Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,265
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,265 results for “discharges”
Future monthly discharge and water temperature simulations under global change (CMIP6)
<p>Monthly discharge (m3 s-1) and water temperature (K) simulated by a global hydrological model coupled to a surface water quality model (<i>PCR-GLOBWB2-DynQual)</i> for the time period 2005 - 2100, for an ensemble of 15 projections based on three combined climate and socio-economic scenarios (SSP1-RCP2.6; SSP3-RCP7.0 and SSP5-RCP8.5) and five general circulation models (GFDL-ESM4; UKESM1-0-LL; MPI-ESM1-2-hr; IPSL-CM6A-LR and MRI-ESM2-0)</p><p>Output data are provided at 10km resolution and are averaged at monthly temporal resolution.</p><p>These datasets were generated as part of the work presented in: Jones, E.R., Bierkens, M.F.P., van Puijenbroek, P.J.T.M. <i>et al.</i> Sub-Saharan Africa will increasingly become the dominant hotspot of surface water pollution. <i>Nat Water</i> <strong>1</strong>, 602–613 (2023). <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-023-00105-5#citeas">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00105-5</a></p><p>Relevant model description papers can be found at the following links:</p><ul><li><i>PCR-GLOBWB2</i>: Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, R., Wanders, N., Wada, Y., Bosmans, J. H. C., Drost, N., van der Ent, R. J., de Graaf, I. E. M., Hoch, J. M., de Jong, K., Karssenberg, D., López López, P., Peßenteiner, S., Schmitz, O., Straatsma, M. W., Vannametee, E., Wisser, D., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: PCR-GLOBWB 2: a 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model, <i>Geoscientific Model Development</i>, 11, 2429–2453, <a href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/11/2429/2018/gmd-11-2429-2018.html">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018</a>, 2018.</li><li><i>DynQual</i>: Jones, E. R., Bierkens, M. F. P., Wanders, N., Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, L. P. H., and van Vliet, M. T. H.: DynQual v1.0: a high-resolution global surface water quality model, <i>Geoscientific Model Development</i>, 16, 4481–4500, <a href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/4481/2023/gmd-16-4481-2023.html">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023</a>, 2023.</li></ul><p>Additional information on the water temperature modelling can also be found at:</p><ul><li>Wanders, N., van Vliet, M. T. H., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F. P., & van Beek, L. P. H. (Rens): High-resolution global water temperature modeling. <i>Water Resources Research</i>, 55, 2760–2778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023250">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023250</a>, 2019</li><li>van Beek, L. P. H., Eikelboom, T., van Vliet, M. T. H., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: A physically based model of global freshwater surface temperature, <i>Water Resources. Research</i>, 48, W09530, <a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2012WR011819">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011819</a> , 2012.</li></ul>
108 Basins containing a minimum of 50 years of daily discharge and precipitation observations
<p>Contained within this dataset are the (1) list of USGS basins used in the Livneh et al. 2024 (in-review) analysis of the intermittency-flooding relationship, (2) shapefile of the basins, and (3) the script used to generate the list of basins from the GAGES II dataset. If using these basins or the script to generate a list of basins that meet a certain set of criteria, please cite this dataset accordingly. </p>
Global River Discharge Reanalysis dataset (GRDR)
<p>The Global River Discharge Reanalysis dataset (GRDR) is a global river discharge product that contains daily flows in ~2.9 million vectorized river reaches for 1984-2018.</p> <p>For more details about GRDR, please refer to the following publication: Feng D. and Gleason C.J., 2024, More flow upstream and less flow downstream: The changing form and function of global rivers, <em>Science</em></p>
Parameter fields for the Hydrological Discharge (HD) model at 0.5° and 5 Min. horizontal resolution
<p><strong>HD model parameter files</strong></p> <p>This dataset comprises global parameter data that are necessary to run the Hydrological Discharge (HD) model Vs. 5.1, which has been published on <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5707587">Zenodo</a>. The HD model calculates the lateral transport of water over the land surface to simulate discharge into the oceans. The HD model parameter dataset comprises parameter fields at 0.5° global resolution and at 5 Min. resolution (global, Europe). Details for both resolutions are provided below. </p> <p><strong>Authors</strong>: Stefan Hagemann, Tobias Stacke <br> <strong>Copyright 2021</strong>: Institute of Coastal Systems - Analysis and Modelling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon<br> <strong>License</strong>: under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/)</p> <p><br> <strong>HD model parameter file at 5 Min resolution: hdpara_vs5_1.nc</strong></p> <p>River directions and digital elevation data were provided by Bernhard Lehner (pers. comm., 2014) and were derived from the HydroSHEDS (Lehner et al., 2006) database and from the Hydro1K dataset for areas north of 60°N (https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/HYDRO1K).<br> For a number of rivers (most of them north of 60°N), flow directions and model orography were manually corrected based on available GIS data, such as from DIVA (https://www.diva-gis.org/gdata), CCM River and Catchment Database<br> (Vogt et al. 2007), SMHI (Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute), NVE (Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorats), SYKE (Finnish Environment Institute).</p> <p>This corrected dataset is referred to as HDvs5 in the following.<br> The HD model parameters for overland flow, base flow and river flow are generated as described in Hagemann and Dümenil (1998) and Hagemann et al. (2020). However, different to the HD model vs. 4 described in Hagemann et al. (2020), Vs5 utilizes inland water fractions from the ESA CCI Water Bodies Map v4.0 (Lamarche et al. 2017) and wetland fractions from the Global Lakes and Wetlands Database (Lehner and Döll 2004) instead of the previously used lake and wetlands fractions. Changes from Vs. 5.0 to Vs. 5.1 are provided in the file history_data.md that should be previewed below.</p> <p>The HD parameter dataset contains 14 variables which are shortly described in the following table.</p> <ul> <li> FLAG | Land sea mask | -</li> <li> FDIR | Flow direction | - | defined as written below</li> <li> ALF_K | HD model parameter Overland flow k | d-1</li> <li> ALF_N | HD model parameter Overland flow n | -</li> <li> ARF_K | HD model parameter Riverflow k | d-1</li> <li> ARF_N | HD model parameter Riverflow n | -</li> <li> AGF_K | HD model parameter Baseflow flow k | d-1</li> <li> AREA | Grid cell area | m-2 | based on own computation</li> <li> FILNEW | River flow target indices for longitudes | -</li> <li> FIBNEW | River flow target indices for latitudes | -</li> <li> DISTANCE | Distance between gridboxes in flow direction | m</li> <li> RIVERLENGTH | Distance between gridbox and the river mouth (or final sink) | km</li> <li> CAT_AREA | Upstream catchment area of gridbox | km²</li> <li> CAT_ID | Catchment ID of gridbox | -</li> </ul> <p> <em> Flow directions in variable FDIR are defined as on the Num Pad of a PC keyboard: </em> </p> <ul> <li> 7 8 9</li> <li> \ | /</li> <li> \|/</li> <li> 4--5--6</li> <li> /|\</li> <li> / | \</li> <li> 1 2 3</li> </ul> <p> Special directions: 5 = Sink point, i.e. no outflow<br> 0 = River mouth point in the ocean <br> -1 = Ocean point, but no river mouth</p> <p>Forcing data masks file: masks_5min.nc</p> <p>In the offline HD model version, this file is usually only used to obtain the grid information of the forcing data, i.e. of surface runoff and drainage (subsurface runoff). However, it contains four variables that are read in by the model, and that are actually used un coupled applications within the MPI-ESM. Even though these variables are not used in the HD model offline version, it was decided to keep them in order to allow future developments regarding the usage of these data and to keep some consistency with the HD model code implemented in MPI-ESM.</p> <ul> <li> ALAKE | Lake fraction within a grid box | Lamarche et al. 2017</li> <li> GLAC | Glacier fraction within a grid box | Hagemann 2002</li> <li> SLF | Land fraction within a grid box | Lamarche et al. 2017</li> <li> SLM | Land Sea Mask | Lamarche et al. 2017</li> </ul> <p>For simplicity, the data provided at the HD model resolution. Hence, these masks can be used when the forcing data are interpolated to the HD model resolution before they are read during the model run.</p> <p>This tar archive also include a subset of this global dataset for the European domain, hdpara_vs5_0_euro5min.nc.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>HD model parameter file at 0.5° resolution: hdpara_vs1_11.nc</strong></p> <p>In addition, a global 0.5° HD parameter file hdpara_vs1_11 included. This is an update of the previous version 1.10 that was consistent to the parameter files used in previous offline and coupled applications of the HD model at 0.5° resolution (see, e.g. studies cited in Sect. 2.1 of Hagemann et al., 2020). Compared to the previous version 1.10, Vs. 1.11 now also utilzes the ESA water bodies and GLWD wetlands database such as in the 5 Min vs. 5.1 (see above). In additon, some flow directions have been updated. Except for DISTANCE and RIVERLENGTH, it comprises the same variables as for the 5 Min. version, but flow directions and parameters are generated as described in Hagemann and Dümenil (1998) and Hagemann and Dümenil Gates (2001). Here, the 0.5 degree mask file mask_05.nc comprises those masks that were utilized in the HD parameter generation. Only the land fraction is taken from Hagemann (2002) where the HD land sea mask indicates land.</p> <p><br> <strong>References</strong></p> <ul> <li>Hagemann, S., L. Dümenil (1998) A parameterization of the lateral waterflow for the global scale. Clim. Dyn. 14 (1), 17-31</li> <li>Hagemann, S., L. Dümenil Gates (2001) Validation of the hydrological cycle of ECMWF and NCEP reanalyses using the MPI hydrological discharge model, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 1503-1510</li> <li>Hagemann, S., 2002: An improved land surface parameter dataset for global and regional climate models, MPI Report No. 336, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany</li> <li>Hagemann, S., T. Stacke and H. Ho-Hagemann (2020) High resolution discharge simulations over Europe and the Baltic Sea catchment. Front. Earth Sci., 8:12. doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.00012.</li> <li>Lamarche, C., Santoro, M., Bontemps, S., d’Andrimont, R., Radoux, J., Giustarini, L., Brockmann, C., Wevers, J., Defourny, P. and Arino, O. (2017) Compilation and validation of SAR and optical data products for a complete and global map of inland/ocean water tailored to the climate modeling community. Remote Sensing, 9(1), p.36.</li> <li>Lehner, B., P. Döll (2004) Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands.</li> <li>J. Hydrol., 296: 1-22, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.028.</li> <li>Vogt, J.V. et al. (2007): A pan-European River and Catchment Database. European Commission - JRC, Luxembourg, (EUR 22920 EN) 120 pp.</li> </ul> <p> </p>
GeoERA RESOURCE CHAKA data set which contains time series of precipitation and discharge of springs in the CHAKA pilot areas (D5.5)
<p>Dataset which contains time series of precipitation and discharge of springs in the pilot areas of the CHAKA work package of the GeoERA RESOURCE project. The file contains precipitation and spring discharge data of 16 pilot areas in the Karst & Chalk work package. A description of the application of the dataset for the characterisation of the typology of karst systems in given in the D5.3 deliverable of GeoERA RESOURCE of which the pdf is provided. Further information about the CHAKA results can be assessed though the webservices of the European Geological Data Infrastructure (EGDI). </p>
Remotely-sensed Arctic Discharge Reanalysis (RADR)
<p>This repository contains the dataset RADR generated from the work <em>Recent changes to Arctic river discharge (2021), Nature Communications, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27228-1</em></p> <p>The authors caution users that discrepancy in flow magnitude exists for a few small rivers between 1984-2013 and 2014-2019 due to the different climate forcings used for these two periods.</p>
Geosci. Model Dev. paper data for Flipo et al., "Regional coupled surface-subsurface hydrological model fitting based on a spatially distributed minimalist reduction of frequency-domain discharge data"
<p>Data and associated user guide, as part of the paper :</p> <p>Flipo N., Gallois N., Schuite J. Regional coupled surface-subsurface hydrological model fitting based on a spatially distributed minimalist reduction of frequency-domain discharge data, Geoscientific Model Development.</p> <p>In consistency with the “Code and data availability” sub-section of the paper, all data necessary for the reproduction of<br> Figs. 7, 8c, 8d, 9, 10 and 11 are here provided.</p>
River flows and nutrient discharges to the Atlantic ocean basin
<p>This dataset includes i) River flows and ii) nutrient discharges to the Atlantic ocean basin:</p> <p><strong>River flow</strong> data are a subset of the WaterGAP 2.2d model (Monthly data on a 0.5° x 0.5° grid between 90°N and 60°S. 1901–2016) (Müller Schmied et al. 2020)</p> <p>The original watergap2.2d data is provided in netcdf format. Our postprocessing includes the selection of the coastal cells and the extraction of the monthly values in these cells. The resulting dataset is provided as a shapefile (Global_YearMonthly_River_flow_watermap22_coast.shp), including Date, latitude and longitude of the coastal cell’s centroids and the discharge values (m3s-1).</p> <p>Watergap2.2d outputs offers a very good spatio-temporal extent and resolution, and according to the Müller Schmied et al. 2020, the validation results for streamflow (or discharges values) are reasonably satisfactory, although there is some spatial variability in the performance results. Moreover, the recently published “Global Freshwater Fluxes into the World's Oceans (GRDC, 2021)” product and paper, uses the yearly outcomes of this model, which has also supported our selection.</p> <p><strong>River nutrient discharges</strong> are a subset of observations from the “Global River Water Quality Archive”. (<a href="https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2021-51/">Virro et al, 2021</a>), that among the publicly available and downloadable datasets, gathers the highest number of observations as includes data from different international and national databases.</p> <p>The GRQA data is provided as csv files (one file for each nutrient). These files have been processed to subset only observations at stations near the coastline. To do this a intersection between station locations and a buffer of 0.2 degrees around the coastline has been made. For each nutrient, a shapefile with the subsetted observations is provided.</p> <p>All shapefiles provided are accompanied by a “.qmd” file that includes metadata information in QGIS 3 format.</p>
Remote sensing of river discharge (RSQ) estimates derived from multi-temporal Landsat width observations and BAM/geoBAM discharge inversion algorithms
<p><strong>This repository provides three data files in CSV format:</strong><br> 1. Gauge name, lat/lon information<br> 2. Gauge name, date, and multi-temporal river width extracted from Landsat<br> 3. Gauge name, date, and BAM/geoBAM estimates of river discharge with monthly Q priors</p> <p>Note: the multi-temporal river width data were extracted from Landsat imageries using RivWidthCloud, where the river centerline/orthogonal line definition and the cross-section sampling strategies were made prior to, and different from Feng et al. (2022). So the width values may be different from Feng et al. (2022) at some locations due to these differences. The discharge estimates were derived from BAM/geoBAM algorithms with width-only observations. More details of the technical workflow and the inner workings of BAM/geoBAM were provided in the literature below and papers therein.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Reference:</strong></p> <p>Lin, P., D. Feng, C.J. Gleason, M. Pan, C.B. Brinkerhoff, X. Yang, H.E. Beck, R. Frasson (2023). Inversion of river discharge from remotely sensed river widths: a critical assessment at three-thousand global river gauges. <em>RSE</em>.</p> <p> </p> <p>Updated: 2022/6/17, 2023/1/19</p> <p> </p>
Data for "Three-Dimensional Broadband Interferometric Mapping and Polarization (BIMAP-3D) Observations of Lightning Discharge Processes" by Shao et al.
<p>Data set for manuscript of “Three-Dimensional Broadband Interferometric Mapping and Polarization (BIMAP-3D) Observations of Lightning Discharge Processes” by Shao et al. submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research-atmosphere</p>
Global Airborne Observatory: Submarine Groundwater Discharge on West Hawaii Island
<p>Mapped submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) for the west coast of Hawaii Island. A full description of the data source and methodology is available at:</p> <p>Asner, G.P., N.R. Vaughn, and J. Heckler. 2024. Operational mapping of submarine groundwater discharge into coral reefs: Application to West Hawaii Island. Oceans 5, 547-559. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans5030031</p> <p>There are two data layers:</p> <ol> <li>Estimated point sources of SGD</li> <li>Estimated dischage areas of SGD </li> </ol> <p>SGD discharge point sources as a point layer and SGD discharge areas are provided as polygon layers, both in GeoJSON format. The point source layer includes a Field LocCertainty, describing the certainty in percent that the discharge location is correctly identified. The discharge area layer includes fields InsideC and OutsideC, which average thermal sensor temperature in Celsius inside and outside, respectively, as well as fields for the temperature difference (dTemp) and the size of the dicharge area in hectares (ha). Both layers use the WGS84 coordinate system with spatial coordinates giving positions as degrees longitiude and latitude.</p>
Salt gauging and stage-discharge curve, Avançon de Nant, outlet Vallon de Nant catchment
<p>This data set contains the salt gaugings completed over the period 2016 - 2017 to establish a stage-discharge curve at the <a href="https://s.geo.admin.ch/7834d541d2">outlet of the Vallon de Nant catchment</a>. The data set contains also the latest version of the estimated stage-discharge curve, compared to the theoretical curve estimated from the geometric properties of the weir.</p> <p>The salt gaugings have been obtained independently by two different research groups from</p> <ul> <li>Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics (<a href="https://www.unil.ch/idyst/en/home/menuinst/research-topics/water-and-elemental-cycles/catchment-hydrology.html">IDYST</a>), Faculty of Geosciences and Environement (FGSE), University of Lausanne (UNIL),</li> <li>Stream Biofilm and Ecosystem Research Laboratory (<a href="https://sber.epfl.ch/">SBER</a>), School of Architecture, Environmental and Civil Engineering (ENAC), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland,</li> </ul> <p>The stream gauging station itself was constructed thanks to a joint funding by the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape (WSL), University of Lausanne (chair of Prof. S. Lane) and ETH Zürich (chair of Prof. J. Kirchner).</p> <p>The gauging station is maintained by the <a href="http://www.wsl.ch/en/about-wsl/organization/research-units/mountain-hydrology.html">Mountain Hydrology and Mass Movements research uni</a>t of the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape (WSL) and by the<a href="https://www.unil.ch/idyst/en/home.html"> Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics</a> of University of Lausanne.</p> <p> </p>
Estimation of the variation in specific discharge over large depth using Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) measurements of the heat pulse response
<p>The data contains measurements and derived values that are used for the manuscript "Estimation of the variation in specific discharge over large depth using Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) measurements of the heat pulse response, [Paper # 2018WR024171]" Currently under review at the Water Resources Research journal.</p> <p>The data is stored in netCDF files with xarray (Python), and should be readable with any other netCDF reader. </p> <ul> <li>TEMP is the measured temperature in degrees Celsius relative to the background temperature</li> <li>tempinfty is one of the calibration parameters. Represents the steady state temperature increase</li> <li>A is one of the calibration parameters. Represents the timescale in days</li> <li>b is one of the calibration parameters. Represents the scaled distance to the heat source</li> <li>err_alpha is one of the calibration parameters. Represents the autoregressive parameter</li> <li>TEMPmodel is the best fit temperature response in degrees Celsius relative to the background temperature</li> <li>Innovation is termed the noise in the article, in degrees Celsius.</li> <li>q is the estimated specific discharge in meters per day</li> <li>q_MC_XX are the confidence intervals of the estimated specific discharge calculated with Monte Carlo as presented in the article</li> <li>q_lmfit_XX are the confidence intervals of the estimated specific discharge calculated with LMFIT. Is a rough estimate for q_MC_XX calculated by lmfit (Python package).</li> </ul> <p>Time is measured in days with respect to when the heating cable is turned on.</p> <p>Additionally, a Jupyter notebook is supplemented to the article. It demonstrates the calibration routine and the calculation of the confidence interval for the temperature response at a single depth.</p>
Global monthly discharge dataset, derived from dynamical 1-D water-energy routing model (DynWat) at 10 km spatial resolution
<pre>Global 10km spatial resolution discharge dataset at the global scale for all major rivers, lakes and reservoirs. Data are provided at a monthly temporal resolution.</pre>
Computed Basic Statistics of Hydraulics and Discharge Measures at USGS River Monitoring Stations
<p>The shared table contains basic statistics (average, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and coefficient of variation [%]) river channel hydraulics and discharge records of the 4472 USGS river monitoring stations. The required raw data are free to access by the USGS-<em>National Water Information System</em> (<a href="https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis">https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis</a>). Hydraulics and discharge records that measured at each USGS monitoring site, given a long time period, were assembled, assessed, and finally used for computing the basic statistics. </p>
Data files for: Gigantic jet discharges evolve stepwise through the middle atmosphere
<p>Original video files and some other data belonging to the article "Gigantic jet discharges evolve stepwise through the middle atmosphere" published in Nature Communications on September 25th, 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12261-y)</p> <p>The high-speed video .cine files can be read by (free) CineViewer and PCC software of Vision Research Inc. which can convert to avi files. For any questions, contact the first author.</p> <p> </p>
A Synthetic Global Spatiotemporal Sampled River Discharge Database for Different Satellite Altimetry Mission Orbits
<p><strong>Corresponding peer-reviewed publication</strong></p> <p>This dataset corresponds to all the RRR input and output files that were used in the study reported in:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Sikder, Md. S., Bonnema, M., Emery, C. M., David, C. H., Lin, P., Pan, M., et al. (2021). A Synthetic Data Set Inspired by Satellite Altimetry and Impacts of Sampling on Global Spaceborne Discharge Characterization. <em>Water Resources Research</em>, <em>57</em>(2), e2020WR029035. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029035">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029035</a></p> </li> </ul> <p>When making use of any of the files in this dataset, please cite both the aforementioned article and the dataset herein. </p> <p>Note that this dataset makes extensive use of the river network and RAPID simulations that were produced in the following study, and the paper is gratefully acknowledged here:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Lin, P., Pan, M., Beck, H. E., Yang, Y., Yamazaki, D., Frasson, R., et al. (2019). Global Reconstruction of Naturalized River Flows at 2.94 Million Reaches. <em>Water Resources Research</em>, <em>55</em>(8), 6499–6516. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025287">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025287</a></p> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Version of record and details of this version</strong></p> <p>The version of record for this dataset (i.e. the one used in the aforementioned paper) is version V1.1 available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4064188">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4064188</a>. This version V2.1 was produced to facilitate testing of the RRR software (<a href="https://github.com/c-h-david/rrr">https://github.com/c-h-david/rrr</a>). Notable details regarding this version compared to V2.0 are as follows:</p> <ul> <li>The temporal sequence files (seq_TIM*.csv) of observations for regular temporal sampling now all have a sampling mean time of 0 second for every river reach instead of the previous value which corresponded to the cycle of observations (e.g. 259,200 seconds for a three-day regular temporal sampling). This allows to start sampling at the onset of each simulation instead of at the end of the first cycle. This change does impact the findings of the study.</li> <li>The sampled discharge files (Qout*.nc) where produced with an updated version of rrr_anl_spl_mod.py which now selects the time step at which a sample is retained using a slightly different approach. The update only impacts sampling results when the sampling time matches the river model output time step exactly, and is more accurate now. This change does impact the findings of the study.</li> </ul>
A framework for estimating global river discharge from the Surface Water and Ocean Topography satellite mission example data
<p>These files contain the Confluence pipeline outputs, prior information (SOS) and Simulated SWOT shape files from the example in the "A framework for estimating global river discharge from the Surface Water and Ocean Topography satellite mission" manuscript. </p>
Ultra-Slow Discharges that Precede Lightning Initiation dataset
<p><strong>Description of Dataset:</strong></p> <p>These data were used to produce figures for the Geophysical Research Letters publication: <em>Ultra-Slow Discharges that Precede Lightning Initiation</em>. Data are provided in human readable ".csv" and ".dat" formats.</p> <p>Arrays within the in csv files are stored in rows, headings for each row are the array titles. The arrays t, x, y, z are the time, easting, northing, and altitude for arrays after cuts have been performed, while the cutT, cutX, cutY, and cutZ are the corresponding arrays for the t, x, y, z data that have been cut from the fit. The fitT, fitX, fitY, and fitZ are the fit curves for t, x, y, and z. The hist_bins, binwidth, hist, xPDF, and PDF are the bins, bin width, histogram counts, PDF x values, and PDF for the lateral spread from the fit. All data values are in milliseconds and meters.</p> <p>The arrays within the dat files are stored in equally spaced rows. The first row contains the header and array names for the columns. Data for TRI-D plots contains the source index, time in milliseconds, easting in kilometers, northing in kilometers, altitude in kilometers, and intensity in units of galactic background. For the impulsive image figure (FigureS5_data.dat, Supplemental figure S5), the data are the block index, time in milliseconds, easting in kilometers, northing in kilometers, altitude in kilometers, and the <span class="math-tex">\(\chi^2\)</span> for the located source.</p>
Lithium-Ion Batteries in Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) dataset for article "Automated Battery Power Fade Estimation for Fast Charge and Discharge Operations"
<p>Dataset of aggregated information related to discharge-only cycles of lithium-ion battery packs employed in Automated Guided Vehicle systems.</p> <p>The dataset supports the study in conference article "Automated Battery Power Fade Estimation for Fast Charge and Discharge Operations"</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.