Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 5 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 5. Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group: relative length of rostrum (CM3/LCc) against relative horizontal length of tympanic bulla (LBT/LCc)

FIG. 9 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 9. Portraits of Rhinolophus midas Andersen, 1905 from Oman; A, B — ♂ (NMP 93782), Misfah, Ad Dakhiliyah Province, 9 April 2011, lateral and frontal views; C — ♀ (NMP 93994), Sal Alah, Masandam Province, 13 March 2012, lateral view. Photos by A. Reiter

FIG. 3 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 3. Chronogram of the family Rhinolophidae based on a Bayesian inference of the nuclear dataset (according to the model by Stoffberg et al., 2010). The numbers at nodes show mean divergence time estimates (Ma) and horizontal boxes 95% highest posterior density intervals of these estimates. The asterisk (*) indicates nodes with low branch support, the rest of the nodes were supported (PP ≥ 0.95)

FIG. 8 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 8. Spectrograms of echolocation call examples of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (original data); A — an individual recorded inside the Aksamitka Cave, Slovakia; B — an individual foraging at Arjank, Iran (cf. Benda et al., 2012); C — a handled individual recorded at Zingrogh, Tajikistan; D — a handled individual recorded at Misfah, Oman. For details see Materials and Methods

FIG. 6 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 6. Bivariate plot of tooth dimensions of the examined samples of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group: relative crown size of third upper molar (LM3×LaM3/LM1×LaM1) against crown size of upper canine (LCs×LaCs)

FIG. 2 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 2. Maximum likelihood tree of reconstructed phylogenetic relationships of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group with selected species of the families Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae based on the nuclear (left) and mitochondrial (right) datasets, respectively. Branch support values are shown by pie charts on the nodes

FIG. 5 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 1 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 1. Map of the distribution range of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (pale grey; after numerous sources) and the localities of origin and grouping of the examined samples (some symbols can denote more sites); full squares indicate the samples examined in both molecular genetic and morphological comparisons, open squares indicate the samples examined in the morphological comparison only, and open circles the samples used in molecular genetic analysis only. Grey dots denote isolated records out of the known distribution range

FIG. 4 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 4. Bivariate plot of skull dimensions of the examined samples of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group: condylocanine length of skull (LCc) against length of the upper tooth-row (CM3); values in mm

FIG. 7 in A revision of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) with definition of an additional species from the Middle East

FIG. 7. Results of the cluster analysis (UPGMA): differences between mean values of morphometric traits among the particular sets of samples of the Rhinolophus hipposideros group calculated from 27 plain and relative dimensions of skull (A), and from 36 plain and relative dimensions of teeth (B). Samples and sample sets: CEU — Central Europe; WMT — West Mediterranean; EMT — East Mediterranean; CAS — Central Asia; NEA — north-eastern Africa; OMA — Oman; mid — type specimen of R. midas Andersen, 1905

opennotspecifiedApr 2018View details →

Figure 1 in Into the light: atypical diurnal foraging activity of Blyth's horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus lepidus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) on Tioman Island, Malaysia

Figure 1: Map showing Tioman Island in the State of Pahang, Peninsular Malaysia, along with locations of villages and Tekok-Juara trail where day-flying RHiNOlOpHus lepidus was recorded.

opennotspecifiedApr 2018View details →

Figure 3 in Into the light: atypical diurnal foraging activity of Blyth's horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus lepidus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) on Tioman Island, Malaysia

Figure 3: Spectrogram of echolocation calls of RHiNOlOpHus lepidus recorded at Juara, Tioman Island, on September 26, 2017 at 11:59 h, showing a feeding buzz.

opennotspecifiedApr 2018View details →

Figure 2 in Into the light: atypical diurnal foraging activity of Blyth's horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus lepidus (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) on Tioman Island, Malaysia

Figure 2: IN situ image and characteristic features of the day-flying bats of Tioman Island, Malaysia. (A) Day-flying insectivorous bat flying a low circuit in Paya, Tioman Island, Malaysia. (B and C) Frontal and lateral views of diurnal RHiNOlOpHus lepidus displaying characteristic features of the species, i.e. pointed lancelet with concave sides, triangular connecting process and hair with light tips.

FIGURE 11 in Taxonomic status of the Lesser Woolly Horseshoe bats (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus beddomei) in peninsular India and Sri Lanka

FIGURE 11. Baculum structure of Rhinolophus b. sobrinus [a—dorsal view; b—ventral view; c—lateral view; Scale: 1 mm].

FIGURE 10 in Taxonomic status of the Lesser Woolly Horseshoe bats (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus beddomei) in peninsular India and Sri Lanka

FIGURE 10. Skull and mandible of Rhinolophus b. sobrinus [a—dorsal view of skull; b—lateral view of skull; c—frontal view of skull; d—ventral view of skull; e—dorsal view of mandible; f—lateral view of mandible; g—frontal view of mandible; Scale: 5 mm].

FIGURE 9 in Taxonomic status of the Lesser Woolly Horseshoe bats (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus beddomei) in peninsular India and Sri Lanka

FIGURE 9. External features of Rhinolophus b. sobrinus [a—structure of ear; b—close-up view of lower lip, showing one mental groove; c—frontal view of head and ventral view of the sella; d—frontal view of noseleaf; e—lateral view of noseleaf; f—frontal view of penis; g—lateral view of penis; h—hind foot].

FIGURE 7 in Taxonomic status of the Lesser Woolly Horseshoe bats (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus beddomei) in peninsular India and Sri Lanka

FIGURE 7. Skull and mandible of Rhinolophus b. beddomei [a—dorsal view of skull; b—lateral view of skull; c—frontal view of skull; d—ventral view of skull; e—dorsal view of mandible; f—lateral view of mandible; g—frontal view of mandible; Scale: 5 mm].

FIGURE 5 in Taxonomic status of the Lesser Woolly Horseshoe bats (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus beddomei) in peninsular India and Sri Lanka

FIGURE 5. External features of Rhinolophus b. beddomei [a—frontal view of noseleaf; b—lateral view of noseleaf depicting the sella; c—frontal view of head and ventral view of the sella; d—structure of the ear; e—closeup of the lower lip showing one mental groove; f—frontal view of penis; g—hind foot].

FIGURE 6 in Taxonomic status of the Lesser Woolly Horseshoe bats (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus beddomei) in peninsular India and Sri Lanka

FIGURE 6. Coloration of dorsal fur (in live condition) of a—Rhinolophus b. beddomei and b—R. b. sobrinus.

FIGURE 4 in Taxonomic status of the Lesser Woolly Horseshoe bats (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae Rhinolophus beddomei) in peninsular India and Sri Lanka

FIGURE 4. Bayesian inference (BI) tree based on partial COI sequences, using the HKY+G nucleotide substitution model (BIC = 4338.0916). Nodal values represent posterior probability.