Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedMar 2023View details →

Рис. 11. ВыΛупΛение в гнёзΑах скаΛьных гоΛубей Columba rupestris. Уссурийский гороΑской округ, окрестности сеΛа НовоникоΛьск. 1–3 — 27.03.2022; 4 — 03.05.2022. Фото À. В. Коробова Fig. 11. Hatching in the nests of hill pigeons Columba rupestris. Ussuriysky City District, vicinity of the village of Novonikolsk. 1–3 — 27.03.2022; 4 — 03.05.2022. Photo by D. V. Korobov растений (нереΑко жестких, в частности, ΑопоΛнитеΛьно испоΛьзоваΛи сухие Λистья, поΛыни Artemisia sp.). Часто в гнезΑах при- пропиΛеновые нити, кусочки поΛиэтиΛена, сутствуют перья (преимущественно махо- а 3 мая 2022 гоΑа в окрестностях сеΛа Новые) скаΛьных, реже сизых гоΛубей и Αру- воникоΛьск быΛо найΑено гнезΑо, основу гих птиц. В некоторых Αругих сΛучаях в которого составΛяΛи обгоревшие кусочки качестве строитеΛьного материаΛа гоΛуби корΑа автомобиΛьного коΛеса, сожженного Рис. 12. ГнёзΑа скаΛьных гоΛубей Columba rupestris. 1 — с оперенными птенцами, Пограничный район, мост через реку СтуΑёная, 12.07.2007, фото À.В. Коробова; 2 — посΛе выΛета птенцов, Δазовский район, мост через кΛюч ЗвёзΑочка, 25.05.2022, фото В. П. Шохрина Fig. 12. Nests of hill pigeons Columba rupestris. 1 — with feathered chicks, Pogranichny District, bridge over the Studenaya River, 12.07.2007. Photo by D.V. Korobov; 2 — after the chicks have flown out, Lazovsky District, bridge over Zvezdochka Spring, 25.05.2022. Photo by V. P. Shokhrin in About breeding biology of the hill pigeon Columba rupestris in Primorsky Krai

Рис. 11. ВыΛупΛение в гнёзΑах скаΛьных гоΛубей Columba rupestris. Уссурийский гороΑской округ, окрестности сеΛа НовоникоΛьск. 1–3 — 27.03.2022; 4 — 03.05.2022. Фото À. В. Коробова Fig. 11. Hatching in the nests of hill pigeons Columba rupestris. Ussuriysky City District, vicinity of the village of Novonikolsk. 1–3 — 27.03.2022; 4 — 03.05.2022. Photo by D. V. Korobov растений (нереΑко жестких, в частности, ΑопоΛнитеΛьно испоΛьзоваΛи сухие Λистья, поΛыни Artemisia sp.). Часто в гнезΑах при- пропиΛеновые нити, кусочки поΛиэтиΛена, сутствуют перья (преимущественно махо- а 3 мая 2022 гоΑа в окрестностях сеΛа Новые) скаΛьных, реже сизых гоΛубей и Αру- воникоΛьск быΛо найΑено гнезΑо, основу гих птиц. В некоторых Αругих сΛучаях в которого составΛяΛи обгоревшие кусочки качестве строитеΛьного материаΛа гоΛуби корΑа автомобиΛьного коΛеса, сожженного Рис. 12. ГнёзΑа скаΛьных гоΛубей Columba rupestris. 1 — с оперенными птенцами, Пограничный район, мост через реку СтуΑёная, 12.07.2007, фото À.В. Коробова; 2 — посΛе выΛета птенцов, Δазовский район, мост через кΛюч ЗвёзΑочка, 25.05.2022, фото В. П. Шохрина Fig. 12. Nests of hill pigeons Columba rupestris. 1 — with feathered chicks, Pogranichny District, bridge over the Studenaya River, 12.07.2007. Photo by D.V. Korobov; 2 — after the chicks have flown out, Lazovsky District, bridge over Zvezdochka Spring, 25.05.2022. Photo by V. P. Shokhrin

Figure 3 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

Figure 3. Eggs of eight kiskadee-like mimetic species from egg collections. Egg collection reference (institution acronym–catalogue number): (a) NBCN–181942; (b) NBCN–181153; (c) COMB-E165; (d) WFVZ–118541-2; (e) USNM–48256; (f) MHNG–735096; (g) NBCN–181945; (h) ZMB–SN; (i) DMNH– 10519; (j) WFVZ–184215; (k) MNHN–489-490; (l) NBCN–180866; (m) WFVZ–118522.

Figure 2 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

Figure 2. Egg-laying records of lesser kiskadee (Philohydor lictor) based on citizen science, literature, and museum egg collections in relation to monthly total precipitation.

Figure 1 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

Figure 1. Reproductive records (nest construction, eggs, nestlings, and fledglings) of lesser kiskadee (Philohydor lictor) from citizen science, literature, and museum egg collections. Ecoregion abbreviations: Temp = Temperate, Trop = Tropical and Subtropical. Asterisks indicate the country's centroid.

Figure 4 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

Figure 4. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on egg length, width, volume, and pointedness of eight kiskadee-like mimetic species.

Table 2 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

<p><b>Table 2.</b> Comparison of traits among eight kiskadee-like mimetic species. Body mass from Dunning (2007) and Tobias <i>et al</i>. (2022), bill length from (Tobias <i>et al</i>. 2022), nest type, clutch size, and range from Billerman <i>et al</i>. (2020).</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Body mass Bill length (g) (mm)</th><th>Egg length (mm)</th><th>Egg width (mm)</th><th>Egg volume (mm3)</th><th>Egg pointedness</th><th>Clutch size</th><th>Nest type</th><th>Range</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Smaller body size mimetic species</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Philohydor lictor</i></th><td>25.5</td><td>23.4</td><td>20.89 ± 1.41</td><td>16.06 ± 0.66</td><td>2734.66 ± 334.87</td><td>0.0002 ± 0.0001</td><td>1–4</td><td>Open cup</td><td>E Panama to E Brazil</td></tr><tr><th><i>Myiozetetes cayanensis</i></th><td>25.9</td><td>14.4</td><td>22.17 ± 0.99</td><td>15.99 ± 0.67</td><td>2894.08 ± 317.26</td><td>0.0003 ± 0.0001</td><td>2–3</td><td>Domed</td><td>SW Costa Rica to SE Brazil</td></tr><tr><th><i>Myiozetetes similis</i></th><td>28</td><td>16.64</td><td>22.21 ± 1.09</td><td>16.03 ± 0.64</td><td>2897.21 ± 303.41</td><td>0.0004 ± 0.0002</td><td>2–4</td><td>Domed</td><td>W Mexico to NE Argentina</td></tr><tr><th><i>Phelpsia inornata</i></th><td>29.4</td><td>17.9</td><td>21 ± 0.42</td><td>15.95 ± 0.07</td><td>2690 ± 84.85</td><td>0.0003 ± 0.00008</td><td>2</td><td>Open cup</td><td>N and C Venezuela to NE Colombia</td></tr><tr><th><i>Conopias parvus</i></th><td>21</td><td>20</td><td>21.26 ± 0.35</td><td>15.98 ± 0.38</td><td>2787.19 ± 191.05</td><td>0.0002 ± 0.00003</td><td>2–3</td><td>Tree hole or</td><td>S and E Venezuela to N Bolívia and</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>cavity</td><td>N Brasil</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. trivirgatus</i></th><td>24.36</td><td>16.6</td><td>20.98</td><td>15.76</td><td>2647.62</td><td>0.0003</td><td>NA</td><td>Tree hole or</td><td>Venezuela to N Brazil and SE Brazil to NE</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>cavity</td><td>Argentina</td></tr><tr><th><b>Larger body size mimetic species</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>P. lictor</i>: misidentified</th><td>_</td><td>_</td><td>29.03 ± 1.92</td><td>19.84 ± 0.35</td><td>5799.84 ± 543.71</td><td>0.0004 ± 0.0001</td><td>2–3</td><td>_</td><td>_</td></tr><tr><th>eggs</th></tr><tr><th><i>Megarynchus</i></th><td>63.4</td><td>32.82</td><td>28.01 ± 1.53</td><td>20.19 ± 0.55</td><td>5863.74 ± 520.85</td><td>0.0003 ± 0.0002</td><td>2–3</td><td>Open cup</td><td>SE Mexico to S Argentina</td></tr><tr><th><i>pitangua</i></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Pitangus sulphuratus</i></th><td>74</td><td>29</td><td>27.93 ± 1.52</td><td>19.94 ± 0.74</td><td>5657.18 ± 564.55</td><td>0.0003 ± 0.0001</td><td>2–5</td><td>Domed</td><td>S Texas to C Argentina</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 1 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

<p><b>Table 1.</b> Misidentifications in breeding records of lesser kiskadee (<i>Philohydor lictor</i>) found in citizen science databases (WikiAves, eBird, iNaturalist), museum egg sets, and literature up to August 2023. NA indicates that no information was available.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Misidentification type</th><th>Locality</th><th>Year</th><th>Record type</th><th>Code/reference/museum</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Amazonas, Brazil</td><td>2015</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>WA1599942</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Colón, Panama</td><td>2016</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>ML34302821</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Pará, Brazil</td><td>2018</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>WA3137441</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Rondônia, Brazil</td><td>2021</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>WA4371921</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Meta, Colombia</td><td>2022</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>145727415</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Guyana</td><td>1848</td><td>Literature</td><td>Schomburgk (1848)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Brazil</td><td>1997</td><td>Literature</td><td>Euler (1867)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</td><td>1900</td><td>Literature</td><td>Euler (1900)</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs</th><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td>Literature</td><td>Oates and Reid (1903)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Guyana</td><td>1929</td><td>Literature</td><td>Young (1929)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Brazil</td><td>1935</td><td>Literature</td><td>Snethlage (1935)</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Argentina</td><td>NA</td><td>Literature</td><td>Hellebrekers (1942)</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Argentina</td><td>NA</td><td>Literature</td><td>Hellebrekers (1945)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Guyana</td><td>1936</td><td>Literature</td><td>Davis (1961)</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs</th><td>NA</td><td>1832</td><td>Museum</td><td>MNHN–489/490</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs; outside species range</th><td>Argentina</td><td>1898</td><td>Museum</td><td>ZBM–SN</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Argentina</td><td>1901</td><td>Museum</td><td>NBCN–181945</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Santa Catarina, Brazil</td><td>1908</td><td>Museum</td><td>SNMB–24013</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Santa Catarina, Brazil</td><td><1910</td><td>Museum</td><td>SNMB–24012</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Santa Catarina, Brazil</td><td><1910</td><td>Museum</td><td>SNMB–24014</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs; domed nest</th><td>Sucre, Venezuela</td><td>1934</td><td>Museum</td><td>DMNH–10519</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs</th><td>Brazil</td><td>NA</td><td>Museum</td><td>WFVZ–184215</td></tr></tbody></table>

opennotspecifiedMar 2021View details →

Figure 2 in Breeding biology of a high altitudinal Aethopyga sunbird in southwestern China

Figure 2. The sexual differences of parents on feeding frequencies in three nests of the Fire-tailed Sunbird. Feeding frequency was calculated as the number of feeding bouts per hour made by males and females during each successive observation in each nest. The error bars represent the confidence intervals of feeding frequencies of males and females within each nest.

opennotspecifiedMar 2021View details →

Figure 3 in Breeding biology of a high altitudinal Aethopyga sunbird in southwestern China

Figure 3. The morphological developments of the nestlings of the Fire-tailed Sunbird. Six morphological traits were included. Body mass was measured in g, and other measurements (lengths of body, bill, tail, tarsus, and wing) were measured in cm. Note that the sample sizes of nestlings measured are not the same in different periods, as some nestlings were depredated or found after being hatched.

opennotspecifiedMar 2021View details →

Figure 1 in Breeding biology of a high altitudinal Aethopyga sunbird in southwestern China

Figure 1. The nest with two nestlings (a), eggs (b), and predator (the Spotted Nutcracker) (c) of the Fire-tailed Sunbird in southwestern China.

opennotspecifiedJan 2018View details →

Figure 3 in Comparison of breeding biology aspects of Fluvicola nengeta (Aves: Tyrannidae) between two nesting sites

Figure 3. Nest shapes of Fluvicola nengeta on Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro's campus grounds. (a) closed/globular/base; (b) closed/ovoid/base; (c) low cup/base.

opennotspecifiedJan 2018View details →

Figure 1 in Comparison of breeding biology aspects of Fluvicola nengeta (Aves: Tyrannidae) between two nesting sites

Figure 1. Study area with nest markings: 1 – Açu Lake; 2 – lake at the Institute of Biology; 3 – lake at the Botanical Gardens; 4 – student lodging; 5 – waterlogged area near the Institute of Technology.

opennotspecifiedAug 2018View details →

Figure 3 in Breeding biology of the Pale-bellied Tyrant-manakin Neopelma pallescens (Aves: Pipridae) in south-eastern Brazil

Figure 3. Nest (LJF 005) with two nestlings of the Pale-bellied Tyrant-manakin Neopelma pallescens. Above: one-day nestlings. Below: three-day nestlings. Photographs taken in Florestal, Minas Gerais, Brazil, by Luana J. Ferreira.

opennotspecifiedAug 2018View details →

Figure 2 in Breeding biology of the Pale-bellied Tyrant-manakin Neopelma pallescens (Aves: Pipridae) in south-eastern Brazil

Figure 2. Above: Female Pale-bellied Tyrant-manakin Neopelma pallescens defending its nest. Note that she held the wings and tail slightly open and the crown feathers raised, exposing the discreet yellow coronal patch, while staring at the observer. Below: Female (white circle) exhibiting the broken-wing distraction display on the ground. Photographs taken in Florestal, Minas Gerais, Brazil, by Luana J. Ferreira.

opennotspecifiedAug 2018View details →

Figure 1 in Breeding biology of the Pale-bellied Tyrant-manakin Neopelma pallescens (Aves: Pipridae) in south-eastern Brazil

Figure 1. Above. Nest (LJF 008) with two eggs of the Pale-bellied Tyrant-manakin Neopelma pallescens. Note the large amount of spider silk attaching the nest to the supporting branch. Below: An egg showing spots and blotches concentrated around the larger pole, forming a distinct crown. Photographs taken in Florestal, Minas Gerais, Brazil, by Luana J. Ferreira.

Figure 5 in Breeding biology of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera (Aves: Scleruridae), a Neotropical grassland specialist

Figure 5. Relationship between the time spent on building activity (including digging and platform construction) and the date of nest initiation in 24 nests of the Campo Miner monitored in southeastern Brazil during the 2014 breeding season.

Figure 4 in Breeding biology of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera (Aves: Scleruridae), a Neotropical grassland specialist

Figure 4. (a) Entrance hole of a nest of the Campo Miner dug in a dirt bank along a dirt road; (b) the nest chamber (opened after being partially damaged by cattle activity); (c) materials used to line the nest, clockwise from left, mammal faeces, grass and other plant fragments, mammal hairs and charcoal fragments; (d) eggs. Photographs by TLSSM.

Figure 3 in Breeding biology of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera (Aves: Scleruridae), a Neotropical grassland specialist

Figure 3. Relationship between cavity area, cavity depth, and relative position in the soil profile of 70 nest of the Campo Miner found during the 2014 to 2016 breeding seasons in the municipality of São João del-Rei, south-eastern Brazil.

Figure 1 in Breeding biology of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera (Aves: Scleruridae), a Neotropical grassland specialist

Figure 1. (a) Location of the study area. (b) Detail of the study area, depicting the Rio Grande. Grey areas are above 900 m asl. (c) Detail of the study area, depicting the limits of the municipality of São João del-Rei and the remaining patches of natural grasslands according to Carvalho and Scolforo (2008). Records of the Campo Miner for other municipalities were not depicted.

Figure 2 in Breeding biology of the threatened Campo Miner Geositta poeciloptera (Aves: Scleruridae), a Neotropical grassland specialist

Figure 2. Number of active nests of the Campo Miner found during the 2014 to 2016 breeding seasons in São João del-Rei, south-eastern Brazil. Each month was subdivided in three periods of 10 days each (I, II and III) and each nest was counted only once during each stage: nest with eggs (day of laying of the first egg) and nest with nestlings (day of hatching of the first egg). Each nest was counted only once for tallying the number of active nests.