Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
328
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
328 results for “cochlear implant”
Spatial Hearing Perception in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03738592. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Comparative Study of Two Surgical Techniques for Soft Tissue Healing and Implant Stability of Cochlear BI300 Implants.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01699620. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Data from: A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Development of sound localization strategies in children with bilateral cochlear implants
Localizing sounds in our environment is one of the fundamental perceptual abilities that enable humans to communicate, and to remain safe. Because the acoustic cues necessary for computing source locations consist of differences between the two ears in signal intensity and arrival time, sound localization is fairly poor when a single ear is available. In adults who become deaf and are fitted with cochlear implants (CIs) sound localization is known to improve when bilateral CIs (BiCIs) are used compared to when a single CI is used. The aim of the present study was to investigate the emergence of spatial hearing sensitivity in children who use BiCIs, with a particular focus on the development of behavioral localization patterns when stimuli are presented in free-field horizontal acoustic space. A new analysis was implemented to quantify patterns observed in children for mapping acoustic space to a spatially relevant perceptual representation. Children with normal hearing were found to distribute their responses in a manner that demonstrated high spatial sensitivity. In contrast, children with BiCIs tended to classify sound source locations to the left and right; with increased bilateral hearing experience, they developed a perceptual map of space that was better aligned with the acoustic space. The results indicate experience-dependent refinement of spatial hearing skills in children with CIs. Localization strategies appear to undergo transitions from sound source categorization strategies to more fine-grained location identification strategies. This may provide evidence for neural plasticity, with implications for training of spatial hearing ability in CI users.
Data from: Investigation of the effect of cochlear implant electrode length on speech comprehension in quiet and noise compared with the results with users of electro-acoustic-stimulation, a retrospective analysis
Objectives: This investigation evaluated the effect of cochlear implant (CI) electrode length on speech comprehension in quiet and noise and compare the results with those of EAS users. Methods: 91 adults with some degree of residual hearing were implanted with a FLEX20, FLEX24, or FLEX28 electrode. Some subjects were postoperative electric-acoustic-stimulation (EAS) users; the other subjects were in the groups of electric stimulation-only (ES-only). Speech perception was tested in quiet and noise at 3 and 6 months of ES or EAS use. Speech comprehension results were analyzed and correlated to electrode length. Results: While the FLEX20 ES and FLEX24 ES groups were still in their learning phase between the 3 to 6 months interval, the FLEX28 ES group was already reaching a performance plateau at the three months appointment yielding remarkably high test scores. EAS subjects using FLEX20 or FLEX24 electrodes outscored ES-only subjects with the same short electrodes on all 3 tests at each interval, reaching significance with FLEX20 ES and FLEX24 ES subjects on all 3 tests at the 3-months interval and on 2 tests at the 6- months interval. Amongst ES-only subjects at the 3- months interval, FLEX28 ES subjects significantly outscored FLEX20 ES subjects on all 3 tests and the FLEX24 ES subjects on 2 tests. At the-6 months interval, FLEX28 ES subjects still exceeded the other ES-only subjects although the difference did not reach significance. Conclusions: Among ES-only users, the FLEX28 ES users had the best speech comprehension scores, at the 3- months appointment and tendentially at the 6 months appointment. EAS users showed significantly better speech comprehension results compared to ES-only users with the same short electrodes.
Perception of speaker sincerity in complex social interactions by cochlear implant users
<p><span>Understanding insincere language, for example sarcasm and teasing, is a fundamental element of communication and crucial for maintaining social relationships. This can be a challenging task for cochlear implant users (CIs) who receive degraded suprasegmental information important for perceiving a speaker's attitude. We measured perception of speaker sincerity (literal positive, literal negative, sarcasm, and teasing) in 16 adults with CIs using an established video inventory. Participants were presented with audio-only and audio-visual social interactions between two people with and without supporting verbal context. They were instructed to describe the content of the conversation and answer whether the speakers meant what they said. Results showed that subjects could not always identify speaker sincerity, even when the content of the conversation was perfectly understood. This deficit was greater for perceiving insincere relative to sincere utterances. Performance improved when additional visual cues or verbal context cues were provided. Subjects who were better at perceiving the content of the interactions in the audio-only condition benefited more from having additional visual cues for judging the speaker's sincerity, suggesting that the two modalities compete for cognitive recourses. Percentage scores for understanding the content also did not correlate with that for extracting speaker sincerity, suggesting that what was said vs. how it was said were perceived using unrelated segmental versus suprasegmental cues. Our results further showed that subjects who had access to lower-order resolved harmonic information provided by a hearing aids in the contralateral ear identified speaker sincerity better than those who used implants alone. The results suggest that measuring speech recognition alone in CI users do not fully describe the outcome and our findings stress the importance of measuring social communication functions in people with CIs.</span></p>
Automatic analysis of cochlear response using electrocochleography signals during cochlear implant surgery
<p>Cochlear implants (CIs) provide an opportunity for the hearing impaired to perceive sound through electrical stimulation of the hearing (cochlear) nerve. However, there is a high risk of losing a patient's natural hearing during CI surgery, which has been shown to reduce speech perception in noisy environments as well as music appreciation. This is a major barrier to the adoption of CIs by the hearing impaired. Electrocochleography (ECochG) has been used to detect intra-operative trauma that may lead to loss of natural hearing. There is early evidence that ECochG can enable early intervention to save natural hearing of the patient. However, detection of trauma by observing changes in the ECochG response is typically carried out by a human expert. Here, we discuss a method of automating the analysis of cochlear responses during CI surgery. We establish, using historical patient data, that the proposed method is highly accurate (~94% and ~95% for sensitivity and specificity respectively) when compared to a human expert. The automation of real-time cochlear response analysis is expected to improve the scalability of ECochG and improve patient safety.</p>
Anatomy-based Fitting in Cochlear implantation - Database
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Evaluating a Noise Reduction Algorithm With Cochlear Implant Users
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05805384. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A New Predictor Marker for Cochlear Implants Infection
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04120181. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 7.
Safety and Efficacy of the Cochlear Nucleus CI422 Cochlear Implant in Adults
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01867008. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Extra-cochlear Electrode Placement at the Post-auricular Vagus Nerve in Cochlear Implantation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07011927. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Hybrid Cochlear Implants in Severe to Profound Adults, Children, and Adolescents
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01975571. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Retrospective Analysis of Long-term Speech Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Electro-acoustic Stimulation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06301568. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Innovations in Clinical Care of CE Approved Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05270876. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 2. Publications: 0.
Implantation of the Cochlear® Nucleus® System in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01670006. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Ambulatory Telemonitoring of People With Hearing Loss and Having a Cochlear Implant COCHLESURV
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02890576. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 2.
Bimodal Stimulation Compared to Unilateral Cochlear Implant
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04093830. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 3.
Implantation of the HiRes90K™ Advantage Cochlear Implant With HiFocus™ Mid-Scala and Development of a Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Technology in Adults With Partial Deafness
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02189798. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Non-significant Risk Study of a Cochlear Implant Headpiece
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05488535. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.