Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,024
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,024 results for “mosquitoes”
Fig. 3 in Mosquitos (Diptera, Culicidae) de la Laguna de Tortajada (Teruel) (NE de la Península Ibérica).
Fig. 3.- Margen litoral de la laguna donde se acumulan algas y se concentra la actividad larvaria de los mosquitos.
1 2 in First record of tiger mosquito Aedes flavopictus Yamada, 1921 (Diptera, Culicidae) in the Lower Amur area (Khabarovsk region, Russia)
1 2 Рис. 1. Тигровый комар Aedes (Stegomyia) sibiricus Danilov et Filippova, 1978: 1 — фото О. БерΛова, Иркутск, 9.08.2021; 2 — фото О. Куберской, КомсомоΛьск-на-Амуре, 25.08.2021 Fig. 1. Tiger mosquito Aedes (Stegomyia) sibiricus Danilov et Filippova, 1978: 1 — photo by O. Berlov, Irkutsk, 9 August 2021; 2 — photo by O. Kuberskaya, Komsomolsk-na-Amure, 25 August 2021
Fig. 3 in Influence of Hepatozoon parasites on host-seeking and host-choice behaviour of the mosquitoes Culex territans and Culex pipiens
Fig. 3. Time of mosquito biting activity on infected or uninfected frogs. Mosquitoes that fed on infected frogs are represented by the solid line, and those that fed on uninfected frogs are represented by the dashed line. The top figure represents the time for each mosquito to land in trials where mosquitoes were allowed to feed to repletion (i.e., uninterrupted trials). A significantly higher proportion of mosquitoes that fed on infected frogs began to land later in the trial, compared to mosquitoes feeding on uninfected frogs. The bottom figure represents the time for each mosquito to land in trials where mosquitoes were allow to land but were removed before feeding (i.e., interrupted trials). A significant difference in the time for mosquitoes to land on infected or uninfected frogs was not observed in interrupted trials.
Fig. 4 in Influence of Hepatozoon parasites on host-seeking and host-choice behaviour of the mosquitoes Culex territans and Culex pipiens
Fig. 4. Time between mosquito bites on infected and uninfected frogs. Mosquitoes that were allowed to feed are represented by a solid line. Mosquitoes that were aspirated off the frog after landing are represented by the dashed line. A significantly longer amount of time passed between the bite of one mosquito and the bite of the following mosquito during trials in which mosquitoes were allowed to feed on a frog, compared to trials where mosquitoes were removed before feeding.
Fig. 1 in Influence of Hepatozoon parasites on host-seeking and host-choice behaviour of the mosquitoes Culex territans and Culex pipiens
Fig. 1. Number of mosquitoes that chose wild-caught frogs paired by different levels of infection. Each panel represents a pairing by infection level in green frogs. Each trial was repeated three times, and separate trials are shown by different shapes. Higher numbers of mosquitoes chose to land on wild-caught frogs with high infections of H. clamatae when paired with frogs with moderate infections or without infection. Infection level had a weakly significant effect on the number of mosquitoes that chose to land on a frog. UI = uninfected.
Fig. 2 in Influence of Hepatozoon parasites on host-seeking and host-choice behaviour of the mosquitoes Culex territans and Culex pipiens
Fig. 2. Number of mosquitoes that chose laboratory-raised frogs that were uninfected or experimentally infected. Each panel represents a pairing of infected or uninfected green frogs. Each pairing was repeated four times and each trial is represented by a different shape. Infection level did not have a significant effect on the number of mosquitoes choosing to land on a frog.
Fig. 3 Species diagnostic internal transcribed spacer 2 in Anopheles (Anopheles) petragnani Del Vecchio 1939-a new mosquito species for Germany
Fig. 3 Species diagnostic internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) fragments from all An. petragnani (367 bp) and some An. claviger s.s. (269 bp) individuals found during this study (M, Quantitas DNA Marker 100 bp–1 kb, Biozym; lanes 1–5, An. petragnani; lanes 6–10, An. claviger s.s.; − negative control)
Fig. 4 in Anopheles (Anopheles) petragnani Del Vecchio 1939-a new mosquito species for Germany
Fig. 4 Alignment of the An. petragnani consensus sequence obtained during this study with the An. petragnani consensus sequence published under AY129233.1 in GenBank
Fig. 1 in Anopheles (Anopheles) petragnani Del Vecchio 1939-a new mosquito species for Germany
Fig. 1 Map of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. The red dots indicate the trapping sites at the river Murg in the Black Forest (Raumünzach) and in the flood plains of the river Rhine (Neuried)
Fig. 2 in Anopheles (Anopheles) petragnani Del Vecchio 1939-a new mosquito species for Germany
Fig. 2 Diagnostic setae of An. claviger s.l. larvae. a Postclypeal setae of An. petragnani. b Postclypeal setae of An. claviger s.s. c Antepalmate setae of abdominal segments IV and V of An. petragnani. d Antepalmate setae of abdominal segments IV and V of An. claviger s.s.
Experiments for detection of Plasmodium berghei infected Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes using near-infrared spectroscopy
<p> </p> <p><strong>Experiments for detection of <em>Plasmodium berghei</em> infected <em>Anopheles stephensi</em> mosquitoes using near-infrared spectroscopy</strong></p> <p>This dataset contains near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) measurements on <em>Plasmodium berghei</em> infected <em>Anopheles stephensi</em> mosquitoes reared in the lab together with either oocyst counts or sporozoite counts, correponding to the two experiments undertaken:</p> <ul> <li>Experiment 1 (oocysts), file "NIRSdata2017_Lab_AnSteph_PlasmBerg_oocysts.txt"</li> <li>Experiment 2 (sporozoites), file "NIRSdata2017_Lab_AnSteph_PlasmBerg_sporozoites.txt"</li> </ul> <p>For further details on the experimental setup see: P.M. Esperança, A.M. Blagborough, D.F. Da, F.E. Dowell, T.S. Churcher (2018) "Detection of <em>Plasmodium berghei</em> infected <em>Anopheles stephensi</em> using near-infrared spectroscopy". <em>Parasites and Vector</em>, <strong>11</strong>:377. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2960-z">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2960-z</a>.</p> <p>The structure of the data files is as follows:</p> <ul> <li>column 1 (<strong>Scan_ID</strong>): scan identifier</li> <li>column 2 (<strong>Mosquito_ID</strong>): mosquito identifier</li> <li>column 3 (<strong>Replication</strong>): replication identifier</li> <li>column 4 (<strong>Oocysts</strong> or <strong>Sporozoites</strong>): response variable <ul> <li>for the Experiment 1, the oocyst count<em> </em>on a level-scale</li> <li>for the Experiment 2, the sporozoite count on a log-scale: 0 (no sporozoites), 1 (1–10), 2 (11–100), 3 (101–1000), 4 (>1000)</li> </ul> </li> <li>columns 5 to 2155 (<strong>x350</strong> to <strong>x2500</strong>): NIRS absorbance measurements for wavelengths in the range 350 to 2500 nanometers</li> </ul> <p> </p>
Figure 1 in Gene Flow Patterns of the Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquito in Colombia: a Continental Comparison Suggests Multiple Invasion Routes and Gene Exchange
Figure 1 Geographic location of the A. aegypti populations included in this study and gene-flow models evaluated. In both graphics, circles indicate the populations and arrows represent the gene flow between populations. A) Scale at American continent level (N = 2,996 specimens from six locations: Mexico – North America (M-NA), Venezuela (VZ), Peru (PE), Brazilian Amazon (BrAm), southeastern Brazil (SEBr), and Colombia (CO). B) Scale at South America level (N = 1,083 specimens from six locations: Venezuela, Peru, Brazilian Amazon (5 locations; Brazilian Amazon (BrAM), Manaus (MAO), Belém (BL). Boa Vista (BV), Rio Branco (RB), Porto Velho (PV)), Southeastern Brazil (SEBr) and Colombia (2 locations; Sucre (S), Quindio (Q)).
Figure 4. Phylogeny constructed through Bayesian inference estimated from the 35H in Gene Flow Patterns of the Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquito in Colombia: a Continental Comparison Suggests Multiple Invasion Routes and Gene Exchange
Figure 4. Phylogeny constructed through Bayesian inference estimated from the 35H found of the ND4 gene for the A. aegypti populations in the American continent. The blue horizontal bars above the branches reflect the 95% CI for the branch supports. The color bars (blue, green, and red) on the tree terminals indicate which haplotypes are exclusive for a specific population. The dotted lines on the right side of the tree and numbers I or II indicate to what clade each of the terminals belong. H1-Col (Colombia (Sucre and Quindio), Venezuela, Peru, M-NA, Brasil (MA-O, RBPV, SEBr, BE-L)), H4 (Venezuela, M-NA, Brasil (MA-O, RBPV, BEL)), H3 (Venezuela, M-NA, Brazil (RBPV, SEBr, BE-L)), H2-Col (Colombia (Sucre), Venezuela, Peru, M-NA, Brazil (RBPV, SEBr, BE-L)), H13 (M-NA, Brazil (SEBr)), H8 (Venezuela, Brazil (SEBr)).
Figure 3 in Gene Flow Patterns of the Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquito in Colombia: a Continental Comparison Suggests Multiple Invasion Routes and Gene Exchange
Figure 3. Representation of the gene-flow model with greater subsequent probability in the scenarios of the Americas and South America.A. Scale at American continent level (N = 2,996 specimens from six locations: Mexico–North America, Venezuela, Peru, Brazilian Amazon, southeastern Brazil, and Colombia. Within the continent context, the Stepping Stone 1 model shows through the green vectors the way the gene flow occurs among the different populations evaluated. B. Scale at South America level; the Full-migration model indicates migration among all the populations, hence, plotting of the potential migration routes through passive land transport (Pan-American highway) and riverine paths (principal rivers).
Figure 3 in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in oviposition traps set in forest fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest, Atlantic Forest domain, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Figure 3. Mean abundance of mosquitoes collected in oviposition traps in three fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest in the northwestern region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Means followed by the same letter do not differ by the Tukey test at <0.05. Vertical bars denote 1±SD. / Abundancia media de mosquitos recolectados en trampas de oviposición en tres fragmentos de un bosque estacional semideciduo en la región noroeste del estado de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Las medias seguidas por la misma letra no difieren por la prueba de Tukey en <0,05. Las barras verticales denotan 1 ± SD.
Figure 1 in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in oviposition traps set in forest fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest, Atlantic Forest domain, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Figure 1. Location of three fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest in the northwestern region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. URB: forest fragment located in the urban area of the city of Panambi-RS. RUR: forest fragment located in the rural area close to the urban area of Panambi-RS. NAT: forest fragment located in the rural area far from urban area of the city of Pejuçara-RS. / Ubicación de tres fragmentos de un bosque estacional semideciduo en la región noroeste del estado de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. URB: fragmento de bosque ubicado en el casco urbano de la ciudad de Panambi-RS. RUR: fragmento de bosque ubicado en el área rural cercana al área urbana de Panambi-RS. NAT: fragmento de bosque ubicado en el área rural alejada del área urbana de la ciudad de Pejuçara-RS.
Figure 2 in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in oviposition traps set in forest fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest, Atlantic Forest domain, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Figure 2. Cluster analysis (Morisita–Horn index) of the mosquitoes collected in oviposition traps in three fragments of a semideciduous seasonal forest in the northwestern region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. / Análisis de conglomerados (Índice Morisita-Horn) de los mosquitos recolectados en trampas de oviposición en tres fragmentos de un bosque estacional semideciduo en la región noroeste del estado de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
Fig. 3 in Host-parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
Fig. 3. Attachment preferences of mites for mosquito body parts. Bars show ± SE, comparisons are made at 95% confidence using ANOVA. Bars without SE = no variations.
Fig. 4 in Host-parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
Fig. 4. Attachment preference of mites for mosquito sexes. Bars show ± SE, comparisons are made at 95% confidence using ANOVA. Bars without SE = no variations.
Fig. 2 in Host-parasite interaction and impact of mite infection on mosquito population
Fig. 2. Mosquitoes parasitized by mites. Tukey's multiple comparison tests were applied at 95% confidence to compare differences. Bars (±SE) with different letters show significant differences at p ≤ 0.05. Bars without SE = no variations.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.