Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
575
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
575 results for “Quality assessment”
Table 2. Studies on psychiatric side effects of fluoroquinolones. The risk of bias and study quality assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project's Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (QATQS) was presented as the global rating for each publication (3 – weak).
<p>Studies on psychiatric side effects of fluoroquinolones. The risk of bias and study quality assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project’s Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (QATQS) was presented as the global rating for each publication (3 – weak).</p>
Validation of Polish-language questionnaires for assessing the quality of life of patients with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD-QOL)
<p>In recent years, questionnaires were published in English to assess the quality of life of patients with PCD for adults, adolescents aged 13-17, and children aged 6-12 and their caregivers. The aim of this study was to prepare a Polish version of the questionnaires and validate them in specific age groups with the participation of Polish patients with PCD.</p>
Assessment of the Quality of Life and Resilience in Ventilated Patients with COVID-19: Findings One year After Hospital Discharge
<p>Assessment of the Quality of Life and Resilience in Ventilated Patients with COVID-19: Findings One year After Hospital Discharge</p> <p>This dataset was collected in a prospective cohort study to evaluate the quality of life and resilience of patients managed with invasive mechanical ventilation due to severe COVID-19, one year after hospital discharge.</p> <p><strong>Methodology</strong></p> <p><strong>Design </strong></p> <p>A prospective cohort study was conducted, and the present study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Universidad del Rosario (DVO005-1957- CV1534). Informed consent was obtained from each patient or their legal caregiver, which was given via telephone.</p> <p><strong>Patients/Population</strong></p> <p>Data were collected from patients who received MV support for respiratory failure secondary to critical illness due to COVID-19. The study included consecutively patients discharged alive from the Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi located in the city of Bogota, Colombia from March 19, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Patients who passed away after discharge, those with whom telephone communication was not feasible, individuals with cognitive impairment preventing them from responding to the survey without obtaining information from a caregiver, and those who declined to participate in the study (as indicated by the patient and/or caregiver) were excluded from the final analysis.</p> <p><strong>Intervention/Measurement</strong></p> <p>Participants were administered a structured questionnaire that included three scales: PCFS (Post-COVID-19 functional Status Scale), EQ-5D-3L (EuroQol 5 dimensions 3 levels) (administered via telephone application), and CD-RISC (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale). Permission for the non-commercial use of the EQ-5D-3L scale was obtained from the EuroQol Customer Portal (Registration No. 55265).</p> <p><strong>Statistical Analysis</strong></p> <p>The general characteristics of the population and the results of the PCFS, EQ-5D-3L, and CD-RISC were described. Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) depending on the data distribution. Categorical variables were described using absolute and relative frequencies.</p> <p>The PCFS was reported using a grading system ranging from Grade 0, indicating patients who were able to resume their daily activities without limitations, to Grade 4, representing severe functional limitations.</p> <p>The five dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L were considered as numerical variables and scored as follows: 1 for no alteration, 2 for moderate alteration, and 3 for severe alteration. The total score was computed by summing the scores from each dimension, ranging from 5 (indicating optimal quality of life) to 15 (indicating severely compromised quality of life). To assess the usefulness of the PCFS in measuring QoL, Pearson correlations were performed between the total score of the EQ-5D-3L and each individual dimension with the PCFS score.</p> <p>The CD-RISC and its 25 dimensions were evaluated as well. Each dimension was treated as a numerical variable and scored as follows: 0 for no alteration, 1 for mild alteration, 2 for moderate alteration, 3 for severe alteration, and 4 for critical alteration. The total CD-RISC score ranged from 0 (indicating no resilience) to 100 (indicating the best possible resilience). Furthermore, it was hypothesized that patients with higher resilience, as measured by the CD-RISC scale, would have better quality of life (QoL). Pearson correlations were examined between the PCFS score and the total CD-RISC score.</p>
A Study of AST-120 for Evaluating Prevention of Progression In Chronic Kidney Disease Including Assessment of Quality of Life (EPPIC-2)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00501046. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 12. Publications: 3.
A Phase 4 Study to Assess the Impact of Patient Support Program on Health Related Quality of Life and Adherence in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Administered Rebif® With the Reb
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01791244. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 2. Publications: 1.
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Study to Assess the Effect of Aclidinium Bromide 400 μg Bid on COPD Symptoms and Sleep Quality After 3 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Stable Moderate
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02153489. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Open-Label Study to Assess the Effect of Long-Term Prolonged-Release Fampridine (BIIB041) on Quality of Life as Reported by Participants With Multiple Sclerosis
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01480076. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 9. Publications: 1.
Assessment of Quality of Life in Patients With Symptomatic Chemotherapy-induced Anaemia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01444456. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 9. Publications: 1.
Developing a Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Quality Improvement (QI) Systems Impact Assessment Questionnaire
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00754377. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Assessing the Quality of Life and Social Support in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05427994. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Flow virometry for water-quality assessment: Protocol optimization for a model virus and automation of data analysis
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Freshwater ecological quality assessment of the gold mining Mashcon watershed, Cajamarca - Peru
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Validation of Quality-of-Life assessment tool for Ethiopian old age people
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Longitudinal assessment of thermal and perceived air quality acceptability in relation to temperature, humidity, and CO2 exposure in Singapore
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Analysis of laboratory reporting practices using a quality assessment of a 'virtual patient'. (data)
<p>Dataset for paper Analysis of laboratory reporting practices using a quality assessment of a ‘virtual patient', published in Genetics in Medicine.</p> <p>This dataset consists of the FASTQ, BAM, and VCF for the virtual patients as described in the paper.<br> </p>
Is your OCR good enough? A comprehensive assessment of the impact of OCR quality on downstream tasks
<p>Is an average OCR quality of 70% enough for my study? What OCR quality should we ask from external suppliers? Should we re-do the OCR of our collections to bring it from 80% to 85%? Libraries and researchers alike face the same dilemma in our times of textual abundance: when is OCR quality good enough? User access, scientific results and the investment of limited resources increasingly depend on answering this question.</p> <p>This project focuses on a comprehensive assessment of the impact of OCR quality in Dutch newspaper, journal and book collections, comparing it with published results for English and French. This is be done via <em>extrinsic evaluation</em>: assessing results from a set of representative downstream tasks, such as text classification or clustering. The ultimate goal of the project is to contribute guidelines detailing when OCR quality is to be considered good enough, in order to inform the development and use of textual collections.</p> <p>The datasets released here are described in <a href="https://github.com/Giovanni1085/KB_OCR_impact/wiki/Datasets">this Wiki page</a>. Please refer to the <a href="https://github.com/Giovanni1085/KB_OCR_impact">project's repository</a> for more information.</p>
Data from: Development of a simple, practice-based tool to assess quality of paediatric emergency care delivery in resource-limited settings: identifying critical actions via a Delphi study
Objective: Provision of timely, high-quality care for the initial management of critically ill children in African hospitals remains a challenge. Monitoring the completion of critical actions during resuscitations can inform efforts to reduce variability and improve outcomes. We sought to develop a practice-based tool based on contextually relevant actions identified via a Delphi process. Our goal was to develop a tool that could identify gaps in care, facilitate identification of training and standardized assessment to support quality improvement efforts. Design: Six sentinel conditions were selected based on disease epidemiology and mortality at rural and urban African emergency departments. Potential critical actions were identified through focused literature review. These actions were evaluated within a three-round modified Delphi process. A set of logistical filters was applied to the candidate list to derive a practice-based tool. Setting and participants: Attendees at an international emergency medicine conference comprised an expert panel of 25 participants, with 84% working primarily in African settings. Consensus rounds allowing novel responses were conducted via online and in-person surveys. Results: The expert panel generated 199 actions that apply to six conditions in emergently ill children. Application of appropriateness criteria refined this to 92 candidate actions across seven categories: core skills, active seizure, altered mental status, diarrheal illness, febrile illness, respiratory distress, polytrauma. From these, we identified 28 actions for inclusion in a practice-based tool contextually relevant to the initial management of critically ill children in Africa. Conclusions: A group consensus process identified critical actions for severely ill children with select sentinel conditions in emergency paediatric care in an African setting. Absence of these actions during resuscitation might reflect modifiable gaps in quality of care. The resulting practice-based tool is context-relevant and can serve as a foundation for training and quality improvement efforts in African hospitals and emergency departments.
Innovations in water quality assessment
<p>Dataset accompanying BSc thesis "Innovations in water quality assessment" by Henok Tesfai, University of Amsterdam.</p>
Validation of Thyroid Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire in Indonesian as A Tool to Assess Quality of Life Among Pediatric Thyroid Cancer Patients
<p>Validation of Thyroid Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire in Indonesian as A Tool to Assess Quality of Life Among Pediatric Thyroid Cancer Patients</p>
Replication Package for Data Quality Assessment in the Wild: Findings from GitHub
<p>This contains the data and code used in the EASE 2014 paper "Data Quality Assessment in the Wild: Findings from GitHub."</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.