log−transformed crown length versus width of selected cheek teeth in Chilgatherium harrisi sp. nov. and other deinothere species. Comparative dimensions are from Bachmann (1875), Weinsheimer (1883), Roger (1886), Andrews (1911), Cooper (1922), Palmer (1924), Éhik (1930), MacInnes (1942), Gräf (1957), Sahni and Tripathi (1957), Symeonidis (1970), Harris (1973, 1977, 1983, 1987), Gaziry (1976), Tobien (1988), Tsoukala and Melentis (1994), Huttunen (pers. com.; 2000), Sach and Heizmann (2001), and Sanders (2003). A. Specimens CH9−7 and CH9−22 compared with D2 in other deinotheres. Note that in this comparison, the Chilga specimens appear anomalously large, relative to size contrasts between other cheek teeth from the Chilga deinothere sample and those of Prodeinotherium and Deinotherium. B. P3. C. M3. D. m2. E. m3.

Fig. 5 in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 5. Cheek teeth of Chilgatherium harrisi sp. nov. A. Right m2, part of type specimen, CH35−3a, in lingual (A1) and occlusal (A2, A3) views; anterior is to the left. B. Left m3, part of type specimen, CH35−3c, in occlusal view. Scale bar 1 cm.

Fig. 1. A in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 1. A. Map of Afro−Arabia with several important Paleogene terrestrial mammal sites (underlined characters denote abbreviations for the localities marked on the map), including Chilga (Ethiopia), Dogali (Eritrea), Lothidok (Eragaleit Beds, Kenya), Fayum (Egypt), Dor el Talha (Libya), Malembe (Angola), Mahenge (Tanzania), and Thaytini and Taqah (Oman). Outline of Ethiopia is inset. B. Map of Ethiopia showing the location of Chilga, north of Lake Tana. C. Detailed map of the Chilga area showing the fossil localities, geologic section (Fig. 2), and dated rock sample localities, along the Guang and Hauga Rivers.

Fig. 13 in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 13. Dental specimens of Chilga palaeomastodonts, aff. Palaeomastodon. A. aff. Palaeomastodon sp. nov. A., left M3, CH14−V−12, in lingual (A1) and occlusal (A2, A3) views. B. Diagrammatic representation of occlusal view of right M3, AMNH 13449, paratype of Palaeomastodon intermedius (after Osborn 1936: figs. 93, 94). Anterior is to the left. Scale bar 1 cm.

Fig. 3 in New large-bodied mammals from the late Oligocene site of Chilga, Ethiopia

Fig. 3. Cranio−dental remains of Arsinoitherium giganteum sp. nov. A. Maxilla fragment with M2−3, CH69−1, holotype, in lateral view; anterior is to the right. (A2, diagram of A1). B. Juvenile dentary with two deciduous premolars, CH10−5, in buccal (B1) and occlusal (B2, B3) views; anterior is to the right. C. Left p4, CH9−9, in buccal (C1) and occlusal (C2) views; anterior is to the left. D. Partial left nasal horn core, CH26−10. E. Left M3 in posterior view, CH3−95. F. Left m2, CH25−17, in buccal (F1) and occlusal (F2, F3) views; anterior is to the left. Scale bars 3 cm.