Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 9 in A rare window into a back-reef fish community from the middle Miocene (late Badenian) Medobory Hills barrier reef in western Ukraine, reconstructed mostly by means of otoliths

Fig. 9 Otoliths of Haemulidae, Serranidae, Sparidae, Leiognathidae and Caproidae: a (reversed)—Brachydeuterus speronatus (Bassoli, 1906), Kozatskyi Yar, NMNHU-P PI 2549. b, c Serranidae indet., b (broken and repaired), c (reversed), Kozatskyi Yar, NMNHU-P PI 2579. d, e Pshekharus yesinorum Bannikov & Kotlyar, 2015, Mlyntsi, NMNHU-P PI 2578. f (reversed)—Leiognathidae indet., Shydlivshchyna, NMB P1214. g Perciformes indet., Shydlivshchyna, NMB P1221. h (reversed) – Capros aper (Linnaeus, 1758), Mlyntsi, NMB P1206

Fig. 12 in A rare window into a back-reef fish community from the middle Miocene (late Badenian) Medobory Hills barrier reef in western Ukraine, reconstructed mostly by means of otoliths

Fig. 12 Late Badenian paleogeography of the Paratethys and distribution of gobioid otolith-based taxa through the basin. Most common species are shown in bold printing (Gobius reichenbacherae tentatively includes records of Gobius aff. niger by Brzobohatý et al., 2022). Asterisk denotes multiple locations, of which Borský Mikuláš represents the richest and most recently described otolith assemblage (Brzobohatý et al., 2022). Double asterisk denotes species only known in the Vienna Basin from the early Badenian and shown for correlation purposes. Paleogeography based on Rögl (1999), Popov et. al. (2004), and KováČ et. al. (2017)

Fig. 6 in A rare window into a back-reef fish community from the middle Miocene (late Badenian) Medobory Hills barrier reef in western Ukraine, reconstructed mostly by means of otoliths

Fig. 6 Otoliths of Medoborichthys and Vanderhorstia: a–d Medoborichthys podolicus n. gen. et n. sp., b holotype, NMNHU-P PI 2563, Mlyntsi, a, c, d paratypes, a Mlyntsi, NMNHU-P PI 2564, c Shydlivshchyna, NMNHU-P PI 2565, d (reversed) Kozatskyi Yar, NMB P1215. e–g Medoborichthys renesulcis n. gen. et n. sp., e holotype, NMNHU-P PI 2566, Mlyntsi, f, g paratypes, f Kozatskyi Yar, NMB P1216, g (reversed) Mlyntsi, NMNHU-P PI 2567. h–j Vanderhorstia prochazkai Schwarzhans et al., 2020a, 2020b, h (reversed), j (reversed) Mlyntsi, NMB P1223, h (reversed) Shydlivshchyna, NMNHU-P PI 2582. k Vanderhorstia sp., Shydlivshchyna, NMB P1224

Fig. 3 in A rare window into a back-reef fish community from the middle Miocene (late Badenian) Medobory Hills barrier reef in western Ukraine, reconstructed mostly by means of otoliths

Fig. 3 Otoliths of Gadiformes: a, b Micromesistius planatus (Bassoli & Schubert, 1906), Mlyntsi, a NMNHU-P PI 2568 and b NMB P1218. c–f Onogadus simplicissimus (Schubert, 1906), c (reversed), d, f Shydlivshchyna, NMB P1220, e Mlyntsi, NMNHU-P PI 2572

Fig. 2 in A rare window into a back-reef fish community from the middle Miocene (late Badenian) Medobory Hills barrier reef in western Ukraine, reconstructed mostly by means of otoliths

Fig. 2 Photographs of the investigated outcrops: Mlyntsi (a, b), Kozatskyi Yar (c, d), and Shydlivshchyna (e, f) in general view and close-up. The total length of the shovel handle is 72 cm

Fig. 8 in A rare window into a back-reef fish community from the middle Miocene (late Badenian) Medobory Hills barrier reef in western Ukraine, reconstructed mostly by means of otoliths

Fig. 8 Otoliths of Blenniidae and Labridae: a, b Blennius vernyhorovae n. sp., a holotype, NMNHU-P PI 2547, Mlyntsi, b (reversed) paratype, Kozatskyi Yar, NMB P1205. c, d Coris medoboryensis n. sp., c holotype, NMNHU-P PI 2551, Kozatskyi Yar, d (reversed) paratype, Mlyntsi, NMB P1208

Fig. 11 in A rare window into a back-reef fish community from the middle Miocene (late Badenian) Medobory Hills barrier reef in western Ukraine, reconstructed mostly by means of otoliths

Fig. 11 Schematic block diagram of the northern part of the Central Paratethys during the late Badenian depicting the main localities from which otolith have been studied and the common species found therein (most common ones shown in bold printing). Diagram not to scale and not proportional; based on KováČ et. al. (2017)

Fig. 5 in A rare window into a back-reef fish community from the middle Miocene (late Badenian) Medobory Hills barrier reef in western Ukraine, reconstructed mostly by means of otoliths

Fig. 5 Otoliths of Odondebuenia, Parenypnias and Bathygobius?: a–d Odondebuenia agiadiae Schwarzhans et al., 2020a, 2020b, a (reversed) Kozatskyi Yar, NMB P1219, b (reversed), d Kozatskyi Yar, NMNHU-P PI 2569, c (reversed) Mlyntsi, NMNHU-P PI 2570. e–h Parenypnias inauditus n. gen. et n. sp., f holotype, Kozatskyi Yar, NMNHU-P PI 2550, e, g (reversed) Shydlivshchyna, NMB P1207, h Žižkov 1 well (1616–1622 m), DGS MU-0395. i Parenypnias kiselevi n. gen. et n. sp., holotype, Mlyntsi, NMNHU-P PI 2574. j Enypnias seminudus (GÜnther, 1861), Recent, USNM 407784, 13° 22′ N 87° 52′ W. k Gobiosoma bosc (Lacépède, 1800), Recent (reversed), LACM coll. Fitch, off Rappahannock. l Bathygobius? sp. (reversed), Kozatskyi Yar, NMNHU-P PI 2548

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Figure 2. Dendrogram resulting from a in Host specificity and the structure of helminth parasite communities of fishes in a Neotropical river in Mexico

Figure 2. Dendrogram resulting from a similarity matrix based on the Sørensen measure for component communities of adult autogenic helminth parasites of 10 fish species from Apazapan, Río La Antigua, Veracruz, Mexico. Host species are: Amex, A. mexicanus; Rgua, R. guatemalensis; Smar, S. marmoratus; Hbim, P. bimaculata; Pmex, Poecilia mexicana; Pgra, Poeciliosis gracilis; Psph, Poecilia sphenops; Xell, X. helleri; Tell, T. ellioti; Vfen, V. fenestrata.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Figure 1 in Host specificity and the structure of helminth parasite communities of fishes in a Neotropical river in Mexico

Figure 1. Patterns of relative abundance of 24 species of helminths in 11 component communities of freshwater fishes from Río Apazapan, Río La Antigua basin, Mexico (fish species: Am, A. mexicanus; Rg, Rhamdia guatemalensis; Hb, Pseudoxiphophorus bimaculata; Pm, Poecilia mexicana; Ps, P. sphenops; Pg, Poeciliopsis gracilis; Xh, Xiphophorus helleri; Te, Thorichthys helleri; Vf, Vieja fenestrata; Sm, Sicydium gymnogaster).

Fig. 6 in Zooplankton Community Structure Of The Fish Farm Nagļi (Latvia)

Fig. 6. Mean (Zscore) of zooplankton (rotifers, cladocerans, copepods) abundance and biomass in the ponds, May.

Fig. 5 in Zooplankton Community Structure Of The Fish Farm Nagļi (Latvia)

Fig. 5. Mean (Zscore) of zooplankton taxa number, Shannon-Wiener index and total abundance in the ponds.

Figure 13 in Spatial and temporal variations of fish communities in the longitudinal gradient of the Mono River (Benin and Togo: West Africa)

Figure 13. – Indicator species for each cluster of the dendrogram resulting from the self-organizing map procedure (n = 10). IndVal values (in %) are shown in brackets. Shown indicator values (p <0.05) are only those greater than 25%.

Figure 2 in Spatial and temporal variations of fish communities in the longitudinal gradient of the Mono River (Benin and Togo: West Africa)

Figure 2. – Variation (average and standard deviation) in species richness by sampling sites. Site order follows the upstream-downstream gradient.

Figure 12 in Spatial and temporal variations of fish communities in the longitudinal gradient of the Mono River (Benin and Togo: West Africa)

Figure 12. – Correlation circle of the environmental variable, which discriminate clusters (n = 3) defined by the self-organizing map for stations in the F1 x F2 design for the factorial discriminant analysis. Dis, distance from source; FoBa, forest area; CaHi, canopy height; Vol, flow velocity; Cond, conductivity; Trans, water transparency; Alt, altitude.

Figure 7 in Spatial and temporal variations of fish communities in the longitudinal gradient of the Mono River (Benin and Togo: West Africa)

Figure 7. – Hierarchical classification of the nodes of the Kohonen map based on the species richness of the sites (n = 10). A: Self-organizing map (SOM) (20 nodes); B: Hierarchical clustering of the SOM nodes with a Ward linkage method and a Euclidean distance: the numbers (i.e. ranging from 1 to 20) correspond to those assigned on each node of the SOM.

Figure S4 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure S4. – Spatial-temporal correlation matrix at a 782 km2 (A) and 1043 km2 (B) scale displaying correlation from strongly negative (dark blue) to strongly positive (dark red).

Figure S2 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure S2. – Spatial hierarchical clustering at a 782 km2 (A) and 1043 km2 (B) scale. The rectangle outlines the communities that where find statistically significant by ASTEC given the approximately unbiased p-values expressed as proportion (red).

Figure 2 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure 2. – Spatial correlation matrix at a 522 km2 scale displaying correlation from strongly negative (dark blue) to strongly positive (dark red).

Figure 11 in Spatiotemporal patterns in marine fish and cephalopods communities across scales: using an autoregressive spatiotemporal clustering model. A study of fish and cephalopods of the Eastern English Channel

Figure 11. – Scophthalmus rhombus from low (blue) to high (red) median densities of numbers/ km2 in log scale for 522 km2 for the Eastern English Channel.