Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
398
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
398 results for “morphotype”
Fig. 5 in Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation "Sue" Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons
Fig. 5. Principal components analysis of "Sue" quarry dromaeosaurid teeth. Analysis contained variables height, FABL, basal width, and denticles/ mm. PC 1 ([0.40 FABL]+[0.1 basal width]+[0.54 height]-[0.74 denticles/ mm]) explained 77.53% of the variance. PC 2 ([0.06 FABL]+[0.03 basal width]+[0.79 height]+[0.61 denticles/mm]) explained 20.17% of the variance. PC 3 ([0.91 FABL]+[0.08 basal width]-[0.29 height]+[0.28 denticles/ mm]) explained 2.30% of the variance.
Fig. 2 in Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation "Sue" Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons
Fig. 2. Scanning electron image of select theropod teeth from the late Maastrichtian "Sue" locality, USA. A–D. Dromaeosauridae: FMNH PR 2893 A), FMNH PR 2896 (B), FMNH PR 2897 (C), FMNH PR 2899 (D). E. Troodontidae: FMNH PR 2900. F. Avialae: FMNH PR 2901. G. Tyrannosauridae: FMNH PR 2902. Scale bars 1 mm (refer to Table 1 for measurements of each tooth).
Fig. 4 in Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation "Sue" Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons
Fig. 4. Principal components analysis of troodontid teeth from Hell Creek and Lance formations (×) and alleged troodontid tooth FMNH PR 2901 from the "Sue" quarry (circle). Analysis contained variables height, FABL, and denticles/mm. PC 1 ([0.45 FABL]+[0.20 basal width]+[0.68 height]-[0.55 denticles/mm]) explained 48.04% of the variance. PC 2 ([0.01 FABL]+[0.03 basal width]+[0.62 height]+[0.78 denticles/mm]) explained 40.73% of the variance. PC 3 ([0.88 FABL]+[0.05 basal width]-[0.37 height]+[0.28 denticles/mm]) explained 9.46% of the variance.
Fig. 3 in Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation "Sue" Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons
Fig. 3. Principal components analysis of Richardoestesia teeth from Hell Creek and Lance formations (circles) and dromaeosaurid tooth FMNH PR 2899 from the Sue quarry (cross). Analysis contained variables height, FABL, and denticles/mm. PC 1 ([0.28 FABL]+[0.94 height]-[0.19 denticles/mm]) explained 76.36% of the variance. PC 2 ([0.03 FABL]+[0.18 height]+[0.98 denticles/mm]) explained 22.51% of the variance. PC 3 ([0.96 FABL]-[0.28 height]+[0.02 denticles/mm]) explained 1.13% of the variance.
Fig. 1 in Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation "Sue" Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons
Fig. 1. Principal components analysis of all teeth from the "Sue" theropod sample, Sankey (2008) tooth database (except Paronychodon and Richardoestesia), and Smith et al. (2005; Deinonychus, Dromaeosaurus, and Troodon). Principal components: (1) ([0.41 FABL]+[0.1 basal width]+[0.90 height]-[0.07 denticles/mm]) explained 77.01% of variance; (2) ([-0.03 FABL]+[0.02 basal width]+[0.09 height]+[1 denticles/mm]) explained 16.58% variance; and (3) ([0.82 FABL]+[0.40 basal width]-[0.41 height]+[0.05 denticles/mm]) 5.00% variance.
Fig. 7 in Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation "Sue" Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons
Fig. 7. Biplot of dromaeosaurid teeth from "Sue" quarry (dots) and Sankey (2008) database (crosses) measuring height versus denticles/mm. Ovals are the 95% confidence ellipses for each dataset, Sue quarry solid oval and Sankey database in dashed oval. Sue specimens are designated by the specimen number that follows FMNH PR in each instance.
Fig. 6 in Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation "Sue" Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons
Fig. 6. Principal components analysis of "Sue" quarry dromaeosaurid teeth (dots) in addition to the dromaeosaurid teeth (crosses) included in Sankey (2008). Analysis contained variables height, FABL, and denticles/mm. Basal width was not included because this variable was not included in the Sankey (2008) dataset. PC 1 ([0.38 FABL]+[0 basal width]+[0.90 height]-[0.23 denticles/mm]) explained 89.91% of the variation. PC 2 ([-0.36 FABL]-[0.01 basal width]+[0.38 height]+[0.85 denticles/mm]) explained 6.91% of the variation. PC 3 ([0.85 FABL]-[0.01 basal width]-[0.24 height]+[0.47 denticles/mm]) explained 3.17% of the variation. Ovals are the 95% confidence ellipses for each dataset, "Sue" quarry solid oval and Sankey database in dashed oval. Sue specimens are designated by the specimen number that follows FMNH PR in each instance.
Fig. 6. Thrinacodus incurvus ferox morphotype. Specimens TCD.36792 and TCD.36801 in Early Carboniferous chondrichthyan Thrinacodus from Ireland, and a reconstruction of jaw apparatus
Fig. 6. Thrinacodus incurvus ferox morphotype. Specimens TCD.36792 and TCD.36801 are from the Kilbride Limestone Formation, Polygnathus mehli conodont Zone, Ivorian (probably Freyrian), late Tournaisian. Specimen TCD.36803 is from the Lyraun Cove Shale Member of the Porter's Gate formation Polygnathus inornatus conodont Zone, Hastarian, Tournaisian. Specimens TCD.36804 and TCD.36805 are from the Upper Ballysteen Limestone Polygnathus mehli conodont Zone, Ivorian (pre−Freyrian), late Tournaisian. A. TCD.36801 in dorso−lateral (A1), dorso−lateral (A2), lateral (A3), and labial (A4) views. B. TCD.36803 in dorsal (B1) and lateral view (B2). C. TCD.36804 in dorsal view. D. TCD.36805 in dorsal (D1) and lingual (D2) views. E. TCD.36792 in dorso−lingual view. Scale bars 200 µm.
FIGURE 16. Shiramine Morphotype B, right mandible SBEI 827. 1–2 in An assemblage of lizards from the Early Cretaceous of Japan
FIGURE 16. Shiramine Morphotype B, right mandible SBEI 827. 1–2, dentary in labial view; 3–4, dentary and associated splenial in lingual view; 5–11, postdentary bones in 5–6 dorsomedial view; 7, ventral view; 8, dorsal view; 9, medial view; and 10, posterior view of articular surface. For abbreviations, see Material and Methods.
FIGURE 15. Shiramine Morphotype A, bicuspid dentition. 1–2 in An assemblage of lizards from the Early Cretaceous of Japan
FIGURE 15. Shiramine Morphotype A, bicuspid dentition. 1–2, left maxilla, SBEI 1525 in labial view; 3–4, right maxilla, SBEI 1501, in labial view; 5–10, left dentary, SBEI 808, in two parts, in labial view, with 5–6, symphysial region, 7– 8, posterior dentary, and 9–10, detail of bicuspid teeth.
FIGURE 18. Shiramine Morphotype C, SBEI 1277 in An assemblage of lizards from the Early Cretaceous of Japan
FIGURE 18. Shiramine Morphotype C, SBEI 1277, posterior region of a left dentary in 1–2, labial view.
Fig. 4. Morphotype 1, specimen MSNM V5373 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 4. Morphotype 1, specimen MSNM V5373. Berivotra, Mahajanga Basin, northern Madagascar; Anembalemba Member, Maevarano Formation (Campanian?–Maastrichtian). A. Mesial denticles from the posterior carina. B. Labial view. C. Lingual view. D. Basal cross−section.
Fig. 5. Morphotype 2, specimen MSMN V5378 in Theropod tooth assemblages from the Late Cretaceous Maevarano Formation and the possible presence of dromaeosaurids in Madagascar
Fig. 5. Morphotype 2, specimen MSMN V5378. Berivotra, Mahajanga Basin, northern Madagascar; Anembalemba Member, Maevarano Formation (Campanian?–Maastrichtian). A. Mesial denticles from the posterior carina. B. Labial view. C. Lingual view. D. Basal cross section.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Revision of the genus Miridiba Reitter, 1902 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae): genital morphotypes and new taxonomic data.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Revision of the genus Miridiba Reitter, 1902 (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae): genital morphotypes and new taxonomic data". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/83109e54-596a-4be0-ac2c-c4e1702cfb8a">https://bionomia.net/dataset/83109e54-596a-4be0-ac2c-c4e1702cfb8a</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/83109e54-596a-4be0-ac2c-c4e1702cfb8a">https://gbif.org/dataset/83109e54-596a-4be0-ac2c-c4e1702cfb8a</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
FIGURE 4. Morphotype I in Terrestrial Isopods from Spanish Amber (Crustacea: Oniscidea): Insights into the Cretaceous Soil Biota
FIGURE 4. Morphotype I, family Ligiidae (MCNA 9513, sex unknown). A. Microphotograph in dorsal habitus. B. Camera lucida drawing in dorsal habitus. Figure made with consecutive photographs taken at successive focal planes. Scale bar = 1 mm (both panels to the same scale).
FIGURE 5. Morphotype II in Terrestrial Isopods from Spanish Amber (Crustacea: Oniscidea): Insights into the Cretaceous Soil Biota
FIGURE 5. Morphotype II, family Ligiidae (MCNA 14274, sex unknown). A. Microphotograph in ventral habitus. B. Camera lucida drawing of uropods. C. Microphotograph in dorsal habitus. Figures A and C made with consecutive photographs taken at successive focal planes. Scale bars: A, C = 1 mm (both panels share the same scale); B = 0.25 mm.
Text-fig. 2. P3, morphotypes of Parasorex depereti from BRS 25. a) P3 with only one lingual cusp, hypocone. b) P3 with fused protocone and hypocone, forming a ridge-like complex. c) P3 with well-developed protocone and hypocone. Scale bar 1 mm. in New Light On Parasorex Depereti (Erinaceomorpha: Erinaceidae: Galericini) From The Late Messinian (Mn 13) Of The Monticino Quarry (Brisighella, Faenza, Italy)
Text-fig. 2. P3, morphotypes of Parasorex depereti from BRS 25. a) P3 with only one lingual cusp, hypocone. b) P3 with fused protocone and hypocone, forming a ridge-like complex. c) P3 with well-developed protocone and hypocone. Scale bar 1 mm.
Figure 12. Placoid scales. A–D, morphotype 1. A–B, A, occlusal view. B, lateral view. C–D, C, occlusal view. D, lateral view. E–H, morphotype 2. E, occlusal view. F, lateral view. G, posterior view. H, anterior view. I–L, morphotype 3. I, occlusal view. J, lateral view. K, posterior. L, anterior. M–P, morphotype 4. M, occlusal view. N, lateral view. O, posterior view. P, anterior view. Q–U, morphotype 5. Q, occlusal view. R, lateral view. S, lateral view. T, posterior view. U, anterior view. V–Y, morphotype 6. V, anterior view. W, lateral view. X, occlusal view. Y, posterior view. All scale bars equal 0.5 in Neoselachians (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from the Lower and lower Upper Cretaceous of north-eastern Spain
Figure 12. Placoid scales. A–D, morphotype 1. A–B, A, occlusal view. B, lateral view. C–D, C, occlusal view. D, lateral view. E–H, morphotype 2. E, occlusal view. F, lateral view. G, posterior view. H, anterior view. I–L, morphotype 3. I, occlusal view. J, lateral view. K, posterior. L, anterior. M–P, morphotype 4. M, occlusal view. N, lateral view. O, posterior view. P, anterior view. Q–U, morphotype 5. Q, occlusal view. R, lateral view. S, lateral view. T, posterior view. U, anterior view. V–Y, morphotype 6. V, anterior view. W, lateral view. X, occlusal view. Y, posterior view. All scale bars equal 0.5 mm.
FIG. 4 in Populations of a new morphotype of corrugate Lessonia Bory in the Beagle Channel, sub-Antarctic Magellanic ecoregion: a possible case of on-going speciation
FIG. 4. — Phylogenetic tree based on concatenated ITS1 and atp8-trnS partial sequences (418 bp). Note that corrugated Lessonia Bory specimens are grouped with Lessonia flavicans Bory specimens which have smooth blade surface. First number on the branches refers to the bootstrap value determined from the ML phylogeny and the second is the posterior probability from the BI analysis. Scale bar: 0.05 substitution per site.
FIG. 5 in Populations of a new morphotype of corrugate Lessonia Bory in the Beagle Channel, sub-Antarctic Magellanic ecoregion: a possible case of on-going speciation
FIG. 5. — Phylogenetic tree based on concatenated cox1 and cox3 partial sequences (1176 bp). Note that corrugated Lessonia Bory specimens are grouped with Lessonia flavicans Bory specimens which have smooth blade surface. First number on the branches refers to the bootstrap value determined from the ML phylogeny and the second is the posterior probability from the BI analysis. Scale bar: 0.01 substitution per site.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.