Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in Repeated inoculations with the lung and heartworm nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum result in increasing larval excretion and worm burden in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Fig. 3. Arithmetic mean worm fecundity (expressed as final LPG/number female worms at necropsy) per group. Foxes of groups A were inoculated once and necropsied at 9 wpi (A1), 13 wpi (A2) or 23 wpi (A3), while foxes of groups challenged once (B) or twice (D) and the control foxes of the first (C) and second challenge (E) were necropsied 23 wpi. Bar indicates mean with outlier excluded. Error bars = S.E.M.

Fig. 1 in Repeated inoculations with the lung and heartworm nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum result in increasing larval excretion and worm burden in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Fig. 1. Experimental design: inoculations with 100 third stage larvae (L3) of Angiostrongylus vasorum are indicated by triangles, challenge inoculations (also with 100 L3) by circles and the differing group termination times by squares.

Fig. 4 in Repeated inoculations with the lung and heartworm nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum result in increasing larval excretion and worm burden in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Fig. 4. Arithmetic mean larval counts (first stage larvae per gram of feces) of foxes dogs experimentally inoculated at 0 wpi and challenged once (group B) or twice (group D) with 100 third stage larvae of Angiostrongylus vasorum from 6 to 22 wpi. Y-axis log10 transformed. Arrows indicate the challenge time points.

Fig. 3 in Using experimental de-worming to measure the immunological and pathological impacts of lungworm infection in cane toads

Fig. 3. The effects of lungworm (Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala infection level on lung pathology of 15 cane toads. (A) number of areas of inflammation predominated by lymphocytes, (B) number of areas of regional septal fibrosis, and (C) areas of inflammation predominated by neutrophils and macrophages. The size of the symbols represents sample size of each count.

Fig. 2 in Using experimental de-worming to measure the immunological and pathological impacts of lungworm infection in cane toads

Fig. 2. Effects of anthelmintic injection (Ivermectin) on the viability of adult lungworms (Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala inside the lungs of cane toads (n = 10) hosts over a 7-day period following anthelmintic injection. Lungworm viability scores (see text for definitions) decreased with time since injection. The size of the symbols represents sample size of each score. Two toads had not been treated with anthelmintic when euthanized and were given scores of 0 days post injection.

Fig. 6 in Using experimental de-worming to measure the immunological and pathological impacts of lungworm infection in cane toads

Fig. 6. (A) The effects of anthelmintic treatment on relative liver mass of 5 de-wormed (open bars) vs. 6 not de-wormed (grey bars) free-ranging toads. (B) Effect of experimental treatment on relative liver mass of 49 captive cane toads. ID = infected, dewormed (n = 11), IC = infected, control (n = 13), ND = non-infected, de-wormed

Fig. 4 in Using experimental de-worming to measure the immunological and pathological impacts of lungworm infection in cane toads

Fig. 4. The effects of lungworm (Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala) abundance on leukocyte concentrations in cane toads. Captive toads (n = 19) exhibited high leukocyte concentrations that were independent of the level of Rhabdias infection. In contrast, leukocyte concentrations in free-ranging toads (n = 11) increased with Rhabdias infection level.

Fig. 2 in Occurrence of tongue worm, Linguatula cf. serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae) in wild canids and livestock in south-eastern Australia

Fig. 2. In the petri dishes, adult males and females removed from the left and right nasal cavities of a wild dog; Right image shows the anterior end of a nymph removed from lymph node of a cow.

Fig. 1 in Occurrence of tongue worm, Linguatula cf. serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae) in wild canids and livestock in south-eastern Australia

Fig. 1. Left: A female tongue worm being removed from the nasal cavity of a wild dog; Right: Two encapsulated tongue worm nymphs in a bovine mesenteric lymph node.

Fig. 4 in Molecular identification and characterization of partial COX1 gene from caecal worm (Aulonocephalus pennula) in Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) from the Rolling Plains Ecoregion of Texas

Fig. 4. Molecular Phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method. The evolutionary history was inferred using the ML method based on the General Time Reversible model. The phylogenetic tree illustrates COX1 gene sequences of nematodes related to A. pennula. Bootstrap values above 50 are shown in the tree. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions-per-site. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7.

Fig. 1. A in Molecular identification and characterization of partial COX1 gene from caecal worm (Aulonocephalus pennula) in Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) from the Rolling Plains Ecoregion of Texas

Fig. 1. A. Caecum of the wild quail B. Morphology of male and female caecal worm. All the parts of male and female caecal worm Aulonocephalus pennula are marked in Fig. 1B.

Fig. 4 in Occurrence of tongue worm, Linguatula cf. serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae) in wild canids and livestock in south-eastern Australia

Fig. 4. Tongue worm eggs found in the faeces of a wild dog in the present study. Arrows indicate a pair of hooks.

Fig. 3 in Molecular identification and characterization of partial COX1 gene from caecal worm (Aulonocephalus pennula) in Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) from the Rolling Plains Ecoregion of Texas

Fig. 3. Pairwise alignment of the sequences of A. pennula and H. gallinarum. Sequence variations between A. pennula and H. gallinarum are highlighted in red. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 2. A in Molecular identification and characterization of partial COX1 gene from caecal worm (Aulonocephalus pennula) in Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) from the Rolling Plains Ecoregion of Texas

Fig. 2. A. PCR amplification of COX1 gene using nematode primers. Lane M: 100 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas); lane 1‾4 COX1 gene amplicon (750 bp). B. PCR amplification of partial COX1 gene using gene specific primers. Lane M: 100 bp DNA Marker (Fermentas); lane 1‾4 partial COX1 amplified products (405bp).

Fig. 3. Localities where animals infected with L in Occurrence of tongue worm, Linguatula cf. serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae) in wild canids and livestock in south-eastern Australia

Fig. 3. Localities where animals infected with L. cf. serrata were found. Open and solid symbols represent uninfected and infected animals, respectively. The stars, the red circles and the blue circles are cattle, wild dogs and foxes, respectively. Those animals that have been collected opportunistically have been excluded from this map. A) Creighton's Creek, B) Tallangatta, C) Mitta Mitta, D) Black Mountain, E) Corryong, F) Tumbarumba, G) Limestone, H) Wee Jasper, I) Brindabella, J) Mullion, K) Bullen Range, L) Booroomba, M) Perisher Valley, N) Orbost, O) Wabonga, P) Wangaratta, Q) Wodonga, R) Holbrook, S) Wagga Wagga, T) Towong, U) Braidwood, V) Carcoar. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 4 in Characterization of tongue worms, Linguatula spp. (Pentastomida) in Romania, with the first record of an unknown adult Linguatula from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus)

Fig. 4 Light and scanning electron microscopy images of male specimens of Linguatula sp. collected from Capreolus capreolus. A SEM of posterior hook (SPL1165-2), with sensory papillae #3. B Anterior hook with fulcrum (SPL1165-2). Scale bar = 100 µm. C Posterior hook with fulcrum (SPL1165-2). Scale bar = 100 µm. D Posterior hook opening "pit" (SPL1165-2), showing fine spines on cuticle (arrow). Scale bar = 10 µm. E Anterior hook base with fine spines (arrow) (SPL1165-2). Scale bar = 25 µm. F Buccal capsule (SPL1156-1). Scale bar = 100 µm. G SEM of male genital aperture with sensory papillae #4 on lateral edges (SPL1165-3). H SEM of tip of copulatory spicule emerging from male genital aperture (SPL1165- 2). I Dissected copulatory spicule (SPL1165-1). Scale bar = 100 µm

Fig. 1 in Characterization of tongue worms, Linguatula spp. (Pentastomida) in Romania, with the first record of an unknown adult Linguatula from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus)

Fig. 1 Map of the collection locations for the pentastomes examined in this study. Locations are indicated by red (collected from Canis lupus), yellow (collected from Canis aureus), and blue (collected from Capreolus capreolus) markers. The number within the marker refers to the specimen listed in Table 1

Fig. 3 in Characterization of tongue worms, Linguatula spp. (Pentastomida) in Romania, with the first record of an unknown adult Linguatula from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus)

Fig. 3 Scanning electron microscopy images of male specimens of Linguatula sp. collected from Capreolus capreolus. A Anterior end, ventral view (SPL1165-3), white box marks location of sensory sensillae presented in E; ga, genital atrium. B Lateral edge of body (SPL1165-2), ventral side to the right. C Posterior end of body, dorsal view (SPL1165-2), note absence of chloride cells in midline of dorsal side. D Abdominal annulus, ventral view (SPL1165-2), note single row of chloride cells and markings on posterior edge of annuli. E Sensory pore, ventral surface of anterior end (SPL1165-3)

Fig. 2 in Characterization of tongue worms, Linguatula spp. (Pentastomida) in Romania, with the first record of an unknown adult Linguatula from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus Linnaeus)

Fig. 2 Scanning electron microscopy images of a male specimen of Linguatula serrata (Frölich 1789) collected from Canis lupus (specimen number L4). A Anterior end of specimen, ventral view; ga, genital atrium. B Posterior hook with hook "pit" showing spines on wall (white box). C Spines on wall of hook "pit"