Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,583
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,583 results for “elevations”
Elevated increase in compound extreme heat-precipitation events over China
<p>This file contains the fractions (in percentage) of the compound extreme precipitation events that are preceded by an extreme heat event in China during 1961-2017. The compound events are identified based on the CN05.1 dataset at 0.5x0.5 resolution. Please contact us with any questions or concerns (email: luo.ming@hotmail.com).</p>
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of northern Brøggerhalvøya (Svalbard, Norway) with Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) of 50 cm
<p>HRSC is a multisensor pushbroom instrument with 9 CCD line sensors mounted in parallel that has been in orbit around Mars since January 2004 on ESA’s Mars Express spacecraft (Gwinner et al., 2016). It simultaneously obtains high-resolution stereo, multicolor, and multiphase images. Digital photogrammetric techniques are used to reconstruct the topography on the basis of five stereo channels, which provide five different views of the ground.</p> <p>An airborne version of the HRSC was used for the acquisition of stereo and color images in Svalbard. Since 1997, different airborne versions of HRSC have been developed. The principles of HRSC-AX data processing are described by Gwinner et al. (2006). The orientation data of the camera are reconstructed from a global positioning system inertial navigation system (GPS INS). HRSC-AX has been applied in diverse technical and scientific applications (e.g., Gwinner et al., 1999, 2000; Hauber et al., 2001; Otto et al., 2007) and has also been successfully used to investigate rock glacier activity (Roer and Nyenhuis, 2007). The flight campaign in July–August 2008 covered a total of seven regions in Svalbard: (1) Longyearbyen and the surroundings of Adventfjorden, (2) large parts of Adventdalen, (3) large parts of the Brøggerhalvøya (halvøya = peninsula) in western Spitsbergen (this dataset), (4) the Bockfjorden area in northern Spitsbergen, (5) the northeastern shore of the Palanderbukta and the margin of the adjacent ice cap in Nordaustlandet, (6) an area on Prins Karls Forland, and (7) the area of the abandoned Russian mining settlement of Pyramiden together with the nearby Ebbedalen. </p> <p>This dataset is a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived from HRSC-AX stereo images. The elevations recorded in the DEM are ellipsoid heights; i.e., they are not computed with respect to a geoid but to a mathematically defined reference surface, which is a<br>rotational ellipsoid with the equatorial A and B axes both having a radius of 6378.14 km and the polar<br>C axis having a radius of 6356.75 km. This results in an offset of about 36.5m with respect to geoid<br>heights; i.e., sea level in the HRSC-AX DEM is not at 0 m, but at ~36.5 m.</p> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>Gwinner, K., Hauber, E., Hoffmann, H., Scholten, F., Jaumann, R., Neukum, G.,<br>Coltelli, M., and Puglisi, G., 1999, The HRSC-A experiment on high reso-<br>lution imaging and DEM generation at the Aeolian Islands, in Proceedings<br>of the 13th International Conference on Applied Geologic Remote Sens-<br>ing: Ann Arbor, Michigan, ERIM International, v. I, p. 560–569.</p> <p>Gwinner, K., Hauber, E., Jaumann, R., and Neukum, G., 2000, High-resolution,<br>digital photogrammetric mapping: A tool for earth science: Eos<br>(Transactions, American Geophysical Union), v. 81, no. 44, p. 513–520,<br>doi:10.1029/00EO00364.</p> <p>Gwinner, K., Coltelli, M., Flohrer, J., Jaumann, R., Matz, K.-D., Marsella, M.,<br>Roatsch, T., Scholten, F., and Trauthan, F., 2006, The HRSC-AX Mt.<br>Etna Project: High-Resolution Orthoimages and 1 m DEM at Regional<br>Scale: International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,<br>v. XXXVI, Part 1, http://isprs.free.fr/documents/Papers/T05-23.pdf.</p> <p>Gwinner, K., Scholten, F., Spiegel, M., Schmidt, R., Giese, B., Oberst,<br>J., Heipke, C., Jaumann, R., and Neukum, G., 2009, Derivation and<br>validation of high-resolution digital elevation models from Mars Express<br>HRSC data: Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 75,<br>no. 9, p. 1127–1142.</p> <p>Gwinner, K., Jaumann, R., Hauber, E., et al., 2016, The High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) of Mars Express and its<br>approach to science analysis and mapping for Mars and its satellites: Planetary and Space Science, v. 126, p. 93–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2016.02.014</p> <p>Hauber, E., Slupetzky, H., Jaumann, R., Wewel, F., Gwinner, K., and Neukum,<br>G., 2001, Digital and automated high resolution stereo mapping of the<br>Sonnblick glacier: EARSeL eProceedings, v. 1, no. 1, p. 246–254.</p> <p>Jaumann, R., Neukum, G., Behnke, T., Duxbury, T.C., Eichentopf, K., Flohrer,<br>J., van Gasselt, S., Giese, B., Gwinner, K., Hauber, E., Hoffmann, H., Hoff-<br>meister, A., Köhler, U., Matz, K.-D., McCord, T.B., Mertens, V., Oberst,<br>J., Pischel, R., Reiss, D., Ress, E., Roatsch, T., Saiger, P., Scholten, F.,<br>Schwarz, G., Stephan, K., Wählisch, M., and the HRSC Co-Investigator<br>Team, 2007, The high-resolution stereo camera (HRSC) experiment on<br>Mars Express: instrument aspects and experiment conduct from interplan-<br>etary cruise through the nominal mission: Planetary and Space Science, v.<br>55, p. 928–952, doi:10.1016/j.pss.2006.12.003.</p> <p>Otto, J.-C., Kleinod, K., König, O., Krautblatter, M., Nyenhuis, M., Roer,<br>I., Schneider, M., Schreiner, B., and Dikau, R., 2007, HRSC-A data:<br>A new high-resolution data set with multipurpose applications in physi-<br>cal geography: Progress in Physical Geography, v. 31, no. 2, p. 179–197,<br>doi:10.1177/0309133307076479.</p> <p>Roer, I., and Nyenhuis, M., 2007, Rockglacier activity studies on a regional<br>scale: Comparison of geomorphological mapping and photogrammetric<br>monitoring: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 32, p. 1747–1758,<br>doi:10.1002/esp.1496.</p>
Shorelines, elevation transects and environmental data for Drew Point, Ak study area, 2019-2022
<p>This record consists of the shorelines and their derived products, elevation transects and environmental data used for the Cryosphere preprint: <em>Multiple modes of shoreline change along the Alaskan Beaufort Sea observed using ICESat-2 altimetry and satellite imagery</em>. There are three primary datasets:</p> <p><em>ERA-5 </em>contains hourly output ERA5 reanalysis dataset (Hersbach et al., 2020, https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47) from a single pixel (-153.83, 70.87) from May 1st through November 30th for 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. It also contians a list of derived open water days for each year.</p> <p><em>ICESat-2 </em>contains the subsetted ATL03 photons (Neuman et. al, 2023, https://doi.org/10.5067/ATLAS/ATL03.006) for RGT 137 ground tracks 1r, 2r and 3r on 07 April 2019, 04 January 2020, 02 July 2021, and 31 December 2021, elevation profiles derived from SlideRule (Shean et al., 2023), and shoreline boundaries picked from the elevation profiles and Planet imagery. It also includes cross-shore transects used to project ICESat-2-derived changes into the local shoreline-perpindicular direction.</p> <p><em>Planet_shorelines</em> contains shorelines drived from 3m multispectral imagery from Planet Labs (Planet Team, 2024) as well as their derivatiev products. This included shorelines used for year-to-year change (<em>annual_coastlines</em>) and for uncertainty analysis (<em>uncertainty_coastlines</em>). It also includes the derived year-to year-change <em>(shoreline_change),</em> the baseline and cross-shore transects used to derived these change estiamtes, and a table with our derived annual shoreline change estimates compared with previously published estimates in this region.</p> <p>More detailed information on each datasets can be found in each folder's README file.</p>
WINTERC-G: a global upper mantle thermochemical model from coupled geophysical–petrological inversion of seismic waveforms, heat flow, surface elevation and gravity satellite data
<p>WINTERC-G: A global, temperature and compositional model of the lithosphere<br> and upper mantle.<br> Version: v5.4, December 2020, J. Fullea, S. Lebedev, Z. Martinec, N. Celli<br> <br> Contact: Javier Fullea (jfullea@ucm.es)<br> Facultad de Fisica,<br> Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM),<br> Spain<br> ////////<br> Geophysics Section,<br> Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies<br> Dublin, Ireland<br> </p> <p>TYPE:<br> This contains files with:<br> i) the model directly on the triangular grid solved for in the surface wave inversion.</p> <p> ii) an interpolated grid at 0.5 deg lateral resolution for the density and density discontinuities used in the gravity field data inversion<br> </p> <p>If you have any questions regarding the methodology or the construction<br> of the model, please contact the authors. If you use the model, we would<br> request that you cite the reference indicated below, and appreciate<br> your feedback regarding the model and its application.</p> <p>Citation:</p> <p>Fullea, J., Lebedev, S., Martinec, Z., & Celli, N. L. (2021). WINTERC-G: mapping the upper mantle thermochemical heterogeneity from coupled geophysical–petrological inversion of seismic waveforms, heat flow, surface elevation and gravity satellite data. Geophysical Journal International, 226(1), 146-191.</p> <p>*******************************<br> Summary: construction of the model.<br> WINTERC-G is a Waveform tomography and Gravity (geoid and gravity anomalies and gradiometric measurements<br> from ESA's GOCE mission) INversion model of the TEmpeRature and Composition of the lithosphere and upper mantle at<br> global scale. WINTERC-G is based on upon the integrated geophysical-petrological<br> approach LitMod (Afonso et al., 2008; Fullea et al. 2009) and, hence, all<br> relevant mantle rock physical properties modelled (seismic velocities and density) are<br> computed within a thermodynamically self-consistent framework allowing for a direct<br> parameterization in terms of the temperature and composition of the lithosphere-upper<br> mantle. The inversion is a two-step procedure. In a first step, we invert surface-wave, Rayleigh and Love<br> fundamental mode dispersion curves from a high resolution global dataset measured using waveform inversion,<br> along with surface heat flow and elevation (isostasy) for temperature and crustal structure<br> using a point-wise, non-linear, gradient-search inversion<br> over a triangular grid with an average 225 km lateral inter-knot spacing. In a second step we<br> use a fully parallelized spherical harmonic formalism to invert satellite gravity field data in<br> order to refine the initial crustal density and mantle composition distributions from the step 1<br> for a fixed temperature field.</p> <p>The parameter space in step 1 includes crust (densities and S-wave velocities for a three-layered crust)<br> and mantle variables (the depth of the thermal Lithosphere-Athenosphere-Boundary,<br> the thickness of the sublithospheric thermal buffer, the sublithospheric temperatures at 3 different<br> equispaced nodes down to 400 km, the lithospheric and sublithospheric mantle compositon, and<br> the the radial anisotropy at the 3 crustal layers and at 56, 80, 110, 150, 200, 260, 330,<br> and 400 km depths.</p> <p>The parameter space in step 2 is defined by the average crustal density, and the<br> mantle composition in the lithosphere and sublithosphere.<br> We use the output crustal density from step 1 as the<br> initial value in step 2 inversion. Mantle densities are derived based on the output temperature<br> field from step 1 (kept fixed) and the bulk mantle composition inversion variables.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>*******************************</p> <p>This archive contains the following files:<br> README (this file)<br> WINTERC-G_Vp-Vs.lis (triangular grid)<br> WINTERC-G_rad_anis_Vs.lis (triangular grid)<br> WINTERC-G_Temperature.lis (triangular grid)<br> WINTERC-G_Density.lis (triangular grid)<br> WINTERC-G_LAB.lis (triangular grid)<br> WINTERC_T_rho_1D.z (1D average model of temperature and density)<br> rho_*_out.xyz (0.5 deg egular grid for gravity field)<br> ETOPO2_km_continental.xyz (0.5 deg egular grid for gravity field)<br> ETOPO2_km_depth_Ice.xyz (0.5 deg egular grid for gravity field)<br> ETOPO2_km_depth_Bed.xyz (0.5 deg egular grid for gravity field)<br> Global_Moho_WINTERC-G.xyz (0.5 deg egular grid for gravity field)</p> <p><br> Files in the triangular grid with an average 225 km lateral inter-knot spacing (12232 grid points):</p> <p>* WINTERC-G_Vp-Vs.lis: Vp and Vs (in km/s) in all model columns with a vertical grid step of 2 km<br> Format for each column:<br> #Column number longitude latitude depth(km, <0 downwards) Vp (km/s) Vs(km/s)<br> 5640 93.72 4.135 -5.0 3.91 2.11</p> <p><br> * WINTERC-G_rad_anis_Vs.lis: radial anisotropy, (Vsh-Vsv)/Vs_iso (in %) in all model columns with a vertical grid step of 2 km<br> Format for each column:<br> #Column number longitude latitude depth(km, <0 downwards) anisotropy (%)</p> <p>* WINTERC-G_Temperature.lis: temperature (in ºC) in all model columns with a vertical grid step of 2 km<br> Format for each column:<br> #Column number longitude latitude depth (km, <0 downwards) T (ºC) dT (%) dT(K) <br> 6437 297.20 -2.524 -259.000 1431.9 -1.91 -27.9<br> The anomalies dT are in % and K with respect to the 1D model in WINTERC_T_rho_1D.z (column 2).</p> <p>* WINTERC-G_Density.lis: density (in kg/m3) in all model columns with a vertical grid step of 2 km<br> Format for each column:<br> #Column number longitude latitude depth(km, <0 downwards) rho (kg/m3) drho(%) drho(kg/m3)<br> The anomalies drho are in % and kg/m3 with respect to the 1D model in WINTERC_T_rho_1D.z (column 3).</p> <p>* WINTERC_T_rho_1D.z: 1D average model of temperature (column 2 in ºC) and density (column 3 in kg/m3) with a vertical grid step of 2 km <br> 5.00000000 0.0000000000000000 6.0259973839110526<br> 3.00000000 0.0000000000000000 38.960571309690394<br> 1.00000000 0.33634006819423840 174.42296045978722<br> -1.00000000 3.8888495253719624 1692.8437489147236<br> -3.00000000 23.974111923225379 1863.8834351235944<br> -5.00000000 47.727920701943034 2568.2414495590924<br> -7.00000000 89.633398074381162 2819.8386016341910<br> -9.00000000 137.01489361657013 2839.5325893195904<br> -11.0000000 182.35233447017222 2897.6600872935287<br> -13.0000000 224.46247069572485 2945.2036923862997<br> -15.0000000 260.63395547331390 3069.6809340323475<br> -17.0000000 292.28175449521456 3132.4574175461721<br> -19.0000000 322.29571965406632 3145.5747337463940<br> -21.0000000 351.58698283375054 3157.2401512748038<br> -23.0000000 380.30002225705056 3177.0000420059773<br> -25.0000000 408.50259805632055 3183.6651032398490<br> -27.0000000 436.22632217636487 3190.9586785996116<br> -29.0000000 463.48733903170023 3198.9369509456310<br> -31.0000000 490.29841705549831 3209.7229872383764<br> -33.0000000 516.71149258457456 3221.6329506091679<br> ...</p> <p>Files in the interpolated regular grid at 0.5 deg lateral resolution used for gravity field data inversion:</p> <p> * rho_c_out.xyz: average crustal density<br> * rho_submoho_out.xyz: mantle density below the Moho discontinuity<br> * rho_*_out.xyz: mantle density defined at different model depths: 20, 35, 56, 80, 110, 150, 200, 260, 330 and 400 km.</p> <p> Format for the density files:<br> # longitude latitude density (kg/m3)<br> <br> Files containing layer discontinuities:</p> <p> * ETOPO2_km_continental.xyz: surface elevation including ice sheet and 0 in marine areas (km, <0 upwards)</p> <p> * ETOPO2_km_depth_Ice.xyz: surface elevation including ice sheet (km, >0 downwards, <0 above sea level)</p> <p> * ETOPO2_km_depth_Bed.xyz: bedrock surface elevation without ice sheet (km, >0 downwards, <0 above sea level)</p> <p> * Global_Moho_WINTERC-G.xyz: crust-mantle discontinuity depth (km, >0 downwards)</p> <p> Format for the discontinuity files:<br> # longitude latitude depth (km)<br> <br> <br> The gravity field in WINTERC-G is computed using an spherical harmonic formalism and a model discretization<br> in 13 layers with laterally varying density. The first 7 layers are characterized by top and bottom boundaries with laterally varying radius whereas the last 6 layers are defined by top and bottom boundaries with constant radius:</p> <p>1/ Water: from ETOPO2_km_continental.xyz to ETOPO2_km_depth_Ice.xyz with rho=1030 kg/m3 (constant vertically)</p> <p>2/ Ice: from ETOPO2_km_depth_Ice.xyz to ETOPO2_km_depth_Bed.xyz with rho=910 kg/m3 (constant vertically)</p> <p>3/ Crust: from ETOPO2_km_depth_Bed to Global_Moho_WINTERC-G.xyz with rho=rho_c_out.xyz (constant vertically)</p> <p>4/ submoho-20km: from Global_Moho_WINTERC-G.xyz to z_20km (file with 20 km everywhere except where z_moho>20km) with rho=rho_submoho_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_20km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>5/ 20km-36km: from z_20km (file with 20 km everywhere except where z_moho>20km) to z_36km (file with 36 km everywhere except where z_moho>36km) with rho=rho_20km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_36km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>6/ 36km-56km: from z_36km (file with 36 km everywhere except where z_moho>36km) to z_56km (file with 56 km everywhere except where z_moho>56km) with rho=rho_36km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_56km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>7/ 56km-80km: from z_56km (file with 56 km everywhere except where z_moho>56km) to 80 km depth with rho=rho_56km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_80km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>The next 6 layers are computed using the constant radius option:</p> <p>8/ 80km-110km: from z=80km to z=110 km with rho=rho_80km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_110km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>9/ 110km-150km: from z=110km to z=150 km with rho=rho_110km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_150km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>10/ 150km-200km: from z=150km to z=200 km with rho=rho_150km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_200km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>11/ 200km-260km: from z=200km to z=260 km with rho=rho_200km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_260km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>12/ 260km-330km: from z=260km to z=330 km with rho=rho_260km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_330km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p>13/ 330km-400km: from z=330km to z=400 km with rho=rho_330km_out.xyz (top) and rho=rho_400km_out.xyz (bottom)</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Cyprus Elevations 5m (2014)
<p>This dataset contains a TIF file for Cyprus elevations. The file comes to merge all small areas TIF files from the Department of Lands and Surveys and relates to altitude data. The digital terrain model is a homogeneous and regular point grid, which shows altitude on the ground, to create a model of the earth's surface.<br><br>Source: <a href="https://bit.ly/3ovUhny">https://bit.ly/3ovUhny</a></p>
Copernicus Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for Europe at 3 arc seconds (ca. 90 meter) resolution derived from Copernicus Global 30 meter DEM dataset
<p>Overview:<br> The Copernicus DEM is a Digital Surface Model (DSM) which represents the surface of the Earth including buildings, infrastructure and vegetation. The original GLO-30 provides worldwide coverage at 30 meters (refers to 10 arc seconds). Note that ocean areas do not have tiles, there one can assume height values equal to zero. Data is provided as Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs. Note that the vertical unit for measurement of elevation height is meters.</p> <p>The Copernicus DEM for Europe at 3 arcsec (0:00:03 = 0.00083333333 ~ 90 meter) in COG format has been derived from the Copernicus DEM GLO-30, mirrored on Open Data on AWS, dataset managed by Sinergise (https://registry.opendata.aws/copernicus-dem/).</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original Copernicus GLO-30 DEM contains a relevant percentage of tiles with non-square pixels. We created a mosaic map in <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/vrt.html">VRT</a> format and defined within the VRT file the rule to apply cubic resampling while reading the data, i.e. importing them into GRASS GIS for further processing. We chose cubic instead of bilinear resampling since the height-width ratio of non-square pixels is up to 1:5. Hence, artefacts between adjacent tiles in rugged terrain could be minimized:</p> <p><code>gdalbuildvrt -input_file_list list_geotiffs_MOOD.csv -r cubic -tr 0.000277777777777778 0.000277777777777778 Copernicus_DSM_30m_MOOD.vrt </code></p> <p>In order to reduce the spatial resolution to 3 arc seconds, weighted resampling was performed in GRASS GIS (using <code>r.resamp.stats -w</code> and the pixel values were scaled with 1000 (storing the pixels as integer values) for data volume reduction. In addition, a hillshade raster map was derived from the resampled elevation map (using <code>r.relief</code>, GRASS GIS). Eventually, we exported the elevation and hillshade raster maps in Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF (COG) format, along with SLD and QML style files.</p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 3 arc seconds (approx. 90 m)</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> meters * 1000 (scaled to Integer; example: value 23220 = 23.220 m a.s.l.)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0 (r.resamp.stats -w; r.relief)</p> <p>Original dataset license:<br> <a href="https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/CSCDA_ESA_Mission-specific+Annex.pdf">https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/CSCDA_ESA_Mission-specific+Annex.pdf</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p>
Copernicus Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for Europe at 30 arc seconds (ca. 1000 meter) resolution derived from Copernicus Global 30 meter DEM dataset
<p>Overview:<br> The Copernicus DEM is a Digital Surface Model (DSM) which represents the surface of the Earth including buildings, infrastructure and vegetation. The original GLO-30 provides worldwide coverage at 30 meters (refers to 10 arc seconds). Note that ocean areas do not have tiles, there one can assume height values equal to zero. Data is provided as Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs. Note that the vertical unit for measurement of elevation height is meters.</p> <p>The Copernicus DEM for Europe at 30 arcsec (0:00:30 = 0.0083333333 ~ 1000 meter) in COG format has been derived from the Copernicus DEM GLO-30, mirrored on Open Data on AWS, dataset managed by Sinergise (https://registry.opendata.aws/copernicus-dem/).</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original Copernicus GLO-30 DEM contains a relevant percentage of tiles with non-square pixels. We created a mosaic map in <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/vrt.html">VRT</a> format and defined within the VRT file the rule to apply cubic resampling while reading the data, i.e. importing them into GRASS GIS for further processing. We chose cubic instead of bilinear resampling since the height-width ratio of non-square pixels is up to 1:5. Hence, artefacts between adjacent tiles in rugged terrain could be minimized:</p> <p><code>gdalbuildvrt -input_file_list list_geotiffs_MOOD.csv -r cubic -tr 0.000277777777777778 0.000277777777777778 Copernicus_DSM_30m_MOOD.vrt </code></p> <p>In order to reduce the spatial resolution to 30 arc seconds, weighted resampling was performed in GRASS GIS (using <code>r.resamp.stats -w</code> and the pixel values were scaled with 1000 (storing the pixels as integer values) for data volume reduction. In addition, a hillshade raster map was derived from the resampled elevation map (using <code>r.relief</code>, GRASS GIS). Eventually, we exported the elevation and hillshade raster maps in Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF (COG) format, along with SLD and QML style files.</p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 82:00:30N<br> south: 18N<br> west: 32:00:30W<br> east: 70E</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 30 arc seconds (approx. 1000 m)</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> meters * 1000 (scaled to Integer; example: value 23220 = 23.220 m a.s.l.)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0 (r.resamp.stats -w; r.relief)</p> <p>Original dataset license:<br> <a href="https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/CSCDA_ESA_Mission-specific+Annex.pdf">https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/CSCDA_ESA_Mission-specific+Annex.pdf</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p> <p> </p>
Copernicus Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for Europe at 1000 meter resolution (EU-LAEA) derived from Copernicus Global 30 meter DEM dataset
<p>Overview:<br> The Copernicus DEM is a Digital Surface Model (DSM) which represents the surface of the Earth including buildings, infrastructure and vegetation. The original GLO-30 provides worldwide coverage at 30 meters (refers to 10 arc seconds). Note that ocean areas do not have tiles, there one can assume height values equal to zero. Data is provided as Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs. Note that the vertical unit for measurement of elevation height is meters.</p> <p>The Copernicus DEM for Europe at 1000 meter resolution (EU-LAEA projection) in COG format has been derived from the Copernicus DEM GLO-30, mirrored on Open Data on AWS, dataset managed by Sinergise (https://registry.opendata.aws/copernicus-dem/).</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original Copernicus GLO-30 DEM contains a relevant percentage of tiles with non-square pixels. We created a mosaic map in <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/vrt.html">VRT</a> format and defined within the VRT file the rule to apply cubic resampling while reading the data, i.e. importing them into GRASS GIS for further processing. We chose cubic instead of bilinear resampling since the height-width ratio of non-square pixels is up to 1:5. Hence, artefacts between adjacent tiles in rugged terrain could be minimized:</p> <p><code>gdalbuildvrt -input_file_list list_geotiffs_MOOD.csv -r cubic -tr 0.000277777777777778 0.000277777777777778 Copernicus_DSM_30m_MOOD.vrt </code></p> <p>In order to reproject the data to EU-LAEA projection while reducing the spatial resolution to 1000 m, bilinear resampling was performed in GRASS GIS (using <code>r.proj</code> and the pixel values were scaled with 1000 (storing the pixels as Integer values) for data volume reduction. In addition, a hillshade raster map was derived from the resampled elevation map (using <code>r.relief</code>, GRASS GIS). Eventually, we exported the elevation and hillshade raster maps in Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF (COG) format, along with SLD and QML style files.</p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> ETRS89-extended / LAEA Europe (EPSG: 3035)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 6874000<br> south: -485000<br> west: 869000<br> east: 8712000</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 1000 m</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> meters * 1000 (scaled to Integer; example: value 23220 = 23.220 m a.s.l.)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0 (r.proj; r.relief)</p> <p>Original dataset license:<br> <a href="https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/CSCDA_ESA_Mission-specific+Annex.pdf">https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/CSCDA_ESA_Mission-specific+Annex.pdf</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p>
Copernicus Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for Europe at 100 meter resolution (EU-LAEA) derived from Copernicus Global 30 meter DEM dataset
<p>Overview:<br> The Copernicus DEM is a Digital Surface Model (DSM) which represents the surface of the Earth including buildings, infrastructure and vegetation. The original GLO-30 provides worldwide coverage at 30 meters (refers to 10 arc seconds). Note that ocean areas do not have tiles, there one can assume height values equal to zero. Data is provided as Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs. Note that the vertical unit for measurement of elevation height is meters.</p> <p>The Copernicus DEM for Europe at 100 meter resolution (EU-LAEA projection) in COG format has been derived from the Copernicus DEM GLO-30, mirrored on Open Data on AWS, dataset managed by Sinergise (https://registry.opendata.aws/copernicus-dem/).</p> <p>Processing steps:<br> The original Copernicus GLO-30 DEM contains a relevant percentage of tiles with non-square pixels. We created a mosaic map in <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/vrt.html">VRT</a> format and defined within the VRT file the rule to apply cubic resampling while reading the data, i.e. importing them into GRASS GIS for further processing. We chose cubic instead of bilinear resampling since the height-width ratio of non-square pixels is up to 1:5. Hence, artefacts between adjacent tiles in rugged terrain could be minimized:</p> <p><code>gdalbuildvrt -input_file_list list_geotiffs_MOOD.csv -r cubic -tr 0.000277777777777778 0.000277777777777778 Copernicus_DSM_30m_MOOD.vrt </code></p> <p>In order to reproject the data to EU-LAEA projection while reducing the spatial resolution to 100 m, bilinear resampling was performed in GRASS GIS (using <code>r.proj</code> and the pixel values were scaled with 1000 (storing the pixels as Integer values) for data volume reduction. In addition, a hillshade raster map was derived from the resampled elevation map (using <code>r.relief</code>, GRASS GIS). Eventually, we exported the elevation and hillshade raster maps in Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF (COG) format, along with SLD and QML style files.</p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br> ETRS89-extended / LAEA Europe (EPSG: 3035)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br> north: 6874000<br> south: -485000<br> west: 869000<br> east: 8712000</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br> 100 m</p> <p>Pixel values:<br> meters * 1000 (scaled to Integer; example: value 23220 = 23.220 m a.s.l.)</p> <p>Software used:<br> GDAL 3.2.2 and GRASS GIS 8.0.0 (r.proj; r.relief)</p> <p>Original dataset license:<br> <a href="https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/CSCDA_ESA_Mission-specific+Annex.pdf">https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/CSCDA_ESA_Mission-specific+Annex.pdf</a></p> <p>Processed by:<br> mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Germany (<a href="https://www.mundialis.de/">https://www.mundialis.de/</a>)</p>
Digital elevation model mosaic of the Hypanis region, Mars
<p><strong>This dataset accompanies the following papers:</strong></p> <p>Adler et al. (2019) Hypotheses for the origin of the Hypanis fan-shaped deposit at the edge of the Chryse escarpment, Mars: Is it a delta? Icarus, 319, 885-908. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.05.021</p> <p>Adler et al. (2022) Regional Geology of the Hypanis Valles System, Mars. JGR: Planets, doi: 10.1029/2021JE006994</p> <p><strong>Contents:</strong></p> <p>- DEM mosaic of the Hypanis Valles and deposit region constructed from CTX, HRSC, and MOLA elevation data (geotiff).</p> <p>- Coverage map of CTX, HRSC, and MOLA footprints used (shapefile).</p> <p>- Previews of DEM (greyscale and color) and of coverage map (png)</p> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p>We constructed a regional elevation mosaic (~17 m/pixel) in Adler et al. (2019) archived here. This mosaic incorporates 10 CTX digital elevation models (DEMs) of high resolution, 3 HRSC digital elevation models of medium resolution, and 1 MOLA global DEM of low resolution. Individual CTX DEMs were generated from the stereopairs listed below. Some individual products were calibrated and formatted with the USGS Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS) and then Ames Stereo Pipeline. Other products were generated with SOCET SET. All products were controlled to MOLA shot elevation data.</p> <p><strong>Data incorporated:</strong></p> <p><strong>CTX stereopairs:</strong></p> <p><em>ID (nadir-most), ID (resolution [m/pix])</em></p> <p>P07_003631_1920, B09_013296_1920 (17.7 m/pixel)</p> <p>B17_016408_1913, G06_020443_1916 (18.5 m/pixel)</p> <p>J03_046104_1918, F05_037783_1918 (24.0 m/pixel)</p> <p>P08_004264_1912, B06_011951_1916 (17.7 m/pixel)</p> <p>G09_021788_1918, G11_022434_1918 (18.4 m/pixel)</p> <p>B17_016474_1915, B19_017186_1915 (20.2 m/pixel)</p> <p>D19_034816_1921, F01_036293_1920 (24.0 m/pixel)</p> <p>P13_006176_1918, F01_036293_1920 (18.2 m/pixel)</p> <p>D07_029845_1921, D07_029990_1921 (20.2 m/pixel)</p> <p>G21_026601_1918, P04_002774_1922 (20.2 m/pixel)</p> <p><strong>HRSC DA4:</strong></p> <p>H2134 (75 m/pixel)</p> <p>H2145 (50 m/pixel)</p> <p>H0894 (75 m/pixel)</p> <p><strong>MOLA Elevation:</strong></p> <p>128 ppd Elevation (463 m/pixel)</p> <p><strong>Funding:</strong></p> <p>The work to create individual CTX stereopair DEMs was funded by UK Space Agency (UK SA) grants ST/ K502388/1, ST/R002355/1, ST/L00643X/1, and ST/R001413/1. We thank the Science and Technology Facilities Council for supporting science relating to ExoMars Rover landing site selection activities. The work to create a mosaic using these products and others was supported by grants from the NASA Mars Odyssey Project under a subcontract to ASU administered by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology.</p>
Data from: Elevated fires during COVID-19 lockdown and the vulnerability of protected areas
<p><strong>Related article:</strong> Johanna Eklund, Julia P G Jones, Matti Räsänen, Jonas Geldmann, Ari-Pekka Jokinen, Adam Pellegrini, Domoina Rakotobe, O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo, Tuuli Toivonen, and Andrew Balmford. Elevated fires during COVID-19 lockdown and the vulnerability of protected areas. Nature Sustainability (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00884-x.</p> <p><strong>In this dataset:</strong></p> <p>This dataset contains information about monthly fire incidence and precipitation for the protected areas of Madagascar from January 2012 to December 2020. The fire data is sourced from NASA’s Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) 375 m active fire product and the precipitation data from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission (for years 2016-2020) and its predecessor The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) (for years 2011-2015) at spatial resolution 10 km. The fire and precipitation data was overlayed with the protected area polygons of the June 2020 release of the World Database of Protected Areas. For sources and more details on how the data was compiled see the related article. The data can be used to inspect temporal dynamics of wildfires inside protected areas and for informing adaptive protected area management and planning.</p> <p><strong>Please cite this dataset as:</strong></p> <p>Johanna Eklund, Julia P G Jones, Matti Räsänen, Jonas Geldmann, Ari-Pekka Jokinen, Adam Pellegrini, Domoina Rakotobe, O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo, Tuuli Toivonen, and Andrew Balmford. Elevated fires during COVID-19 lockdown and the vulnerability of protected areas. Nature Sustainability (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00884-x.</p> <p><strong>Column names</strong></p> <p>NAME: Name of protected area</p> <p>Fires_sum: Number of observed fires (VIIRS)</p> <p>Month: Month</p> <p>Year: Year</p> <p>Precipitation: Precipitation (mm)</p> <p>Plag_1:Plag_12: Precipitation during previous month; 2 months ago; 3 months ago…12 months ago</p> <p>YEAR_CREAT: Year of establishment of protected area</p> <p>Biome: Biome</p> <p>REP_AREA: Area of protected area (km<sup>2</sup>)</p> <p>Fires_per_km2: Fires per km<sup>2</sup></p> <p>Prec_acc_12m: Accumulated precipitation during the last 12 months</p> <p>fBiome: Biome as factor</p> <p>fNAME: Name as factor</p> <p>sPrecipitation: Precipitation (scaled; see Methods section of article)</p> <p>sPlag_1: Precipitation in previous month (scaled; see Methods section of article)</p> <p>sPrec_acc_12m: Accumulated precipitation during the last 12 months (scaled; see Methods section of article)</p> <p>Pred_Zinb_1a: Predicted fires (see Methods section of article)</p> <p>Diff_Zinb_1a: Difference: Observed fires - predicted fires</p> <p>Year_pred: Year for prediction</p> <p><strong>License</strong><br> Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.</p>
Factors determining distributions of rainforest Drosophila shift from interspecific competition to high temperature with decreasing elevation (original datasets)
<p>This repository provides the data for the manuscript "Factors determining distributions of rainforest Drosophila shift from interspecific competition to high temperature with decreasing elevation"</p> <p>We investigated thermal tolerances and interspecific competition as causes of species turnover in the nine most abundant species of <em>Drosophila</em> along elevational gradients in the Australian Wet Tropics. Specifically, we 1) analyzed the distribution patterns of the studies <em>Drosophila</em> species; 2) fitted thermal performance curves; 3) tested the correlation between multiple thermal traits and distribution patterns; 4) fitted the Beverton-Holt model to describe the single-generation intra- and inter-specific competition effect; 5) examined the long-term effect of competition and temperature on the population size of a pair of Drosophila species.</p> <p>More details are provided in the README file.</p>
Optimal elevated agrivoltaic system design and key performance indicators across Europe based on three crop light levels
<p>Optimal elevated (stilted) agrivoltaic system design (PV coverage ratio) is given on a European gridded level (25km grid and NUTS3 regions) based on three light levels: shade-loving crops (daily light integral (DLI) of 12 mol/m²day), shade-tolerant crops (DLI of 12 mol/m²day) and shade-intolerant crops (DLI of 25 mol/m²day)</p> <p>Estimations of other performance indicators are given: power capacity (kWp/ha), energy production (MWh/ha), levelized cost of electricity (€/MWh) and land equivalent ratio (LER -).</p> <p>The assumptions and methodology of this dataset can be found in the article "Geospatial assessment of elevated agrivoltaics on arable land in Europe to highlight the implications on design, land use and economic level."</p> <p>Interactive maps can be found on https://iiw.kuleuven.be/apps/agrivoltaics/maps.html</p>
Digital Elevation Models of Tweedsmuir Glacier 1950-2018
<p>This dataset contains digital elevation models (DEMs) of Tweedsmuir Glacier, British Columbia, Canada between 1950 and 2018. DEMs from 1950, 1969, 1974, and 1987 were created using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry in Agisoft Metashape by Meghan A. Sharp. DEMs from 2000, 2007, 2010, and 2018 were acquired from open-source satellite sources (see "Amplification of Surface Topography during Surges of Tweedsmuir Glacier" for sources). All DEMs have been co-registered to ArcticDEM (Porter et al., 2018) using Shean et al (2016)'s open-source tool <em>demcoreg</em>.</p> <p> </p>
Shape from Shading Digital Elevation Model for Oxia Planum Candidate Landing Site
<p>This data set contains the calibrated and map-projected HiRISE image ESP_037558_1985 and the matching Shape from Shading DEM using the method described in Hess et al., (2019a), and in more detail in Hess et al. (2022). The SfS DTM was part of the EPSC abstract Hess et al., (2019b). When using the data please reference Hess et al. (2022) for the method.</p> <p>ESP_037558_1985_30cm_o.cub: Image data in radiances, ISIS cube file, Equirectangular map projection at 0.25 m/pixel resolution.</p> <p>ESP_037558_1985_30cm_DEM.cub: Digital Elevation Model (DEM) with heights in meter, ISIS cube file, Equirectangular map projection at 0.25 m/pixel resolution.</p> <p>Cube files can be converted to other data formats using gdal (https://gdal.org/) or directly loaded in, e.g., ArcGIS or QGIS.</p> <p> </p> <p>Hess, M., Wohlfarth, K., Grumpe, A., Wöhler, C., Ruesch, O., and Wu, B.: ATMOSPHERICALLY COMPENSATED SHAPE FROM SHADING ON THE MARTIAN SURFACE: TOWARDS THE PERFECT DIGITAL TERRAIN MODEL OF MARS, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W13, 1405–1411, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1405-2019, 2019a.</p> <p>Hess, Marcel. "High Resolution Digital Terrain Model for the Landing Site of the Rosalind Franklin (ExoMars) Rover." Proc. European Planetary Science Congress, EPSC-DPS2019-1533-4, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019b.</p> <p>Hess, M.; Tenthoff, M.; Wohlfarth, K.; Wöhler, C. Atmospheric Correction for High-Resolution Shape from Shading on Mars. <em>J. Imaging</em> <strong>2022</strong>, <em>8</em>, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8060158</p>
Lateral moraine elevation differences along a debris covered moraine
<p>Debris-covered glaciers in the Himalaya play an important role in the high-altitude water cycle.<br> The thickness of the debris layer is a key control of the melt rate of those glaciers, yet little is known about<br> the relative importance of the three potential sources of debris supply: the rockwalls, the glacier bed and the<br> lateral moraines. In this study, we hypothesize that mass movement from the lateral moraines is a significant<br> debris supply to debris-covered glaciers, in particular when the glacier is disconnected from the rockwall due to<br> downwasting. To test this hypothesis, eight high-resolution and highly accurate digital elevation models from the<br> lateral moraines of the debris-covered Lirung Glacier in Nepal are used. These are created using structure from<br> motion (SfM), based on images captured using an unmanned aerial vehicle between May 2013 and April 2018.<br> The analysis shows that mass transport results in an elevation change on the lateral moraines with an average rate<br> of -0.31 +/- 0.26 m/year during this period, partly related to sub-moraine ice melt. There is a higher elevation<br> change rate observed in the monsoon (-0.39 +/- 0.74 m/year) than in the dry season (-0.23 +/- 0.68 m/year).<br> The lower debris aprons of the lateral moraines decrease in elevation at a faster rate during both seasons, probably<br> due to the melt of ice below. The surface lowering rates of the upper gullied moraine, with no ice core below,<br> translate into an annual increase in debris thickness of 0.08 m/year along a narrow margin of the glacier surface,<br> with an observed absolute thickness of approximately 1 m, reducing melt rates of underlying glacier ice. Further<br> research should focus on how large this negative feedback is in controlling melt and how debris is redistributed<br> on the glacier surface. This dataset contains the elevation differences on the moraine as presented in the van Woerkom et al. (2019).</p>
The Human Developing Cerebral Cortex Is Characterized by an Elevated De Novo Expression of Long Noncoding RNAs in Excitatory Neurons
<p>This project contains the annotated transcriptomes in GTF format used in the manuscript "The Human Developing Cerebral Cortex Is Characterized by an Elevated De Novo Expression of Long Noncoding RNAs in Excitatory Neurons" DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae123">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae123</a></p>
Data supporting: Combined stress of an insecticide and heatwaves or elevated temperature induce community and food web effects in a Mediterranean freshwater ecosystem
<p>Data used to obtain the results of the research paper entitled: "Combined stress of an insecticide and heatwaves or elevated temperature induce community and food web effects in a Mediterranean freshwater ecosystem", published in the journal "Water Research". The data derives from an outdoor (meso-) cosm experiment in Spain (Imdea Water, Alcala de Henares) in which the transportable temperature and heatwave control device (TENTACLE) was used to investigate the multiple stressors effects of two different climate change scenarios related to temperature (i.e., elevated temperature and reoccurring heatwaves) in combination with the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid.</p>
MOOD_GMTED_Elevation_Plus_1000
<p> </p> <p>Overview:</p> <p>This layer has been modified from the GMTED 90m resolution datasets to produce a 1km layer to match other MOOD covariates. The data are minimum elevation in metres plus 1000 to remove negative values.</p> <p> </p> <p>File naming scheme:</p> <p>vcmi30grdp1k.TIF and vcmi30grdp1k.TFW </p> <p>Projection + EPSG code:<br>Latitude-Longitude/WGS84 (EPSG: 4326)</p> <p>Spatial extent:<br>Extent -24.0000000000000000,-38.5000000000000000 : 110.9999999999999432,86.9999999999999432</p> <p>Spatial resolution:<br>0.0083333 deg (approx. 1000 m)</p> <p>Accuracy:</p> <p>Based on World Geodetic System 1984 ensemble (EPSG:6326), which has a limited accuracy of at best 2 meters.</p> <p>Pixel values:<br>unit: meter</p> <p>Source: </p> <p>Copernicus Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for Europe derived from Copernicus Global 30 meter DEM dataset</p> <p>Software used:<br>ArcMap 10.8</p> <p>License: CC-BY-SA 4.0</p> <p>Processed by:<br>ERGO (Environmental Research Group Oxford) <a href="https://ergoonline.co.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://ergoonline.co.uk/</a> for the H2020 MOOD project</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Individual-based body sizes of wild bees along elevational gradients on Mt. Kilimanjaro
<p><span>This dataset contains body size measurements of wild bees that were captured along elevational gradients on the southern slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro (Tanzania) using standardized sampling methods (pan traps, transect walks). The dataset includes bee species identified at the species level as well as morphospecies. The bees were measured individually, meaning that intraspecific differences in body size are also represented. The intertegular distance (ITD) in millimeters was measured as a surrogate for body size.</span></p> <p><span>The KiLi project (2010-2018) is a German Science Foundation (DFG) funded research unit (DFG research unit FOR1246) that focuses on biodiversity and ecosystem processes along altitudinal and disturbance gradients on Mt. Kilimanjaro (Tanzania, Africa), capitalizing on its world-wide unique range of climatic and vegetation zones. The research unit comprises 2 central projects and 7 subprojects from various disciplines. On a total of 60 study sites in both natural and human-disturbed ecosystems biodiversity (e.g. plants, soil arthropods, ants, bees, frogs, lizards, bats, birds), related ecosystem processes (decomposition, seed dispersal, pollination, herbivory, predation), and biogeochemical processes and properties of ecosystems (climate, soil properties and nutrient status, regulation of water and carbon fluxes, trace gas emissions, primary productivity, functional diversity) are analyzed.</span></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.