Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,212
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5,212 results for “new species taxonomy”
Fig. 1. A in Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Trichomyrmex Mayr, 1865 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Arabian Peninsula, with the description of two new species
Fig. 1. A. Head of Trichomyrmex almosayari sp. nov. showing psammophore. B. Head of T. mayri (Forel, 1902) showing absence of the psammophore. C. T. almosayari sp. nov., body in profile. D. T. lameerei (Forel, 1902), body in profile. E. T. chobauti (Emery, 1897), head in full-face view. F. T. lameerei, head in full-face view.
Fig. 3. A in Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Trichomyrmex Mayr, 1865 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Arabian Peninsula, with the description of two new species
Fig. 3. A. Trichomyrmex perplexus (Radchenko, 1997), mesosoma, petiole and postpetiole in profile. B. T. shakeri sp. nov., mesosoma in dorsal view showing propodeum. C. T. shakeri sp. nov., head in full-face view. D. T. mayri (Forel, 1902), mesosoma in dorsal view showing propodeum. E. T. mayri, showing posterior margin of head in dorsal view. F. T. mayri, mesosoma in profile.
Fig. 2. A in Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Trichomyrmex Mayr, 1865 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Arabian Peninsula, with the description of two new species
Fig. 2. A. Vertical propodeal spiracle of Trichomyrmex abyssinicus (Forel, 1894a). B. Head of T. abyssinicus in full-face view showing clypeus and mandibles. C. Circular propodeal spiracle of T. mayri (Forel, 1902). D. Head of T. mayri in full-face view showing clypeus. E. Mesosoma of T. abyssinicus in profile. F. Petiole and postpetiole of T. abyssinicus in dorsal view.
Fig. 6 in The Taxonomy And Phylogenetic Relationships Of Species In The Bactrocera Musae Complex Of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) In Papua New Guinea
Fig. 6. Neighbour joining tree showing relationships between CO1 haplotypes from species in the Bactrocera musae complex. Values at nodes are for 1000 bootstrap replicates of the maximum likelihood calculations using the Kimura two-parameter model of sequence evolution (left) and Bayesian posterior probability (right). Clade A = B. musae, Clade B = B. rufivitta, Clade C = B. contermina. Note: the numbers at the branch tips represent the field collection codes given to individual specimens.
Fig. 7 in The Taxonomy And Phylogenetic Relationships Of Species In The Bactrocera Musae Complex Of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) In Papua New Guinea
Fig. 7. Diagram showing clustering of individuals at (A) the highest hierarchical level of structuring in the Bactrocera musae complex using STRUCTURE, and (B) the sub-group structuring into two further clusters of the individuals from the red cluster in A. Vertical bars represent individuals and colours denote the proportion of ancestry from each cluster based on eight microsatellite loci. Note at the highest level (A), individuals are clearly assigned to either the B. musae or the 'others' cluster. At the next level (B), individuals from the 'others' cluster are assigned to either the B. rufivitta cluster (red) or the B. contermina cluster (green). Note: The numbers below the vertical bars represent the field collection codes given to individual specimens.
Fig. 15 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 15. Differences in the posterior part of the surstylus among species of the M. avidus complex. A. UPGMA phenogram constructed using squared Mahalanobis distances. B. Thin-plate spline deformation grids showing overall shape differences between analysed species.
Fig. 14 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 14. Differences in the posterior part of the surstylus among species of the M. avidus complex. A. Scatter plot of individual scores of CV1 vs CV2. B. Scatter plot of individual scores of CV2 vs CV3.
Fig. 11 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 11. UPGMA phenogram constructed using the squared Mahalanobis distances of wing shape for species of the M. avidus complex.
Fig. 12 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 12. Thin-plate spline deformation grids showing wing shape differences between analysed species. Differences between the species have been exaggerated five-fold to make them more visible.
Fig. 10 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 10. Differences in wing shape among species of the M. avidus complex. A. Scatter plot of individual scores of CV1 vs CV2. B. Scatter plot of individual scores of CV2 vs CV3.
Fig. 9 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 9. UPGMA tree based on pairwise genetic distances for four species from the Merodon avidus complex.
Fig. 8 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 8. Median-joining network of the mtDNA 5'-end of the COI gene. Circle sizes are proportional to haplotype frequencies. Each branch represents one mutational step; if more than one mutational step is present, it is denoted by the given number.
Fig. 6 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 6. Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree based on DNA barcode COI sequences. Length 136 steps, Consistency Index (CI) = 93, Retention Index (RI) = 95. Filled circles denote unique changes, open circles non-unique.
Fig. 4 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 4. Merodon megavidus Vujić & Radenković sp. nov., head, antero-lateral view. A. Ƌ. B. ♀. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Fig. 3. Hind leg, lateral view. A–B in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 3. Hind leg, lateral view. A–B. Merodon avidus (Rossi, 1790). A. Ƌ. B. ♀. — C–D. M. megavidus Vujić & Radenković sp. nov. C. Ƌ. D. ♀. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Fig. 2 in Defining species boundaries in the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera, Syrphidae) using integrative taxonomy, with the description of a new species
Fig. 2. Merodon megavidus Vujić & Radenković sp. nov., male genitalia. A. Epandrium, lateral view. B. Left surstylus, anterior view. C. Hypandrium, lateral view. Abbreviations: psl = posterior surstylus lobe; asl = anterior surstylus lobe; c = cercus; ae = aedeagus; ea = ejaculatory apodeme. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.
Figure 7 in Taxonomy and sexual dimorphism of a new species of Loxoconcha (Podocopida: Ostracoda) from the Pleistocene of the Japan Sea
Figure 7. Recent geographical occurrences of Loxocorniculum mutsuense Ishizaki, 1971, based on data from previous studies.
Figure 3 in Taxonomy and sexual dimorphism of a new species of Loxoconcha (Podocopida: Ostracoda) from the Pleistocene of the Japan Sea
Figure 3. Distributional pattern of pore systems in adult left valve of Loxoconcha kamiyai sp. nov. Position of one missing pore system of this species is determined by comparison with the distributional pattern of pore systems of Loxocorniculum mutsuense Ishizaki, 1971 (Ishii et al., 2005).
Figure 5 in Taxonomy and sexual dimorphism of a new species of Loxoconcha (Podocopida: Ostracoda) from the Pleistocene of the Japan Sea
Figure 5. Results of DDP analysis for 17 loxoconchid species and Loxoconcha kamiyai sp. nov., modified from Ishii et al. (2005). Numbers indicate total numbers of pore systems for each lineage and stage. Trees drawn by hand.
Figure 4 in Taxonomy and sexual dimorphism of a new species of Loxoconcha (Podocopida: Ostracoda) from the Pleistocene of the Japan Sea
Figure 4. Patterns of normal pore systems below the eye tubercle by PBE analysis of Ishii et al. (2005) for the adult left valve of Loxoconcha kamiyai sp. nov., based on Figure 3. Pore systems with italic letters (v–z) are the same as those of Ishii et al. (2005), respectively. etb: eye tubercle.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.